About the Execution of ITS-Tools for LamportFastMutEx-PT-4
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 0.000 | 822115.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | FTTFFFTFFFTFFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423100666.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-4, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423100666
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 964K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 90K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 164K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 23K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 153K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 190K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 114K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748881315488
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-PT-4
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 16:21:56] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 16:21:56] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 81 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Transformed 135 places.
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Transformed 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [P_start_1_0, P_start_1_1, P_start_1_2, P_start_1_3, P_start_1_4, P_b_0_false, P_b_0_true, P_b_1_false, P_b_1_true, P_b_2_false, P_b_2_true, P_b_3_false, P_b_3_true, P_b_4_false, P_b_4_true, P_setx_3_0, P_setx_3_1, P_setx_3_2, P_setx_3_3, P_setx_3_4, P_setbi_5_0, P_setbi_5_1, P_setbi_5_2, P_setbi_5_3, P_setbi_5_4, P_ify0_4_0, P_ify0_4_1, P_ify0_4_2, P_ify0_4_3, P_ify0_4_4, P_sety_9_0, P_sety_9_1, P_sety_9_2, P_sety_9_3, P_sety_9_4, P_ifxi_10_0, P_ifxi_10_1, P_ifxi_10_2, P_ifxi_10_3, P_ifxi_10_4, P_setbi_11_0, P_setbi_11_1, P_setbi_11_2, P_setbi_11_3, P_setbi_11_4, P_fordo_12_0, P_fordo_12_1, P_fordo_12_2, P_fordo_12_3, P_fordo_12_4, P_wait_0_0, P_wait_0_1, P_wait_0_2, P_wait_0_3, P_wait_0_4, P_wait_1_0, P_wait_1_1, P_wait_1_2, P_wait_1_3, P_wait_1_4, P_wait_2_0, P_wait_2_1, P_wait_2_2, P_wait_2_3, P_wait_2_4, P_wait_3_0, P_wait_3_1, P_wait_3_2, P_wait_3_3, P_wait_3_4, P_wait_4_0, P_wait_4_1, P_wait_4_2, P_wait_4_3, P_wait_4_4, P_await_13_0, P_await_13_1, P_await_13_2, P_await_13_3, P_await_13_4, P_done_0_0, P_done_0_1, P_done_0_2, P_done_0_3, P_done_0_4, P_done_1_0, P_done_1_1, P_done_1_2, P_done_1_3, P_done_1_4, P_done_2_0, P_done_2_1, P_done_2_2, P_done_2_3, P_done_2_4, P_done_3_0, P_done_3_1, P_done_3_2, P_done_3_3, P_done_3_4, P_done_4_0, P_done_4_1, P_done_4_2, P_done_4_3, P_done_4_4, P_ifyi_15_0, P_ifyi_15_1, P_ifyi_15_2, P_ifyi_15_3, P_ifyi_15_4, P_awaity_0, P_awaity_1, P_awaity_2, P_awaity_3, P_awaity_4, P_CS_21_0, P_CS_21_1, P_CS_21_2, P_CS_21_3, P_CS_21_4, P_setbi_24_0, P_setbi_24_1, P_setbi_24_2, P_setbi_24_3, P_setbi_24_4]
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 135 places and 230 transitions and 990 arcs in 205 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 50 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 102 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 180/180 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 180/180 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 221 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 176 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:21:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 102/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 26/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 289 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 15 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD48 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 144/246 variables, 102/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 40/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved in 17344 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 44/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 144/246 variables, 102/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 40/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 152/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 498 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/176 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 47463ms problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 47476ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/102 places, 156/180 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 47892 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/180 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 16:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:45] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 16:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 56 to 52
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1820 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 5/52 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 721 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 143 ms. (277 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 117 ms. (339 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-06-02 16:22:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 16:22:46] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 51/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 51/102 variables, 23/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 51/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved in 182 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 83/95 variables, 24/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/95 variables, 83/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp55 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 95/230 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 0 unsolved in 393 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 95/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 24/26 constraints, State Equation: 0/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/4 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 589ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:22:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 23978 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 44/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 54016ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54018ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54185 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13942159138686231139.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1488762413401851880.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13942159138686231139.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1488762413401851880.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,3.02532,89744,2,15570,5,254562,6,0,566,359392,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((((AF((((((P_b_4_false==1)&&(P_setbi_5_4==1))||((P_b_1_true==1)&&(P_setbi_5_1==1)))||(((P_b_2_false==1)&&(P_setbi_5_2==1))||((P_b_4...8926
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((((!(EG(!((((((P_b_4_false==1)&&(P_setbi_5_4==1))||((P_b_1_true==1)&&(P_setbi_5_1==1)))||(((P_b_...10979
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 76/0/80
(forward)formula 0,0,3.49323,89744,1,0,8,254562,15,1,1177,359392,4
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:23:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 23889 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 44/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53922ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53923ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54125 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11173092683685276156.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 16:24:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17058820107233583743.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11173092683685276156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17058820107233583743.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,3.22725,90200,2,15570,5,254562,6,0,566,359392,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((((((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_2==1))||((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_3==1)))||(((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_4==1))||((y_4==1)&&(P_ify0_4_2==1))))||((((y_...7221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,((!((((((((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_2==1))||((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_3==1)))||(((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_4==1...7306
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 16:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 16:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12821254318761807427.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12821254318761807427.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12821254318761807427.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12821254318761807427.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12821254318761807427.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 16:25:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 16:25:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 16:25:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 157 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:25:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 99 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 20 ms.
