Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876423000602.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-3, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000602
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 equiv_pt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 39K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-11
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-12
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-13
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-14
FORMULA_NAME LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748871565357

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=LamportFastMutEx-COL-3
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is COL
CTLFireability COL
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 13:39:26] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 13:39:26] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 13:39:26] [INFO ] Detected file is not PT type :http://www.pnml.org/version-2009/grammar/symmetricnet
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.locator.DefaultOMMetaFactoryLocator).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [WARNING] Using fallBack plugin, rng conformance not checked
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (colored model parsed with PNMLFW) : 637 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Imported 18 HL places and 17 HL transitions for a total of 100 PT places and 192.0 transition bindings in 19 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Built PT skeleton of HLPN with 18 places and 17 transitions 68 arcs in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Skeletonized 5 HLPN properties in 2 ms. Removed 11 properties that had guard overlaps.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 3 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Remains 3 properties that can be checked using skeleton over-approximation.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
RANDOM walk for 15269 steps (3 resets) in 152 ms. (99 steps per ms) remains 0/5 properties
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Domain [pid(4), pid(4)] of place P_wait breaks symmetries in sort pid
Symmetric sort wr.t. initial and guards and successors and join/free detected :P_bool
Arc [3:1*[$i, 1]] contains constants of sort P_bool
Transition T_setbi_2 : constants on arcs in [[3:1*[$i, 1]]] introduces in P_bool(2) partition with 1 elements that refines current partition to 2 subsets.
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Unfolded HLPN to a Petri net with 100 places and 156 transitions 664 arcs in 23 ms.
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Unfolded 15 HLPN properties in 1 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 42 transitions.
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 71 out of 71 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 114/114 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 114/114 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 13:39:27] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 210 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 121 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 367 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 111 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 18 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 27 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD3 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD4 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD5 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 16/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 96/167 variables, 71/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 27/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 2/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 167/167 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved in 7678 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 23/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 17/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/167 variables, 71/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 27/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 93/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 167/167 variables, and 255 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved in 13982 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 27/27 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/111 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 21741ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 21760ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/71 places, 96/114 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 22144 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/114 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 71 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 13:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 39 to 35
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1338 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 1/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 682 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-02 13:39:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 13:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 45/67 variables, 12/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/151 variables, 67/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 24/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/155 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 76 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/22 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 45/67 variables, 12/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 67/155 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 605 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 16/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 695ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 3 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:39:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5639 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 11076 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16731ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16731ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16858 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8692963008571938944.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3181008618412617775.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8692963008571938944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3181008618412617775.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.22929,13996,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((EF(AG(((((((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))||((y_2>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))))||((((...1273
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((EX((((((((P_b_4>=1)&&(P_wait_10>=1))&&(P_await_13_2>=1))||(((P_b_6>=1)&&(P_wait_7>=...1348
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,1.59433,58524,1,0,269,270302,214,104,2714,269646,215
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 88 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 92 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7991428391747293889.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10360610466822461512.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7991428391747293889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10360610466822461512.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.213436,14372,2,4234,5,32782,6,0,370,40818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(AX(EG((((((((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_3>=1))||((x_3>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1)))||(((x_3>=1)&&(P_setx_3_2>=1))||((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1))))||...612
