Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008300665.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-17, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008300665
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 608K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 42K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 117K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.0K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 78K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 175K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749008975145

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-17
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 03:49:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 03:49:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 03:49:38] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 246 ms
[2025-06-04 03:49:38] [INFO ] Transformed 624 places.
[2025-06-04 03:49:38] [INFO ] Transformed 828 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:49:38] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 03:49:38] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 624 places and 828 transitions and 1879 arcs in 625 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 34 ms.
Support contains 92 out of 624 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 624/624 places, 828/828 transitions.
Discarding 107 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 107 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 517 transition count 700
Iterating global reduction 0 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 517 transition count 700
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 255 place count 476 transition count 648
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 476 transition count 648
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 476 transition count 646
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 315 place count 459 transition count 618
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 459 transition count 618
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 337 place count 454 transition count 610
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 454 transition count 610
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 343 place count 453 transition count 609
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 453 transition count 609
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 345 place count 452 transition count 607
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 346 place count 452 transition count 607
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 347 place count 451 transition count 606
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 451 transition count 606
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 349 place count 450 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 350 place count 450 transition count 605
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 351 place count 450 transition count 604
Applied a total of 351 rules in 372 ms. Remains 450 /624 variables (removed 174) and now considering 604/828 (removed 224) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 604 rows 450 cols
[2025-06-04 03:49:39] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 52 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:49:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 759 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:49:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:49:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 898 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1761 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 603 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:49:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/450 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 470 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 147 places in 364 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 338 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 348 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 270 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 406 ms of which 74 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 277 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 311 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 311 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 427 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 278 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 262 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 370 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 314 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 277 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 437 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 329 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 315 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30507ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30541ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 450/624 places, 604/828 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32722 ms. Remains : 450/624 places, 604/828 transitions.
Support contains 92 out of 450 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 03:50:11] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 03:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 136 ms
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 03:50:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 72 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 604 transitions.
Support contains 61 out of 450 places (down from 92) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (346 resets) in 2138 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 23/40 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (91 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
[2025-06-04 03:50:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 114/156 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 294/450 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 604/1054 variables, 450/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 391 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 276 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 231 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 311 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 346 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1054 variables, 5/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 164 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 208 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1054 variables, 3/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 207 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1054/1054 variables, and 477 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 450/450 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 114/156 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp17 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 294/450 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 9/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 437 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 429 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 408 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 384 ms of which 68 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 394 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 365 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 401 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 526 ms of which 116 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 505 ms of which 108 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 442 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 10073ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Fused 22 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 0 ms.
Support contains 39 out of 450 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 455 edges and 450 vertex of which 57 / 450 are part of one of the 16 SCC in 11 ms
Free SCC test removed 41 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 62 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 62 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 922 edges and 409 vertex of which 400 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 9 places using SCC suffix rule.4 ms
Discarding 9 places :
Also discarding 1 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 1 transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 145 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 145 transitions
Performed 145 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 145
Iterating post reduction 0 with 145 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 400 transition count 396
Reduce places removed 145 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 157 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 255 transition count 384
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 249 transition count 379
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 244 transition count 378
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 244 transition count 372
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 238 transition count 372
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 350 place count 221 transition count 340
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 367 place count 221 transition count 340
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 368 place count 221 transition count 339
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 371 place count 218 transition count 336
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 374 place count 218 transition count 336
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 218 transition count 334
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 377 place count 217 transition count 332
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 217 transition count 332
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition with reduction of 4 identical transitions.
