Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423000610.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-4, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000610
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748871854754

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-COL-4
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 932 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 17 HL transitions for a total of 135 PT places and 285.0 transition bindings in 20 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 17 transitions 68 arcs in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Skeletonized 6 HLPN properties in 2 ms. Removed 10 properties that had guard overlaps.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 6 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 542 steps (0 resets) in 28 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 0/6 properties
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [pid(5), pid(5)] of place P_wait breaks symmetries in sort pid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :P_bool
Arc [3:1*[$i, 1]] contains constants of sort P_bool
Transition T_setbi_2 : constants on arcs in [[3:1*[$i, 1]]] introduces in P_bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 135 places and 230 transitions 990 arcs in 25 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Unfolded 16 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 50 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 180/180 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 180/180 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 344 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 176 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 5/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 144/246 variables, 102/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 40/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved in 10938 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 35/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 22/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 144/246 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 40/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 152/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 399 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/176 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 41040ms problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 41049ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/102 places, 156/180 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 41414 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/180 transitions.
Support contains 102 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 42 to 38
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1316 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 3/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 665 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (8 resets) in 117 ms. (338 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 191 ms. (208 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-02 13:45:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:45:00] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Excessive predecessor constraint size, skipping predecessor.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 56/102 variables, 24/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 256 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 81/94 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/94 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 128/222 variables, 94/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 36/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/230 variables, 8/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 562ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 85 ms.
Support contains 13 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 98 transition count 152
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 4 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 98 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 94 transition count 148
Applied a total of 16 rules in 31 ms. Remains 94 /102 variables (removed 8) and now considering 148/156 (removed 8) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 31 ms. Remains : 94/102 places, 148/156 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 288 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1580085 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=526 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1580085 steps, saw 358842 distinct states, run finished after 3014 ms. (steps per millisecond=524 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 13:45:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-02 13:45:03] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 73/86 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/206 variables, 86/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 36/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 8/214 variables, 8/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 4/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 214/214 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 229 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 73/86 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/206 variables, 86/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 36/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/214 variables, 8/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 4/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/214 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 214/214 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 325 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 94/94 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 567ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 45 ms.
Support contains 13 out of 94 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 148/148 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 94 /94 variables (removed 0) and now considering 148/148 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 94/94 places, 148/148 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 94/94 places, 148/148 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 94 /94 variables (removed 0) and now considering 148/148 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [62, 63, 64, 65]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 111 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 90/94 places, 148/148 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 148/148 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 121 ms. Remains : 90/94 places, 148/148 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 181 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1739099 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=579 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1739099 steps, saw 387301 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=579 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 13:45:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-02 13:45:07] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 69/82 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/202 variables, 82/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 8/210 variables, 8/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 4/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 168 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 69/82 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/202 variables, 82/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 8/210 variables, 8/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 4/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 146 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 328ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 75 ms.
