About the Execution of ITS-Tools for LamportFastMutEx-COL-5
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | TTTTTFFT???????? | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423000618.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-5, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000618
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748872836734
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-COL-5
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 701 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 17 HL transitions for a total of 174 PT places and 396.0 transition bindings in 20 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 18 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 17 transitions 68 arcs in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Skeletonized 6 HLPN properties in 1 ms. Removed 10 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 6 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 11 to 10
RANDOM walk for 986 steps (0 resets) in 32 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 0/10 properties
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [pid(6), pid(6)] of place P_wait breaks symmetries in sort pid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :P_bool
Arc [3:1*[$i, 1]] contains constants of sort P_bool
Transition T_setbi_2 : constants on arcs in [[3:1*[$i, 1]]] introduces in P_bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 174 places and 318 transitions 1380 arcs in 27 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 58 transitions.
Support contains 137 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 231 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 180 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 455 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 168 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 152 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 108 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 90 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 100 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 479 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 150 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 136 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 168 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 140 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 19/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 6/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 200/337 variables, 137/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 55/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 6/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 7/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 337/337 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 68/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/337 variables, 137/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 55/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 225/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 7/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 3/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 2/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 337/337 variables, and 566 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/255 constraints, Known Traps: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60191ms problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 30 dead transitions in 60209ms
Found 30 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 30 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 30 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/137 places, 230/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60693 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/260 transitions.
Support contains 137 out of 137 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 44 to 36
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1385 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 2/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 387 ms. (103 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 15 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 96/127 variables, 31/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 180/307 variables, 127/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 50/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 10/317 variables, 10/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 111 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 107/127 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 180/307 variables, 127/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 50/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 10/317 variables, 10/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 251 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 2263 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2409ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 122 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 130 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16820322093632983235.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8891575076968608335.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16820322093632983235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8891575076968608335.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17051273892562813119.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17051273892562813119.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17051273892562813119.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17051273892562813119.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17051273892562813119.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 73 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3533252392232262156.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1418050496972138580.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3533252392232262156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1418050496972138580.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 192 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 299 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 9 ms returned []
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23304 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53378ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53379ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53709 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3766341040516551199.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5335061709845114043.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3766341040516551199.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5335061709845114043.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2186683063210201389.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2186683063210201389.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2186683063210201389.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2186683063210201389.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2186683063210201389.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 268 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5223925636104050541.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14357744252988951771.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5223925636104050541.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14357744252988951771.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 132 transition count 225
Applied a total of 10 rules in 27 ms. Remains 132 /137 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/230 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 125 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/137 places, 225/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 127 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 10 rules in 15 ms. Remains 122 /127 variables (removed 5) and now considering 220/225 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 88 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:04:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 267 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 435 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15156868094356927803.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7968929425644710456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15156868094356927803.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7968929425644710456.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8938019526744232589.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8938019526744232589.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8938019526744232589.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8938019526744232589.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8938019526744232589.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 266 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 59 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10901361879266917101.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7597448252351169421.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10901361879266917101.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7597448252351169421.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13721201265012090987.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12468754081303827909.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13721201265012090987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12468754081303827909.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12856337646533356522.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12856337646533356522.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12856337646533356522.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12856337646533356522.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12856337646533356522.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 73 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6735525038098338246.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability569027857433797897.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6735525038098338246.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability569027857433797897.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5289700454427348190.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8635604658265326875.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5289700454427348190.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8635604658265326875.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5787989190031062912.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5787989190031062912.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5787989190031062912.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5787989190031062912.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5787989190031062912.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5826860622152237664.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability580651065706630781.