Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423200690.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-7, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423200690
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.5M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 143K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 206K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 420K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 265K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748885418357

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-PT-7
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 101 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Transformed 264 places.
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Transformed 536 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [P_start_1_0, P_start_1_1, P_start_1_2, P_start_1_3, P_start_1_4, P_start_1_5, P_start_1_6, P_start_1_7, P_b_0_false, P_b_0_true, P_b_1_false, P_b_1_true, P_b_2_false, P_b_2_true, P_b_3_false, P_b_3_true, P_b_4_false, P_b_4_true, P_b_5_false, P_b_5_true, P_b_6_false, P_b_6_true, P_b_7_false, P_b_7_true, P_setx_3_0, P_setx_3_1, P_setx_3_2, P_setx_3_3, P_setx_3_4, P_setx_3_5, P_setx_3_6, P_setx_3_7, P_setbi_5_0, P_setbi_5_1, P_setbi_5_2, P_setbi_5_3, P_setbi_5_4, P_setbi_5_5, P_setbi_5_6, P_setbi_5_7, P_ify0_4_0, P_ify0_4_1, P_ify0_4_2, P_ify0_4_3, P_ify0_4_4, P_ify0_4_5, P_ify0_4_6, P_ify0_4_7, P_sety_9_0, P_sety_9_1, P_sety_9_2, P_sety_9_3, P_sety_9_4, P_sety_9_5, P_sety_9_6, P_sety_9_7, P_ifxi_10_0, P_ifxi_10_1, P_ifxi_10_2, P_ifxi_10_3, P_ifxi_10_4, P_ifxi_10_5, P_ifxi_10_6, P_ifxi_10_7, P_setbi_11_0, P_setbi_11_1, P_setbi_11_2, P_setbi_11_3, P_setbi_11_4, P_setbi_11_5, P_setbi_11_6, P_setbi_11_7, P_fordo_12_0, P_fordo_12_1, P_fordo_12_2, P_fordo_12_3, P_fordo_12_4, P_fordo_12_5, P_fordo_12_6, P_fordo_12_7, P_wait_0_0, P_wait_0_1, P_wait_0_2, P_wait_0_3, P_wait_0_4, P_wait_0_5, P_wait_0_6, P_wait_0_7, P_wait_1_0, P_wait_1_1, P_wait_1_2, P_wait_1_3, P_wait_1_4, P_wait_1_5, P_wait_1_6, P_wait_1_7, P_wait_2_0, P_wait_2_1, P_wait_2_2, P_wait_2_3, P_wait_2_4, P_wait_2_5, P_wait_2_6, P_wait_2_7, P_wait_3_0, P_wait_3_1, P_wait_3_2, P_wait_3_3, P_wait_3_4, P_wait_3_5, P_wait_3_6, P_wait_3_7, P_wait_4_0, P_wait_4_1, P_wait_4_2, P_wait_4_3, P_wait_4_4, P_wait_4_5, P_wait_4_6, P_wait_4_7, P_wait_5_0, P_wait_5_1, P_wait_5_2, P_wait_5_3, P_wait_5_4, P_wait_5_5, P_wait_5_6, P_wait_5_7, P_wait_6_0, P_wait_6_1, P_wait_6_2, P_wait_6_3, P_wait_6_4, P_wait_6_5, P_wait_6_6, P_wait_6_7, P_wait_7_0, P_wait_7_1, P_wait_7_2, P_wait_7_3, P_wait_7_4, P_wait_7_5, P_wait_7_6, P_wait_7_7, P_await_13_0, P_await_13_1, P_await_13_2, P_await_13_3, P_await_13_4, P_await_13_5, P_await_13_6, P_await_13_7, P_done_0_0, P_done_0_1, P_done_0_2, P_done_0_3, P_done_0_4, P_done_0_5, P_done_0_6, P_done_0_7, P_done_1_0, P_done_1_1, P_done_1_2, P_done_1_3, P_done_1_4, P_done_1_5, P_done_1_6, P_done_1_7, P_done_2_0, P_done_2_1, P_done_2_2, P_done_2_3, P_done_2_4, P_done_2_5, P_done_2_6, P_done_2_7, P_done_3_0, P_done_3_1, P_done_3_2, P_done_3_3, P_done_3_4, P_done_3_5, P_done_3_6, P_done_3_7, P_done_4_0, P_done_4_1, P_done_4_2, P_done_4_3, P_done_4_4, P_done_4_5, P_done_4_6, P_done_4_7, P_done_5_0, P_done_5_1, P_done_5_2, P_done_5_3, P_done_5_4, P_done_5_5, P_done_5_6, P_done_5_7, P_done_6_0, P_done_6_1, P_done_6_2, P_done_6_3, P_done_6_4, P_done_6_5, P_done_6_6, P_done_6_7, P_done_7_0, P_done_7_1, P_done_7_2, P_done_7_3, P_done_7_4, P_done_7_5, P_done_7_6, P_done_7_7, P_ifyi_15_0, P_ifyi_15_1, P_ifyi_15_2, P_ifyi_15_3, P_ifyi_15_4, P_ifyi_15_5, P_ifyi_15_6, P_ifyi_15_7, P_awaity_0, P_awaity_1, P_awaity_2, P_awaity_3, P_awaity_4, P_awaity_5, P_awaity_6, P_awaity_7, P_CS_21_0, P_CS_21_1, P_CS_21_2, P_CS_21_3, P_CS_21_4, P_CS_21_5, P_CS_21_6, P_CS_21_7, P_setbi_24_0, P_setbi_24_1, P_setbi_24_2, P_setbi_24_3, P_setbi_24_4, P_setbi_24_5, P_setbi_24_6, P_setbi_24_7]
[2025-06-02 17:30:19] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 264 places and 536 transitions and 2352 arcs in 209 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 22 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 45 places and 74 transitions.
Support contains 219 out of 219 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 462/462 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 462/462 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 336 transitions (discarded 126 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 336 rows 219 cols
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 249 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 336 transitions (discarded 126 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 91 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 499 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 455 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 336 transitions (discarded 126 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 17:30:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 91 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 219/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 455 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 65/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 455 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 147 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 152 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 137 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD11 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 19 solved, 436 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD245 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD252 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 27 solved, 428 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD258 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD262 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD264 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 16/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/555 variables, and 404 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 219/219 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 0/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 455/455 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 212/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 9/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 84/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 7/219 variables, 56/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 36/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 13/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 12/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 12/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 336/555 variables, 219/660 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 91/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 413/1164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 555/555 variables, and 1164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 219/219 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 91/91 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 413/455 constraints, Known Traps: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60261ms problems are : Problem set: 42 solved, 413 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 42 dead transitions in 60281ms
Found 42 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 42 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 42 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 219/219 places, 420/462 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60827 ms. Remains : 219/219 places, 420/462 transitions.
Support contains 219 out of 219 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 17:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 67 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:21] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 17:31:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 73 to 69
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1805 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 8/69 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-06-02 17:31:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 219 cols
[2025-06-02 17:31:22] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 160/180 variables, 51/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 160/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp69 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 5/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 285/465 variables, 180/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 72/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 26/491 variables, 16/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/491 variables, 16/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/491 variables, 5/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/491 variables, 5/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/491 variables, 0/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 21/512 variables, 8/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 21/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 15/527 variables, 23/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 2/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 1/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 7/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 0/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/527 variables, 0/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 527/527 variables, and 592 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved in 1275 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 219/219 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 142/151 variables, 42/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 142/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 262/413 variables, 151/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 60/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 42/455 variables, 22/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 22/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 5/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 10/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 3/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 2/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/455 variables, 0/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 42/497 variables, 16/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 42/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 1/529 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 1/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 30/527 variables, 46/576 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 4/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 2/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 14/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 0/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/527 variables, 0/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 527/527 variables, and 596 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved in 903 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 219/219 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/8 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2199ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2156 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 219 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 212 transition count 413
