Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423000620.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-5, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000620
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748873158359

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-COL-5
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
LTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 730 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 17 HL transitions for a total of 174 PT places and 396.0 transition bindings in 23 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 17 transitions 68 arcs in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Skeletonized 14 HLPN properties in 1 ms. Removed 2 properties that had guard overlaps.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 12 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 600 steps (0 resets) in 25 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 0/15 properties
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [pid(6), pid(6)] of place P_wait breaks symmetries in sort pid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :P_bool
Arc [3:1*[$i, 1]] contains constants of sort P_bool
Transition T_setbi_2 : constants on arcs in [[3:1*[$i, 1]]] introduces in P_bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 174 places and 318 transitions 1380 arcs in 29 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:06:00] [INFO ] Unfolded 14 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 58 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 19 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 200 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 387 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:06:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 172 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 19/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 6/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 200/337 variables, 137/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 55/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 6/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 7/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 1.0)
(s46 1.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 1.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 337/337 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 68/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/337 variables, 137/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 55/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 225/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 7/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 3/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 2/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 337/337 variables, and 566 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/255 constraints, Known Traps: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60168ms problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 30 dead transitions in 60180ms
Found 30 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 30 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 30 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/137 places, 230/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60593 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/260 transitions.
Support contains 132 out of 137 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
Support contains 107 out of 137 places (down from 132) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 19 to 17
RANDOM walk for 361 steps (0 resets) in 48 ms. (7 steps per ms) remains 0/17 properties
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 11 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 132 transition count 225
Applied a total of 10 rules in 26 ms. Remains 132 /137 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/230 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 143 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 145 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/137 places, 225/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 127 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 10 rules in 16 ms. Remains 122 /127 variables (removed 5) and now considering 220/225 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 290 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 477 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 168 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 492 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 282 steps with 0 reset with depth 283 and stack size 283 in 2 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-00 finished in 1199 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((p0 U X(!p0))))'
Support contains 11 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 132 transition count 225
Applied a total of 10 rules in 14 ms. Remains 132 /137 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/230 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 112 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/137 places, 225/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 127 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 10 rules in 11 ms. Remains 122 /127 variables (removed 5) and now considering 220/225 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 285 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 422 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 83 ms :[p0, true, p0]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 13 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-01 finished in 518 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&G(p1))))'
Support contains 26 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 108 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 116 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 122 ms :[true, (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-02
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-02 finished in 250 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(((!p0 U (G(!p0)||p1)) U (G((!p0 U (p1||G(!p0))))||(X(F((!p2&&X((!p2 U (X(!p2)||G(!p2)))))))&&(!p0 U (p1||G(!p0)))))))))'
Support contains 26 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 96 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 104 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 218 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 p2 (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1157 reset in 514 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 88606 steps with 1035 reset with depth 67 and stack size 67 in 509 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-03 finished in 1380 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 11 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 132 transition count 225
Applied a total of 10 rules in 17 ms. Remains 132 /137 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/230 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 135 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 136 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/137 places, 225/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 127 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 10 rules in 11 ms. Remains 122 /127 variables (removed 5) and now considering 220/225 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 273 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 437 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-04
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3226 reset in 294 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3235 reset in 304 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 66 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 27 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 103 steps (0 resets) in 8 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 84 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 31 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 73 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 98 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 16 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 12/11 trap constraints in 753 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 140/615/140 causal constraints (skipped 25 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Added : 102 causal constraints over 21 iterations in 320 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 11 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 122 /122 variables (removed 0) and now considering 220/220 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 288 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
Running 215 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 9/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 6/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 25980 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 60/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 40/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 215/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 3/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 523 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 129/129 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56067ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56375 ms. Remains : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 65 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 34 ms :[(NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 115 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 90 ms. Reduced automaton from 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 33 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:08:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:08:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:08:05] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:08:05] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:05] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 100 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 12/11 trap constraints in 732 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:06] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 140/615/140 causal constraints (skipped 25 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Added : 102 causal constraints over 21 iterations in 314 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 29 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3242 reset in 280 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3256 reset in 289 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin12963437330108341038
