Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r114-tall-174876422000074.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HirschbergSinclair-PT-15, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r114-tall-174876422000074
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 668K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 173K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748775438361

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HirschbergSinclair-PT-15
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-01 10:57:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-01 10:57:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-01 10:57:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 81 ms
[2025-06-01 10:57:20] [INFO ] Transformed 330 places.
[2025-06-01 10:57:20] [INFO ] Transformed 296 transitions.
[2025-06-01 10:57:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 330 places and 296 transitions and 906 arcs in 214 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 17 ms.
Support contains 143 out of 330 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 330/330 places, 296/296 transitions.
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 315 transition count 296
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 309 transition count 290
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 309 transition count 290
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 305 transition count 286
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 305 transition count 286
Applied a total of 35 rules in 69 ms. Remains 305 /330 variables (removed 25) and now considering 286/296 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 286 rows 305 cols
[2025-06-01 10:57:20] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 10:57:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 354 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 10:57:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 10:57:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 414 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 822 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 271 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 10:57:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/305 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 286/591 variables, 305/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/591 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/591 variables, and 324 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 29949 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/305 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/305 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 286/591 variables, 305/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 271/595 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 591/591 variables, and 595 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 271/271 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60126ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 271 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60139ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 305/330 places, 286/296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61053 ms. Remains : 305/330 places, 286/296 transitions.
Support contains 143 out of 305 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-01 10:58:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 55 ms
[2025-06-01 10:58:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-06-01 10:58:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 286 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (132 resets) in 1927 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 8/107 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (16 resets) in 204 ms. (195 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (16 resets) in 153 ms. (259 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (17 resets) in 168 ms. (236 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (20 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (16 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (20 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (16 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (18 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-06-01 10:58:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 241/264 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/269 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp73 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp78 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp96 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 286/555 variables, 269/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 36/591 variables, 36/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/591 variables, 0/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 591/591 variables, and 324 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 685 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 249/261 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/261 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/269 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 286/555 variables, 269/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 36/591 variables, 36/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 1/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/591 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/591 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 591/591 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 679 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 305/305 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1382ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 68 ms.
Support contains 12 out of 305 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 569 edges and 305 vertex of which 303 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.5 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 77 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 77 transitions
Performed 77 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 77
Iterating post reduction 0 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 303 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 399 edges and 226 vertex of which 214 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 12 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 12 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 1 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 214 transition count 207
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 214 transition count 195
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 202 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 202 transition count 183
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 202 transition count 181
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 356 edges and 200 vertex of which 196 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 196 transition count 181
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 196 transition count 177
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 211 place count 188 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 188 transition count 169
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 12 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 188 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 176 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 10 places and 10 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 166 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 165 transition count 147
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 8 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 165 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 156 transition count 138
Applied a total of 272 rules in 70 ms. Remains 156 /305 variables (removed 149) and now considering 138/286 (removed 148) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 70 ms. Remains : 156/305 places, 138/286 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (256 resets) in 413 ms. (96 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 25490 steps (32 resets) in 64 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-01 10:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-01 10:58:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-01 10:58:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 286 transitions.
Support contains 130 out of 305 places (down from 136) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 305 stabilizing places and 286 stable transitions
Complete graph has no SCC; deadlocks are unavoidable. place count 305 transition count 286
Detected that all paths lead to deadlock. Applying this knowledge to assert that all AP eventually converge (and all enablings converge to false).
AF dead knowledge conclusive for 4 formulas.
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 297 transition count 278
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 297 transition count 278
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 292 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 292 transition count 273
Applied a total of 26 rules in 40 ms. Remains 292 /305 variables (removed 13) and now considering 273/286 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 273 rows 292 cols
[2025-06-01 10:58:24] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 10:58:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 200 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 10:58:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 10:58:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1345 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1561 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 258 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 10:58:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/292 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 273/565 variables, 292/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/565 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/565 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 565/565 variables, and 311 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 28347 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 292/292 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/292 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 273/565 variables, 292/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/565 variables, 258/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 565/565 variables, and 569 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 292/292 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 58405ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58408ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 292/305 places, 273/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60026 ms. Remains : 292/305 places, 273/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 10:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 273 transitions.