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 7 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 212 transition count 406
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 205 transition count 406
Applied a total of 28 rules in 62 ms. Remains 205 /219 variables (removed 14) and now considering 406/420 (removed 14) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62 ms. Remains : 205/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 324 ms. (123 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 113 ms. (350 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 609868 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=203 ) properties seen :0 out of 3
Probabilistic random walk after 609868 steps, saw 279168 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=202 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 17:31:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 205 cols
[2025-06-02 17:31:30] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 132/141 variables, 42/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 132/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 252/393 variables, 141/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 60/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 42/435 variables, 22/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 22/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 5/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 10/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 38/473 variables, 16/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 38/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 26/499 variables, 42/539 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 4/543 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 2/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 14/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 0/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/499 variables, 0/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 499/499 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 399 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 205/205 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, ReadFeed: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 132/141 variables, 42/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 132/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 252/393 variables, 141/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 60/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/393 variables, 0/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 42/435 variables, 22/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 22/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 5/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 10/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 3/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/435 variables, 0/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 38/473 variables, 16/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 38/500 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/500 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 26/499 variables, 42/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 4/546 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 2/548 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 14/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 0/562 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/499 variables, 1/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/499 variables, 0/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/499 variables, 0/563 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 499/499 variables, and 563 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 1093 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 205/205 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, ReadFeed: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1504ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2156 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 205 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 205/205 places, 406/406 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 205 /205 variables (removed 0) and now considering 406/406 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 14 ms. Remains : 205/205 places, 406/406 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 205/205 places, 406/406 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 205 /205 variables (removed 0) and now considering 406/406 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:31:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:31:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 253 ms returned [128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 255 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 198/205 places, 406/406 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 198 /198 variables (removed 0) and now considering 406/406 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 277 ms. Remains : 198/205 places, 406/406 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 219 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 562507 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=187 ) properties seen :0 out of 3
Probabilistic random walk after 562507 steps, saw 257607 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=187 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 17:31:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-02 17:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 127/136 variables, 37/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 127/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 252/388 variables, 136/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 25/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 42/430 variables, 22/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 22/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 5/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 10/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 36/466 variables, 14/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 36/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 26/492 variables, 40/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 4/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 2/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 0/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/492 variables, 0/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 492/492 variables, and 489 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 324 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 198/198 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 127/136 variables, 37/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 127/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 252/388 variables, 136/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 25/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 42/430 variables, 22/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 22/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 5/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 10/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 3/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 0/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/466 variables, 14/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 36/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 26/492 variables, 40/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 4/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 2/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 0/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/492 variables, 0/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 492/492 variables, and 492 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 722 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 198/198 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1060ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2413 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 198 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 198/198 places, 406/406 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 198 /198 variables (removed 0) and now considering 406/406 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 198/198 places, 406/406 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 198/198 places, 406/406 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 198 /198 variables (removed 0) and now considering 406/406 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:31:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:31:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 439 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 642 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 30 ms returned []
Running 399 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 17:31:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 191/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 9/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/198 variables, 49/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 7/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 108 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 117 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 98 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 104 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 120 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 122 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 122 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 198/492 variables, and 382 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 198/198 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 0/198 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 399/399 constraints, Known Traps: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 191/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 9/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 94/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 7/198 variables, 49/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 7/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 32/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 4/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 7/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 5/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 294/492 variables, 198/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 35/653 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/492 variables, 399/1052 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 492/492 variables, and 1052 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 198/198 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 58/58 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 399/399 constraints, Known Traps: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 399 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60130ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 60823 ms. Remains : 198/198 places, 406/406 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Ensure Unique test removed 112 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 112 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 198 transition count 294
