Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423200698.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-8, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423200698
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 2.1M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 175K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 263K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 310K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 582K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 329K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748888079133

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-PT-8
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 98 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Transformed 315 places.
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Transformed 666 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [P_start_1_0, P_start_1_1, P_start_1_2, P_start_1_3, P_start_1_4, P_start_1_5, P_start_1_6, P_start_1_7, P_start_1_8, P_b_0_false, P_b_0_true, P_b_1_false, P_b_1_true, P_b_2_false, P_b_2_true, P_b_3_false, P_b_3_true, P_b_4_false, P_b_4_true, P_b_5_false, P_b_5_true, P_b_6_false, P_b_6_true, P_b_7_false, P_b_7_true, P_b_8_false, P_b_8_true, P_setx_3_0, P_setx_3_1, P_setx_3_2, P_setx_3_3, P_setx_3_4, P_setx_3_5, P_setx_3_6, P_setx_3_7, P_setx_3_8, P_setbi_5_0, P_setbi_5_1, P_setbi_5_2, P_setbi_5_3, P_setbi_5_4, P_setbi_5_5, P_setbi_5_6, P_setbi_5_7, P_setbi_5_8, P_ify0_4_0, P_ify0_4_1, P_ify0_4_2, P_ify0_4_3, P_ify0_4_4, P_ify0_4_5, P_ify0_4_6, P_ify0_4_7, P_ify0_4_8, P_sety_9_0, P_sety_9_1, P_sety_9_2, P_sety_9_3, P_sety_9_4, P_sety_9_5, P_sety_9_6, P_sety_9_7, P_sety_9_8, P_ifxi_10_0, P_ifxi_10_1, P_ifxi_10_2, P_ifxi_10_3, P_ifxi_10_4, P_ifxi_10_5, P_ifxi_10_6, P_ifxi_10_7, P_ifxi_10_8, P_setbi_11_0, P_setbi_11_1, P_setbi_11_2, P_setbi_11_3, P_setbi_11_4, P_setbi_11_5, P_setbi_11_6, P_setbi_11_7, P_setbi_11_8, P_fordo_12_0, P_fordo_12_1, P_fordo_12_2, P_fordo_12_3, P_fordo_12_4, P_fordo_12_5, P_fordo_12_6, P_fordo_12_7, P_fordo_12_8, P_wait_0_0, P_wait_0_1, P_wait_0_2, P_wait_0_3, P_wait_0_4, P_wait_0_5, P_wait_0_6, P_wait_0_7, P_wait_0_8, P_wait_1_0, P_wait_1_1, P_wait_1_2, P_wait_1_3, P_wait_1_4, P_wait_1_5, P_wait_1_6, P_wait_1_7, P_wait_1_8, P_wait_2_0, P_wait_2_1, P_wait_2_2, P_wait_2_3, P_wait_2_4, P_wait_2_5, P_wait_2_6, P_wait_2_7, P_wait_2_8, P_wait_3_0, P_wait_3_1, P_wait_3_2, P_wait_3_3, P_wait_3_4, P_wait_3_5, P_wait_3_6, P_wait_3_7, P_wait_3_8, P_wait_4_0, P_wait_4_1, P_wait_4_2, P_wait_4_3, P_wait_4_4, P_wait_4_5, P_wait_4_6, P_wait_4_7, P_wait_4_8, P_wait_5_0, P_wait_5_1, P_wait_5_2, P_wait_5_3, P_wait_5_4, P_wait_5_5, P_wait_5_6, P_wait_5_7, P_wait_5_8, P_wait_6_0, P_wait_6_1, P_wait_6_2, P_wait_6_3, P_wait_6_4, P_wait_6_5, P_wait_6_6, P_wait_6_7, P_wait_6_8, P_wait_7_0, P_wait_7_1, P_wait_7_2, P_wait_7_3, P_wait_7_4, P_wait_7_5, P_wait_7_6, P_wait_7_7, P_wait_7_8, P_wait_8_0, P_wait_8_1, P_wait_8_2, P_wait_8_3, P_wait_8_4, P_wait_8_5, P_wait_8_6, P_wait_8_7, P_wait_8_8, P_await_13_0, P_await_13_1, P_await_13_2, P_await_13_3, P_await_13_4, P_await_13_5, P_await_13_6, P_await_13_7, P_await_13_8, P_done_0_0, P_done_0_1, P_done_0_2, P_done_0_3, P_done_0_4, P_done_0_5, P_done_0_6, P_done_0_7, P_done_0_8, P_done_1_0, P_done_1_1, P_done_1_2, P_done_1_3, P_done_1_4, P_done_1_5, P_done_1_6, P_done_1_7, P_done_1_8, P_done_2_0, P_done_2_1, P_done_2_2, P_done_2_3, P_done_2_4, P_done_2_5, P_done_2_6, P_done_2_7, P_done_2_8, P_done_3_0, P_done_3_1, P_done_3_2, P_done_3_3, P_done_3_4, P_done_3_5, P_done_3_6, P_done_3_7, P_done_3_8, P_done_4_0, P_done_4_1, P_done_4_2, P_done_4_3, P_done_4_4, P_done_4_5, P_done_4_6, P_done_4_7, P_done_4_8, P_done_5_0, P_done_5_1, P_done_5_2, P_done_5_3, P_done_5_4, P_done_5_5, P_done_5_6, P_done_5_7, P_done_5_8, P_done_6_0, P_done_6_1, P_done_6_2, P_done_6_3, P_done_6_4, P_done_6_5, P_done_6_6, P_done_6_7, P_done_6_8, P_done_7_0, P_done_7_1, P_done_7_2, P_done_7_3, P_done_7_4, P_done_7_5, P_done_7_6, P_done_7_7, P_done_7_8, P_done_8_0, P_done_8_1, P_done_8_2, P_done_8_3, P_done_8_4, P_done_8_5, P_done_8_6, P_done_8_7, P_done_8_8, P_ifyi_15_0, P_ifyi_15_1, P_ifyi_15_2, P_ifyi_15_3, P_ifyi_15_4, P_ifyi_15_5, P_ifyi_15_6, P_ifyi_15_7, P_ifyi_15_8, P_awaity_0, P_awaity_1, P_awaity_2, P_awaity_3, P_awaity_4, P_awaity_5, P_awaity_6, P_awaity_7, P_awaity_8, P_CS_21_0, P_CS_21_1, P_CS_21_2, P_CS_21_3, P_CS_21_4, P_CS_21_5, P_CS_21_6, P_CS_21_7, P_CS_21_8, P_setbi_24_0, P_setbi_24_1, P_setbi_24_2, P_setbi_24_3, P_setbi_24_4, P_setbi_24_5, P_setbi_24_6, P_setbi_24_7, P_setbi_24_8]
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 315 places and 666 transitions and 2934 arcs in 224 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 5 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 82 transitions.
Support contains 266 out of 266 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 584/584 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 584/584 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:14:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 416 transitions (discarded 168 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 416 rows 266 cols
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 263 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 416 transitions (discarded 168 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 112 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 332 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 635 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 576 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 416 transitions (discarded 168 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 18:14:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 112 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 266/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 576 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 82/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 576 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 209 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 165 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD255 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD272 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD296 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 557 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 138 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD280 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD288 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD304 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD312 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD320 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD322 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD324 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD326 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD328 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD330 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 43 solved, 533 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD332 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD334 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD332 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD334 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/682 variables, and 448 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 0/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 576/576 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 65/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 35/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 129 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 4/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 128 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 17/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 5/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/682 variables, and 514 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 0/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/112 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/576 constraints, Known Traps: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60324ms problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 528 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 48 dead transitions in 60344ms
Found 48 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 48 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 48 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 266/266 places, 536/584 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61061 ms. Remains : 266/266 places, 536/584 transitions.