Support contains 13 out of 90 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 148/148 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 148/148 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 148/148 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 90/90 places, 148/148 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 90 /90 variables (removed 0) and now considering 148/148 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 144 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:45:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/90 variables, 16/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 20/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 20/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 10/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 4/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 5/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 120/210 variables, 90/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 20/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 210/210 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 9330 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 40/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/90 variables, 16/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 22/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/210 variables, 90/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 20/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 144/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 4/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 3/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/210 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 210/210 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved in 26299 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 22/22 constraints, State Equation: 90/90 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 144/144 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 35647ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 144 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35649ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 35855 ms. Remains : 90/90 places, 148/148 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Ensure Unique test removed 28 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 28 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 90 transition count 120
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 90 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 12 places
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 62 transition count 104
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -12
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 58 transition count 116
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 58 transition count 116
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 58 transition count 116
Applied a total of 88 rules in 24 ms. Remains 58 /90 variables (removed 32) and now considering 116/148 (removed 32) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] After 75ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] After 36ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 88 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] After 156ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] After 196ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 314 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:45:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 10125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40171ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40173ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40327 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15748739019266183754.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6856760627002999263.ctl : 21 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15748739019266183754.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6856760627002999263.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.17542,159340,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((((AF((((((P_b_8>=1)&&(P_setbi_5_4>=1))||((P_b_4>=1)&&(P_setbi_5_2>=1)))||(((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_setbi_5_1>=1))||((P_b_9>=1)&&(P_setbi_5_...7626
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((((!(EG(!((((((P_b_8>=1)&&(P_setbi_5_4>=1))||((P_b_4>=1)&&(P_setbi_5_2>=1)))||(((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_s...8855
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 76/0/80
(forward)formula 0,0,5.89559,159340,1,0,8,465594,15,1,1146,660897,4
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:46:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 10113 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40151ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40152ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40316 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4245291131634810470.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17287954596915189961.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4245291131634810470.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17287954596915189961.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.23413,159376,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((((((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||(((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_4>=1))||((y_4>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1))))||((((y_...7016
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,((!((((((((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||(((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_4>=1...7101
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12187833604856915993.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12187833604856915993.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12187833604856915993.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12187833604856915993.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12187833604856915993.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 161 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5303794093606509649.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8746848425845460100.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5303794093606509649.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8746848425845460100.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,8.57267,242004,3368,90,318416,913,379,1.51635e+06,86,6085,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((((((i7.u32.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((i7.u32.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||(((i7.u32.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_4>=1))...9748
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,((!((((((((i7.u32.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((i7.u32.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||...9833
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t52, t56, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...616
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:48:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 10401 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40431ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40432ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40614 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5961646696349145785.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14342185963941265342.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5961646696349145785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14342185963941265342.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.38339,159404,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((!(E(!((((((((y_1>=1)&&(P_sety_9_1>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_sety_9_2>=1)))||(((y_1>=1)&&(P_sety_9_3>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_sety_9_4>=1))))||(...6236
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(!((((((((y_1>=1)&&(P_sety_9_1>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_sety_9_2>=1)))||(((y_1>=1)&&(P_sety_9_3>=1)...6764
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph92180043808406260.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph92180043808406260.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph92180043808406260.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph92180043808406260.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph92180043808406260.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 170 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17569873834664589239.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability855296633743738685.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17569873834664589239.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability855296633743738685.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.6304,123308,5901,176,159779,318,390,573046,76,1853,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((!(E(!((((((((i0.u0.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u0.P_sety_9_1>=1))||((i0.u0.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u12.P_sety_9_2>=1)))||(((i0.u0.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u0.P_sety_9_3>=...8750