[2025-06-01 10:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14548585550841192817.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13524015271064445370.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14548585550841192817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13524015271064445370.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88973e+17,0.77441,31664,2,24243,5,111445,6,0,1429,108901,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AX((rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1))) U (!(((AG((((rcv_right_election_15_3_8_7>=1)&&(newmsg6>=1))&&(election_5_0_1_to_right_5>=1))) + ...564
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1)))))) * !(((!(E(TRUE U !((((rcv_right_election_15_3_8_7>=1...1769
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t26, t28...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 10:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 10:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11109768070179740058.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11109768070179740058.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11109768070179740058.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11109768070179740058.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11109768070179740058.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 10:59:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 10:59:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 10:59:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 26 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 10:59:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 234 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-01 10:59:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability914869481067453013.gal : 27 ms
[2025-06-01 10:59:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6982542563076982448.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability914869481067453013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6982542563076982448.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.88973e+17,3.57722,106664,3767,3371,151972,56502,750,431555,287,317491,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AX((i5.u5.rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1))) U (!(((AG((((i5.u5.rcv_right_election_15_3_8_7>=1)&&(i6.u4.newmsg6>=1))&&(i6.u4.election_5...677
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((i5.u5.rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1)))))) * !(((!(E(TRUE U !((((i5.u5.rcv_right_election...2076
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t6, t8, t10, t12, t13, t14, t20, t30, t227, t272, i0.u12.t16, i1.t9, i1.u6.t4...550
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 294 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 294 transition count 275
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 286 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 286 transition count 267
Applied a total of 38 rules in 21 ms. Remains 286 /305 variables (removed 19) and now considering 267/286 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 267 rows 286 cols
[2025-06-01 11:00:25] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:00:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 229 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:00:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:00:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1350 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 252 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:00:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/286 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 267/553 variables, 286/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/553 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 553/553 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 26191 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 286/286 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/286 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 267/553 variables, 286/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 252/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 553/553 variables, and 557 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 286/286 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56253ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56256ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 286/305 places, 267/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57629 ms. Remains : 286/305 places, 267/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 267 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3331842009775730080.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7320214059983547083.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3331842009775730080.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7320214059983547083.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.19349e+16,0.728565,30416,2,22979,5,105908,6,0,1399,104264,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AX((rcv_left_election_15_4_1_1<1)) * EX(!(E(((newmsg12>=1)&&(reply_12_0_to_right_11>=1)) U ((newmsg1>=1)&&(election_15_4_1_to_right...461
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!(EX(!((rcv_left_election_15_4_1_1<1)))) * EX(!(E(((newmsg12>=1)&&(reply_12_0_to_right...810
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15249243381040143174.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15249243381040143174.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15249243381040143174.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15249243381040143174.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15249243381040143174.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2306911333654108186.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:01:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15460294751144190086.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2306911333654108186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15460294751144190086.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.19349e+16,1.47998,58832,3081,3750,79874,45772,731,170759,275,228706,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((AX((i0.u0.rcv_left_election_15_4_1_1<1)) * EX(!(E(((i4.u9.newmsg12>=1)&&(i3.u15.reply_12_0_to_right_11>=1)) U ((i0.u0.newmsg1>=1)&&...558
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!(EX(!((i0.u0.rcv_left_election_15_4_1_1<1)))) * EX(!(E(((i4.u9.newmsg12>=1)&&(i3.u15....965
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t24, t48, t61, t251, t266, i0.t20, i...529
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 295 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 295 transition count 276
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 287 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 287 transition count 268
Applied a total of 36 rules in 28 ms. Remains 287 /305 variables (removed 18) and now considering 268/286 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 268 rows 287 cols
[2025-06-01 11:02:23] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:02:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 138 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:02:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:02:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1337 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1479 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:02:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/287 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 268/555 variables, 287/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/555 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 555/555 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 26748 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/287 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 268/555 variables, 287/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 253/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 555/555 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30049 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56826ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56827ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 287/305 places, 268/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58336 ms. Remains : 287/305 places, 268/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:03:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15215140456949203099.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2755247244589734457.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15215140456949203099.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2755247244589734457.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.79207e+16,0.673283,29920,2,22832,5,102501,6,0,1404,101291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((((rcv_left_election_10_0_1_11<1) * ((EG(((rcv_left_reply_15_3_11>=1)||(rcv_left_election_15_3_8_8>=1))) + EF((rcv_right_election_1...326