[2025-06-02 16:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3519938338106778111.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1422270375830743163.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3519938338106778111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1422270375830743163.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,6.5246,156336,2737,182,205383,1504,439,883438,96,16282,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((((((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_2==1))||((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_3==1)))||(((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_4==1))...10193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,((!((((((((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_2==1))||((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_3==1)))||...10278
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t48, t58, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...661
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:25:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 23715 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 44/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53751ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53752ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53956 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4220715359995909664.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 16:26:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13440471504554672018.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4220715359995909664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13440471504554672018.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,2.91487,89996,2,15570,5,254562,6,0,566,359392,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((!(E(!((((((((y_1==1)&&(P_sety_9_1==1))||((y_1==1)&&(P_sety_9_2==1)))||(((y_1==1)&&(P_sety_9_3==1))||((y_1==1)&&(P_sety_9_4==1))))||(...6328
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(!((((((((y_1==1)&&(P_sety_9_1==1))||((y_1==1)&&(P_sety_9_2==1)))||(((y_1==1)&&(P_sety_9_3==1)...6876
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16093027134040830712.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16093027134040830712.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16093027134040830712.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16093027134040830712.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16093027134040830712.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 157 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13206786579376491927.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12092479952675706595.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13206786579376491927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12092479952675706595.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,13.3653,307948,2907,176,301078,2229,432,2.5178e+06,100,18069,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((!(E(!((((((((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i6.u8.P_sety_9_1==1))||((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i6.u32.P_sety_9_2==1)))||(((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i0.i1.u9.P_sety...9220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(!((((((((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i6.u8.P_sety_9_1==1))||((i6.u32.y_1==1)&&(i6.u32.P_sety_9_2==1)))||...9938
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t58, t61, t76, t77, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108...665
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 87 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7359382750959772724.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7960930944327129470.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7359382750959772724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7960930944327129470.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,2.09186,57280,2,11489,5,165693,6,0,550,239530,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AG(EX((((((((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_2==1))||((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_3==1)))||(((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_4==1))||((y_4==1)&&(P_ify0_4_2==1))))||(...1971
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(((((((!((((((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_2==1))||((y_1==1)&&(P_ify0_4_3==1)))||(((y_1==1)&&...4327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,0,14.1243,386732,1,0,436,1.92679e+06,340,173,3933,2.11805e+06,359
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 96 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 100 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14504001486718062320.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:27:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3719653443448422432.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14504001486718062320.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3719653443448422432.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,1.73776,57336,2,11489,5,165693,6,0,550,239530,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(((((x_1==1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1==1))||((x_2==1)&&(P_ifxi_10_2==1)))||(((x_3==1)&&(P_ifxi_10_3==1))||((x_4==1)&&(P_ifxi_10_4==1))))) + !((A...1916
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((P_fordo_12_2==1)||(P_fordo_12_1==1))||((P_fordo_12_4==1)||(P_fordo_12_3==1)...4404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1173222119863857451.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1173222119863857451.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1173222119863857451.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1173222119863857451.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1173222119863857451.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 162 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10563964857297008388.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8964594355145962065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10563964857297008388.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8964594355145962065.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,12.9351,297528,4568,171,317046,1134,397,2.26293e+06,75,9135,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(((((i4.u6.x_1==1)&&(i7.u9.P_ifxi_10_1==1))||((i4.u7.x_2==1)&&(u10.P_ifxi_10_2==1)))||(((i4.u4.x_3==1)&&(i7.u11.P_ifxi_10_3==1))||((i...2561
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((i1.u14.P_fordo_12_2==1)||(i0.u20.P_fordo_12_1==1))||((i3.u26.P_fordo_12_4==...5849
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t53, t60, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...573