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 198 transition count 245
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 42 places
Reduce places removed 91 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 107 transition count 245
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 96 transition count 234
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -52
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 87 transition count 286
Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 295 place count 87 transition count 283
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 84 transition count 283
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 305 place count 84 transition count 283
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 308 place count 84 transition count 283
Applied a total of 308 rules in 64 ms. Remains 84 /198 variables (removed 114) and now considering 283/406 (removed 123) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 3 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 283 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-02 17:32:41] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 17:32:41] [INFO ] After 151ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:3
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 16 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] After 87ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] After 143ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] After 232ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :3
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 463 ms.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-7-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 7 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 212 transition count 413
Applied a total of 14 rules in 13 ms. Remains 212 /219 variables (removed 7) and now considering 413/420 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 301 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned [128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 186 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/219 places, 413/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 205 transition count 406
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 198 transition count 406
Applied a total of 14 rules in 12 ms. Remains 198 /205 variables (removed 7) and now considering 406/413 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 408 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 585 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 798 ms. Remains : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 406 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9504562133492073492.gal : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:32:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3516296770132395012.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9504562133492073492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3516296770132395012.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8767528570349804254.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8767528570349804254.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8767528570349804254.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8767528570349804254.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8767528570349804254.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 525 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13308194410829444140.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1720367937619386009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13308194410829444140.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1720367937619386009.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 212 transition count 413
Applied a total of 14 rules in 21 ms. Remains 212 /219 variables (removed 7) and now considering 413/420 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:33:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 301 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-02 17:33:43] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned [128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 210 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/219 places, 413/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 205 transition count 406
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 198 transition count 406
Applied a total of 14 rules in 11 ms. Remains 198 /205 variables (removed 7) and now considering 406/413 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 158 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 362 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 523 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 766 ms. Remains : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 406 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15761221835107078510.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:33:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8861792410670425032.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15761221835107078510.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8861792410670425032.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:34:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:34:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8853855729751407848.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8853855729751407848.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8853855729751407848.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8853855729751407848.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8853855729751407848.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:34:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:34:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:34:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 525 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:34:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10610488986826915599.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13766063767394772104.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10610488986826915599.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13766063767394772104.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 219 cols
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 221 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 413 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 17:34:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 212/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 9/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/219 variables, 56/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 114 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/527 variables, and 410 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 219/219 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 0/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 413/413 constraints, Known Traps: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 212/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 9/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 97/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 7/219 variables, 56/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 29/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 14/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 308/527 variables, 219/654 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 84/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 413/1151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60185ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60186ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60522 ms. Remains : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7114874066221619804.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:35:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5196334614025026045.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7114874066221619804.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5196334614025026045.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1144477901275616129.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1144477901275616129.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1144477901275616129.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1144477901275616129.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1144477901275616129.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:36:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:36:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:36:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 657 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 35 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:36:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12900094528008919772.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4971834141179594126.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12900094528008919772.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4971834141179594126.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 212 transition count 413
Applied a total of 14 rules in 21 ms. Remains 212 /219 variables (removed 7) and now considering 413/420 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 301 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned [128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 205 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/219 places, 413/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 205 transition count 406
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 198 transition count 406