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5826860622152237664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability580651065706630781.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 154 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 22941 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 52991ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52993ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53151 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7021643918809295848.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13876659563957786086.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7021643918809295848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13876659563957786086.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14227661607781010090.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14227661607781010090.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14227661607781010090.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14227661607781010090.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14227661607781010090.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 268 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12601211268443762090.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1820911645699234934.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12601211268443762090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1820911645699234934.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 99 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14720060347704697793.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1728036751685342174.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14720060347704697793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1728036751685342174.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2985130759925731868.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2985130759925731868.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2985130759925731868.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2985130759925731868.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2985130759925731868.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7476660813645433223.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability637489713260083012.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7476660813645433223.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability637489713260083012.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:10:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 260 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:10:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 22496 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 52551ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52552ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52817 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16451576888171861959.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11695098360619098652.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16451576888171861959.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11695098360619098652.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7202719622440964635.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7202719622440964635.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7202719622440964635.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7202719622440964635.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7202719622440964635.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 268 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 77 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16544565119339878317.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16961385072791214653.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16544565119339878317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16961385072791214653.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:12:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:12:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:12:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:12:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:12:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53086ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53087ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53253 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:13:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:13:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10085062119534399657.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11593900875644625198.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10085062119534399657.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11593900875644625198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16880677085074420048.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16880677085074420048.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16880677085074420048.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16880677085074420048.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16880677085074420048.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 263 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9115944341769631272.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:13:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3063501962172149861.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9115944341769631272.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3063501962172149861.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 127 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 130 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15745073683886473617.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2184588350370938727.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15745073683886473617.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2184588350370938727.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph223064384343840729.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph223064384343840729.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph223064384343840729.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph223064384343840729.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph223064384343840729.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability926195823049595405.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:14:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13385350215782536891.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability926195823049595405.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13385350215782536891.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:15:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23180 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53226ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53227ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53403 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1139267718663960518.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9771685587483830837.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1139267718663960518.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9771685587483830837.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph200365493979076692.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph200365493979076692.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph200365493979076692.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph200365493979076692.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph200365493979076692.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 263 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 63 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4297327430616611902.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:16:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14636370330308671907.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4297327430616611902.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14636370330308671907.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 106 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11725435858703204322.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3752645382112802985.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11725435858703204322.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3752645382112802985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8936043950767207719.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8936043950767207719.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8936043950767207719.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8936043950767207719.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8936043950767207719.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 73 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7839931872118924310.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:17:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10924573995604067302.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7839931872118924310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10924573995604067302.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:18:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:18:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:18:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:18:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:18:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:18:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:18:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:18:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23514 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53579ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53580ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53855 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability233503747122453224.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13598270378516297711.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability233503747122453224.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13598270378516297711.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6124049587600428631.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6124049587600428631.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6124049587600428631.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6124049587600428631.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6124049587600428631.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 268 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14401033534228926442.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:19:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12666403876559271718.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14401033534228926442.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12666403876559271718.