About the Execution of ITS-Tools for JoinFreeModules-PT-0050
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ?TTFFT?FTFTFTTTT | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876422700434.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is JoinFreeModules-PT-0050, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876422700434
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 612K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 152K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748840333341
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=JoinFreeModules-PT-0050
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 04:58:54] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 04:58:54] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 04:58:54] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 91 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:54] [INFO ] Transformed 251 places.
[2025-06-02 04:58:54] [INFO ] Transformed 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:58:54] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 251 places and 401 transitions and 1152 arcs in 194 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 74 out of 250 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 401 rows 250 cols
[2025-06-02 04:58:55] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 22 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20058 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 650 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40206ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40224ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:59:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:59:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:59:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:59:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20931 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50980ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50981ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91498 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Support contains 74 out of 250 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 05:00:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40019 steps (8 resets) in 509 ms. (78 steps per ms) remains 0/68 properties
[2025-06-02 05:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:00:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:00:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40059ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21194 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51231ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51232ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91494 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8349388973704738580.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17480660205298890099.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8349388973704738580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17480660205298890099.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.3751,298032,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14860727112853359923.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14860727112853359923.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14860727112853359923.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14860727112853359923.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14860727112853359923.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6537425879411357987.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12315347652040022665.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6537425879411357987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12315347652040022665.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.319438,12368,52,369,254,32897,190,53,73,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((AX(EG((u40.p205<5))) * (EG(!(E((u46.p234>=3) U (u11.p58>=2)))) + (u43.p217<2)))) * EF((u6.p34<4)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG((u40.p205<5))))] = FALSE * [((EY(Init) * !((u43.p217<2))) * !(EG(!(E((u46.p234>=3) U (u1...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,0,0.767692,21840,1,0,28200,49064,2231,16455,794,70922,25294
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:02:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:02:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40047ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:03:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:03:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:03:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:03:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21052 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51096ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51096ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91365 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability531072185229168308.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7333217740029870623.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability531072185229168308.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7333217740029870623.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.1731,296796,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15420042803975248021.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15420042803975248021.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15420042803975248021.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15420042803975248021.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15420042803975248021.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10650975250531844887.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2053862682197281878.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10650975250531844887.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2053862682197281878.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.323945,12368,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((u44.p221>=5) + (E(!(EF((u21.p109>=3))) U AF((u44.p225>=5))) * (EX((u7.p39<3)) + (A((u24.p124>=3) U (u48.p245>=5)) * ((u16.p81>=3)||...339
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((u44.p221>=5) + (E(!(E(TRUE U (u21.p109>=3))) U !(EG(!((u44.p225>=5))))) * (EX((u7.p39<3)) + (!((...518
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,1,0.949751,25296,1,0,29391,63244,2241,16253,807,86348,26442
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:04:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:04:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40049ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:05:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:05:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:05:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:05:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21599 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51640ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51641ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91909 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14287458342940058377.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5408547764086574781.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14287458342940058377.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5408547764086574781.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.5546,297532,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4387282746134452542.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4387282746134452542.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4387282746134452542.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4387282746134452542.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4387282746134452542.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18089373917208789206.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8298593563746271947.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18089373917208789206.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8298593563746271947.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.321807,12376,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((u9.p48<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((u9.p48<1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:07:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:07:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40048ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:07:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:07:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:07:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21508 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51547ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51548ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91807 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5598091909056112243.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7655305201142477575.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5598091909056112243.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7655305201142477575.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.2713,298436,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4043422100854874459.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4043422100854874459.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4043422100854874459.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4043422100854874459.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4043422100854874459.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8911737411094088868.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7269786155978132491.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8911737411094088868.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7269786155978132491.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.327282,12372,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((((u0.p3>=1) * AG((u39.p196>=5))) * (EG(E((u11.p57>=2) U (u42.p214>=4))) * AX(A(A((u23.p119>=3) U (u49.p246>=5)) U (u34.p173>=1))))) ...225
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((((u0.p3>=1) * !(E(TRUE U !((u39.p196>=5))))) * (EG(E((u11.p57>=2) U (u42.p214>=4))) * !(EX(!(!((E...451
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,0,2.1718,55336,1,0,39584,172152,2636,26573,839,247286,35946