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((rcv_left_election_10_0_1_11<1) * ((EG(((rcv_left_reply_15_3_11>=1)||(rcv_left_election_...388
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4214184261473984755.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4214184261473984755.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4214184261473984755.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4214184261473984755.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4214184261473984755.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17507237656094857974.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17226151916073656248.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17507237656094857974.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17226151916073656248.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.79207e+16,2.54587,88648,2545,4526,104011,95852,731,235367,269,480610,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((((i4.u15.rcv_left_election_10_0_1_11<1) * ((EG(((i4.u15.rcv_left_reply_15_3_11>=1)||(i3.u6.rcv_left_election_15_3_8_8>=1))) + EF((...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((i4.u15.rcv_left_election_10_0_1_11<1) * ((EG(((i4.u15.rcv_left_reply_15_3_11>=1)||(i3.u...458
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t24, t48, t222, t267, i0.t20, i0.u1.t18, ...558
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Reduce places removed 10 places and 10 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 72 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 72 transitions
Performed 72 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 72
Iterating post reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 295 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 223 transition count 204
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 213 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 213 transition count 194
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 213 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 212 transition count 193
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 209 transition count 190
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 209 transition count 190
Applied a total of 172 rules in 44 ms. Remains 209 /305 variables (removed 96) and now considering 190/286 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 209 cols
[2025-06-01 11:04:22] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:04:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:04:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:04:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 711 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 906 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:04:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 171 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:04:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/195 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 176/371 variables, 195/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/371 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 371/399 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved in 12108 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 195/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/195 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 176/371 variables, 195/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 171/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 371/399 variables, and 385 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 195/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 42134ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 171 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42134ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/305 places, 190/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43098 ms. Remains : 209/305 places, 190/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 11:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:05:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 190 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:05:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:05:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12367063125862063309.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 11:05:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10342524544474538734.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12367063125862063309.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10342524544474538734.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.43017e+14,0.160208,10724,2,4605,5,27306,6,0,1011,23632,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AF((rcv_right_reply_15_3_3>=1)) * ((newmsg15<1)||(election_15_4_15_to_left_1<1))) * (AF((((AF(((newmsg14>=1)&&(reply_14_0_to_right_1...464
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EG(!((rcv_right_reply_15_3_3>=1)))) * ((newmsg15<1)||(election_15_4_15_to_left_1<1))) * (!(EG(!((...531
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t9, t11, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t23, t25, t27, t29, t32, t...297
dead was empty
(forward)formula 0,0,21.3195,695864,1,0,2482,4.07353e+06,426,1442,6310,4.26062e+06,2605
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 295 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 295 transition count 276
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 290 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 290 transition count 271
Applied a total of 30 rules in 28 ms. Remains 290 /305 variables (removed 15) and now considering 271/286 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 271 rows 290 cols
[2025-06-01 11:05:26] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:05:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:05:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:05:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1780 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1904 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 256 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:05:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/290 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 271/561 variables, 290/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/561 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/561 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 561/561 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 27410 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 290/290 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/290 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 271/561 variables, 290/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/561 variables, 256/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 561/561 variables, and 565 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 290/290 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57465ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57468ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 290/305 places, 271/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59402 ms. Remains : 290/305 places, 271/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:06:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 271 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:06:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9813741785019157437.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14854562530829558365.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9813741785019157437.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14854562530829558365.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64984e+17,0.6774,29572,2,22489,5,103023,6,0,1419,99648,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((((EG(((newmsg6<1)||(elected_15_to_left_7<1))) + ((((rcv_right_election_15_3_3_12<1)||(reply_15_2_left15<1))||(reply_15_2_right15<1)...733
