Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423000609.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-4, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000609
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.6K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748871849112

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-COL-4
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLCardinality COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 13:44:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 13:44:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 13:44:10] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-02 13:44:10] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-02 13:44:11] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 641 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:11] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 17 HL transitions for a total of 135 PT places and 285.0 transition bindings in 22 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 17 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:44:11] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 17 transitions 68 arcs in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:44:11] [INFO ] Skeletonized 16 HLPN properties in 2 ms.
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 16 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 40005 steps (8 resets) in 838 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 32/50 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 17 rows 15 cols
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Computed 2 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp19 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp23 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp30 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 15/32 variables, and 2 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 32 solved, 0 unsolved in 269 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, State Equation: 0/15 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 335ms problems are : Problem set: 32 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 32 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 6 formulas.
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [pid(5), pid(5)] of place P_wait breaks symmetries in sort pid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :P_bool
Arc [3:1*[$i, 1]] contains constants of sort P_bool
Transition T_setbi_2 : constants on arcs in [[3:1*[$i, 1]]] introduces in P_bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 135 places and 230 transitions 990 arcs in 20 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Unfolded 9 HLPN properties in 0 ms.
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 50 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 102 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 180/180 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 180/180 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 256 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 176 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 36 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:44:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 176 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD6 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD7 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD33 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD38 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 5/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 144/246 variables, 102/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 40/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved in 10318 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 35/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 22/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 144/246 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 40/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 152/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 398 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/176 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40388ms problems are : Problem set: 24 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 24 dead transitions in 40392ms
Found 24 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 24 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 24 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/102 places, 156/180 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 40669 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/180 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 102 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1671 ms. (23 steps per ms) remains 18/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp4 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp7 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp11 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp13 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp18 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 84/230 variables, and 20 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 0 unsolved in 98 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 20/26 constraints, State Equation: 0/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 120ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 18 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 4 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 75 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 79 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3400008343843987725.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:44:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10503057069948143601.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3400008343843987725.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10503057069948143601.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.85629,152288,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((((((P_sety_9_1+P_sety_9_2)+(P_sety_9_3+P_sety_9_4))<=((P_awaity_1+P_awaity_2)+(P_awaity_3+P_awaity_4))) + EG(AX((((((P_wait_6+P_wa...510
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((((P_sety_9_1+P_sety_9_2)+(P_sety_9_3+P_sety_9_4))<=((P_awaity_1+P_awaity_2)+(P_awaity...583