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Built C files in 55ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin12963437330108341038
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12963437330108341038;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 599 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin12963437330108341038;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin12963437330108341038;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10830686434759890015.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 11 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 122 /122 variables (removed 0) and now considering 220/220 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:08:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:08:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:08:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:08:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 10 ms returned []
Running 215 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:08:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:08:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 9/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 6/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 26293 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 60/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 40/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 215/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 3/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 525 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56337ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56339ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56637 ms. Remains : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin9613508100199672104
[2025-06-02 14:09:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:09:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:09:19] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:19] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:09:19] [INFO ] Built C files in 30ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin9613508100199672104
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9613508100199672104;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 445 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin9613508100199672104;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 29 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin9613508100199672104;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased14151370204483768003.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 14:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL16755070875760309593.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL4076552232277822916.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL16755070875760309593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut7037748733840162847.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL4076552232277822916.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL4076552232277822916.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut7037748733840162847.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL8263123433114704585.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL7968264790174923258.ltl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL8263123433114704585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL7968264790174923258.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F("(((((((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))||((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1)))||(((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1))||((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_5>=1))))||((((y_4...927
Formula 0 simplified : G!"(((((((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))||((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1)))||(((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1))||((y_4>=1)&&(P_CS_21_5>=1))))||((((y_4>...923
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:10:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9190745199530627455.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9190745199530627455.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9190745199530627455.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9190745199530627455.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9190745199530627455.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:10:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:10:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:10:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 253 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 59 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3284404711912878256.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL15223828088797297179.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3284404711912878256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL15223828088797297179.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F("(((((((i8.u24.y_4>=1)&&(i0.u23.P_CS_21_1>=1))||((i8.u24.y_4>=1)&&(i1.u21.P_CS_21_3>=1)))||(((i8.u24.y_4>=1)&&(i6.u20.P_CS_21_2>=...1347
Formula 0 simplified : G!"(((((((i8.u24.y_4>=1)&&(i0.u23.P_CS_21_1>=1))||((i8.u24.y_4>=1)&&(i1.u21.P_CS_21_3>=1)))||(((i8.u24.y_4>=1)&&(i6.u20.P_CS_21_2>=1...1343
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-04 finished in 194285 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((p0 U p1)||X(p2)))'
Support contains 26 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:10:20] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 116 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 135 ms :[true, (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-05
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-05 finished in 265 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)||X(F(p1))||(X(X(p2))&&F(p3))))'
Support contains 36 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 100 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 103 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 205 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 296 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 307 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p3 p1 (NOT p2)), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 12 factoid took 17 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-06 finished in 951 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||X(X(X(X(X(F(!p1)))))))))'
Support contains 15 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 113 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 129 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 213 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1307 reset in 190 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1320 reset in 209 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 73 ms. Reduced automaton from 6 states, 7 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 62 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 139 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (17 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X p0), (X (X p0))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 109 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 55 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 74 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Support contains 15 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:10:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 12/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 9/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 2/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/312 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 62/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 28/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 9/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 225/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 11/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 4/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 8/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60105ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60107ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60419 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 93 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
RANDOM walk for 133 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 0/3 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p0 p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p0 (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT p0))]
Knowledge based reduction with 7 factoid took 143 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 81 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p0) p1)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1284 reset in 194 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1266 reset in 196 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5780637923943515602
[2025-06-02 14:11:23] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:23] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:11:23] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:23] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:11:23] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:23] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:11:23] [INFO ] Built C files in 30ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5780637923943515602