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(!(EG((((((((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_3>=1))||((x_3>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1)))||(((x_3>=1)&&(P_s...668
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,1.41744,54328,1,0,302,246923,215,116,2498,238840,257
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 74 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 76 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1331955782041871922.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10062776730127128468.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1331955782041871922.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10062776730127128468.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.210049,14248,2,4234,5,32782,6,0,370,40818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG(EF((((((P_start_1_2<1)||(P_b_5<1))&&((P_start_1_2<1)||(P_b_4<1)))&&(((P_start_1_1<1)||(P_b_3<1))&&((P_start_1_3<1)||(P_b_7<1))))&&...701
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((((P_start_1_2<1)||(P_b_5<1))&&((P_start_1_2<1)||(P_b_4<1)))&&(((P_...1448
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,1,1.08745,45504,1,0,253,181532,210,95,2496,174857,199
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:40:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5852 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 10991 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16870ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16872ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17022 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9949126212362287523.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3186067486128409445.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9949126212362287523.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3186067486128409445.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.229094,14208,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((((((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_3>=1))||((x_3>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1)))||(((x_3>=1)&&(P_setx_3_2>=1))||((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1))))||((((x_3>=...2101
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(E((!((E(!(((((y_0>=1)&&(P_awaity_3>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_awaity_2>=1)))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_awaity_1>=1...5269
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,6.60454,209728,1,0,634,1.1638e+06,237,320,2763,1.21123e+06,622
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 68 transition count 93
Applied a total of 6 rules in 20 ms. Remains 68 /71 variables (removed 3) and now considering 93/96 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [44, 45, 46]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/71 places, 93/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 81 ms. Remains : 65/71 places, 93/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9981401772141322949.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14152674237780070233.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9981401772141322949.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14152674237780070233.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,17255,0.259575,15608,2,4613,5,37929,6,0,355,45355,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((AG(((((((y_3<1)||(P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((y_3<1)||(P_ifyi_15_1<1)))&&(((y_2<1)||(P_ifyi_15_3<1))&&((y_1<1)||(P_ifyi_15_3<1))))&&((((y_0...1391
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((!(E(TRUE U !(((((((y_3<1)||(P_ifyi_15_2<1))&&((y_3<1)||(P_ifyi_15_1<1)))&&(((y_2<1)||(P_ifyi_15_3...1458
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,3.47392,124580,1,0,356,669908,221,148,2599,571715,350
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5403 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 10729 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16145ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16146ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16263 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12024429357601055132.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:40:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11757876682097814355.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12024429357601055132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11757876682097814355.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.220208,14200,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((AF((((((y_2>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_2>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3>=1)))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_1>=1)))&&((((((y_3>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_2>=1))||...3220
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!((((((P_await_13_1>=1)&&(P_done_5>=1))&&((P_done_6>=1)&&(P_done_7>=1)))||(((P_await_13_2>=1)...8493
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,10.7108,318712,1,0,781,1.85072e+06,252,371,2909,1.77458e+06,823
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:41:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5705 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 10920 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16648ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16659ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16796 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16766941173649824032.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13886151398839296985.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16766941173649824032.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13886151398839296985.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.216016,14328,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF((!(((((((P_start_1_2>=1)&&(P_b_5>=1))||((P_start_1_2>=1)&&(P_b_4>=1)))||(((P_start_1_1>=1)&&(P_b_3>=1))||((P_start_1_3>=1)&&(P_b_7>=...1864
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EX(!(!(((((((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1...7026
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,10.1168,311540,1,0,648,1.83046e+06,232,329,2779,1.72645e+06,621
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 68 transition count 93
Applied a total of 6 rules in 5 ms. Remains 68 /71 variables (removed 3) and now considering 93/96 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 81 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned [44, 45, 46]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 89 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/71 places, 93/96 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 65 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 62 transition count 90
Applied a total of 6 rules in 8 ms. Remains 62 /65 variables (removed 3) and now considering 90/93 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 62/71 places, 90/96 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 280 ms. Remains : 62/71 places, 90/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11277244255152313215.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18215833545369078517.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11277244255152313215.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18215833545369078517.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,15512,0.340628,17604,2,5572,5,44785,6,0,340,53216,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((((y_0<1)||(P_ify0_4_2<1))&&((y_0<1)||(P_ify0_4_3<1)))&&((y_0<1)||(P_ify0_4_1<1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((((y_0<1)||(P_ify0_4_2<1))&&((y_0<1)||(P_ify0_4_3<1)))&&((y_0<1)||(P_ify0_4_1<1))))] != F...159
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 48/18/42
