Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423100658.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-3, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423100658
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 796K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 134K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 158K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748881109484

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-PT-3
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 16:18:30] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 16:18:30] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 70 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Transformed 100 places.
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Transformed 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Completing missing partition info from NUPN : creating a component with [P_start_1_0, P_start_1_1, P_start_1_2, P_start_1_3, P_b_0_false, P_b_0_true, P_b_1_false, P_b_1_true, P_b_2_false, P_b_2_true, P_b_3_false, P_b_3_true, P_setx_3_0, P_setx_3_1, P_setx_3_2, P_setx_3_3, P_setbi_5_0, P_setbi_5_1, P_setbi_5_2, P_setbi_5_3, P_ify0_4_0, P_ify0_4_1, P_ify0_4_2, P_ify0_4_3, P_sety_9_0, P_sety_9_1, P_sety_9_2, P_sety_9_3, P_ifxi_10_0, P_ifxi_10_1, P_ifxi_10_2, P_ifxi_10_3, P_setbi_11_0, P_setbi_11_1, P_setbi_11_2, P_setbi_11_3, P_fordo_12_0, P_fordo_12_1, P_fordo_12_2, P_fordo_12_3, P_wait_0_0, P_wait_0_1, P_wait_0_2, P_wait_0_3, P_wait_1_0, P_wait_1_1, P_wait_1_2, P_wait_1_3, P_wait_2_0, P_wait_2_1, P_wait_2_2, P_wait_2_3, P_wait_3_0, P_wait_3_1, P_wait_3_2, P_wait_3_3, P_await_13_0, P_await_13_1, P_await_13_2, P_await_13_3, P_done_0_0, P_done_0_1, P_done_0_2, P_done_0_3, P_done_1_0, P_done_1_1, P_done_1_2, P_done_1_3, P_done_2_0, P_done_2_1, P_done_2_2, P_done_2_3, P_done_3_0, P_done_3_1, P_done_3_2, P_done_3_3, P_ifyi_15_0, P_ifyi_15_1, P_ifyi_15_2, P_ifyi_15_3, P_awaity_0, P_awaity_1, P_awaity_2, P_awaity_3, P_CS_21_0, P_CS_21_1, P_CS_21_2, P_CS_21_3, P_setbi_24_0, P_setbi_24_1, P_setbi_24_2, P_setbi_24_3]
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 100 places and 156 transitions and 664 arcs in 176 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 42 transitions.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 71 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 114/114 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 114/114 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 360 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 111 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:18:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 17/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD1 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD31 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 12/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/167 variables, 71/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 27/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 167/167 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved in 6255 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 19/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 17/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 96/167 variables, 71/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 27/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 93/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 167/167 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved in 16033 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/111 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 22355ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 22375ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/71 places, 96/114 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 22766 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/114 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 71 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 16:18:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 39 to 36
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1504 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 5/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 566 ms. (70 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 129 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 191 ms. (208 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-06-02 16:18:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 16:18:54] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 27/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 44/71 variables, 13/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 44/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 5/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved in 486 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 45/67 variables, 12/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 45/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 5/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/151 variables, 67/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 24/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/155 variables, 4/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 4/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 4/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 0 unsolved in 495 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/5 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 995ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 5 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 16:18:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 11/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 7816 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 25/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 14/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 15132 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 22962ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22963ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23100 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12448987952479614623.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1463509755469467312.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12448987952479614623.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1463509755469467312.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.167427,10448,2,2322,5,22275,6,0,382,31698,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((EF(AG(((((((y_0==1)&&(P_CS_21_3==1))||((y_0==1)&&(P_CS_21_2==1)))||(((y_0==1)&&(P_CS_21_1==1))||((y_2==1)&&(P_CS_21_1==1))))||((((...1373
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((EX((((((((P_b_2_false==1)&&(P_wait_2_2==1))&&(P_await_13_2==1))||(((P_b_3_false==1)...1448
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,0.968442,40172,1,0,269,185031,214,104,2721,197366,215
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2941322261225760927.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7713646324621633753.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2941322261225760927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7713646324621633753.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.182373,11984,2,2851,5,26842,6,0,370,37221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AX(EG((((((((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_3==1))||((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1)))||(((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_2==1))||((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1))))||...645