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5010408220013090520.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5010408220013090520.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5010408220013090520.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5010408220013090520.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5010408220013090520.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 124 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 74 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 63 labels/synchronizations in 20 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4427143657223527312.gal : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11876300234365791743.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4427143657223527312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11876300234365791743.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,8.33682,230868,2,65000,5,836911,6,0,563,1.07585e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 109 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 110 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 98 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 94 transition count 152
Applied a total of 8 rules in 16 ms. Remains 94 /98 variables (removed 4) and now considering 152/156 (removed 4) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 94 cols
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 368 ms. Remains : 94/102 places, 152/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 152 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11676261462648627186.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:45:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11865274083339787204.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11676261462648627186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11865274083339787204.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72378e+06,8.86543,246752,2,65984,5,871577,6,0,530,980059,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((P_CS_21_1+P_CS_21_2)+(P_CS_21_3+P_CS_21_4))>((P_setbi_5_1+P_setbi_5_2)+(P_setbi_5_3+P_setbi_5_4)))&&(((P_start_1_1+P_start_1_2)+(...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((P_CS_21_1+P_CS_21_2)+(P_CS_21_3+P_CS_21_4))>((P_setbi_5_1+P_setbi_5_2)+(P_setbi_5_3+P_setbi_5_...298
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 84/0/68
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11452082296885663847.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11452082296885663847.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11452082296885663847.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11452082296885663847.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11452082296885663847.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 166 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 62 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17777205414982649173.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9740564331499977524.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17777205414982649173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9740564331499977524.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72378e+06,5.78302,181728,2,50709,5,620444,6,0,536,791792,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((gu10.P_CS_21_1+gu10.P_CS_21_2)+(gu10.P_CS_21_3+gu10.P_CS_21_4))>((gu10.P_setbi_5_1+gu10.P_setbi_5_2)+(gu10.P_setbi_5_3+gu10.P_set...329
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((gu10.P_CS_21_1+gu10.P_CS_21_2)+(gu10.P_CS_21_3+gu10.P_CS_21_4))>((gu10.P_setbi_5_1+gu10.P_setb...374
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 81/0/52
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 179 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 301 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:46:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 10224 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40265ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40266ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40572 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12619495039450983065.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:47:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7521237471800290296.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12619495039450983065.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7521237471800290296.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.37516,159352,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(EF(AX((((P_await_13_1+P_await_13_2)+(P_await_13_3+P_await_13_4))<=((P_CS_21_1+P_CS_21_2)+(P_CS_21_3+P_CS_21_4)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((P_await_13_1+P_await_13_2)+(P_await_13_3+P_await_13_4))<=((P_CS_21_...206
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15589364281179167241.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15589364281179167241.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15589364281179167241.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15589364281179167241.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15589364281179167241.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 127 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 86 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7808667457276095425.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3263172045682228890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7808667457276095425.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3263172045682228890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,7.91462,231392,2,52027,5,765861,6,0,584,984671,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(EF(AX((((gu18.P_await_13_1+gu18.P_await_13_2)+(gu18.P_await_13_3+gu18.P_await_13_4))<=((gu18.P_CS_21_1+gu18.P_CS_21_2)+(gu18.P_CS_2...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((gu18.P_await_13_1+gu18.P_await_13_2)+(gu18.P_await_13_3+gu18.P_awai...246
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gi0.gi4.gu0.t40, gi0.gi4.gu0.t42, gi0.gi4.gu0.t43, gi0.gi4.gu0.t48, gi0.gi4.gu0.t49, gi0.gi4....1125
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 152 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:48:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 36 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 12/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/230 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 230/230 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 10252 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 38/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/102 variables, 20/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 19/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/230 variables, 102/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 36/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 152/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 4/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 1/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 2/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 230/230 variables, and 394 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, ReadFeed: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 152/152 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40296ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 152 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40297ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40491 ms. Remains : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2366837127905006123.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12385901339454263923.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2366837127905006123.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12385901339454263923.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.31908,159564,2,36382,5,465594,6,0,566,660897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AX(FALSE) * (((((P_done_6+P_done_7)+(P_done_8+P_done_9))+((P_done_11+P_done_12)+(P_done_13+P_done_14)))+(((P_done_16+P_done_17)+(P_d...567