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(!((((((((i0.u0.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u0.P_sety_9_1>=1))||((i0.u0.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u12.P_sety_9_2>=1)))||((...9418
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t48, t57, t77, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108, t10...579
(forward)formula 0,1,22.5997,568720,1,0,791012,2463,2450,2.95669e+06,378,13965,1936541
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 77 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2522378006041195976.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9523236975451481268.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2522378006041195976.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9523236975451481268.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.23238,152304,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AG(EX((((((((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||(((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_4>=1))||((y_4>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1))))||(...1927
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(((((((!((((((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||(((y_1>=1)&&...4283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph94461694689317091.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph94461694689317091.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph94461694689317091.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph94461694689317091.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph94461694689317091.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 153 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17215885734234539137.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability433794857051182261.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17215885734234539137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability433794857051182261.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,12.486,321480,4101,86,325074,1124,418,2.59243e+06,78,8506,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(AG(EX((((((((i6.u35.y_1>=1)&&(i1.u6.P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((i6.u35.y_1>=1)&&(i1.u4.P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||(((i6.u35.y_1>=1)&&(i1.u7.P_ify0_4_4...2677
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(((((((!((((((i6.u35.y_1>=1)&&(i1.u6.P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((i6.u35.y_1>=1)&&(i1.u4.P_if...5929
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t50, t59, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108...618
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
(forward)formula 0,0,17.8752,321480,1,0,371480,1711,2220,2.59243e+06,380,8902,708170
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 71 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13859146320417841084.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14038697946660926020.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13859146320417841084.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14038697946660926020.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.89567,152968,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(((((x_1>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((x_2>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((x_3>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((x_4>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_4>=1))))) + !((A...1828
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((P_fordo_12_2>=1)||(P_fordo_12_1>=1))||((P_fordo_12_4>=1)||(P_fordo_12_3>=1)...4228
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8183984439069410964.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8183984439069410964.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8183984439069410964.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8183984439069410964.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8183984439069410964.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 153 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability291316306077229258.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8316750000962081444.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability291316306077229258.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8316750000962081444.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,14.2121,334776,4773,126,416042,1467,403,2.28859e+06,78,11263,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(((((i4.u6.x_1>=1)&&(u8.P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((i4.u7.x_2>=1)&&(u9.P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((i4.u4.x_3>=1)&&(i7.u10.P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((i4.u5...2504
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((i1.u14.P_fordo_12_2>=1)||(i0.u22.P_fordo_12_1>=1))||((i3.u19.P_fordo_12_4>=...5752
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t51, t53, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...616
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:51:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:51:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:51:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:51:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:51:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:51:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 10018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40044ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40180 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:52:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:52:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10319434043530383254.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15523881527074254453.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10319434043530383254.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15523881527074254453.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.22317,159392,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(E(((EX((((((((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_4>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))))||((((y...6177
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(((EX((((((((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_4>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_...13021
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1952421508733563879.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1952421508733563879.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1952421508733563879.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1952421508733563879.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1952421508733563879.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 161 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3888289292107761497.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability21217009455405775.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3888289292107761497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability21217009455405775.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,7.95991,220740,3388,92,293651,815,439,1.38556e+06,82,5569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(E(((EX((((((((i5.u35.y_3>=1)&&(i5.u35.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i5.u35.y_3>=1)&&(i5.u33.P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((i5.u35.y_3>=1)&&(i0.i0.u34.P_CS_2...8891
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(((EX((((((((i5.u35.y_3>=1)&&(i5.u35.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i5.u35.y_3>=1)&&(i5.u33.P_CS_21_2>...18625
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t49, t58, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...621
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 98 transition count 152
Applied a total of 8 rules in 14 ms. Remains 98 /102 variables (removed 4) and now considering 152/156 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [62, 63, 64, 65]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 94 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 90 transition count 148
Applied a total of 8 rules in 7 ms. Remains 90 /94 variables (removed 4) and now considering 148/152 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/102 places, 148/156 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 273 ms. Remains : 90/102 places, 148/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3592655861198278470.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11913619675830460756.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3592655861198278470.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11913619675830460756.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4985e+06,6.65588,189300,2,44347,5,579797,6,0,510,733397,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((x_0>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1))||((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_3>=1)))||(((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_4>=1))||((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1))))||((((x_...642
