Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423000617.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-5, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000617
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 528K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748872803352

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-COL-5
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLCardinality COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 14:00:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 14:00:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 14:00:04] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 665 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 17 HL transitions for a total of 174 PT places and 396.0 transition bindings in 21 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 19 ms.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 17 transitions 68 arcs in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Skeletonized 15 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 15 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 951 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 48/81 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 51 ms. (76 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 61 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 64 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 106 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 74 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 52 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 48/48 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 15 cols
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 16 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp35 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp49 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp51 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp58 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp59 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp63 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp64 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp65 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp66 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp69 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp70 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp71 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp73 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp75 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp80 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 15/32 variables, and 2 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 0 unsolved in 176 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/15 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 242ms problems are : Problem set: 48 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 48 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 4 formulas.
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Domain [pid(6), pid(6)] of place P_wait breaks symmetries in sort pid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :P_bool
Arc [3:1*[$i, 1]] contains constants of sort P_bool
Transition T_setbi_2 : constants on arcs in [[3:1*[$i, 1]]] introduces in P_bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 174 places and 318 transitions 1380 arcs in 24 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Unfolded 8 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 58 transitions.
Support contains 115 out of 137 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 260/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 260/260 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:00:06] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 105 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 291 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 200 transitions (discarded 60 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:00:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 55 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 37/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD8 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD9 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 231 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 19/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 6/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 200/337 variables, 137/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 55/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 6/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 7/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/337 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 337/337 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 68/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/337 variables, 137/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 55/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 225/554 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 7/561 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 3/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 2/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 337/337 variables, and 566 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/255 constraints, Known Traps: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60139ms problems are : Problem set: 30 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 30 dead transitions in 60143ms
Found 30 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 30 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 30 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/137 places, 230/260 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60462 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/260 transitions.
Support contains 115 out of 137 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 944 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 35/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 34/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Computed 37 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp36 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp43 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp52 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 180/295 variables, 115/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 50/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 22/317 variables, 22/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 7/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved in 144 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 110/115 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 180/295 variables, 115/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 50/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 22/317 variables, 22/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 7/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 33 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp51 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 235 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 34 solved, 0 unsolved in 860 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/34 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1034ms problems are : Problem set: 34 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 34 atomic propositions for a total of 8 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
Support contains 110 out of 137 places (down from 115) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 5 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 98 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 105 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14190036778982875772.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15441738807970802537.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14190036778982875772.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15441738807970802537.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18395103904016843623.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18395103904016843623.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18395103904016843623.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18395103904016843623.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18395103904016843623.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 193 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1537343399814748597.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4732681368633330619.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1537343399814748597.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4732681368633330619.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:02:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:02:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:02:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:02:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 324 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:02:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:02:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23831 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 130 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53909ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53915ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54245 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15498778994655134274.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1769264002857943202.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15498778994655134274.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1769264002857943202.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12047883538381566511.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12047883538381566511.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12047883538381566511.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12047883538381566511.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12047883538381566511.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 190 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 108 labels/synchronizations in 29 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9008049981203223588.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:03:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2890907588950638173.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9008049981203223588.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2890907588950638173.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 139 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 150 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7153797134574431751.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9117885383743124959.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7153797134574431751.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9117885383743124959.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:04:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3862272961607235747.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3862272961607235747.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3862272961607235747.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3862272961607235747.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3862272961607235747.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:04:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:04:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:04:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 124 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:04:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:04:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12726382417414766711.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:04:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4647413648750896424.