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5780637923943515602;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 447 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5780637923943515602;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5780637923943515602;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1543622390089174644.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 15 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 200 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 301 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:11:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 12/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 9/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 2/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/312 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 62/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 28/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 9/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 225/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 11/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 4/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 8/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60059ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60383 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16828371128673279632
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Built C files in 18ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16828371128673279632
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16828371128673279632;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 442 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16828371128673279632;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 37 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16828371128673279632;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10739656563679187447.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 14:12:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL17030489238946039536.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL18219328766186511171.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL17030489238946039536.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut14684677954388534809.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL18219328766186511171.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...320
Loading property file /tmp/LTL18219328766186511171.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut14684677954388534809.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:13:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2725996791109165155.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL13979375008418080893.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2725996791109165155.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL13979375008418080893.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("(((((y_3<1)||(P_ifyi_15_3<1))&&((y_4<1)||(P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((y_1<1)||(P_ifyi_15_1<1))&&((y_2<1)||(P_ifyi_15_2<1))))&&((y_5<...307
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"(((((y_3<1)||(P_ifyi_15_3<1))&&((y_4<1)||(P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((y_1<1)||(P_ifyi_15_1<1))&&((y_2<1)||(P_ifyi_15_2<1))))&&((y_5<1)...289
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11059939918296783842.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11059939918296783842.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11059939918296783842.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11059939918296783842.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11059939918296783842.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 243 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 70 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL13283944202568834007.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL7414852365955056829.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL13283944202568834007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL7414852365955056829.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G((F("(((((i7.u44.y_3<1)||(i1.u39.P_ifyi_15_3<1))&&((i7.u44.y_4<1)||(i2.u40.P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((i7.u44.y_1<1)||(i6.u41.P_ifyi_15_1...407
Formula 0 simplified : F(G!"(((((i7.u44.y_3<1)||(i1.u39.P_ifyi_15_3<1))&&((i7.u44.y_4<1)||(i2.u40.P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((i7.u44.y_1<1)||(i6.u41.P_ifyi_15_1<1...389
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-07 finished in 198527 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((p0 U ((X(X(p1)) U (p2||G(p0))) U !p3)))'
Support contains 61 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:13:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:13:39] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:13:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23765 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53807ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53808ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54051 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 368 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8028 reset in 668 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 8047 reset in 682 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p3 (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X p3), (X (AND p3 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p3 p0))), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 133 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 21 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 363 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 313 steps (0 resets) in 14 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 0/11 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p3 (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p1)), (X p2), (X p3), (X (AND p3 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT (AND p3 p0))), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) p0))), (X (X p2)), (X (X p3)), (X (X (AND p3 (NOT p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p2) p0))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p3) (NOT p0)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F p1), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT p3)), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p3) p0))), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT (OR p2 p0))), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p0)))), (F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 22 factoid took 510 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 367 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 376 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:14:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 37 positive place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:14:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 98 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:14:37] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 37 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 112 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 50 Read/Feed constraints in 15 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 320 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 155/705/155 causal constraints (skipped 20 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Added : 112 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 389 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p3
Support contains 61 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 247 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:14:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23668 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53713ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53962 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p0) p3 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0)))), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 15 factoid took 100 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 377 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 233 steps (0 resets) in 15 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/11 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p0) p3 (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0)))), (X p2), (X p3), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X p2)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0))))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3 p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p0)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0)))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2 (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR p0 p2))), (F (NOT p3)), (F (NOT p2)), (F (NOT (OR p2 (NOT p3)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p2 (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 15 factoid took 466 ms. Reduced automaton from 9 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 9 states, 18 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 383 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 392 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 37 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 90 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 37 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 102 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 50 Read/Feed constraints in 15 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:15:35] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 316 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:35] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 155/705/155 causal constraints (skipped 20 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:15:35] [INFO ] Added : 112 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 402 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p3
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 351 ms :[p3, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), p3, (NOT p1), true, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 7996 reset in 434 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 49565 steps with 3953 reset with depth 32 and stack size 32 in 222 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-08 finished in 116780 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Support contains 15 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:15:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:15:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 106 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2818 reset in 204 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2837 reset in 214 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 87 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 86 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 154 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 91 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 70 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 113 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 105 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 12/11 trap constraints in 881 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 155/675/155 causal constraints (skipped 20 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Added : 135 causal constraints over 27 iterations in 451 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 15 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 132 transition count 225