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(((((EG(((newmsg6<1)||(elected_15_to_left_7<1))) + ((((rcv_right_election_15_3_3_12<1)||(...1672
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t21, t23, t26, t28...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1879759309942184053.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1879759309942184053.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1879759309942184053.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1879759309942184053.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1879759309942184053.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 34 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11103002273068386366.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:06:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13343759256601963370.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11103002273068386366.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13343759256601963370.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64984e+17,2.38835,85156,3233,2785,138575,39081,737,280901,258,232523,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((((EG(((i6.u16.newmsg6<1)||(i8.i1.u38.elected_15_to_left_7<1))) + ((((i3.u7.rcv_right_election_15_3_3_12<1)||(i0.u10.reply_15_2_left...902
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(((((EG(((i6.u16.newmsg6<1)||(i8.i1.u38.elected_15_to_left_7<1))) + ((((i3.u7.rcv_right_e...2029
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t6, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t255, t270, i0.u0.t225, i0.u10.t16, i1.t21, i...547
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 294 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 294 transition count 275
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 286 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 286 transition count 267
Applied a total of 38 rules in 9 ms. Remains 286 /305 variables (removed 19) and now considering 267/286 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 267 rows 286 cols
[2025-06-01 11:07:26] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:07:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:07:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:07:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1378 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1495 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 252 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:07:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/286 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 267/553 variables, 286/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/553 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 553/553 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 27148 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 286/286 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/286 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 267/553 variables, 286/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/553 variables, 252/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 553/553 variables, and 557 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 286/286 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 252/252 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57194ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 252 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57196ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 286/305 places, 267/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58702 ms. Remains : 286/305 places, 267/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:08:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 267 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:08:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16208013848636049734.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10710068435193418081.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16208013848636049734.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10710068435193418081.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.18956e+16,0.770362,30132,2,22982,5,104220,6,0,1399,103377,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((!(E((((newmsg2>=1)&&(election_15_4_13_to_left_3>=1))||((newmsg9>=1)&&(elected_15_to_left_10>=1))) U E((rcv_right_election_2_0_1_1>...306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E((((newmsg2>=1)&&(election_15_4_13_to_left_3>=1))||((newmsg9>=1)&&(elected_15_to_lef...507
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9461273852673252718.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9461273852673252718.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9461273852673252718.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9461273852673252718.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9461273852673252718.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 37 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17263116590462420848.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:08:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8001812599823049721.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17263116590462420848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8001812599823049721.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.18956e+16,1.55038,52784,3057,2889,80579,32206,800,158365,262,137397,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((!(E((((i0.u1.newmsg2>=1)&&(i1.u2.election_15_4_13_to_left_3>=1))||((i4.u7.newmsg9>=1)&&(i8.i1.u37.elected_15_to_left_10>=1))) U E(...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E((((i0.u1.newmsg2>=1)&&(i1.u2.election_15_4_13_to_left_3>=1))||((i4.u7.newmsg9>=1)&&...599
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t24, t32, t57, t221, t266, i0.u0.t20, i0....547
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 294 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 294 transition count 275
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 285 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 285 transition count 266
Applied a total of 40 rules in 9 ms. Remains 285 /305 variables (removed 20) and now considering 266/286 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 266 rows 285 cols
[2025-06-01 11:09:25] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:09:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:09:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:09:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1274 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1408 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 251 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:09:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/285 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 266/551 variables, 285/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/551 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/551 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 551/551 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved in 26387 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 251/251 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/285 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 266/551 variables, 285/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/551 variables, 251/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 551/551 variables, and 555 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 251/251 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 56432ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 56434ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 285/305 places, 266/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57852 ms. Remains : 285/305 places, 266/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8458624331695061670.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5566829744452859225.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8458624331695061670.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5566829744452859225.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.70338e+16,0.712257,29768,2,22806,5,101989,6,0,1394,101779,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10086100240450437369.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10086100240450437369.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10086100240450437369.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10086100240450437369.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10086100240450437369.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 26 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17290839148845795926.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13199963918867803142.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17290839148845795926.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13199963918867803142.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.70338e+16,1.92695,74984,3212,3093,105515,49047,753,259822,281,233045,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(((i1.u1.newmsg2>=1)&&(i1.u1.election_15_2_2_to_right_1>=1)))) + A((!(AF((EF((i1.u2.rcv_left_election_15_3_3_3>=1)) * A(((i5.u10.ne...405