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:28:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 102 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 25102 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 98/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 44/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/483 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 5/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 102/102 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 55153ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55154ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55393 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9724766004083191518.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:29:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13435813822322614114.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9724766004083191518.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13435813822322614114.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,3.35997,89728,2,15570,5,254562,6,0,566,359392,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(E(((EX((((((((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_4==1))||((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_2==1)))||(((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_3==1))||((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_1==1))))||((((y...6737
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(((EX((((((((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_4==1))||((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_2==1)))||(((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_...14529
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14380679735155145741.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14380679735155145741.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14380679735155145741.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14380679735155145741.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14380679735155145741.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 170 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5974799225237467178.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3165780220146893084.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5974799225237467178.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3165780220146893084.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,7.51132,163760,2609,134,160649,805,405,1.1403e+06,79,6896,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(E(((EX((((((((i0.u0.y_3==1)&&(i0.u35.P_CS_21_4==1))||((i0.u0.y_3==1)&&(i0.u33.P_CS_21_2==1)))||(((i0.u0.y_3==1)&&(i5.u34.P_CS_21_3==1...9216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(((EX((((((((i0.u0.y_3==1)&&(i0.u35.P_CS_21_4==1))||((i0.u0.y_3==1)&&(i0.u33.P_CS_21_2==1...19754
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t48, t57, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108...576
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 98 transition count 152
Applied a total of 8 rules in 19 ms. Remains 98 /102 variables (removed 4) and now considering 152/156 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:30:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 16:30:44] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned [62, 63, 64, 65]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 94 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 90 transition count 148
Applied a total of 8 rules in 14 ms. Remains 90 /94 variables (removed 4) and now considering 148/152 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:30:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-02 16:30:44] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/102 places, 148/156 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 372 ms. Remains : 90/102 places, 148/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17755736078746123029.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9912237294194048472.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17755736078746123029.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9912237294194048472.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4985e+06,2.08789,67860,2,12452,5,225646,6,0,510,275015,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((x_0==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1))||((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_3==1)))||(((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_4==1))||((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1))))||((((x_...642
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((x_0==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1))||((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_3==1)))||(((x_1==1)&&(P_se...702
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...660
(forward)formula 0,1,18.1793,460396,1,0,421,2.37935e+06,313,164,3645,2.21946e+06,346
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6999891870722383583.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13106270172166893627.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6999891870722383583.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13106270172166893627.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,1.98507,57436,2,11489,5,165693,6,0,550,239530,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EX(AG(((((y_2==0)||(P_ifyi_15_2==0))&&((y_4==0)||(P_ifyi_15_4==0)))&&(((y_1==0)||(P_ifyi_15_1==0))&&((y_3==0)||(P_ifyi_15_3==0)))))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((((y_2==0)||(P_ifyi_15_2==0))&&((y_4==0)||(P_ifyi_15_4==0)))&&(((y_1=...227
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,0,29.133,728732,1,0,459,3.46792e+06,334,183,3933,3.4538e+06,397
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 91 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 102 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4864232792056649638.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15935665969943021454.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4864232792056649638.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15935665969943021454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,1.63269,57328,2,11489,5,165693,6,0,550,239530,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((AX(((y_1==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_1==1))) + ((AG(((y_0==1)&&(P_awaity_4==1))) + EF(((y_2==1)&&(P_CS_21_1==1)))) * AX(FALSE)))) + AG(((((P_sta...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(EX(!(((y_1==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_1==1))))) + ((!(E(TRUE U !(((y_0==1)&&(P_awaity_4==1))))...308
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,1,24.7462,687900,1,0,477,3.43042e+06,334,197,3799,3.35487e+06,418
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 110 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2772397100556308120.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:31:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12768428282677091443.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2772397100556308120.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12768428282677091443.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,1.75868,57376,2,11489,5,165693,6,0,550,239530,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((P_b_4_true==0)||(P_setbi_5_4==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((P_b_4_true==0)||(P_setbi_5_4==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,0,6.53204,176128,1,0,409,836210,324,157,3708,995202,315
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 98 transition count 152