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 127 transition count 225
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 20 rules in 12 ms. Remains 122 /132 variables (removed 10) and now considering 220/230 (removed 10) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 278 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 215 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:15:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 19/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 8/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 8/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 7/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 66/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 30/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 7/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 215/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 3/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 511 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/132 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60355 ms. Remains : 122/132 places, 220/230 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 79 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 72 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 101 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 109 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 78 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 99 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 12 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 12/11 trap constraints in 828 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 140/615/140 causal constraints (skipped 25 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:16:41] [INFO ] Added : 121 causal constraints over 25 iterations in 399 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 61 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3046 reset in 220 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3077 reset in 237 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin15884351876186111947
[2025-06-02 14:16:42] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:42] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:16:42] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:42] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:16:42] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:42] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:16:42] [INFO ] Built C files in 23ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin15884351876186111947
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15884351876186111947;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 435 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin15884351876186111947;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin15884351876186111947;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased10869222016117328691.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 15 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 122 /122 variables (removed 0) and now considering 220/220 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 178 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 215 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:16:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 19/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 8/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 8/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 7/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 66/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 30/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 7/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 215/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 3/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 511 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60073ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60369 ms. Remains : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin5126087149329521970
[2025-06-02 14:17:58] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:17:58] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:17:58] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:17:58] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:17:58] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:17:58] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 2 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:17:58] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin5126087149329521970
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5126087149329521970;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 447 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin5126087149329521970;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 37 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin5126087149329521970;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased1984535759546630073.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 14:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL17721024650993310546.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL1925181221643064075.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL17721024650993310546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut3152204386777472672.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL1925181221643064075.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...318
Loading property file /tmp/LTL1925181221643064075.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut3152204386777472672.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:18:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3392724804933817445.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL17714197037551949600.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3392724804933817445.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL17714197037551949600.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(F("((((((P_b_8>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((P_b_9>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_6>=1)&&(P_setbi...382
Formula 0 simplified : XG!"((((((P_b_8>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((P_b_9>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_6>=1)&&(P_setbi_2...376
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12314323412981034289.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12314323412981034289.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12314323412981034289.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12314323412981034289.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12314323412981034289.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 266 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 66 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14546878698539319950.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL5886563858179476542.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14546878698539319950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL5886563858179476542.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(F("((((((i3.u4.P_b_8>=1)&&(i9.u23.P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((i0.u1.P_b_3>=1)&&(i0.u21.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i3.u4.P_b_9>=1)&&(i9.u23.P...512
Formula 0 simplified : XG!"((((((i3.u4.P_b_8>=1)&&(i9.u23.P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((i0.u1.P_b_3>=1)&&(i0.u21.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i3.u4.P_b_9>=1)&&(i9.u23.P_s...506
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-09 finished in 201796 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)&&F(G(p1)))))'
Support contains 45 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 201 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 288 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:18:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23320 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53367ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53368ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53669 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 111 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p0), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-10
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 369 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 248 steps with 1 reset with depth 233 and stack size 233 in 1 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-10 finished in 54172 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 6 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 132 transition count 225
Applied a total of 10 rules in 11 ms. Remains 132 /137 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/230 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 124 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/137 places, 225/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 127 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 10 rules in 6 ms. Remains 122 /127 variables (removed 5) and now considering 220/225 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:19:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 195 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 451 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 66 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2850 reset in 191 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 9206 steps with 261 reset with depth 47 and stack size 47 in 18 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-11 finished in 743 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(F((p1&&F(p2))))||p0) U X((G(!p2) U X(!p3)))))'