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!(FALSE))) * (((((P_done_6+P_done_7)+(P_done_8+P_done_9))+((P_done_11+P_done_12)+(P_done_13+...618
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,0,27.6278,692788,1,0,413,2.48341e+06,329,157,4712,3.28244e+06,326
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 85 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9244787368523935695.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8702084329273519346.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9244787368523935695.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8702084329273519346.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.20637,152104,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX(EG((((P_sety_9_1+P_sety_9_2)+(P_sety_9_3+P_sety_9_4))<1)))) * AX(FALSE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(EG((((P_sety_9_1+P_sety_9_2)+(P_sety_9_3+P_sety_9_4))<1)))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(FA...170
(forward)formula 0,0,5.21308,152104,1,0,6,451632,7,1,810,632520,1
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:49:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 86 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17842916672815412276.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10865529258655052672.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17842916672815412276.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10865529258655052672.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,5.06568,152460,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(FALSE)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(FALSE)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
(forward)formula 0,0,21.3628,535764,1,0,411,2.19246e+06,332,156,3790,2.68682e+06,321
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 90 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 94 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17716082207615948338.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3583522131921752908.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17716082207615948338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3583522131921752908.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.73735,153016,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(((((P_start_1_1+P_start_1_2)+(P_start_1_3+P_start_1_4))>=1) + A((((P_awaity_1+P_awaity_2)+(P_awaity_3+P_awaity_4))<=((P_ifxi_10_1+P...307
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((((P_start_1_1+P_start_1_2)+(P_start_1_3+P_start_1_4))>=1) + !((E(!(EX((((P_start_1_1+P_sta...599
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3257580328844360650.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3257580328844360650.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3257580328844360650.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3257580328844360650.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3257580328844360650.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 169 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 110 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10337353377691005602.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:50:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3267870476326479676.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10337353377691005602.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3267870476326479676.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,3.68059,118580,2,35001,5,380377,6,0,564,553522,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX(((((gu0.P_start_1_1+gu0.P_start_1_2)+(gu0.P_start_1_3+gu0.P_start_1_4))>=1) + A((((gu11.P_awaity_1+gu11.P_awaity_2)+(gu11.P_awaity_...395
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!(((((gu0.P_start_1_1+gu0.P_start_1_2)+(gu0.P_start_1_3+gu0.P_start_1_4))>=1) + !((E(!(EX((((g...751
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gi1.gi1.gi3.gu6.t4, gi1.gi1.gi3.gu6.t5, gi1.gi1.gi3.gu7.t11, gi1.gi1.gi3.gu10.t23, gi1.gi1.gi...770
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,25.9539,726696,1,0,538,3.86317e+06,281,263,3706,4.07904e+06,457
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 90 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14337182152886853497.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7226372090293019454.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14337182152886853497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7226372090293019454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.78164,152772,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((((((P_done_6+P_done_7)+(P_done_8+P_done_9))+((P_done_11+P_done_12)+(P_done_13+P_done_14)))+(((P_done_16+P_done_17)+(P_done_18+P_do...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((((P_done_6+P_done_7)+(P_done_8+P_done_9))+((P_done_11+P_done_12)+(P_done_13+P_done_14)))+...266
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9631226360992223064.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9631226360992223064.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9631226360992223064.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9631226360992223064.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9631226360992223064.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16840889791823558489.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:51:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14050041570990145182.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16840889791823558489.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14050041570990145182.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,6.27401,188480,2,40702,5,563949,6,0,560,771560,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((((((gu12.P_done_6+gu12.P_done_7)+(gu12.P_done_8+gu12.P_done_9))+((gu12.P_done_11+gu12.P_done_12)+(gu12.P_done_13+gu12.P_done_14)))...295
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((((gu12.P_done_6+gu12.P_done_7)+(gu12.P_done_8+gu12.P_done_9))+((gu12.P_done_11+gu12.P_don...346