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:20:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:20:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 121 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 127 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9893332651428352407.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14192801968367653051.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9893332651428352407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14192801968367653051.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2817380135349726898.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2817380135349726898.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2817380135349726898.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2817380135349726898.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2817380135349726898.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 248 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12636520592334074399.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:20:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11600963408644234608.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12636520592334074399.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11600963408644234608.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 265 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:21:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 22491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 52551ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52552ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52820 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7834159952212900077.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10312213963445503868.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7834159952212900077.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10312213963445503868.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3429067986888846568.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3429067986888846568.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3429067986888846568.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3429067986888846568.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3429067986888846568.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 268 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5777221093318726173.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:22:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7929395241045252631.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5777221093318726173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7929395241045252631.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 132 transition count 225
Applied a total of 10 rules in 17 ms. Remains 132 /137 variables (removed 5) and now considering 225/230 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 175 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 175 rows 132 cols
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned [82, 83, 84, 85, 86]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 107 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/137 places, 225/230 transitions.
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 127 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 122 transition count 220
Applied a total of 10 rules in 10 ms. Remains 122 /127 variables (removed 5) and now considering 220/225 (removed 5) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 170 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 287 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 421 ms. Remains : 122/137 places, 220/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9254570238144302429.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability474286151249975921.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9254570238144302429.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability474286151249975921.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15794191311027761966.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15794191311027761966.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15794191311027761966.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15794191311027761966.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15794191311027761966.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 266 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 59 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6677363987268280391.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:23:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16012648893071860233.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6677363987268280391.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16012648893071860233.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13361449766859171717.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13361449766859171717.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13361449766859171717.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13361449766859171717.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13361449766859171717.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 268 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 75 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5306979751304634963.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:24:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4788244690017167083.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5306979751304634963.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4788244690017167083.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.30682e+08,295.384,2960676,19528,170,1.74761e+06,1708,535,3.178e+07,101,14042,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((EG((AF(((((((i6.u3.P_b_9<1)||(i0.u8.P_setbi_5_4<1))&&((i7.i0.u1.P_b_5<1)||(i0.u5.P_setbi_5_2<1)))&&(((i8.u4.P_b_10<1)||(i0.u9.P_set...1762
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(Init) * !(EG((!(EG(!(((((((i6.u3.P_b_9<1)||(i0.u8.P_setbi_5_4<1))&&((i7.i0.u1.P_b_5<1)||(i0.u5.P_setbi_5...2816
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t60, t61, t62, t63, t64, t77, t78, t79, t88, t115, t116, t117, t118,...804
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 331 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16091999130532518760.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:35:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17487309888345207429.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16091999130532518760.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17487309888345207429.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.30682e+08,20.4854,522236,35904,320,935182,1321,442,1.33448e+06,85,19928,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((EG((AF(((((((pidP_bool9.P_b_9<1)||(pid4.P_setbi_5_4<1))&&((pidP_bool5.P_b_5<1)||(pid2.P_setbi_5_2<1)))&&(((pidP_bool10.P_b_10<1)||(...1848
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(Init) * !(EG((!(EG(!(((((((pidP_bool9.P_b_9<1)||(pid4.P_setbi_5_4<1))&&((pidP_bool5.P_b_5<1)||(pid2.P_se...2974
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t2...925
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
(forward)formula 0,1,512.09,3911056,1,0,9.06121e+06,9662,6325,1.00948e+07,259,88901,11282230
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: !(E((EF(!(EF((((((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid5.P_ify0_4_5>=1))||((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid4.P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid3.P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((...2404
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid5.P_ify0_4_5>=1))||((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid4.P_ify0_4_4>=1))...2470
(forward)formula 1,1,597.604,4403984,1,0,9.60976e+06,9662,6721,1.16293e+07,264,88901,4281472
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: AG(EF(((((((pidP_bool8.P_b_8<1)||(pid4.P_setbi_24_4<1))&&((pidP_bool3.P_b_3<1)||(pid1.P_setbi_24_1<1)))&&(((pidP_bool9.P_b_9<1)||(pid4.P_...516
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((((((pidP_bool8.P_b_8<1)||(pid4.P_setbi_24_4<1))&&((pidP_bool3.P_b_3<1)||(pid1.P...576
(forward)formula 2,1,606.226,4403984,1,0,9.60976e+06,9662,6774,1.16293e+07,266,88901,6840321
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E((EG(!(AG(((((((((pid2.x_2>=1)&&(pid4.P_ifxi_10_4>=1))||((pid2.x_2>=1)&&(pid5.P_ifxi_10_5>=1)))||(((pid1.x_1>=1)&&(pid2.P_ifxi_10_2>=1))...6646
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((((((pid2.x_2>=1)&&(pid4.P_ifxi_10_4>=1))||((pid2.x_2>=1)&&(pid5.P_ifxi_10_5>=...6722
(forward)formula 3,1,670.603,4403984,1,0,9.60976e+06,9662,7612,1.16293e+07,278,105632,20797159
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (EX((EX((((((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid5.P_ify0_4_5>=1))||((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid4.P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid3.P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((pid0....3829
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((((FwdU(FwdU((Init * EX((EX((((((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid5.P_ify0_4_5>=1))||((pid0.y_0>=1)&&(pid4.P_ify0_4_4>...6723
(forward)formula 4,1,686.658,4489616,1,0,9.60976e+06,9662,7691,1.16509e+07,280,109385,24290211
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(((EG(E(((((((pid3.y_3>=1)&&(pid3.P_ifyi_15_3>=1))||((pid4.y_4>=1)&&(pid4.P_ifyi_15_4>=1)))||(((pid1.y_1>=1)&&(pid1.P_ifyi_15_1>=1))||((...8804
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((EG(E(((((((pid3.y_3>=1)&&(pid3.P_ifyi_15_3>=1))||((pid4.y_4>=1)&&(pid4.P_ifyi_15_4>=1)))||(((pid1....8880
(forward)formula 5,0,766.249,5073684,1,0,1.06564e+07,9662,6180,1.31016e+07,248,118895,8623504
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: AG((EX((EX(((((((pidP_bool9.P_b_9<1)||(pid4.P_setbi_5_4<1))&&((pidP_bool5.P_b_5<1)||(pid2.P_setbi_5_2<1)))&&(((pidP_bool10.P_b_10<1)||(pi...3085
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((((((((pid5.y_5>=1)&&(pid5.P_ify0_4_5>=1))||((pid4.y_4>=1)&&(pid5....5231
(forward)formula 6,0,940.053,5594900,1,0,1.20022e+07,9662,6224,1.3644e+07,249,118895,9172627
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: (EF(AX(((((((((pid5.P_await_13_5>=1)&&(pidpid31.P_done_31>=1))&&((pidpid32.P_done_32>=1)&&(pidpid33.P_done_33>=1)))&&((pidpid34.P_done_34...2557
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((((((((pid5.P_await_13_5>=1)&&(pidpid31.P_done_31>=1))&&((pidpid32.P_done_32>=1...2623
(forward)formula 7,1,1132.61,7821076,1,0,1.71862e+07,9662,6038,1.95958e+07,246,137366,1685130
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (!(E(EG(!(((((AF(((((((pidP_bool11.P_b_11>=1)&&(pid5.P_setbi_11_5>=1))||((pidP_bool2.P_b_2>=1)&&(pid1.P_setbi_11_1>=1)))||(((pidP_bool4.P...13968
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-COL-5"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-5, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000618"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-COL-5.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-COL-5 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;