Support contains 37 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:19:53] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 92 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 459 ms :[p3, (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3)), p3, (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2) p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3)), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-12
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2801 reset in 310 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2823 reset in 326 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p3))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 19 factoid took 138 ms. Reduced automaton from 11 states, 24 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 410 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND p1 (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3) (AND p0 (NOT p1) p3)), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 14 to 12
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 542 ms. (73 steps per ms) remains 1/12 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 497 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-02 14:19:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:19:55] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem apf3 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 37/312 variables, and 0 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 17 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 0/32 constraints, State Equation: 0/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 26ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Found 1 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) p3))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p3))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (G (OR p1 p2 (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p3))), (F p1), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT p3)), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 20 factoid took 621 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 20 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 19 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 411 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3 p1) (AND p2 p3 (NOT p1))), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 416 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3 p1) (AND p2 p3 (NOT p1))), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
[2025-06-02 14:19:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 88 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 97 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 9 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 8/7 trap constraints in 514 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:57] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 155/675/155 causal constraints (skipped 20 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Added : 54 causal constraints over 11 iterations in 179 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p3
Support contains 37 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:19:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 12/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 9/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 2/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/312 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 62/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 28/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 9/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 225/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 11/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 4/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 8/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 312/312 variables, and 539 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60055ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60285 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p3))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 139 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 19 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 19 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 396 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3 p1) (AND p2 p3 (NOT p1))), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 13 to 12
RANDOM walk for 69 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/12 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3 (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X p3)), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2 p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) p3)))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) p3))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (AND (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)))), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2))), (F (NOT (AND p3 (NOT p0)))), (F p1), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p3))), (F p2), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3)))), (F (NOT p3)), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p1 (NOT p2))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 560 ms. Reduced automaton from 10 states, 19 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 10 states, 19 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 397 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3 p1) (AND p2 p3 (NOT p1))), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 418 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3 p1) (AND p2 p3 (NOT p1))), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 82 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 92 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 9 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 8/7 trap constraints in 491 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 155/675/155 causal constraints (skipped 20 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:21:01] [INFO ] Added : 54 causal constraints over 11 iterations in 185 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG p3
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 423 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3 p1) (AND p2 p3 (NOT p1))), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2855 reset in 299 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 2836 reset in 316 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, false, false, true, true, true, false, true, true, true]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 443 ms :[p3, p3, (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3 p1) (AND p2 p3 (NOT p1))), (AND p2 (NOT p1) p3), (OR (AND (NOT p2) p3) (AND (NOT p1) p3)), (AND (NOT p2) p3), p3, (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (NOT p2)]
Support contains 37 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 132 transition count 230
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Applied a total of 5 rules in 12 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:21:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:21:03] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 16/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 3/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/312 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved in 16987 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 43/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/132 variables, 25/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 21/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 220/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 8/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 11/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 312/312 variables, and 507 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 220/225 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 47027ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 220 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 5 dead transitions in 47028ms
Found 5 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 5 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 5 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/132 places, 225/230 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 606 edges and 132 vertex of which 127 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 6 ms. Remains 127 /132 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/225 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 127/132 places, 225/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 47051 ms. Remains : 127/132 places, 225/230 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin14283457611274326111
[2025-06-02 14:21:50] [INFO ] Built C files in 3ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin14283457611274326111
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14283457611274326111;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 377 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin14283457611274326111;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 37 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin14283457611274326111;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5518257410649473012.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 37 out of 132 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:22:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 12/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 9/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 2/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
(s67 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 1.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 (/ 1.0 4.0))
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 (/ 3.0 4.0))
(s40 0.0)
(s41 1.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0timeout
)