Applied a total of 14 rules in 10 ms. Remains 198 /205 variables (removed 7) and now considering 406/413 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 446 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 613 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 850 ms. Remains : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:36:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 406 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:36:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10829183520904627262.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 17:36:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10254174321410978290.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10829183520904627262.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10254174321410978290.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph897631118421212415.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph897631118421212415.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph897631118421212415.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph897631118421212415.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph897631118421212415.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 525 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7694584063143087906.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7065477613663667535.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7694584063143087906.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7065477613663667535.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 219 cols
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 194 ms returned [135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 197 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 212 /212 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 200 ms. Remains : 212/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2466848228242923630.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 17:37:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15138407297487076018.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2466848228242923630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15138407297487076018.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4881626422224824426.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4881626422224824426.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4881626422224824426.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4881626422224824426.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4881626422224824426.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 615 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability431047024251302862.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9617891036472023424.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability431047024251302862.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9617891036472023424.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:38:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:38:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:38:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:38:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:38:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 295 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 11 ms returned []
Running 413 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:38:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:38:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 17:38:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 212/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 9/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/219 variables, 56/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/527 variables, and 413 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 219/219 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 0/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 413/413 constraints, Known Traps: 129/129 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 212/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 9/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 100/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 7/219 variables, 56/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 29/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 18/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 308/527 variables, 219/656 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 84/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/527 variables, 413/1153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 527/527 variables, and 1154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 219/219 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 65/65 constraints, State Equation: 219/219 constraints, ReadFeed: 84/84 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 413/413 constraints, Known Traps: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60097ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60532 ms. Remains : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2883619440299310268.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:39:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4477504880568411064.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2883619440299310268.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4477504880568411064.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13178004705260828434.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13178004705260828434.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13178004705260828434.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13178004705260828434.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13178004705260828434.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 657 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 25 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6378020487758330098.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1893616558705271971.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6378020487758330098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1893616558705271971.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:40:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:40:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:40:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:40:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:40:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 280 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 393 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 413 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:40:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:40:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 17:40:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 84 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 212/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 9/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/212 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/219 variables, 56/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30152ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 413 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30153ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30549 ms. Remains : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2065077320113750940.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13803938685515353.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2065077320113750940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13803938685515353.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9709664094646176337.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9709664094646176337.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9709664094646176337.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9709664094646176337.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9709664094646176337.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 657 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 33 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12288167671701374361.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:41:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8114412483835012019.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12288167671701374361.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8114412483835012019.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 212 transition count 413
Applied a total of 14 rules in 12 ms. Remains 212 /219 variables (removed 7) and now considering 413/420 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 301 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 145 ms returned [128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 146 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/219 places, 413/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 205 transition count 406
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 198 transition count 406
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 198 /205 variables (removed 7) and now considering 406/413 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:42:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 312 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 443 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 607 ms. Remains : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 406 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6636754628635009709.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6515561509327476665.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6636754628635009709.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6515561509327476665.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9467014615904732675.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9467014615904732675.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9467014615904732675.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9467014615904732675.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9467014615904732675.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 525 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 135 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13786085548448622446.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:42:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6895317149036818158.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13786085548448622446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6895317149036818158.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 308 rows 219 cols