Support contains 266 out of 266 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 18:15:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 165 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 69 to 64
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1836 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 9/64 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 218 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 173 ms. (229 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 155 ms. (256 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 147 ms. (270 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 115 ms. (344 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 384 rows 266 cols
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 182/196 variables, 58/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 182/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 154 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 9/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 3/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 336/532 variables, 196/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/532 variables, 78/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/532 variables, 0/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 40/572 variables, 20/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 20/583 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 4/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 10/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 0/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 46/618 variables, 18/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 46/661 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 0/661 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 32/650 variables, 50/711 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 4/715 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 2/717 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 16/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/650 variables, and 733 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved in 2343 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 266/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 126/134 variables, 38/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 126/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 5/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 288/422 variables, 134/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 52/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/422 variables, 0/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 72/494 variables, 32/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 32/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 4/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 20/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 4/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 1/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/494 variables, 0/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 92/586 variables, 36/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 92/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 3/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/586 variables, 0/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 64/650 variables, 100/687 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 8/695 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 4/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 32/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 128 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 6/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 1/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/650 variables, and 745 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved in 1901 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 266/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/7 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4262ms problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 602 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 266 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 258 transition count 528
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 258 transition count 520
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 250 transition count 520
Applied a total of 32 rules in 85 ms. Remains 250 /266 variables (removed 16) and now considering 520/536 (removed 16) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 85 ms. Remains : 250/266 places, 520/536 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 386 ms. (103 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1002078 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1002078 steps, saw 493616 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=333 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 18:15:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 368 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 250 cols
[2025-06-02 18:15:52] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 34/36 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 158/194 variables, 36/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 12/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 144/338 variables, 39/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 39/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 22/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 161/499 variables, 63/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 161/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 119/618 variables, 175/595 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 14/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 7/616 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 70/686 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 0/686 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/618 variables, 0/686 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 618/618 variables, and 686 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 246 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 250/250 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 34/36 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 34/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 158/194 variables, 36/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 12/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 144/338 variables, 39/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 39/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 22/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 161/499 variables, 63/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 161/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 119/618 variables, 175/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 14/610 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 7/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 70/687 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 1/688 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 0/688 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/618 variables, 0/688 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 618/618 variables, and 688 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 401 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 250/250 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 664ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 76 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 250 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 520/520 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 520/520 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 15 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 520/520 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 520/520 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 520/520 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:15:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 368 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:15:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 342 ms returned [154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 344 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 242/250 places, 520/520 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 242 /242 variables (removed 0) and now considering 520/520 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 371 ms. Remains : 242/250 places, 520/520 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 26880 steps (5 resets) in 271 ms. (98 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-8-CTLFireability-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 18:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 8 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:15:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 384 rows 266 cols
[2025-06-02 18:15:53] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 355 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 420 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 777 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 528 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 18:15:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 121 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30220ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30224ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31012 ms. Remains : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11853947177676934338.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2063523632393481551.ctl : 15 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11853947177676934338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2063523632393481551.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10446153214026468802.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10446153214026468802.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10446153214026468802.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10446153214026468802.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10446153214026468802.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 865 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 45 labels/synchronizations in 18 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13617708524288141752.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 18:16:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9111573158247310183.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13617708524288141752.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9111573158247310183.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 258 transition count 528
Applied a total of 16 rules in 18 ms. Remains 258 /266 variables (removed 8) and now considering 528/536 (removed 8) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:17:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 376 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 376 rows 258 cols
[2025-06-02 18:17:25] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned [154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 207 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 250/266 places, 528/536 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 250 transition count 520
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 242 transition count 520
Applied a total of 16 rules in 22 ms. Remains 242 /250 variables (removed 8) and now considering 520/528 (removed 8) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:17:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 368 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 242 cols
[2025-06-02 18:17:25] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 202 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 368 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 447 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 651 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 242/266 places, 520/536 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 899 ms. Remains : 242/266 places, 520/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 520 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15600630795916957358.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13601456253303013512.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15600630795916957358.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13601456253303013512.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18211186570673049682.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18211186570673049682.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18211186570673049682.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18211186570673049682.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18211186570673049682.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 833 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3880751299459349996.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:17:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9138254470503620726.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3880751299459349996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9138254470503620726.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:18:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 384 rows 266 cols