( org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/312 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 312/312 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 132/132 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 62/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/132 variables, 25/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 28/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 9/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/312 variables, 132/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 25/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 225/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 11/524 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 4/528 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 8/536 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 1/537 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60076ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60323 ms. Remains : 132/132 places, 230/230 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin4191225645028323801
[2025-06-02 14:23:05] [INFO ] Built C files in 6ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin4191225645028323801
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4191225645028323801;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 369 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin4191225645028323801;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 28 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin4191225645028323801;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased684002091856487187.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 14:23:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3619146042387206971.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL703141757514422293.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3619146042387206971.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut17111660806109943278.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL703141757514422293.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...317
Loading property file /tmp/LTL703141757514422293.prop.
Loaded 4 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut17111660806109943278.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:23:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL12664146231851237028.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL14101865351163810788.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL12664146231851237028.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL14101865351163810788.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((((((X(F(("((((((P_b_11>=1)&&(P_setbi_11_5>=1))||((P_b_2>=1)&&(P_setbi_11_1>=1)))||(((P_b_4>=1)&&(P_setbi_11_2>=1))||((P_b_9>=1)&&(...3388
Formula 0 simplified : (!"((((P_b_7>=1)&&(P_setbi_11_3>=1))||((P_b_6>=1)&&(P_setbi_11_3>=1)))||((P_b_5>=1)&&(P_setbi_11_2>=1)))" & !"((((P_b_9>=1)&&(P_setb...3360
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18265917764210982532.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18265917764210982532.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18265917764210982532.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18265917764210982532.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18265917764210982532.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL3518482821467202375.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL962935844861548035.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL3518482821467202375.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL962935844861548035.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...253
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !(((((((X(F(("((((((i3.u4.P_b_11>=1)&&(u11.P_setbi_11_5>=1))||((i0.u0.P_b_2>=1)&&(u12.P_setbi_11_1>=1)))||(((i6.u1.P_b_4>=1)&&(i8.u10....4624
Formula 0 simplified : (!"((((i1.u2.P_b_7>=1)&&(i1.u13.P_setbi_11_3>=1))||((i1.u2.P_b_6>=1)&&(i1.u13.P_setbi_11_3>=1)))||((i6.u1.P_b_5>=1)&&(i8.u10.P_setbi...4596
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-12 finished in 252757 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G((X(X(X(X(X(G(p1))))))||p0))))'
Support contains 10 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:24:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:24:06] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 109 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 114 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 216 ms :[true, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-15
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 6 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-15 finished in 357 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((F(p0)||X(X(X(X(X(F(!p1)))))))))'
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(F(p0)))'
Found a Shortening insensitive property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-09
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Support contains 15 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 132 transition count 225
Applied a total of 10 rules in 10 ms. Remains 132 /137 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/230 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:24:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:24:06] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 107 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 115 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/137 places, 225/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 127 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 10 rules in 13 ms. Remains 122 /127 variables (removed 5) and now considering 220/225 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:24:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 415 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Running random walk in product with property : LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-09
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3061 reset in 210 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3080 reset in 227 ms.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 71 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 2 edges and 1 AP (stutter sensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 56 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 132 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 76 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 76 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 78 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 98 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 11/10 trap constraints in 783 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 140/615/140 causal constraints (skipped 25 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Added : 130 causal constraints over 26 iterations in 374 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Support contains 15 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 122 /122 variables (removed 0) and now considering 220/220 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:24:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 268 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 215 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:24:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:24:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:24:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 9/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 6/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 26242 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 60/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 40/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 215/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 3/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 525 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56281ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56282ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56568 ms. Remains : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 75 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 79 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
RANDOM walk for 108 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(NOT p0), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F p0)]
Knowledge based reduction with 3 factoid took 112 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 3 edges and 1 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 53 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
[2025-06-02 14:25:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:25:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:25:06] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:25:06] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 32 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 90 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 25 Read/Feed constraints in 8 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 11/10 trap constraints in 727 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 140/615/140 causal constraints (skipped 25 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Added : 130 causal constraints over 26 iterations in 373 ms. Result :sat
Could not prove EG (NOT p0)
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 67 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3053 reset in 216 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 3069 reset in 229 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2967226808367050110
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:25:08] [INFO ] Built C files in 21ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2967226808367050110
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2967226808367050110;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 433 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2967226808367050110;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 35 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2967226808367050110;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased12690131081113408672.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 15 out of 122 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 122 /122 variables (removed 0) and now considering 220/220 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:25:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:25:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 215 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:25:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 9/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 6/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 279 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 25607 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 60/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/122 variables, 25/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 40/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 4/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 170/292 variables, 122/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 25/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 215/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/508 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 3/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/521 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/523 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 525 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55648ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 215 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55649ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55944 ms. Remains : 122/122 places, 220/220 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin294313213569456185