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12726382417414766711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4647413648750896424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 286 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:05:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 23812 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 53887ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53888ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54224 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8853775102183743153.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:05:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6413938381387314828.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8853775102183743153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6413938381387314828.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17991538083833082448.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17991538083833082448.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17991538083833082448.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17991538083833082448.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17991538083833082448.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 183 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8326097327402048848.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14129515257962176759.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8326097327402048848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14129515257962176759.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:06:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:06:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:06:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:06:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:06:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:07:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 309 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:07:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:07:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 24082 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 54131ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54133ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54467 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2633602062165004311.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1298296038291579379.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2633602062165004311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1298296038291579379.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4194426454771921777.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4194426454771921777.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4194426454771921777.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4194426454771921777.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4194426454771921777.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 233 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 252 labels/synchronizations in 28 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2767938030358363607.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1203785752767049447.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2767938030358363607.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1203785752767049447.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 216 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 339 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:08:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 89 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 300 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 24455 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 48/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/137 variables, 30/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 28/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 180/317 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 50/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 225/527 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/531 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/532 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/533 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 5/538 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 538 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 37/37 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 54535ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54536ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54879 ms. Remains : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3829079580759146048.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16151627180950548153.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3829079580759146048.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16151627180950548153.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13054801605676014952.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13054801605676014952.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13054801605676014952.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13054801605676014952.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13054801605676014952.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 218 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 269 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11778272632677631889.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5290271994485097764.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11778272632677631889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5290271994485097764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 186 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 202 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5644171891978490237.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:10:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5169110165407694417.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5644171891978490237.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5169110165407694417.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5653036745622069196.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5653036745622069196.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5653036745622069196.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5653036745622069196.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5653036745622069196.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 225 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3358857074136286635.gal : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17622599021103654896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3358857074136286635.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17622599021103654896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 137/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 137 /137 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 180 transitions (discarded 50 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned [87, 88, 89, 90, 91]
Discarding 5 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 121 ms to find 5 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 132 /132 variables (removed 0) and now considering 230/230 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 125 ms. Remains : 132/137 places, 230/230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 230 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13894983089007257253.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:11:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7054633819412224944.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13894983089007257253.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7054633819412224944.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17759006702143958182.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17759006702143958182.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17759006702143958182.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17759006702143958182.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17759006702143958182.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 241 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 262 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13914842263189399776.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16835171745611389458.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13914842263189399776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16835171745611389458.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1147060050405931477.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1147060050405931477.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1147060050405931477.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1147060050405931477.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1147060050405931477.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 354 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 60 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1752669900123476120.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:12:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1571451401841533855.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1752669900123476120.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1571451401841533855.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.30682e+08,87.2003,2019148,2,393131,5,5.41738e+06,6,0,776,9.60836e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((((((((gi5.gu13.P_done_7+gi5.gu13.P_done_8)+(gi5.gu13.P_done_9+gi5.gu13.P_done_10))+((gi5.gu13.P_done_11+gi5.gu13.P_done_13)+(gi5.g...763
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (((((((gi5.gu13.P_done_7+gi5.gu13.P_done_8)+(gi5.gu13.P_done_9+gi5.gu13.P_done_10))+((gi...815
(forward)formula 0,1,175.71,2298892,1,0,9,5.72834e+06,9,1,1506,1.00389e+07,2
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-5-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((AX(FALSE) + EG(!(E(((((((gi4.gu11.P_wait_7+gi4.gu11.P_wait_8)+(gi4.gu11.P_wait_9+gi4.gu11.P_wait_10))+((gi4.gu11.P_wait_11+gi4.gu11.P...917
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + EG(!(E(((((((gi4.gu11.P_wait_7+gi4.gu11.P_wait_8)+(gi4.gu11.P_wait_9+gi4.gu11.P_...968
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gi5.gu7.t5, gi5.gu7.t6, gi5.gu7.t7, gi5.gu7.t8, gi5.gu7.t9, gi5.gu7.t10, gi5.gu7.t11, gi5.gu7...921
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 331 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9442844292754349149.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:37:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2235707545416123892.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9442844292754349149.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2235707545416123892.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.30682e+08,91.1655,1900136,2,277269,5,5.84217e+06,6,0,800,8.56708e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(FALSE) + EG(!(E(((((((gpidpid7.P_wait_7+gpidpid8.P_wait_8)+(gpidpid9.P_wait_9+gpidpid10.P_wait_10))+((gpidpid11.P_wait_11+gpidpid1...894
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + EG(!(E(((((((gpidpid7.P_wait_7+gpidpid8.P_wait_8)+(gpidpid9.P_wait_9+gpidpid10.P...945
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gpid1.t6, gpid1.t180, gpid2.t13, gpid2.t181, gpid3.t20, gpid3.t182, gpid4.t27, gpid4.t183, gp...935
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-COL-5"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-5, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000617"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-COL-5.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-COL-5 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;