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 502 place count 155 transition count 266
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 508 place count 155 transition count 260
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 515 place count 148 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 7 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 522 place count 148 transition count 246
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 523 place count 147 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 524 place count 147 transition count 244
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -85
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 550 place count 134 transition count 329
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 555 place count 134 transition count 324
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 33 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 33 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 134 transition count 291
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -13
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 590 place count 133 transition count 304
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 8 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 598 place count 133 transition count 296
Free-agglomeration rule applied 21 times.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 619 place count 133 transition count 275
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 640 place count 112 transition count 275
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 641 place count 112 transition count 274
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 642 place count 112 transition count 275
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 643 place count 111 transition count 275
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 644 place count 111 transition count 275
Applied a total of 644 rules in 349 ms. Remains 111 /450 variables (removed 339) and now considering 275/604 (removed 329) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 349 ms. Remains : 111/450 places, 275/604 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (18 resets) in 1321 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 43 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 21/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 20/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (22 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (23 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (26 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (14 resets) in 52 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (16 resets) in 43 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (15 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (19 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (11 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (16 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (10 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (17 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 487162 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=162 ) properties seen :6 out of 20
Probabilistic random walk after 487162 steps, saw 92610 distinct states, run finished after 3008 ms. (steps per millisecond=161 ) properties seen :6
[2025-06-04 03:50:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 259 transitions (discarded 16 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-04 03:50:27] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 25 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 32/59 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/111 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 259/370 variables, 111/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 25/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/370 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 370/370 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 32/59 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/111 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 134 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 164 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 259/370 variables, 111/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 25/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 14/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 140 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 4/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/370 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/370 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 370/370 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 9482 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 10297ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 8 properties in 3620 ms.
Support contains 11 out of 111 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 111/111 places, 275/275 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 84 edges and 111 vertex of which 4 / 111 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 431 edges and 109 vertex of which 108 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 108 transition count 256
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 93 transition count 255
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 93 transition count 251
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 89 transition count 251
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 76 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 76 transition count 218
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 76 transition count 213
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 74 place count 74 transition count 207
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 74 transition count 207
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 69 transition count 202
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 69 transition count 190
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 68 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 68 transition count 186
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 67 transition count 182
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 67 transition count 182
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 67 transition count 179
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -20
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 65 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 65 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 64 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 64 transition count 193
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 63 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 63 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 63 transition count 184
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 63 transition count 182
Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 63 transition count 176
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 57 transition count 176
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 57 transition count 171
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 57 transition count 171
Applied a total of 140 rules in 50 ms. Remains 57 /111 variables (removed 54) and now considering 171/275 (removed 104) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 57/111 places, 171/275 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (85 resets) in 196 ms. (203 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (71 resets) in 117 ms. (338 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (31 resets) in 107 ms. (370 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (58 resets) in 141 ms. (281 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (18 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (26 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (30 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 35141 steps, run visited all 6 properties in 113 ms. (steps per millisecond=310 )
Probabilistic random walk after 35141 steps, saw 8018 distinct states, run finished after 119 ms. (steps per millisecond=295 ) properties seen :6
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 03:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 604 transitions.
Computed a total of 121 stabilizing places and 134 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 39 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 39 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 411 transition count 553
Iterating global reduction 0 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 411 transition count 553
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 389 transition count 520
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 389 transition count 520
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 389 transition count 516
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 381 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 381 transition count 502
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 375 transition count 494
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 375 transition count 494
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 375 transition count 493
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 371 transition count 487
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 371 transition count 487
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 370 transition count 486
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 370 transition count 486
Applied a total of 165 rules in 76 ms. Remains 370 /450 variables (removed 80) and now considering 486/604 (removed 118) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 486 rows 370 cols
[2025-06-04 03:50:41] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:50:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 439 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 616 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 485 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:50:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/370 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 373 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 400 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 196 places in 371 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 347 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 395 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 212 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 163 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 146 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 175 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 188 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 224 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 212 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 235 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 221 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 15/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 370/856 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved in 30038 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/370 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 485/485 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/370 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 15/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 347 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 329 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 290 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 263 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 334 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 367 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 262 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 270 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 243 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 159 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 202 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 262 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 259 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 259 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 261 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 287 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 254 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 253 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 194 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 169 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 197 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 98 places in 351 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 215 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
(s231 0timeout
^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 1)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 1)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 1)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 1)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 0)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 0)
(s194 0)
(s195 0)
(s196 0)
(s197 1)
(s198 0)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 0)
(s207 0)
(s208 0)
(s209 0)
(s210 0)
(s211 0)
(s212 0)
(s213 0)
(s214 0)
(s215 0)
(s216 0)
(s217 0)
(s218 0)
(s219 0)
(s220 0)
(s221 0)
(s222 0)
(s223 0)
(s224 0)
(s225 0)
(s226 0)
(s227 1)
(s228 0)
(s229 0)
(s230 0)
(s231 0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 370/856 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/370 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/485 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60191ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 485 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60197ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 370/450 places, 486/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60893 ms. Remains : 370/450 places, 486/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 486 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17519365481413635731.gal : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 03:51:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8496158311788342493.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17519365481413635731.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8496158311788342493.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40183e+14,9.28389,199536,2,16600,5,586990,6,0,1968,1.26155e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2331217844226997015.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2331217844226997015.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2331217844226997015.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2331217844226997015.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2331217844226997015.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 191 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 174 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 38 ms.
