Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r128-smll-174876524000122.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is MedleyA-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r128-smll-174876524000122
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 476K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 125K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-12
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-13
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-14
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-15
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748843568133

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=MedleyA-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 86 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Transformed 115 places.
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Transformed 107 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 115 places and 107 transitions and 300 arcs in 246 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 20 ms.
Support contains 70 out of 115 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 107/107 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 114 transition count 107
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 110 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 110 transition count 103
Applied a total of 9 rules in 56 ms. Remains 110 /115 variables (removed 5) and now considering 103/107 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-02 05:52:50] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 430 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:52:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 307 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 814 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 102 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:52:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 3/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 103/213 variables, 110/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 7/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/213 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 213/213 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved in 13662 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 37/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 103/213 variables, 110/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 102/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 2/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 213/213 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 43823ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43843ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 110/115 places, 103/107 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44751 ms. Remains : 110/115 places, 103/107 transitions.
Support contains 70 out of 110 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 05:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 54 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1119 resets) in 2624 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 22/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (32 resets) in 51 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (31 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (29 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (28 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 53 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (31 resets) in 57 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 45 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 56 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 43 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (31 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (32 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (28 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
[2025-06-02 05:53:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 59/94 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/96 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 103/199 variables, 96/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 20 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 14/213 variables, 14/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/213 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 213/213 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved in 1652 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 19 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 68/92 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/94 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 103/197 variables, 94/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 16/213 variables, 16/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 11/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 2/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/213 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 213/213 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 17 unsolved in 3640 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 110/110 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/22 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 5307ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 17 unsolved
Fused 17 Parikh solutions to 16 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2587 ms.
Support contains 19 out of 110 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 110 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 93 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 92 transition count 85
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 92 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 80 transition count 73
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 65 transition count 58
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 65 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 64 transition count 57
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 64 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 63 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 62 transition count 56
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 62 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 61 transition count 55
Applied a total of 97 rules in 52 ms. Remains 61 /110 variables (removed 49) and now considering 55/103 (removed 48) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 52 ms. Remains : 61/110 places, 55/103 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2826 resets) in 334 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 16/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (130 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (127 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (118 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (117 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (107 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (131 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (114 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (124 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (134 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (122 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (126 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (125 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (106 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (126 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (119 resets) in 22 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (126 resets) in 28 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 8003 steps, run visited all 16 properties in 116 ms. (steps per millisecond=68 )
Probabilistic random walk after 8003 steps, saw 3511 distinct states, run finished after 124 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 ) properties seen :16
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
Support contains 61 out of 110 places (down from 64) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 110 stabilizing places and 103 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 110 transition count 103
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 2 formulas.
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 109 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 90 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 89 transition count 82
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 89 transition count 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 82 transition count 75
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 78 transition count 71
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 78 transition count 71
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 78 transition count 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 77 transition count 70
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 61 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 60 transition count 53
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 59 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 58 transition count 52
Applied a total of 100 rules in 54 ms. Remains 58 /110 variables (removed 52) and now considering 52/103 (removed 51) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 51 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/109 variables, 57/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 110/110 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 2913 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/109 variables, 57/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 51/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/110 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 110/110 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 4485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7422ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7424ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/110 places, 52/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7714 ms. Remains : 58/110 places, 52/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9361449404433962501.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15839922462875183654.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9361449404433962501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15839922462875183654.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,290028,0.035422,4112,2,621,5,2770,6,0,286,2116,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p39==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p39==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 49/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.309132,14352,1,0,494,60661,18,4,1467,46508,491