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 39 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:09:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:09:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40054ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 28 ms returned []
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21370 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51404ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51405ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91747 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:10:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:10:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1284557814155004127.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16469050516465016941.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1284557814155004127.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16469050516465016941.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.6112,297492,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((!(A(!(((p76<3)&&(p24<3))) U (p172>=2))) * (p3<2)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p3<2)),!((p172>=2))) * (!(!(((p76<3)&&(p24<3)))) * !((p172>=2))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(...206
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 397/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,19.4875,297492,1,0,12,1.37887e+06,19,4,15967,1.48099e+06,6
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:10:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:10:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40059ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:11:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:11:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:11:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:11:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:11:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20724 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 50758ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50758ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91028 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:12:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8251603883437072465.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:12:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7366988829504950764.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8251603883437072465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7366988829504950764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.3064,296996,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17090692650564594235.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17090692650564594235.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17090692650564594235.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17090692650564594235.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17090692650564594235.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1663855735717247307.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8826306475912748432.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1663855735717247307.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8826306475912748432.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.31626,12296,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(((u25.p127<2) * (!(A((u14.p74>=4) U (u12.p63>=2))) + AG((u24.p121<3))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(((u25.p127<2) * (!(!((E(!((u12.p63>=2)) U (!((u14.p74>=4)) * !((u12.p63>=2)))) + EG(!((u12.p63...209
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,0,0.673696,19080,1,0,26719,43705,2320,12664,828,52336,24579
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 19 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:13:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40055ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:13:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:13:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 217 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:13:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:13:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:13:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51049ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51050ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91352 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2403984970490746950.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5970525944953993664.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2403984970490746950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5970525944953993664.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 17298 steps (3 resets) in 125 ms. (137 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:14:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40054ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:15:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:15:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:15:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:15:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21346 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51384ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51385ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91653 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2147345607478003914.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1166964230915215278.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2147345607478003914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1166964230915215278.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.5151,297980,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10917669200829668215.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10917669200829668215.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10917669200829668215.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10917669200829668215.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10917669200829668215.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4184189289710042684.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:16:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16197986796419735349.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4184189289710042684.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16197986796419735349.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.321071,12368,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A((A((u48.p244>=3) U (u4.p21>=5)) + (u49.p249<4)) U (u28.p141>=5)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(((FwdU(EY(Init),!((u28.p141>=5))) * !((u28.p141>=5))) * !((u49.p249<4))),!((u4.p21>=5))) * (!((u48.p244...340
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,0,3.1619,79644,1,0,7573,328512,834,5526,550,352730,13814
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:16:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:16:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40048ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:17:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:17:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:17:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:17:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21136 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51184ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51185ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91453 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8203439137091342410.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11091382884160813737.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8203439137091342410.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11091382884160813737.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.219,297400,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14445279473907019238.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14445279473907019238.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14445279473907019238.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14445279473907019238.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14445279473907019238.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1061801913682859639.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7386938231103976131.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1061801913682859639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7386938231103976131.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.329781,12368,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((AF((EF((u38.p193<1)) * (u8.p44<4))) + (u6.p35>=5)) + (AX((u25.p129<4)) + EX((u28.p145<5)))) + !(E((EX((u0.p1>=3)) * AG((u47.p237>=2...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(((!(EG(!((E(TRUE U (u38.p193<1)) * (u8.p44<4))))) + (u6.p35>=5)) + (!(EX(!((u25.p129<4)))) ...286
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
(forward)formula 0,1,0.49472,13648,1,0,24939,32897,1917,10742,801,38573,22421
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:18:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:18:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40062ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:19:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:19:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 198 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:19:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:19:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21276 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51309ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51309ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91573 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:20:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:20:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6561208647441761959.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability121161909520475999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6561208647441761959.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability121161909520475999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.3632,298024,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph430105905236453314.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph430105905236453314.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph430105905236453314.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph430105905236453314.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph430105905236453314.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12430200284154164571.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:20:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8993064427510315698.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12430200284154164571.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8993064427510315698.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.333978,12372,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((u38.p192>=2) + AG(A(AF((u29.p148>=1)) U !(((u23.p118>=1)||(u15.p77>=2)))))) U (AF(EX(EG((u28.p143>=1)))) * A(!(((u24.p125>=5)&&(u21.p...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,((u38.p192>=2) + !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(((u23.p118>=1)||(u15.p77>=2)))) U (!(!(EG(!((u29.p148>=1)))...434