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gi0.gi0.gu0.t41, gi0.gi0.gu0.t42, gi0.gi0.gu0.t43, gi0.gi0.gu0.t48, gi0.gi0.gu0.t49, gi0.gi0....1228
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 102/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 102 /102 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 28 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned [66, 67, 68, 69]
Discarding 4 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 69 ms to find 4 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 86 ms. Remains : 98/102 places, 156/156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13510642232407429357.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13426968585112818367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13510642232407429357.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13426968585112818367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,4.8163,152220,2,36296,5,451632,6,0,550,632520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(EG((((((P_CS_21_1+P_CS_21_2)+(P_CS_21_3+P_CS_21_4))<=1)||(((P_start_1_1+P_start_1_2)+(P_start_1_3+P_start_1_4))<=12))&&(((P_CS_21_...963
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(EG((((((P_CS_21_1+P_CS_21_2)+(P_CS_21_3+P_CS_21_4))<=1)||(((P_start_1_1+P_start_1_2)+(P_sta...1032
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23,...659
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5518615400561309893.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5518615400561309893.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5518615400561309893.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5518615400561309893.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5518615400561309893.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 147 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 82 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2384159424469246013.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:52:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3536230731040400067.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2384159424469246013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3536230731040400067.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,6.85941,206868,2,56968,5,937801,6,0,565,795996,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(EG((((((gu10.P_CS_21_1+gu10.P_CS_21_2)+(gu10.P_CS_21_3+gu10.P_CS_21_4))<=1)||(((gi1.gi1.gu0.P_start_1_1+gi1.gi1.gu0.P_start_1_2)+(...1303
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(EG((((((gu10.P_CS_21_1+gu10.P_CS_21_2)+(gu10.P_CS_21_3+gu10.P_CS_21_4))<=1)||(((gi1.gi1.gu0...1372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions gi0.t116, gi0.t112, gi0.t108, gi0.t105, t5, t10, t18, t21, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42,...377
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5150100807144930236.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5150100807144930236.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5150100807144930236.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5150100807144930236.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5150100807144930236.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 263 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7769385636543104855.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:53:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5569127328921581854.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7769385636543104855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5569127328921581854.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91478e+06,6.40728,186224,2,44012,5,544355,6,0,574,841644,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG((((((gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_1+gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_2)+(gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_3+gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_4))<=((gi2.gu8.P_awaity_1+gi2.gu8.P_awaity_2)+(gi2...714
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((((gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_1+gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_2)+(gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_3+gi2.gu8.P_sety_9_4))<=((...787
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t7, t10, t11, t14, t17, t19, t23, t36, t37, t38, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t48, t55, t59, ...453
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,112.06,2317100,1,0,446,1.25886e+07,18,206,1868,1.15714e+07,50
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((((((gu13.P_CS_21_1+gu13.P_CS_21_2)+(gu13.P_CS_21_3+gu13.P_CS_21_4))>((gu11.P_setbi_5_1+gu11.P_setbi_5_2)+(gu11.P_setbi_5_3+gu11.P_set...361
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((gu13.P_CS_21_1+gu13.P_CS_21_2)+(gu13.P_CS_21_3+gu13.P_CS_21_4))>((gu11.P_setbi_5_1+gu11.P_setb...406
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 64/0/50
(forward)formula 1,0,130.557,2317100,1,0,446,1.25886e+07,26,206,2315,1.15714e+07,54
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(AX(EF(AX((((gu13.P_await_13_1+gu13.P_await_13_2)+(gu13.P_await_13_3+gu13.P_await_13_4))<=((gu13.P_CS_21_1+gu13.P_CS_21_2)+(gu13.P_CS_2...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((gu13.P_await_13_1+gu13.P_await_13_2)+(gu13.P_await_13_3+gu13.P_awai...246
(forward)formula 2,1,144.573,2317100,1,0,446,1.25886e+07,28,206,2395,1.15714e+07,94
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(AF((((((gu11.P_done_6+gu11.P_done_7)+(gu11.P_done_8+gu11.P_done_9))+((gu11.P_done_11+gu11.P_done_12)+(gu11.P_done_13+gu11.P_done_14)))...295
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((((((gu11.P_done_6+gu11.P_done_7)+(gu11.P_done_8+gu11.P_done_9))+((gu11.P_done_11+gu11.P_don...346
(forward)formula 3,1,152.257,2317100,1,0,446,1.25886e+07,34,206,2847,1.15714e+07,217
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((AF(EG((((((gu13.P_CS_21_1+gu13.P_CS_21_2)+(gu13.P_CS_21_3+gu13.P_CS_21_4))<=1)||(((gi0.gu0.P_start_1_1+gi0.gu0.P_start_1_2)+(gi0.gu0....1347
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(EG((((((gu13.P_CS_21_1+gu13.P_CS_21_2)+(gu13.P_CS_21_3+gu13.P_CS_21_4))<=1)||(((gi0.gu0.P_s...1416
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 4,0,322.217,2908872,1,0,446,1.85951e+07,25,233,2887,1.65221e+07,326
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-4-CTLCardinality-2025-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Total runtime 861688 ms.

BK_STOP 1748872712176

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-COL-4"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-4, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000609"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-COL-4.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-COL-4 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;