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 101 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 101 transition count 94
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 99 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 99 transition count 92
Applied a total of 22 rules in 16 ms. Remains 99 /110 variables (removed 11) and now considering 92/103 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 99 cols
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 207 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 305 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:53:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/191 variables, 99/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 6/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/191 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 191/191 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 6288 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/99 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 92/191 variables, 99/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 91/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 191/191 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 99/99 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 36335ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36337ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 99/110 places, 92/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36658 ms. Remains : 99/110 places, 92/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability251719446023535742.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15374195475747142755.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability251719446023535742.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15374195475747142755.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.15423e+07,0.079461,5072,2,1673,5,5563,6,0,490,4501,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(AF(E((p28==1) U ((p84==1)&&(p110==1))))) + ((p84==1)&&(p96==1))) U (!(E(((!((p51==1)&&(p58==1)))||(p49==1)) U ((p84==1)&&(p97==1))))...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,(!(!(EG(!(E((p28==1) U ((p84==1)&&(p110==1))))))) + ((p84==1)&&(p96==1)))) * !(E(((!((p51==1)&&(p58...376
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t5, t7, t12, t14, t19, t21, t26, t28, t33, t36, t39, t41, t43, t48, t51, t78, t86, Inter...247
(forward)formula 0,1,9.54091,246576,1,0,2392,1.46794e+06,219,845,2878,1.82378e+06,2408
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 109 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 94 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 86
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 84 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 84 transition count 77
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 84 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 83 transition count 76
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 72 transition count 65
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 72 transition count 65
Applied a total of 76 rules in 34 ms. Remains 72 /110 variables (removed 38) and now considering 65/103 (removed 38) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-02 05:54:39] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 159 ms returned [45]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 163 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/110 places, 65/103 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 71 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 70 transition count 64
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 70 /71 variables (removed 1) and now considering 64/65 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 70/110 places, 64/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 426 ms. Remains : 70/110 places, 64/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4811929933926627867.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17214677804112067087.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4811929933926627867.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17214677804112067087.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,593445,0.033216,4600,2,827,5,3511,6,0,345,2531,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((EF((p43==0)) + E((p71==1) U ((p56==1)&&(p66==1)))) + ((p71==1)||(p42==1))) + ((p2==0) + ((p13==1) * AG((EG((p10==0)) * (p8==1))))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((E(TRUE U (p43==0)) + E((p71==1) U ((p56==1)&&(p66==1)))) + ((p71==1)||(p42==1))))) * ...516
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t6, t7, t9, t10, t12, t14, t15, t17, t23, t54, t56, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,1,1.5709,46188,1,0,829,249431,167,128,2264,277193,841
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 110 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 91 transition count 84
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 91 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 79 transition count 72
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 17
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 62 transition count 55
Applied a total of 96 rules in 18 ms. Remains 62 /110 variables (removed 48) and now considering 55/103 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned [35]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 105 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/110 places, 55/103 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 61 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 60 transition count 54
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 60 /61 variables (removed 1) and now considering 54/55 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 60/110 places, 54/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 343 ms. Remains : 60/110 places, 54/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18190265502065044302.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6765988961229178516.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18190265502065044302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6765988961229178516.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,359405,0.03694,4476,2,772,5,3185,6,0,296,2192,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p84==0)||(p88==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p84==0)||(p88==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 26/0/28
(forward)formula 0,0,0.530565,16124,1,0,521,67556,18,4,1521,50233,519
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 109 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 91 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 90 transition count 83
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 90 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 82 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 82 transition count 75
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 67 transition count 60
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 67 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 66 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 65 transition count 59
Applied a total of 87 rules in 34 ms. Remains 65 /110 variables (removed 45) and now considering 59/103 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-02 05:54:42] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 159 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 257 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 124/124 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 4262 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 59/123 variables, 64/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 57/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/124 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 15772 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 20057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20058ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/110 places, 59/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20360 ms. Remains : 65/110 places, 59/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14495348547612681481.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13734985628870781800.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14495348547612681481.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13734985628870781800.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,425925,0.025877,4440,2,745,5,3153,6,0,320,2201,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG((((p28==0)&&(p5==0))&&(p28==0))) * AF((p79==1))) * ((p32==0)&&(((p67==0)||(p77==0))||(p63==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !((((p28==0)&&(p5==0))&&(p28==0))))) * !(EG(!((p79==1))))) * ((p32==0)&&(((p67==0)||(p...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t6, t7, t9, t11, t13, t15, t42, t46, t51, Intersection with reachable at each step e...210
(forward)formula 0,0,1.9869,65864,1,0,1931,378194,151,879,2090,427553,1577
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 102 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 102 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 101 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 101 transition count 94