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((i1.u1.newmsg2>=1)&&(i1.u1.election_15_2_2_to_right_1>=1)))] != FALSE + [((Init * !(EG(!...792
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 295 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 295 transition count 276
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 287 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 287 transition count 268
Applied a total of 36 rules in 17 ms. Remains 287 /305 variables (removed 18) and now considering 268/286 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 268 rows 287 cols
[2025-06-01 11:11:23] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:11:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 128 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:11:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:11:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1395 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1526 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:11:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/287 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 268/555 variables, 287/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/555 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 555/555 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 27452 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/287 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 268/555 variables, 287/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 253/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 555/555 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57497ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57498ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 287/305 places, 268/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59042 ms. Remains : 287/305 places, 268/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7322686798883729900.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12059312252919633710.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7322686798883729900.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12059312252919633710.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.79255e+16,0.668402,29520,2,22596,5,100697,6,0,1404,99956,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((AF((AF((rcv_left_reply_15_3_15>=1)) + !(((reply_15_2_left15>=1)&&(reply_15_2_right15>=1))))) * AG(((EF(((reply_15_3_left15>=1)&&(re...533
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),(!(EG(!((!(EG(!((rcv_left_reply_15_3_15>=1)))) + !(((reply_15_2_left15>=1)&&(reply_15_2_right15>...615
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1414623347961251792.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1414623347961251792.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1414623347961251792.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1414623347961251792.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1414623347961251792.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 37 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14519286836827227910.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 11:12:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2677359148772288054.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14519286836827227910.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2677359148772288054.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.79255e+16,1.39477,59552,2589,2782,87787,50433,769,148831,252,209452,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((AF((AF((i4.u13.rcv_left_reply_15_3_15>=1)) + !(((i4.u13.reply_15_2_left15>=1)&&(i4.u13.reply_15_2_right15>=1))))) * AG(((EF(((i4.u1...644
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),(!(EG(!((!(EG(!((i4.u13.rcv_left_reply_15_3_15>=1)))) + !(((i4.u13.reply_15_2_left15>=1)&&(i4.u1...726
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t5, t7, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t48, t66, t222, t252, t267, i0.t24, i0.t20, ...543
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Reduce places removed 11 places and 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 83 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 83 transitions
Performed 83 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 83
Iterating post reduction 0 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 294 transition count 192
Reduce places removed 83 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 83 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 211 transition count 192
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 203 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 203 transition count 184
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 203 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 201 transition count 182
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 200 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 200 transition count 181
Applied a total of 188 rules in 33 ms. Remains 200 /305 variables (removed 105) and now considering 181/286 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 200 cols
[2025-06-01 11:13:22] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:13:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:13:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:13:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 597 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 714 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:13:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:13:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/183 variables, 5/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 166/349 variables, 183/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/353 variables, 3/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/353 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 353/381 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 13353 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 186/200 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 5/183 variables, 5/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 166/349 variables, 183/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 147/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/349 variables, 0/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/353 variables, 3/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 12/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 353/381 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 186/200 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43381ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43381ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 200/305 places, 181/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44139 ms. Remains : 200/305 places, 181/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:14:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:14:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:14:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability712120088038522528.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 11:14:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12271463760871509438.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability712120088038522528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12271463760871509438.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19603e+14,0.147056,10492,2,4525,5,27178,6,0,959,23145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((rcv_left_election_7_0_1_8>=1) U AF((!((((((newmsg12>=1)&&(elected_15_to_left_13>=1))||(rcv_left_reply_12_0_12>=1))||((newmsg2>=1)&&(el...475
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((!((((((newmsg12>=1)&&(elected_15_to_left_13>=1))||(rcv_left_reply_12_0_12>=1))||((newms...1745