(forward)formula 0,0,2.21074,86680,1,0,11,354476,19,1,1874,349343,12
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5610 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 10807 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16431ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16431ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16553 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2569914439756225364.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4942767942439453350.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2569914439756225364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4942767942439453350.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.221022,14200,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((EG(A((((((((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_1>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_2>=1)))||(((y_2>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_1>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_ify0_4_1>=1))))||(...1553
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((((((y_2<1)||(P_sety_9_1<1))&&((y_0<1)||(P_sety_9_2<1)))&&(((y_0<1)||(P_sety_9_3<1))&...2021
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,3.32874,120700,1,0,429,658264,228,185,2789,633149,403
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5576 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 10815 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16404ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16405ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16507 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9322371427246040999.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability417577624375788203.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9322371427246040999.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability417577624375788203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.232568,14216,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((((((P_start_1_2<1)||(P_b_5<1))&&((P_start_1_2<1)||(P_b_4<1)))&&(((P_start_1_1<1)||(P_b_3<1))&&((P_start_1_3<1)||(P_b_7<1))))&&(((P_...3890
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(EY(FwdU((Init * !((E(!(((((!(EX(!(!((E(!(((((((x_1>=1)&&(P_setx_3_3>=1))||((x_3>=1)&&(P_setx_3_1>=1)))||(((...27488
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,12.6973,321608,1,0,676,1.92796e+06,234,331,2864,1.82771e+06,661
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:42:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5609 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 11242 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16864ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16865ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16978 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability816892714160395276.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6069117987798901121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability816892714160395276.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6069117987798901121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.238024,14324,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((!((!((!(((((((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))||((y_2>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))))||((((...2975
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(Init,(!((!((!(((((((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_3>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_2>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_CS_21_1>=1))...7622
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
(forward)formula 0,0,3.16857,112244,1,0,372,589298,228,160,2683,644332,317
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [47, 48, 49]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 68 /68 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 58 ms. Remains : 68/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3393760720694190896.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8934709736138775379.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3393760720694190896.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8934709736138775379.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.236122,14372,2,4234,5,32782,6,0,370,40818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((((((y_3>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_2>=1))||((y_3>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_1>=1)))||(((y_2>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3>=1))||((y_1>=1)&&(P_ifyi_15_3>=1))))||((((y_0...1364
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(((((((y_2>=1)&&(P_sety_9_1>=1))||((y_0>=1)&&(P_sety_9_2>=1)))||(((y_0>=1)&&(P_sety_9_3>=...2203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,2.30716,77264,1,0,277,365269,216,114,2658,355322,226
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 12 similar events)
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 24 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 103 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5950 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 22/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/71 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/155 variables, 71/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 24/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 93/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 248 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 10895 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 24/24 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16864ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16864ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17012 ms. Remains : 71/71 places, 96/96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 13:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:43:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-02 13:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:43:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 13:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11562754773990828453.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-02 13:43:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4631152154198914910.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11562754773990828453.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4631152154198914910.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,19742,0.234603,14200,2,4081,5,33034,6,0,382,40841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(((((((x_1>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((x_2>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1>=1)))||(((x_0>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_2>=1))||((x_3>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1>=1))))||((((...2231
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((Init * !((EX(((((((x_1>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_3>=1))||((x_2>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_1>=1)))||(((x_0>=1)&&(P_ifxi_10_2>=...4564
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t30, t31, ...438
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,4.10951,127840,1,0,422,695791,241,186,2855,634973,398
FORMULA LamportFastMutEx-COL-3-CTLFireability-2025-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-02 13:43:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 13:43:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 223541 ms.

BK_STOP 1748871790318

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="LamportFastMutEx-COL-3"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is LamportFastMutEx-COL-3, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876423000602"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/LamportFastMutEx-COL-3.tgz
mv LamportFastMutEx-COL-3 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;