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(!(EG((((((((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_3==1))||((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1)))||(((x_3==1)&&(P_s...701
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,1.11958,44792,1,0,302,207081,215,116,2521,212193,257
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17019789228915949005.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8660622160414832298.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17019789228915949005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8660622160414832298.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.184963,12000,2,2851,5,26842,6,0,370,37221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(EF(((((((P_b_3_false==0)||(P_setbi_24_3==0))&&((P_start_1_2==0)||(P_b_2_true==0)))&&(((P_start_1_2==0)||(P_b_2_false==0))&&((P_sta...1307
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((((((P_b_3_false==0)||(P_setbi_24_3==0))&&((P_start_1_2==0)||(P_b_2_...2657
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,1,1.06789,44148,1,0,262,195797,210,101,2486,198043,212
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:19:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 11/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 7815 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 25/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 14/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 15105 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 22936ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22936ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23070 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8593808295786701779.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability342275531923907444.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8593808295786701779.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability342275531923907444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.163855,10492,2,2322,5,22275,6,0,382,31698,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((((((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_3==1))||((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1)))||(((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_2==1))||((x_1==1)&&(P_setx_3_1==1))))||((((x_3==...2268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(E((!((E(!(((((y_0==1)&&(P_awaity_3==1))||((y_0==1)&&(P_awaity_2==1)))||((y_0==1)&&(P_awaity_1==1...5636
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,5.50848,182960,1,0,634,1.00865e+06,237,320,2812,1.10115e+06,622
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 68 transition count 93
Applied a total of 6 rules in 16 ms. Remains 68 /71 variables (removed 3) and now considering 93/96 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [44, 45, 46]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/71 places, 93/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 87 ms. Remains : 65/71 places, 93/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability708245948853382893.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3526232724208338420.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability708245948853382893.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3526232724208338420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17255,0.156701,10740,2,2420,5,21858,6,0,355,32461,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((AG(((((((y_3==0)||(P_ifyi_15_2==0))&&((y_3==0)||(P_ifyi_15_1==0)))&&(((y_2==0)||(P_ifyi_15_3==0))&&((y_1==0)||(P_ifyi_15_3==0))))&...1790
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((!(E(TRUE U !(((((((y_3==0)||(P_ifyi_15_2==0))&&((y_3==0)||(P_ifyi_15_1==0)))&&(((y_2==0)||(P_ifyi...1857
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,2.55285,95504,1,0,356,467602,221,148,2596,482017,350
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 11/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 7735 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 25/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 14/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 15183 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 22934ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22935ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23060 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2324955753483258051.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15933654819469502288.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2324955753483258051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15933654819469502288.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.163319,10616,2,2322,5,22275,6,0,382,31698,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((AF((((((y_2==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_2==1))||((y_3==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3==1)))||((y_1==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_1==1)))&&((((((y_3==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_2==1))||...3931
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!((((((P_await_13_1==1)&&(P_done_1_1==1))&&((P_done_1_2==1)&&(P_done_1_3==1)))||(((P_await_13...9322
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,6.68541,228060,1,0,747,1.29188e+06,252,355,2986,1.34566e+06,787
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:20:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:20:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:20:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 11/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 7951 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 68/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 25/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 14/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 3/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 322 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 15116 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 71/71 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 23079ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23080ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23211 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15518965911940728217.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6750133930998687288.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15518965911940728217.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6750133930998687288.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.155,10620,2,2322,5,22275,6,0,382,31698,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF((!(((((((P_b_3_false==1)&&(P_setbi_24_3==1))||((P_start_1_2==1)&&(P_b_2_true==1)))||(((P_start_1_2==1)&&(P_b_2_false==1))||((P_start...2240
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EX(!(!(((((((y_0==1)&&(P_CS_21_3==1))||((y_0==1)&&(P_CS_21_2==1)))||(((y_0==1)&&(P_CS_21_1...8004
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,7.1311,242544,1,0,648,1.44968e+06,232,329,2823,1.45564e+06,621
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 68 transition count 93
Applied a total of 6 rules in 14 ms. Remains 68 /71 variables (removed 3) and now considering 93/96 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [44, 45, 46]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 72 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/71 places, 93/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 65 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 62 transition count 90