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t23, t25, t26, t28, t31, t32, t34,...288
(forward)formula 0,1,22.4312,763100,1,0,1845,4.62453e+06,398,1154,5742,5.14525e+06,1995
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 295 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 295 transition count 276
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 287 transition count 268
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 287 transition count 268
Applied a total of 36 rules in 11 ms. Remains 287 /305 variables (removed 18) and now considering 268/286 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 268 rows 287 cols
[2025-06-01 11:14:29] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:14:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:14:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:14:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1161 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:14:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/287 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 268/555 variables, 287/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/555 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 555/555 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 27623 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/287 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 268/555 variables, 287/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/555 variables, 253/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 555/555 variables, and 559 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57661ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57662ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 287/305 places, 268/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58958 ms. Remains : 287/305 places, 268/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 268 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7289972493259460938.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11940159763478314220.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7289972493259460938.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11940159763478314220.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08206e+17,0.724785,31304,2,24433,5,106339,6,0,1404,106292,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!(A(EX((rcv_right_election_15_4_6_9>=1)) U AF(((newmsg9>=1)&&(elected_15_to_left_10>=1))))) + !(((newmsg7>=1)&&(election_15_3_8_to_le...567
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!((((rcv_right_election_15_3_7_8<1)||((newmsg14>=1)&&(election_15_2_1_to_left_15>=1)))|...2348
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t21, t23, t25, t27...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2476688556606902464.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2476688556606902464.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2476688556606902464.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2476688556606902464.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2476688556606902464.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16992195070542207569.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:15:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12180883110146444872.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16992195070542207569.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12180883110146444872.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08206e+17,2.44439,88356,3103,3025,125029,53415,731,301697,256,325984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((!(A(EX((i2.u7.rcv_right_election_15_4_6_9>=1)) U AF(((i2.u7.newmsg9>=1)&&(i7.u33.elected_15_to_left_10>=1))))) + !(((i6.i0.u5.newmsg7...698
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!((((i2.u6.rcv_right_election_15_3_7_8<1)||((i4.u12.newmsg14>=1)&&(i4.u12.election_15_2...2883
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t7, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t25, t33, t252, t267, i0.u0.t222, i0.u13.t16,...562
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 294 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 294 transition count 275
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 285 transition count 266
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 285 transition count 266
Applied a total of 40 rules in 16 ms. Remains 285 /305 variables (removed 20) and now considering 266/286 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 266 rows 285 cols
[2025-06-01 11:16:28] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:16:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:16:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:16:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1329 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1452 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 251 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:16:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/285 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 266/551 variables, 285/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/551 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/551 variables, 0/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 551/551 variables, and 304 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved in 27410 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 251/251 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 15/285 variables, 15/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 266/551 variables, 285/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/551 variables, 251/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 551/551 variables, and 555 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 285/285 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 251/251 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57448ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 251 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57449ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 285/305 places, 266/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58918 ms. Remains : 285/305 places, 266/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 266 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18055940106233510379.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6472258936969536277.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18055940106233510379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6472258936969536277.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.70338e+16,0.672684,29832,2,22806,5,101989,6,0,1394,101779,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((E((((EF((rcv_right_election_15_4_10_5>=1)) + EG((rcv_left_election_15_4_5_5>=1))) * (rcv_right_reply_15_1_15>=1)) * ((!((newmsg15>=1)...453
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E((((E(TRUE U (rcv_right_election_15_4_10_5>=1)) + EG((rcv_left_election_15_4_5_5>=1))) * (rcv_rig...621
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t26...380
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13456247053092706987.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13456247053092706987.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13456247053092706987.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13456247053092706987.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13456247053092706987.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9673186452120632478.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 11:17:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2548314032627885343.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9673186452120632478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2548314032627885343.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.70338e+16,1.42831,57804,2692,3132,82012,43874,716,156809,277,212244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((E((((EF((i2.u3.rcv_right_election_15_4_10_5>=1)) + EG((i2.u3.rcv_left_election_15_4_5_5>=1))) * (i0.u21.rcv_right_reply_15_1_15>=1)) ...552
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E((((E(TRUE U (i2.u3.rcv_right_election_15_4_10_5>=1)) + EG((i2.u3.rcv_left_election_15_4_5_5>=1))...746
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t24, t48, t64, t250, t265, i0.t20, i0.t0, i0...530
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 305/305 places, 286/286 transitions.