Applied a total of 8 rules in 17 ms. Remains 98 /102 variables (removed 4) and now considering 152/156 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 16:32:04] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [62, 63, 64, 65]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 94 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 91 transition count 149
Applied a total of 6 rules in 6 ms. Remains 91 /94 variables (removed 3) and now considering 149/152 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 91 cols
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 236 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 91/102 places, 149/156 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 353 ms. Remains : 91/102 places, 149/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 149 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2939574774975631603.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7006851963172626509.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2939574774975631603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7006851963172626509.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.54041e+06,2.49015,77872,2,14528,5,244527,6,0,515,323874,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((!(((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_3==1))) * E(AG(((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_4==1))) U AF(((y_1==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3==1))))) U EF(!(EF(((y_4==1)&&(P_CS_2...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((!(((y_3==1)&&(P_CS_21_3==1))) * E(!(E(TRUE U !(((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_4==1))))) U !(EG(!(((y_1==1)...243
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...658
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5758445977098090379.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5758445977098090379.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5758445977098090379.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5758445977098090379.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5758445977098090379.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 161 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 44 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4360995179654150177.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6513184740446465633.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4360995179654150177.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6513184740446465633.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.54041e+06,4.56215,117820,2858,331,158596,2136,394,562946,97,13972,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(E((!(((i3.u8.y_3==1)&&(i3.u23.P_CS_21_3==1))) * E(AG(((i2.u5.x_3==1)&&(i2.u7.P_setx_3_4==1))) U AF(((i3.u8.y_1==1)&&(i5.u20.P_ifyi_15_...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E((!(((i3.u8.y_3==1)&&(i3.u23.P_CS_21_3==1))) * E(!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u5.x_3==1)&&(i2.u7.P_setx_3_4==...294
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t50, t54, t93, t94, t95, t96, t97, t105, t110, t120, ...577
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
(forward)formula 0,0,17.5662,387424,1,0,495331,9261,1938,2.24865e+06,482,57923,906028
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 111 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9005641540400736898.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11438606010105667716.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9005641540400736898.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11438606010105667716.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,1.9024,57356,2,11489,5,165693,6,0,550,239530,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,1.90676,57356,1,0,6,165693,7,1,800,239530,1
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4875186385093481211.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4875186385093481211.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4875186385093481211.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4875186385093481211.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4875186385093481211.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 157 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6524905232951087590.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4955373678536683723.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6524905232951087590.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4955373678536683723.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,17.229,344620,4327,198,364282,1428,395,2.63259e+06,99,11896,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((((((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_2==1))||((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_3==1)))||(((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_4==1))...9887
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,((!((((((((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_2==1))||((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_3==1)))||...9972
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t55, t59, t62, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, ...652
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,51.6321,831264,1,0,1.45394e+06,9325,2700,3.59986e+06,540,48591,2457413
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EX(((!(E(!((((((((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(i6.u31.P_sety_9_1==1))||((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(u10.P_sety_9_2==1)))||(((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(u8.P_sety_9_3==1)...8875
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(!((((((((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(i6.u31.P_sety_9_1==1))||((i6.u31.y_1==1)&&(u10.P_sety_9_2==1)))||((...9563
(forward)formula 1,1,76.5659,1387852,1,0,2.07858e+06,10409,3049,7.68166e+06,551,59063,3632822
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: A((!(((((i0.u4.x_1==1)&&(i6.u31.P_ifxi_10_1==1))||((i0.u5.x_2==1)&&(u10.P_ifxi_10_2==1)))||(((i0.u6.x_3==1)&&(u8.P_ifxi_10_3==1))||((i0.u...2574
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((i3.u20.P_fordo_12_2==1)||(i5.u18.P_fordo_12_1==1))||((i2.u15.P_fordo_12_4==...5880
(forward)formula 2,0,95.3501,1765068,1,0,2.68649e+06,11153,3082,9.27852e+06,551,63572,4759445
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: E(!(E(((EX((((((((i6.u31.y_3==1)&&(i6.u34.P_CS_21_4==1))||((i6.u31.y_3==1)&&(i3.u32.P_CS_21_2==1)))||(((i6.u31.y_3==1)&&(i6.u33.P_CS_21_3...9288
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(((EX((((((((i6.u31.y_3==1)&&(i6.u34.P_CS_21_4==1))||((i6.u31.y_3==1)&&(i3.u32.P_CS_21_2=...19875
(forward)formula 3,0,161.625,2212044,1,0,3.30033e+06,11713,1518,1.20827e+07,323,68816,1270042
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-4-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Total runtime 820633 ms.
BK_STOP 1748882137603
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-PT-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-4, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423100666"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-PT-4.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-PT-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;