Applied a total of 6 rules in 9 ms. Remains 62 /65 variables (removed 3) and now considering 90/93 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 62/71 places, 90/96 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 241 ms. Remains : 62/71 places, 90/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15856526154193608001.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18414145375623826721.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15856526154193608001.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18414145375623826721.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15512,0.158935,10312,2,2195,5,20710,6,0,340,29882,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((((y_0==0)||(P_ify0_4_2==0))&&((y_0==0)||(P_ify0_4_3==0)))&&((y_0==0)||(P_ify0_4_1==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((((y_0==0)||(P_ify0_4_2==0))&&((y_0==0)||(P_ify0_4_3==0)))&&((y_0==0)||(P_ify0_4_1==0))))...165
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/18/42
(forward)formula 0,0,1.12463,46776,1,0,11,184079,19,1,1837,211053,12
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 78 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5179514014024780005.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4351346357167267902.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5179514014024780005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4351346357167267902.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.180353,11936,2,2851,5,26842,6,0,370,37221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(FALSE))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,0.735497,31524,1,0,253,129964,204,96,2419,148469,195
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 69 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14125302575641068364.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9568216641096775835.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14125302575641068364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9568216641096775835.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.190623,12064,2,2851,5,26842,6,0,370,37221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AX(FALSE) U ((!(((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_2==1))) + EF(AG(((P_b_1_true==1)&&(P_setbi_11_1==1))))) + AX(FALSE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((!(((x_3==1)&&(P_setx_3_2==1))) + E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((P_b_1_true==1)&&(P_set...497
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,0.961518,41828,1,0,264,174924,219,103,2535,207101,215
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 75 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1690201058990033888.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6906492268204356430.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1690201058990033888.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6906492268204356430.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.186927,11944,2,2851,5,26842,6,0,370,37221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.223368,11944,1,0,6,26842,7,1,661,37221,1
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 68 transition count 93
Applied a total of 6 rules in 14 ms. Remains 68 /71 variables (removed 3) and now considering 93/96 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-02 16:20:57] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [44, 45, 46]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 70 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/71 places, 93/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 65 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 62 transition count 90
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 62 /65 variables (removed 3) and now considering 90/93 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 62/71 places, 90/96 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 262 ms. Remains : 62/71 places, 90/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5543097710033339170.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1552805734613532608.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5543097710033339170.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1552805734613532608.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15512,0.156893,10312,2,2195,5,20710,6,0,340,29882,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(EG(((x_3!=1)||(P_ifxi_10_1!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EG(((x_3!=1)||(P_ifxi_10_1!=1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,0.630951,28632,1,0,298,121140,203,114,2354,135774,256
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [47, 48]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 69 /69 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 69 ms. Remains : 69/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4848353617185629278.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 16:20:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4683855425958644845.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4848353617185629278.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4683855425958644845.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.179643,11592,2,2841,5,26141,6,0,374,35764,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((AF(((P_b_2_true==1)&&(P_setbi_5_2==1))) * EX((EF((P_fordo_12_1==1)) * EF(((x_2==1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1==1)))))) * ((P_await_13_3==1)&&(P_...208
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((P_done_3_2==1)&&(P_done_3_3==1))) * ((P_await_13_3==1)&&(P_done_3_1==1))) * !(...279
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,1,3.26114,114768,1,0,374,536284,222,156,2654,586883,364
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned [48]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 64 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 70 /70 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 66 ms. Remains : 70/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4997583681754485698.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability386734474062080475.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4997583681754485698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability386734474062080475.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.167676,10872,2,2507,5,23823,6,0,378,32739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AG((((P_await_13_1==0)||(P_done_1_1==0))||((P_done_1_2==0)||(P_done_1_3==0)))) * EF((((y_1==1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3==1))&&(((P_b_1_false==0...210
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * !((((P_await_13_1==0)||(P_done_1_1==0))||((P_done_1_2==0)||(P_done_1_3==0)))))]...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,1.84227,71920,1,0,317,348287,213,135,2638,341586,297
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-PT-3-CTLFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 16:21:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 16:21:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 153429 ms.

BK_STOP 1748881264302

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-PT-3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-PT-3, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423100658"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-PT-3.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-PT-3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;