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((x_0>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1))||((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_3>=1)))||(((x_1>=1)&&(P_se...702
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...660
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16588892981560992274.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16588892981560992274.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16588892981560992274.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16588892981560992274.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16588892981560992274.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 149 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4347758655052988203.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11703271140101630479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4347758655052988203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11703271140101630479.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4985e+06,5.91913,158184,2616,323,210163,2387,365,892164,102,22464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((((((((i2.u4.x_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.P_setx_3_1>=1))||((i2.u4.x_1>=1)&&(i2.u7.P_setx_3_3>=1)))||(((i2.u4.x_1>=1)&&(i2.u5.P_setx_3_4>=1))||(...882
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((((((i2.u4.x_0>=1)&&(i2.u4.P_setx_3_1>=1))||((i2.u4.x_1>=1)&&(i2.u7.P_setx_3_3>...942
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t55, t63, t100, t105, t115, t122, t124, t125, t126, t...659
(forward)formula 0,1,9.42001,158184,1,0,210163,10815,1534,892164,552,67473,363001
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 68 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17948820385805747956.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability273584227588682681.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17948820385805747956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability273584227588682681.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.8419,152160,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EX(AG(((((y_2<1)||(P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((y_4<1)||(P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((y_1<1)||(P_ifyi_15_1<1))&&((y_3<1)||(P_ifyi_15_3<1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((((y_2<1)||(P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((y_4<1)||(P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((y_1<1)||...219
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1984572556044101195.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1984572556044101195.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1984572556044101195.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1984572556044101195.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1984572556044101195.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 149 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7026293975986127708.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10471957860522371094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7026293975986127708.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10471957860522371094.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,11.6928,284868,4365,236,309856,2560,411,2.12789e+06,97,23374,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EX(AG(((((i7.u31.y_2<1)||(i6.u29.P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((i7.u31.y_4<1)||(i2.u30.P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((i7.u31.y_1<1)||(i0.u27.P_ifyi_15_1<...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((((i7.u31.y_2<1)||(i6.u29.P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((i7.u31.y_4<1)||(i2.u30.P...275
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t52, t60, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...656
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 61 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17362732317848805035.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:54:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7057919340207267564.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17362732317848805035.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7057919340207267564.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.04928,152220,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((((((AF(EX((((((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1))||((P_b_2>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((P_b_4>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_2>=1))||((P_b_6>=1)&&(P_se...2821
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * (((((!(EG(!(EX((((((P_b_3>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1))||((P_b_2>=1)&&(P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((P_b_4>=1)...6468
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17667617754903035221.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17667617754903035221.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17667617754903035221.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17667617754903035221.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17667617754903035221.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 149 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4801965217665216652.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8170553560985299981.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4801965217665216652.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8170553560985299981.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,13.2641,318120,4638,313,382933,2053,411,2.27178e+06,90,24032,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((((((AF(EX((((((i0.u0.P_b_3>=1)&&(i0.u31.P_setbi_24_1>=1))||((i0.u0.P_b_2>=1)&&(i0.u31.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i1.u1.P_b_4>=1)&&(i1.u3...3945
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * (((((!(EG(!(EX((((((i0.u0.P_b_3>=1)&&(i0.u31.P_setbi_24_1>=1))||((i0.u0.P_b_2>=1)&&(i0.u31.P_setb...8992
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t51, t55, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...655
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 70 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 73 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13933041190675759915.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:55:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12261148706081285868.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13933041190675759915.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12261148706081285868.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.95366,152584,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(EF(((((((y_2>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_1>=1))||((y_2>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_4>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3>=1))))||...538
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((((((y_2>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_1>=1))||((y_2>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&...602
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11949039219855015098.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11949039219855015098.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11949039219855015098.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11949039219855015098.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11949039219855015098.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 162 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11233861006108230321.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14911181685554180019.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11233861006108230321.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14911181685554180019.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,14.7425,349248,4146,112,375150,1220,400,2.61975e+06,73,9361,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(EF(((((((i5.u8.y_2>=1)&&(i0.u29.P_ifyi_15_1>=1))||((i5.u8.y_2>=1)&&(i2.u31.P_ifyi_15_3>=1)))||(((i5.u8.y_0>=1)&&(i3.u32.P_ifyi_15_4...746