Reduce places removed 14 places and 14 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 291 transition count 160
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 112 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 179 transition count 160
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 169 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 169 transition count 150
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 169 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 167 transition count 148
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 249 place count 166 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 166 transition count 147
Applied a total of 250 rules in 15 ms. Remains 166 /305 variables (removed 139) and now considering 147/286 (removed 139) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 166 cols
[2025-06-01 11:18:28] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:18:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 11:18:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:18:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 407 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 531 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 11:18:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:18:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/143 variables, 16/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 125/268 variables, 143/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 269/313 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 7779 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 144/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/143 variables, 16/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 125/268 variables, 143/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 121/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/269 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 269/313 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 24062 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 19/19 constraints, State Equation: 144/166 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 31859ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31859ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 166/305 places, 147/286 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32412 ms. Remains : 166/305 places, 147/286 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:19:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:19:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11592502438792744507.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15127932570605022331.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11592502438792744507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15127932570605022331.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22712e+13,0.098638,7704,2,2536,5,16288,6,0,787,12982,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((rcv_right_reply_15_2_3>=1) + EF((rcv_left_reply_10_0_10>=1))) + (A(EG((rcv_right_reply_15_3_6>=1)) U AF((rcv_left_election_15_4_8_8...218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((rcv_right_reply_15_2_3>=1) + E(TRUE U (rcv_left_reply_10_0_10>=1))) + (!((E(!(!(EG(!((rcv_left_e...392
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t4, t6, t8, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t23, t24, t26, t28, t30, t113, t131, Inter...249
(forward)formula 0,1,5.85099,211728,1,0,1015,1.19245e+06,334,564,4858,1.06809e+06,1196
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12466464991281243396.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12466464991281243396.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12466464991281243396.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12466464991281243396.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12466464991281243396.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17984845914659355010.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 11:19:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10525770097200535771.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17984845914659355010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10525770097200535771.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.60318e+17,1.78003,65960,3034,2696,107128,40238,796,225532,278,153902,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AX((i3.u16.rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1))) U (!(((AG((((i3.u14.rcv_right_election_15_3_8_7>=1)&&(i2.u5.newmsg6>=1))&&(i2.u5.election...686
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((i3.u16.rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1)))))) * !(((!(E(TRUE U !((((i3.u14.rcv_right_electi...2119
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t81, t285, i0.u1.t18, i0.u1.t22, i1.t...573