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 193 ms returned [135, 136, 138, 139, 140, 141]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 200 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 213/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 213 /213 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 207 ms. Remains : 213/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16669849828879407762.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1341393089424860423.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16669849828879407762.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1341393089424860423.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:43:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:43:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12408946547337854546.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12408946547337854546.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12408946547337854546.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12408946547337854546.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12408946547337854546.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:43:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:43:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:43:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 621 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:43:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 28 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:43:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4571620249977876463.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:43:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16035760097094489762.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4571620249977876463.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16035760097094489762.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 211 ms returned [135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 212 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 212 /212 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 218 ms. Remains : 212/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8253839107089351927.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15051608068594624129.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8253839107089351927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15051608068594624129.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1913062635870273319.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1913062635870273319.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1913062635870273319.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1913062635870273319.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1913062635870273319.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 615 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15342713875271303062.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:44:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4479833454429175666.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15342713875271303062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4479833454429175666.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 219 /219 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 308 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 174 ms returned [135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 174 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 212/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 212 /212 variables (removed 0) and now considering 420/420 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 180 ms. Remains : 212/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability661829246289161045.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9777671262632357715.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability661829246289161045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9777671262632357715.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11566436027337640316.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11566436027337640316.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11566436027337640316.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11566436027337640316.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11566436027337640316.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 615 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 29 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability551863108099634748.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:45:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7547990975062984225.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability551863108099634748.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7547990975062984225.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 213 transition count 414
Applied a total of 12 rules in 14 ms. Remains 213 /219 variables (removed 6) and now considering 414/420 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 302 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 213 cols
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 187 ms returned [129, 130, 131, 132, 134, 135]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 188 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 207/219 places, 414/420 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 207 transition count 409
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 202 transition count 409
Applied a total of 10 rules in 6 ms. Remains 202 /207 variables (removed 5) and now considering 409/414 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 297 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 297 rows 202 cols
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 297 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 42 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 418 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 596 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 202/219 places, 409/420 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 804 ms. Remains : 202/219 places, 409/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 409 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3525901547744924041.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14415098495892566614.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3525901547744924041.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14415098495892566614.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5319746820606361616.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5319746820606361616.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5319746820606361616.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5319746820606361616.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5319746820606361616.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 635 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 35 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5157244035828345716.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:46:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16390390397977395999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5157244035828345716.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16390390397977395999.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 219/219 places, 420/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 212 transition count 413
Applied a total of 14 rules in 16 ms. Remains 212 /219 variables (removed 7) and now considering 413/420 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 301 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Computed 65 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned [128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134]
Discarding 7 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 187 ms to find 7 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/219 places, 413/420 transitions.
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 205 transition count 406
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 198 transition count 406
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 198 /205 variables (removed 7) and now considering 406/413 (removed 7) transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 196 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 294 transitions (discarded 112 similar events)
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 418 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 615 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 824 ms. Remains : 198/219 places, 406/420 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 406 transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7142685519217695574.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4001830372074461254.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7142685519217695574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4001830372074461254.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9806770423970170961.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9806770423970170961.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9806770423970170961.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9806770423970170961.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9806770423970170961.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 525 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 131 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4367427849596339573.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 17:47:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12220249722740865446.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4367427849596339573.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12220249722740865446.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11182033935963634153.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11182033935963634153.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11182033935963634153.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11182033935963634153.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11182033935963634153.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 657 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 33 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9438997308392846576.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 17:48:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4937899910180492338.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9438997308392846576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4937899910180492338.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 18:14:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 18:14:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 782 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 18:14:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 18:14:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 454 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 18:14:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 535 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 126 labels/synchronizations in 39 ms.
[2025-06-02 18:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11779823520741020188.gal : 53 ms
[2025-06-02 18:14:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17605068149258860660.ctl : 37 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11779823520741020188.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17605068149258860660.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-PT-7"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-7, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423200690"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-PT-7.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-PT-7 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;