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((((((i5.u8.y_2>=1)&&(i0.u29.P_ifyi_15_1>=1))||((i5.u8.y_2>=1)&&(i2.u31.P_if...810
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t53, t60, t76, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108...576
(forward)formula 0,1,29.7398,475936,1,0,534711,2663,1673,3.64735e+06,300,12486,988904
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 98 transition count 152
Applied a total of 8 rules in 6 ms. Remains 98 /102 variables (removed 4) and now considering 152/156 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned [62, 63, 64, 65]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 94 transition count 148
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 90 transition count 148
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 90 /94 variables (removed 4) and now considering 148/152 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 90 cols
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:56:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 121 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 90/102 places, 148/156 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 90/102 places, 148/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 148 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17478699017263319393.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:56:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14439426496770072991.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17478699017263319393.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14439426496770072991.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4985e+06,6.64342,190344,2,44347,5,579797,6,0,510,733397,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((((x_1>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((x_2>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((x_3>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((x_4>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_4>=1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((((x_1>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((x_2>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((x_3>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_3>...202
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 96/58/52
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1337183892010984275.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1337183892010984275.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1337183892010984275.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1337183892010984275.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1337183892010984275.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 149 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 40 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17326797303331398878.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3300919231374017935.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17326797303331398878.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3300919231374017935.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4985e+06,12.3809,285432,2873,415,283901,3362,364,2.23514e+06,102,34716,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((((i2.u4.x_1>=1)&&(u8.P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((i2.u5.x_2>=1)&&(i7.u9.P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((i2.u6.x_3>=1)&&(i7.u17.P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((i...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((((i2.u4.x_1>=1)&&(u8.P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((i2.u5.x_2>=1)&&(i7.u9.P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((i...246
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 98 transition count 152
Applied a total of 8 rules in 15 ms. Remains 98 /102 variables (removed 4) and now considering 152/156 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned [62, 63, 64, 65]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 94 /94 variables (removed 0) and now considering 152/152 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 101 ms. Remains : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 161 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8562876821139862229.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10743944458968462769.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8562876821139862229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10743944458968462769.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 65 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 68 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16343305109702747610.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:57:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6463020012514320322.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16343305109702747610.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6463020012514320322.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,6.34558,152748,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(AF((((((((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_4>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))))||((((y_...2331
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(!((((((((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_4>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_3>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1))...4343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9256663520230451492.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9256663520230451492.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9256663520230451492.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9256663520230451492.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9256663520230451492.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 162 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12605024997029211676.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1870407990731037817.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12605024997029211676.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1870407990731037817.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,10.4382,186752,4593,172,268141,685,403,838666,73,5440,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(AF((((((((i4.u0.y_3>=1)&&(i1.u36.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i4.u0.y_3>=1)&&(i4.u34.P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((i4.u0.y_3>=1)&&(i6.u35.P_CS_21_3>=1)...3227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(!((((((((i4.u0.y_3>=1)&&(i1.u36.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i4.u0.y_3>=1)&&(i4.u34.P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(...5911
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t59, t61, t76, t77, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108...576
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:58:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 9886 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 39919ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39919ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40113 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6459464338664710916.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:59:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16323075786708186768.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6459464338664710916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16323075786708186768.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.35265,159460,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((y_0>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_1>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1)))) * (A(((((((y...2589
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((y_0>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_1>=1))||((y_0>=...4127
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15854617014520634899.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15854617014520634899.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15854617014520634899.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15854617014520634899.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15854617014520634899.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 170 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15403968192027283880.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17772065528212030795.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15403968192027283880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17772065528212030795.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.07633,107144,5935,180,153781,425,432,391804,77,3071,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((i1.u8.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((i1.u8.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((i1.u8.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_1>=1))||((i1.u...3724