[2025-06-02 18:18:26] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 150 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 425 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 577 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 528 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 18:18:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30144ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30148ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30736 ms. Remains : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10432278463826641024.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:18:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9091930806358035284.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10432278463826641024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9091930806358035284.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6822413335234935599.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6822413335234935599.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6822413335234935599.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6822413335234935599.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6822413335234935599.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:19:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:19:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:19:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 865 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:19:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 31 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:19:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9577581250867267974.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2207241695254948773.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9577581250867267974.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2207241695254948773.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned [162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 230 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 258 /258 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 240 ms. Remains : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13399587810720806256.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:19:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12281817684409407661.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13399587810720806256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12281817684409407661.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13163241540981654296.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13163241540981654296.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13163241540981654296.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13163241540981654296.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13163241540981654296.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 817 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 31 labels/synchronizations in 20 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability310996996470827198.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 18:20:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8482667619353355303.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability310996996470827198.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8482667619353355303.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:20:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:20:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:20:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:20:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:20:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:20:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:20:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 261 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 356 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 528 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:20:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:20:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 18:20:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 121 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30204ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30207ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30568 ms. Remains : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11911597460457083086.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14392289294485359648.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11911597460457083086.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14392289294485359648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7172675665548036818.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7172675665548036818.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7172675665548036818.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7172675665548036818.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7172675665548036818.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 865 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 49 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11683062258880977808.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:21:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8513921875802102751.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11683062258880977808.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8513921875802102751.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:22:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:22:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:22:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:22:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:22:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 380 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 520 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 528 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:22:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 18:22:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 140 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 127 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 123 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 1.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 1.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 1.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 1.0)
(s106 1.0)
(s107 1.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 1.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 1.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 1.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 1.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 1.0)
(s131 1.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 1.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 1.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 1.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 1.0)
(s141 1.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 1.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 1.0)
(s146 1.0)
(s147 1.0)
(s148 1.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(timeout
s205 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/650 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 0/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 528/528 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 56/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 32/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 132 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/650 variables, and 523 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 0/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/528 constraints, Known Traps: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60127ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60129ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60656 ms. Remains : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12961070636341124022.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:23:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2229313023406720080.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12961070636341124022.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2229313023406720080.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17694172621002067431.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17694172621002067431.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17694172621002067431.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17694172621002067431.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17694172621002067431.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 865 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7812524521553104003.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12936529266459144556.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7812524521553104003.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12936529266459144556.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:24:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:24:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 376 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 508 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 528 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 18:24:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 104 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 108 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/650 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 0/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 528/528 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 258/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 56/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 8/266 variables, 72/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 8/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 32/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/456 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 132 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 136 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/496 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 20/516 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/650 variables, and 523 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 266/266 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 82/82 constraints, State Equation: 0/266 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/528 constraints, Known Traps: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 528 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60135ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60650 ms. Remains : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1941519551225107103.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:25:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4878715611664906397.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1941519551225107103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4878715611664906397.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18150227198662106662.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18150227198662106662.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18150227198662106662.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18150227198662106662.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18150227198662106662.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 865 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 51 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 41 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16798785189705489042.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5309011548567523114.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16798785189705489042.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5309011548567523114.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:26:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:26:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned [162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 193 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 258 /258 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 201 ms. Remains : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability485748094292230981.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15596918838774248920.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability485748094292230981.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15596918838774248920.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2362855953882937984.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2362855953882937984.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2362855953882937984.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2362855953882937984.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2362855953882937984.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 817 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6152314870865598055.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11988638153141490549.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6152314870865598055.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11988638153141490549.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned [163, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 227 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 260/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 260 /260 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 231 ms. Remains : 260/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10467512144742789068.