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,1,1.21809,32852,1,0,32787,99537,2340,18346,802,130318,29557
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:20:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:20:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40053ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:21:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 208 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:21:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:21:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21307 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51349ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51349ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91616 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6089099385330244655.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12196902244684566984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6089099385330244655.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12196902244684566984.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.3974,298440,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11721155697269119469.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11721155697269119469.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11721155697269119469.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11721155697269119469.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11721155697269119469.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13118049658740014964.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:22:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2275235640899989687.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13118049658740014964.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2275235640899989687.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.319957,12368,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((E(((u33.p169>=4)&&(u22.p114>=4)) U !(((A((u18.p93>=1) U (u0.p3>=2)) * AX((u27.p137>=2))) * EX((u31.p159>=3))))) + (A((u3.p19<3) U !((...230
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(((u33.p169>=4)&&(u22.p114>=4)) U !(((!((E(!((u0.p3>=2)) U (!((u18.p93>=1)) * !((u0.p3>=2)))) + E...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
(forward)formula 0,1,6.8705,166576,1,0,60040,580925,2365,61761,816,1.18506e+06,47051
FORMULA JoinFreeModules-PT-0050-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 250 /250 variables (removed 0) and now considering 401/401 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:22:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:22:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 20021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40054ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:23:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:23:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:23:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 216 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:23:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:23:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 50 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/650 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 650/651 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 21393 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 50/250 variables, 50/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 400/650 variables, 250/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 50/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 300/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 7/657 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/650 variables, 5/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 650/651 variables, and 662 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 50/50 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, ReadFeed: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 51434ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 51435ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 91711 ms. Remains : 250/250 places, 401/401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 401 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5028088642431450906.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15526724845565261734.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5028088642431450906.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15526724845565261734.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.3193,298136,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6958789724313652722.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6958789724313652722.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6958789724313652722.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6958789724313652722.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6958789724313652722.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4139526297976737958.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:24:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18395564768113137459.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4139526297976737958.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18395564768113137459.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.323243,12372,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E(AX(((u10.p54<3)||(u43.p218>=2))) U !(E((u40.p204>=3) U (EX((u44.p222>=2)) + ((u20.p104>=3)&&(u22.p114>=4)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),!(EX(!(((u10.p54<3)||(u43.p218>=2)))))) * !(E((u40.p204>=3) U (EX((u44.p222>=2)) + ((u20.p104>=3...186
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15542928078761157013.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15542928078761157013.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15542928078761157013.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15542928078761157013.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15542928078761157013.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2683030593558266793.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:25:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3023208987452699928.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2683030593558266793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3023208987452699928.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,0.321545,12368,52,369,254,32897,193,53,75,38573,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((u9.p48<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((u9.p48<1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions u0.t1, u0.t2, u0.t3, u0.t4, u0.t8, u1.t9, u1.t10, u1.t11, u1.t12, u1.t16, u2.t17, u2.t18, u2....2544
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 25
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 26
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 27
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 28
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 29
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 30
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 31
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 32
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 33
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 34
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 35
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 36
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 37
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 38
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 39
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 40
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 41
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 42
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 43
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 44
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 45
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 46
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 47
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 48
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 49
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:54:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17914249079769394090.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:54:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2009417565145904609.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17914249079769394090.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2009417565145904609.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 2 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.74611e+279,16.0258,298128,2,18451,5,1.37887e+06,6,0,2154,1.48099e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((p48<1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((p48<1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t32,...1594
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="JoinFreeModules-PT-0050"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is JoinFreeModules-PT-0050, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876422700434"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/JoinFreeModules-PT-0050.tgz
mv JoinFreeModules-PT-0050 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;