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((i1.u8.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((i1.u8.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((i1.u8.y_0>...5908
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t52, t63, t76, t78, t104, t105, t106, t107, t108, t10...583
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:00:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:00:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:00:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 9700 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 39740ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39740ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39939 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11732927878351689032.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13324129831903092573.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11732927878351689032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13324129831903092573.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.24946,159400,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(AF(((((((P_await_13_2<1)||(P_done_11<1))||((P_done_12<1)||(P_done_13<1)))||(P_done_14<1))&&((((P_await_13_3<1)||(P_done_16<1))||((P...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(EG(!(((((((P_await_13_2<1)||(P_done_11<1))||((P_done_12<1)||(P_done_13<1)))||(P_done_...434
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,0,25.2466,638148,1,0,493,2.83041e+06,331,191,3965,3.23988e+06,419
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 14:01:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 9806 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 39838ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39839ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40019 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10758583063255237474.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15624119103665240250.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10758583063255237474.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15624119103665240250.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.29601,159592,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(AG(EF(((((((P_await_13_2<1)||(P_done_11<1))||((P_done_12<1)||(P_done_13<1)))||(P_done_14<1))&&((((P_await_13_3<1)||(P_done_16<1))||...378
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((((((P_await_13_2<1)||(P_done_11<1))||((P_done_12<1)||(P_done_13<1)))||(P...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,1,22.2461,552584,1,0,412,2.21354e+06,335,156,4034,2.78545e+06,327
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9874865263201585559.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9874865263201585559.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9874865263201585559.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9874865263201585559.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9874865263201585559.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 161 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 46 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7539286928078502410.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 14:02:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8338574505210463855.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7539286928078502410.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8338574505210463855.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,7.64922,210548,3338,90,280780,916,384,1.31111e+06,82,6927,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((((((((i6.u34.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((i6.u34.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||(((i6.u34.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_4>=1))...9748
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((((((FwdU(Init,((!((((((((i6.u34.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u6.P_ify0_4_2>=1))||((i6.u34.y_1>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_3>=1)))||...9833
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t52, t63, t76, t77, t78, t79, t104, t105, t106, t107,...615
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
(forward)formula 0,1,33.5698,733500,1,0,1.281e+06,2057,2578,2.90454e+06,418,10371,2068716
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A((!(((((i0.u4.x_1>=1)&&(i6.u8.P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((i0.u6.x_2>=1)&&(u9.P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((i0.u7.x_3>=1)&&(i6.u10.P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((i0...2504
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (((i2.u15.P_fordo_12_2>=1)||(i1.u12.P_fordo_12_1>=1))||((i4.u26.P_fordo_12_4>=...5752
(forward)formula 1,0,51.1178,1128012,1,0,1.91723e+06,2198,2749,4.53725e+06,418,10949,3262079
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!(E(((EX((((((((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i4.u35.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i2.u33.P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i6.u34.P_CS_21_3...8645
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,!(E(((EX((((((((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i4.u35.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i2.u33.P_CS_21_2>...18109
(forward)formula 2,0,87.8871,1947916,1,0,3.17422e+06,2281,2826,8.00709e+06,423,11417,5065545
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(AG(EX(AG(((((i6.u34.y_2<1)||(i2.u31.P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((i6.u34.y_4<1)||(i4.u29.P_ifyi_15_4<1)))&&(((i6.u34.y_1<1)||(i1.u30.P_ifyi_15_1<...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((((i6.u34.y_2<1)||(i2.u31.P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((i6.u34.y_4<1)||(i4.u29.P...275
(forward)formula 3,0,96.9675,2147920,1,0,3.42914e+06,2796,3097,9.24239e+06,432,16553,5640205
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(((((((AF(EX((((((i1.u0.P_b_3>=1)&&(i6.u32.P_setbi_24_1>=1))||((i1.u0.P_b_2>=1)&&(i6.u32.P_setbi_24_1>=1)))||(((i2.u1.P_b_4>=1)&&(i2.u3...3945
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * (((((!(EG(!(EX((((((i1.u0.P_b_3>=1)&&(i6.u32.P_setbi_24_1>=1))||((i1.u0.P_b_2>=1)&&(i6.u32.P_setb...8992
(forward)formula 4,1,122.69,2201936,1,0,3.52225e+06,2797,1319,9.37802e+06,235,16556,1064908
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(AF(((((i0.u4.x_1>=1)&&(i6.u8.P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((i0.u6.x_2>=1)&&(u9.P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((i0.u7.x_3>=1)&&(i6.u10.P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((i...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((((i0.u4.x_1>=1)&&(i6.u8.P_ifxi_10_1>=1))||((i0.u6.x_2>=1)&&(u9.P_ifxi_10_2>=1)))||(((i...246
(forward)formula 5,0,135.371,2201936,1,0,3.52225e+06,2797,1431,9.37802e+06,239,16556,2007793
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX((EG(AF((((((((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i4.u35.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i2.u33.P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i6.u34.P_CS_21_3>...3243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(EG(!((((((((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i4.u35.P_CS_21_4>=1))||((i6.u34.y_3>=1)&&(i2.u33.P_CS_21_2>=1)))|...5903
(forward)formula 6,1,151.461,2201936,1,0,3.52225e+06,2797,1771,9.37802e+06,272,16556,3120563
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((((((i6.u34.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((i6.u34.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((i6.u34.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u4.P_ify0_4_1>=1))||((i...3705
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((i6.u34.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u7.P_ify0_4_3>=1))||((i6.u34.y_0>=1)&&(i0.u5.P_ify0_4_4>=1)))||(((i6.u34.y...5907
(forward)formula 7,0,181.437,2201936,1,0,3.52225e+06,2797,2099,9.37802e+06,292,16556,4798327
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1289901 ms.

BK_STOP 1748873146023

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-COL-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-4, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000610"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-COL-4.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-COL-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;