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-01 11:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 11:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1516891303444269105.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 11:21:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7261856856363687418.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1516891303444269105.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7261856856363687418.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.60318e+17,0.789769,32464,2,25599,5,113946,6,0,1494,110010,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AX((rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1))) U (!(((AG((((rcv_right_election_15_3_8_7>=1)&&(newmsg6>=1))&&(election_5_0_1_to_right_5>=1))) + ...564
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((rcv_right_election_8_0_1_7>=1)))))) * !(((!(E(TRUE U !((((rcv_right_election_15_3_8_7>=1...1769
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t22, t24, t28, t30...380
(forward)formula 0,1,253.672,3949792,1,0,1934,2.40325e+07,29,1160,5664,2.74043e+07,2021
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EG(((AX((rcv_left_election_15_4_1_1<1)) * EX(!(E(((newmsg12>=1)&&(reply_12_0_to_right_11>=1)) U ((newmsg1>=1)&&(election_15_4_1_to_right...461
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((Init * !(EG(((!(EX(!((rcv_left_election_15_4_1_1<1)))) * EX(!(E(((newmsg12>=1)&&(reply_12_0_to_right...810
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 262/23/24
(forward)formula 1,0,353.894,5194688,1,0,2398,3.22692e+07,26,1865,4859,3.61784e+07,313
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(EG((((rcv_left_election_10_0_1_11<1) * ((EG(((rcv_left_reply_15_3_11>=1)||(rcv_left_election_15_3_8_8>=1))) + EF((rcv_right_election_1...326
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((rcv_left_election_10_0_1_11<1) * ((EG(((rcv_left_reply_15_3_11>=1)||(rcv_left_election_...388
dead was empty
(forward)formula 2,0,360.615,5194688,1,0,2398,3.22692e+07,40,1865,5218,3.61784e+07,408
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(((((EG(((newmsg6<1)||(elected_15_to_left_7<1))) + ((((rcv_right_election_15_3_3_12<1)||(reply_15_2_left15<1))||(reply_15_2_right15<1)...733
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(((((EG(((newmsg6<1)||(elected_15_to_left_7<1))) + ((((rcv_right_election_15_3_3_12<1)||(...1672
(forward)formula 3,1,729.325,7127776,1,0,3060,4.70454e+07,39,1865,5198,4.93019e+07,2124
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(AF((!(E((((newmsg2>=1)&&(election_15_4_13_to_left_3>=1))||((newmsg9>=1)&&(elected_15_to_left_10>=1))) U E((rcv_right_election_2_0_1_1>...306
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E((((newmsg2>=1)&&(election_15_4_13_to_left_3>=1))||((newmsg9>=1)&&(elected_15_to_lef...507
dead was empty
(forward)formula 4,1,766.911,7127776,1,0,3270,4.71344e+07,55,1982,5206,4.98903e+07,3017
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EF(EG(((newmsg2>=1)&&(election_15_2_2_to_right_1>=1)))) + A((!(AF((EF((rcv_left_election_15_3_3_3>=1)) * A(((newmsg12>=1)&&(election_15_...335
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((newmsg2>=1)&&(election_15_2_2_to_right_1>=1)))] != FALSE + [((Init * !(EG(!(((newmsg14>...670
dead was empty
(forward)formula 5,0,941.302,7841072,1,0,4018,5.2438e+07,26,2357,5171,5.49695e+07,1763
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EX(E((AF((AF((rcv_left_reply_15_3_15>=1)) + !(((reply_15_2_left15>=1)&&(reply_15_2_right15>=1))))) * AG(((EF(((reply_15_3_left15>=1)&&(re...533
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),(!(EG(!((!(EG(!((rcv_left_reply_15_3_15>=1)))) + !(((reply_15_2_left15>=1)&&(reply_15_2_right15>...615
(forward)formula 6,0,956.566,7841072,1,0,4018,5.2438e+07,45,2357,5673,5.49695e+07,2487
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(((!(A(EX((rcv_right_election_15_4_6_9>=1)) U AF(((newmsg9>=1)&&(elected_15_to_left_10>=1))))) + !(((newmsg7>=1)&&(election_15_3_8_to_le...567
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!((((rcv_right_election_15_3_7_8<1)||((newmsg14>=1)&&(election_15_2_1_to_left_15>=1)))|...2348
(forward)formula 7,0,980.795,7841072,1,0,4018,5.2438e+07,75,2357,5705,5.49695e+07,3945
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((E((((EF((rcv_right_election_15_4_10_5>=1)) + EG((rcv_left_election_15_4_5_5>=1))) * (rcv_right_reply_15_1_15>=1)) * ((!((newmsg15>=1)...453
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E((((E(TRUE U (rcv_right_election_15_4_10_5>=1)) + EG((rcv_left_election_15_4_5_5>=1))) * (rcv_rig...621
(forward)formula 8,1,992.532,7841072,1,0,4018,5.2438e+07,103,2477,5717,5.49695e+07,4443
FORMULA HirschbergSinclair-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2453480 ms.

BK_STOP 1748777893336

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HirschbergSinclair-PT-15"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HirschbergSinclair-PT-15, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r114-tall-174876422000074"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HirschbergSinclair-PT-15.tgz
mv HirschbergSinclair-PT-15 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;