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15743127132449992127.gal : 21 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15607428070349130170.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15743127132449992127.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15607428070349130170.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40183e+14,3.03821,68936,2952,252,98026,6352,903,317173,135,29174,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(EX(((i11.i1.u63.p327==0)&&(i4.i0.u26.p157==1))))) * (AX(EX(((((i2.i1.u13.p92==0)&&(i7.i0.u31.p186==1))||(i4.i0.u23.p146==0))||(i11...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(EX(((i11.i1.u63.p327==0)&&(i4.i0.u26.p157==1)))))))] = FALSE * [(EY((Init * !(EX(!(EG(!(...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t93, t236, t432, t437, i1.i0.t375, i1.i0.t377, i1.i0.t387, i1.i0.t389, i1.i0.t392, i1.i0.t393...1887
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 24
(forward)formula 0,1,24.3767,541768,1,0,950379,16150,6611,2.34236e+06,680,71504,2352419
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 408 transition count 549
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 408 transition count 549
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 385 transition count 516
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 385 transition count 516
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 385 transition count 511
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 375 transition count 493
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 375 transition count 493
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 367 transition count 483
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 367 transition count 483
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 367 transition count 481
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 362 transition count 473
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 362 transition count 473
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 360 transition count 470
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 360 transition count 470
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 188 place count 359 transition count 468
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 359 transition count 468
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 359 transition count 465
Applied a total of 192 rules in 89 ms. Remains 359 /450 variables (removed 91) and now considering 465/604 (removed 139) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 465 rows 359 cols
[2025-06-04 03:52:38] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:52:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 607 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 881 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 464 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:52:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/359 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 232 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 235 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 370 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 361 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 285 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 257 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 368 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 326 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 248 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 387 ms of which 89 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 164 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 178 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 154 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 166 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 178 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 18/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 359/824 variables, and 36 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/359 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 464/464 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/359 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 18/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 278 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 339 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 282 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 322 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 323 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 256 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 330 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 223 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 248 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 200 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 249 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 245 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 182 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 186 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 201 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 141 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 217 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 19/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 354 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 347 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 175 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 161 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 169 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 185 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 6/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 279 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 282 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 259 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 280 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 275 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 359/824 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/359 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/464 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60116ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 464 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60120ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 359/450 places, 465/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61093 ms. Remains : 359/450 places, 465/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 465 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17932523069186857059.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 03:53:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1484254904931155221.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17932523069186857059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1484254904931155221.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06272e+14,11.2392,230268,2,18236,5,663744,6,0,1903,1.48454e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17785594611898600279.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17785594611898600279.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17785594611898600279.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17785594611898600279.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17785594611898600279.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 173 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 13 ms.