Applied a total of 18 rules in 6 ms. Remains 101 /110 variables (removed 9) and now considering 94/103 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-02 05:55:05] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:55:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:55:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 10/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/195 variables, 101/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 9/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 195/195 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 8264 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 19/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/195 variables, 101/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 93/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 195/195 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 19286 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27573ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27574ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/110 places, 94/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27785 ms. Remains : 101/110 places, 94/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:55:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:55:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17101283564731397694.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7190598026698831965.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17101283564731397694.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7190598026698831965.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.15324e+07,0.048503,5152,2,1631,5,5376,6,0,500,4447,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AX((p2==1))) + EF((((p84==1)&&(p111==1)) + ((EF(EG(((p84==1)&&(p110==1)))) * (AX((p74==1)) + (((p84==1)&&(p111==1))&&(p72==1)))) * ((...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U (((p84==1)&&(p111==1)) + ((E(TRUE U EG(((p84==1)&&(p110==1)))) * (!(EX(!((p74==1)))...270
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t5, t7, t13, t15, t16, t20, t22, t27, t29, t34, t36, t41, t43, t50, t53, t80, Intersecti...242
(forward)formula 0,1,2.06786,64072,1,0,1285,327248,225,137,3058,311129,1298
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 100 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 98 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 91
Applied a total of 24 rules in 6 ms. Remains 98 /110 variables (removed 12) and now considering 91/103 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 05:55:35] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:55:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:55:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/189 variables, 98/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 5/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 189/189 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 6755 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 12/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/189 variables, 98/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 90/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 189/189 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 36781ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36782ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/110 places, 91/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36993 ms. Remains : 98/110 places, 91/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:56:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:56:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6851650833024178304.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1675036423054898472.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6851650833024178304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1675036423054898472.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.15274e+07,0.049277,5068,2,1685,5,5606,6,0,485,4533,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((AF(((p84==1)&&(p97==1))) * (p4==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((!(EG(!(((p84==1)&&(p97==1))))) * (p4==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t5, t7, t12, t14, t19, t21, t26, t28, t33, t35, t40, t42, t47, t50, t77, t85, Intersecti...242
(forward)formula 0,0,9.23791,273120,1,0,2825,1.56501e+06,208,1499,2872,2.04097e+06,2724
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 102 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 102 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 101 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 101 transition count 94
Applied a total of 18 rules in 3 ms. Remains 101 /110 variables (removed 9) and now considering 94/103 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-02 05:56:21] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:56:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:56:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 8/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/195 variables, 101/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 7/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 195/195 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 7665 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/195 variables, 101/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 93/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/195 variables, 0/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 195/195 variables, and 217 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 14511 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22189ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22190ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/110 places, 94/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22398 ms. Remains : 101/110 places, 94/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8959735658163906256.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4572978883938155716.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8959735658163906256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4572978883938155716.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.15336e+07,0.050596,5076,2,1684,5,5592,6,0,500,4532,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG((p19==1)) + A((p26!=1) U ((p84==1)&&(p100==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(!((E(!(((p84==1)&&(p100==1))) U (!((p26!=1)) * !(((p84==1)&&(p100==1))))) + EG(!(((p84==1)&&(p10...195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t5, t7, t12, t14, t19, t21, t26, t28, t33, t35, t40, t43, t46, t48, t49, t50, t79, Inter...247
(forward)formula 0,0,12.1732,354760,1,0,1955,2.30593e+06,218,476,2947,2.64574e+06,1963
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 109 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 90 transition count 82
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 89 transition count 82
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 89 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 83 transition count 76
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 80 transition count 73
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 80 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 72
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 65 transition count 58
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 65 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 64 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 63 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 62 transition count 56
Applied a total of 93 rules in 17 ms. Remains 62 /110 variables (removed 48) and now considering 56/103 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-02 05:56:56] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:56:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:56:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/117 variables, 61/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 3281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/117 variables, 61/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 54/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 7232 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 10524ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10524ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/110 places, 56/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10701 ms. Remains : 62/110 places, 56/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1272853402138272317.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16392498559892679045.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1272853402138272317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16392498559892679045.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,290130,0.02503,4512,2,735,5,3067,6,0,305,2260,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AG(((AF((p64==1)) * (p34==1)) * ((p44==1)&&(p6==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(E(TRUE U !(((!(EG(!((p64==1)))) * (p34==1)) * ((p44==1)&&(p6==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t3, t6, t8, t13, t16, t47, t48, t50, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (...200
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,0.848348,32516,1,0,728,170334,141,122,2020,187391,733
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 102 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 102 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 100 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 93
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 100 /110 variables (removed 10) and now considering 93/103 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:57:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 10/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/193 variables, 100/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/193 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 193/193 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 7676 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/100 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 11/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/193 variables, 100/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 92/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/193 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 193/193 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 37701ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37703ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 100/110 places, 93/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37930 ms. Remains : 100/110 places, 93/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9621390789985821048.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13559042004349374558.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9621390789985821048.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13559042004349374558.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.20545e+07,0.055807,5200,2,1701,5,5772,6,0,495,4675,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(AF(((!((p84==1)&&(p112==1)))||(((p85==1)&&(p84==1))&&(p96==1)))) U ((EF(((p84==1)&&(p97==1))) + (p20==1)) + !(AX((p70==1))))) + (((...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(!(EG(!(((!((p84==1)&&(p112==1)))||(((p85==1)&&(p84==1))&&(p96==1)))))) U ((E(TRUE U ((p84==1)&&(p9...296