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:26:19] [INFO ] Built C files in 14ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin294313213569456185
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin294313213569456185;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 448 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin294313213569456185;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 36 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin294313213569456185;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5104946867551223521.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 14:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL9878022411304966143.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL11818685004061296951.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL9878022411304966143.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut18277156979054023535.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL11818685004061296951.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...319
Loading property file /tmp/LTL11818685004061296951.prop.
Loaded 1 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut18277156979054023535.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:26:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2529438799872057771.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:26:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL10517558559516006133.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2529438799872057771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL10517558559516006133.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(F("((((((P_b_8>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((P_b_9>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_6>=1)&&(P_setbi...382
Formula 0 simplified : XG!"((((((P_b_8>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((P_b_9>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((P_b_6>=1)&&(P_setbi_2...376
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4631079243158684790.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4631079243158684790.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4631079243158684790.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4631079243158684790.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4631079243158684790.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 266 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 66 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL1914803974229186854.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:27:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL6121795190209295770.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL1914803974229186854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL6121795190209295770.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...254
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((X(F("((((((i1.u4.P_b_8>=1)&&(i1.u22.P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((i3.u1.P_b_3>=1)&&(i0.u23.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i1.u4.P_b_9>=1)&&(i1.u22.P...512
Formula 0 simplified : XG!"((((((i1.u4.P_b_8>=1)&&(i1.u22.P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((i3.u1.P_b_3>=1)&&(i0.u23.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i1.u4.P_b_9>=1)&&(i1.u22.P_s...506
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-09 finished in 193514 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((X(F((p1&&F(p2))))||p0) U X((G(!p2) U X(!p3)))))'
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 0 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Built C files in 26ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '180' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18195956160270794562.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18195956160270794562.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18195956160270794562.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18195956160270794562.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18195956160270794562.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 268 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability2202871153886023284.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability1164742747685145741.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability2202871153886023284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability1164742747685145741.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...276
Read 4 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((F("(((((((i6.u45.y_4>=1)&&(i6.u45.P_CS_21_1>=1))||((i6.u45.y_4>=1)&&(i6.u48.P_CS_21_3>=1)))||(((i6.u45.y_4>=1)&&(i5.i1.u47.P_CS_21_...1383
Formula 0 simplified : G!"(((((((i6.u45.y_4>=1)&&(i6.u45.P_CS_21_1>=1))||((i6.u45.y_4>=1)&&(i6.u48.P_CS_21_3>=1)))||(((i6.u45.y_4>=1)&&(i5.i1.u47.P_CS_21_2...1379
Compilation finished in 575 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 34 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '<>((LTLAPp0==true))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t76, t86, t88, t115, t117, t118, t119, t155...813
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>225 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '<>((LTLAPp0==true))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((<>((LTLAPp1==true))||X(X(X(X(X(<>(!(LTLAPp2==true)))))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
1 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
0 transitions explored
1 items max in DFS search stack
17522 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,175.265,2205740,1,0,3.84882e+06,3978,1323,8.28006e+06,264,23851,403904
no accepting run found
Formula 0 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 1 : !((G((F("(((((i6.u45.y_3<1)||(i3.u41.P_ifyi_15_3<1))&&((i6.u45.y_4<1)||(i4.u43.P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((i6.u45.y_1<1)||(i2.u42.P_ifyi_15_1...422
Formula 1 simplified : F(G!"(((((i6.u45.y_3<1)||(i3.u41.P_ifyi_15_3<1))&&((i6.u45.y_4<1)||(i4.u43.P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((i6.u45.y_1<1)||(i2.u42.P_ifyi_15_1<1...400
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>225 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '[]((<>((LTLAPp1==true))||X(X(X(X(X(<>(!(LTLAPp2==true)))))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(<>((LTLAPp3==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
12 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
18 transitions explored
12 items max in DFS search stack
6962 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,244.892,2392076,1,0,4.20193e+06,3978,2077,1.01443e+07,324,23851,8723771
no accepting run found
Formula 1 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 2 : !((X(F("((((((i4.u3.P_b_8>=1)&&(i6.u46.P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((i2.u0.P_b_3>=1)&&(i6.u45.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i4.u3.P_b_9>=1)&&(i6.u46.P...536
Formula 2 simplified : XG!"((((((i4.u3.P_b_8>=1)&&(i6.u46.P_setbi_24_4>=1))||((i2.u0.P_b_3>=1)&&(i6.u45.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i4.u3.P_b_9>=1)&&(i6.u46.P_s...530
WARNING : LTSmin timed out (>225 s) on command cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(<>((LTLAPp3==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' '((X(<>(((LTLAPp5==true)&&<>((LTLAPp6==true)))))||(LTLAPp4==true)) U X(([](!(LTLAPp6==true)) U X(!(LTLAPp7==true)))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 109427 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Retrying LTSmin with larger timeout 7200 s
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin16749941049054149469;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--ltl' 'X(<>((LTLAPp3==true)))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
2 unique states visited
0 strongly connected components in search stack
1 transitions explored
2 items max in DFS search stack
17557 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,420.464,4517060,1,0,7.68017e+06,3978,1311,1.65167e+07,245,23851,3568749
no accepting run found
Formula 2 is TRUE no accepting run found.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-LTLFireability-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Checking formula 3 : !(((("(((((i0.i0.u4.P_b_11>=1)&&(u13.P_setbi_11_5>=1))||((i2.u0.P_b_2>=1)&&(i6.u10.P_setbi_11_1>=1)))||(((i5.i1.u1.P_b_4>=1)&&(i5.i0.u...4766
Formula 3 simplified : (!"(((((i0.i0.u4.P_b_11>=1)&&(u13.P_setbi_11_5>=1))||((i2.u0.P_b_2>=1)&&(i6.u10.P_setbi_11_1>=1)))||(((i5.i1.u1.P_b_4>=1)&&(i5.i0.u1...4742
6 unique states visited
6 strongly connected components in search stack
6 transitions explored
6 items max in DFS search stack
1276 ticks for the emptiness check
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
STATS,0,433.223,4517316,1,0,7.68017e+06,3978,2070,1.65167e+07,299,23851,5155296
an accepting run exists (use option '-e' to print it)
Formula 3 is FALSE accepting run found.
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2275362 ms.

BK_STOP 1748875435203

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-COL-5"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-5, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000620"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-COL-5.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-COL-5 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;