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11755190797531877619.gal : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4465049122834161580.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11755190797531877619.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4465049122834161580.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06272e+14,6.29305,102736,3092,84,143288,1098,863,406237,91,3546,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(A((i20.i0.u116.p524==0) U EG(((i19.u109.p474==0)||(i0.i1.u15.p94==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(((i19.u109.p474==0)||(i0.i1.u15.p94==1))))))) * !(E(!(EG(((i19.u109.p474==0)||(i0.i1.u15...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t399, t400, t401, t402, t403, t415, t420, i0.i0.u4.t395, i2.i0.t358, i2.i0.t367, i2.i0.t372, ...1804
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
(forward)formula 0,0,14.1044,208464,1,0,360319,1508,6107,785055,433,3815,1025452
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 522 edges and 450 vertex of which 76 / 450 are part of one of the 21 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 55 places
Ensure Unique test removed 63 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 63 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 167 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 167 transitions
Performed 167 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 167
Iterating post reduction 0 with 167 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 394 transition count 373
Reduce places removed 167 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 11 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 11 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 1 with 187 rules applied. Total rules applied 355 place count 227 transition count 353
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 218 transition count 352
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 217 transition count 352
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 366 place count 217 transition count 346
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 378 place count 211 transition count 346
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 419 place count 170 transition count 270
Iterating global reduction 4 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 460 place count 170 transition count 270
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 170 transition count 264
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 470 place count 166 transition count 264
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 484 place count 152 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 6 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 498 place count 152 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 6 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 505 place count 152 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 507 place count 151 transition count 235
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 509 place count 149 transition count 232
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 511 place count 149 transition count 232
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 512 place count 148 transition count 231
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 513 place count 148 transition count 231
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 559 place count 125 transition count 208
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 566 place count 125 transition count 201
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 577 place count 114 transition count 179
Iterating global reduction 9 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 114 transition count 179
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 593 place count 109 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 9 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 598 place count 109 transition count 173
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 600 place count 107 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 602 place count 107 transition count 170
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 604 place count 105 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 105 transition count 166
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 608 place count 103 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 610 place count 103 transition count 162
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 611 place count 102 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 612 place count 102 transition count 160
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 615 place count 102 transition count 157
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 619 place count 102 transition count 153
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 10 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 620 place count 102 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 101 transition count 152
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 12 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 621 place count 101 transition count 151
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 623 place count 100 transition count 151
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 12 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 624 place count 99 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 12 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 625 place count 99 transition count 149
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 12 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 626 place count 98 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 12 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 627 place count 98 transition count 147
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 12 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 630 place count 95 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 12 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 633 place count 95 transition count 144
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 12 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 637 place count 93 transition count 142
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 12 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 640 place count 93 transition count 139
Applied a total of 640 rules in 116 ms. Remains 93 /450 variables (removed 357) and now considering 139/604 (removed 465) transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 93 cols
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 172 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 7 ms returned []
Running 138 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 03:54:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 128/221 variables, 93/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/222 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved in 13358 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 138/138 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/93 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 128/221 variables, 93/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 138/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/222 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 246 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved in 23803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 93/93 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 138/138 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 37205ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 138 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37205ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 93/450 places, 139/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37599 ms. Remains : 93/450 places, 139/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 139 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16365679200568228371.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9182753238349039473.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16365679200568228371.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9182753238349039473.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.42656e+08,0.119213,6596,2,636,5,12660,6,0,500,11924,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF((p477==1)) * EG((p2==0))) * ((p311==0)||(p285==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U (p477==1)) * EG((p2==0))) * ((p311==0)||(p285==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t6, t7, t9, t11, t12, t15, t17, t18, t19, t59, t61, t76, t80, t86, t87, t89, t90,...291
(forward)formula 0,1,4.39542,99196,1,0,433,537837,300,217,3235,641036,531
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 414 transition count 556
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 414 transition count 556
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 395 transition count 529
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 395 transition count 529
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 395 transition count 525
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 388 transition count 512
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 388 transition count 512
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 383 transition count 505
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 383 transition count 505
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 379 transition count 499
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 379 transition count 499
Applied a total of 146 rules in 46 ms. Remains 379 /450 variables (removed 71) and now considering 499/604 (removed 105) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 499 rows 379 cols
[2025-06-04 03:55:06] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 155 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 367 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 525 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 498 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:55:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/379 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 257 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 209 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 214 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 212 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 209 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 184 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 279 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 208 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 342 ms of which 67 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 343 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 199 places in 427 ms of which 119 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 176 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 237 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 127 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 164 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 147 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/379 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 141 places in 249 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 119 places in 231 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 252 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 181 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 272 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 316 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 201 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30181ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 498 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30183ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 379/450 places, 499/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30757 ms. Remains : 379/450 places, 499/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 499 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3084473529459926767.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 03:55:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5611124767999298594.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3084473529459926767.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5611124767999298594.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.8691e+14,8.78688,170512,2,16653,5,515462,6,0,2017,1.03585e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8017619516497782833.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8017619516497782833.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8017619516497782833.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8017619516497782833.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8017619516497782833.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 196 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7496835310457078165.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6571989758448316430.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7496835310457078165.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6571989758448316430.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 408 transition count 548