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t6, t8, t9, t13, t16, t19, t21, t23, t28, t30, t35, t37, t42, t44, t49, t52, t79, t87, I...251
(forward)formula 0,1,4.37418,113264,1,0,1581,633517,219,285,3229,573293,1672
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 109 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 92 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 91 transition count 84
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 91 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 84 transition count 77
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 80 transition count 73
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 80 transition count 73
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 80 transition count 72
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 79 transition count 72
Performed 16 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 16
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 63 transition count 56
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 62 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 61 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 60 transition count 54
Applied a total of 96 rules in 14 ms. Remains 60 /110 variables (removed 50) and now considering 54/103 (removed 49) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/113 variables, 59/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 2979 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 54/113 variables, 59/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 53/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 4697 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7685ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7685ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/110 places, 54/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7873 ms. Remains : 60/110 places, 54/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10682350647976670645.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10479364843934031110.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10682350647976670645.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10479364843934031110.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,480422,0.025346,4464,2,625,5,2795,6,0,296,2133,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p14==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p14==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 52/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.371823,16160,1,0,546,69265,18,4,1506,54306,543
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 100 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 100 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 98 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 98 transition count 91
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 98 /110 variables (removed 12) and now considering 91/103 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 213 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 356 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:57:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/189 variables, 98/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 5/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 189/189 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 7541 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/97 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/98 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 12/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/189 variables, 98/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 90/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 1/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 189/189 variables, and 215 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 37570ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37571ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/110 places, 91/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37933 ms. Remains : 98/110 places, 91/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 109 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 99 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 97 transition count 90
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 97 transition count 82
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 89 transition count 82
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 86 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 86 transition count 79
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 73 transition count 66
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 73 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 72 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 71 transition count 64
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 70 transition count 64
Applied a total of 77 rules in 14 ms. Remains 70 /110 variables (removed 40) and now considering 64/103 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:58:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/70 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 64/134 variables, 70/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 3179 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/70 variables, 6/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 64/134 variables, 70/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 62/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 6816 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 10010ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10011ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/110 places, 64/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10249 ms. Remains : 70/110 places, 64/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13694398609993331657.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14698906985835300330.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13694398609993331657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14698906985835300330.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25644e+06,0.028321,4596,2,801,5,3328,6,0,344,2503,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(A((AF(((p84==1)&&(p100==1))) * E(((p70==1)||(p72==1)) U ((p50==1)||((p18==1)&&(p25==1))))) U EF(((A((p53==1) U ((p84==1)&&(p91==1))) ...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((!((E(!(((p84==1)&&(p91==1))) U (!((p53==1)) * !(((p84==1)&&(p91==1))))) + EG(!...671
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t6, t9, t12, t17, t44, t48, t49, t54, t55, t56, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,4.49033,126804,1,0,2789,751630,183,1410,2231,934409,2810
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 110/110 places, 103/103 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 109 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 94 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 86
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 93 transition count 80
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 87 transition count 80
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 83 transition count 76
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 83 transition count 76
Performed 15 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 15
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 68 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 67 transition count 60
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 66 transition count 59
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 65 transition count 59
Applied a total of 86 rules in 14 ms. Remains 65 /110 variables (removed 45) and now considering 59/103 (removed 44) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-02 05:58:51] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:58:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:58:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/65 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/124 variables, 65/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 124/124 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3071 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/65 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 59/124 variables, 65/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 57/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/124 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 8282 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11361ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11362ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/110 places, 59/103 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11558 ms. Remains : 65/110 places, 59/103 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:59:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:59:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 05:59:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13423355378832484659.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:59:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability816761984301007773.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13423355378832484659.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability816761984301007773.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,783703,0.024471,4432,2,760,5,3172,6,0,320,2262,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(!(A(((((p84==1)&&(p113==1))||(p64==1))&&(!((p51==1)&&(p58==1)))) U (p48==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!((E(!((p48==1)) U (!(((((p84==1)&&(p113==1))||(p64==1))&&(!((p51==1)&&(p58==1))))) * !((p48==...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t4, t9, t12, t16, t43, t47, t53, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (...200
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,1,1.22664,45248,1,0,861,259840,147,166,2022,296793,891
FORMULA MedleyA-PT-04-CTLFireability-2024-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 05:59:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:59:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 373959 ms.

BK_STOP 1748843944221

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="MedleyA-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is MedleyA-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r128-smll-174876524000122"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/MedleyA-PT-04.tgz
mv MedleyA-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;