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:27:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1971792754943098480.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10467512144742789068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1971792754943098480.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15632054678242769817.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15632054678242769817.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15632054678242769817.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15632054678242769817.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15632054678242769817.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 829 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1897876587090998443.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3090763743474168737.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1897876587090998443.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3090763743474168737.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 224 ms returned [162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 225 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 258 /258 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 229 ms. Remains : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9856889019884437208.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:28:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13971274107828817705.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9856889019884437208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13971274107828817705.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17665647566539314576.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17665647566539314576.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17665647566539314576.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17665647566539314576.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17665647566539314576.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 817 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 31 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1905074948068416217.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18300327983955664130.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1905074948068416217.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18300327983955664130.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 232 ms returned [162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 233 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 258 /258 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 238 ms. Remains : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13893708634839777398.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 18:29:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15039371561408102808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13893708634839777398.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15039371561408102808.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4343459867846884371.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4343459867846884371.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4343459867846884371.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4343459867846884371.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4343459867846884371.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 817 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 29 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6082481632265932888.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2686025923815029368.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6082481632265932888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2686025923815029368.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 219 ms returned [162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 220 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 259/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 259 /259 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 228 ms. Remains : 259/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability920952336706688531.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:30:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4773438086849392155.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability920952336706688531.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4773438086849392155.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3926251739482266728.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3926251739482266728.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3926251739482266728.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3926251739482266728.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3926251739482266728.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 823 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 41 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability344565439007448423.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10271582085234885956.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability344565439007448423.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10271582085234885956.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:31:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:31:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 231 ms returned [162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 232 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 258 /258 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 239 ms. Remains : 258/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:31:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11238897021013021182.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:31:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1090367960134049882.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11238897021013021182.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1090367960134049882.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14911194680412678880.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14911194680412678880.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14911194680412678880.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14911194680412678880.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14911194680412678880.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 817 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 35 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3697123666654148643.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4410164804836807286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3697123666654148643.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4410164804836807286.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 266 /266 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 384 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned [162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 228 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 259/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 259 /259 variables (removed 0) and now considering 536/536 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 237 ms. Remains : 259/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8977821890740042118.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12222350103038721073.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8977821890740042118.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12222350103038721073.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17126028076242360760.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17126028076242360760.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17126028076242360760.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17126028076242360760.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17126028076242360760.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 823 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability147661106731720034.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3552544863491504163.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability147661106731720034.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3552544863491504163.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 266/266 places, 536/536 transitions.
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 258 transition count 528
Applied a total of 16 rules in 24 ms. Remains 258 /266 variables (removed 8) and now considering 528/536 (removed 8) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:33:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 376 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 376 rows 258 cols
[2025-06-02 18:33:35] [INFO ] Computed 82 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 235 ms returned [154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161]
Discarding 8 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 236 ms to find 8 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 250/266 places, 528/536 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 250 transition count 520
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 242 transition count 520
Applied a total of 16 rules in 20 ms. Remains 242 /250 variables (removed 8) and now considering 520/528 (removed 8) transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 368 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 368 rows 242 cols
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Computed 74 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 232 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 368 transitions (discarded 152 similar events)
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 550 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 784 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 242/266 places, 520/536 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1065 ms. Remains : 242/266 places, 520/536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 520 transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7550958849185426123.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:33:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4436726711675307546.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7550958849185426123.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4436726711675307546.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12631414121781102980.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12631414121781102980.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12631414121781102980.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12631414121781102980.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12631414121781102980.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 833 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12605017890567776148.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 18:34:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4944725893909944743.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12605017890567776148.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4944725893909944743.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9232092942954126366.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9232092942954126366.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9232092942954126366.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9232092942954126366.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9232092942954126366.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 865 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 44 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability124555186366874855.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 18:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5737559991296563298.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability124555186366874855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5737559991296563298.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 19:01:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 19:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 338 ms
[2025-06-02 19:01:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 19:01:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 19:01:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 599 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 19:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1125 ms
[2025-06-02 19:01:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 160 labels/synchronizations in 27 ms.
[2025-06-02 19:01:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4452666535181557658.gal : 33 ms
[2025-06-02 19:01:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5790723865057769676.ctl : 57 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4452666535181557658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5790723865057769676.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-PT-8"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-8, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423200698"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-PT-8.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-PT-8 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;