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 408 transition count 548
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 385 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 385 transition count 514
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 385 transition count 510
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 375 transition count 492
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 375 transition count 492
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 367 transition count 482
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 367 transition count 482
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 367 transition count 480
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 362 transition count 472
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 362 transition count 472
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 360 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 360 transition count 469
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 187 place count 359 transition count 467
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 359 transition count 467
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 359 transition count 464
Applied a total of 191 rules in 58 ms. Remains 359 /450 variables (removed 91) and now considering 464/604 (removed 140) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 464 rows 359 cols
[2025-06-04 03:56:37] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:56:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 490 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 723 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 463 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:56:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/359 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 354 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 350 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 350 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 367 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 375 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 322 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 302 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 350 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 330 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 318 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 293 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 277 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 367 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 217 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 293 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 239 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 262 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 243 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 227 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 239 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 359/823 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/359 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 463/463 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/359 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 310 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 302 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 272 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 283 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 227 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 231 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 197 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 185 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 174 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 207 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 201 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 202 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 203 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 13/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 317 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 311 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 317 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 308 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 312 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 287 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 286 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 303 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 306 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 273 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 260 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 325 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 260 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 232 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 14/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 359/823 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/359 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/463 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 463 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60112ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 359/450 places, 464/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60894 ms. Remains : 359/450 places, 464/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:57:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 464 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:57:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9749509055807681482.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 03:57:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4168207115986758213.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9749509055807681482.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4168207115986758213.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.10547e+14,8.18528,148464,2,13193,5,452882,6,0,1902,887621,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(EX(((p311==0)||(p522==1))) U (p372==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(EX(((p311==0)||(p522==1))) U (p372==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t13, t14, t15, t18, t21, t23, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t34, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t44...885
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5166484883749524466.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5166484883749524466.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5166484883749524466.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5166484883749524466.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5166484883749524466.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 178 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 17 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9656827607940807697.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4737946913071756499.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9656827607940807697.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4737946913071756499.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.10547e+14,3.87574,77464,2440,51,122864,713,884,319656,80,2591,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(EX(((i12.i3.u60.p311==0)||(i21.i0.u120.p522==1))) U (i14.i2.u82.p372==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(EX(((i12.i3.u60.p311==0)||(i21.i0.u120.p522==1))) U (i14.i2.u82.p372==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t131, t415, t420, i1.t395, i3.i0.t358, i3.i0.t367, i3.i0.t372, i3.i0.t374, i3.i0.t376, i...1783
(forward)formula 0,1,6.33534,100248,1,0,217711,713,5112,319656,335,2591,702330
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 407 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 407 transition count 547
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 383 transition count 512
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 383 transition count 512
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 383 transition count 507
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 373 transition count 489
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 373 transition count 489
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 365 transition count 479
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 365 transition count 479
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 365 transition count 477
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 360 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 360 transition count 469
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 358 transition count 466
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 358 transition count 466
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 357 transition count 464
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 357 transition count 464
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 357 transition count 461
Applied a total of 196 rules in 50 ms. Remains 357 /450 variables (removed 93) and now considering 461/604 (removed 143) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 461 rows 357 cols
[2025-06-04 03:58:14] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:58:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 542 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 721 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 460 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:58:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/357 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 190 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 224 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 218 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 228 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 244 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 191 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 305 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 283 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 297 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 319 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 281 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 361 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 366 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 259 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 226 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 342 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30162ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30165ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 357/450 places, 461/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30938 ms. Remains : 357/450 places, 461/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 461 transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8370744662528362708.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 03:58:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13506371662701031606.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8370744662528362708.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13506371662701031606.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02798e+14,8.45333,145432,2,13045,5,443079,6,0,1891,876332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6018979164241476941.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6018979164241476941.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6018979164241476941.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6018979164241476941.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6018979164241476941.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 173 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 25 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8743557773765922553.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11360464102792962720.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8743557773765922553.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11360464102792962720.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02798e+14,1.79163,40728,1620,63,64121,624,892,145791,85,1806,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EF((i4.i2.u29.p179==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U (i4.i2.u29.p179==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t131, t197, t412, t417, i0.i1.t392, i2.t382, i2.i0.u13.t383, i2.i1.t355, i2.i1.t357, i2.i1.t3...1768
(forward)formula 0,0,3.56371,70936,1,0,153747,724,5899,206350,378,1806,518794
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 409 transition count 551
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 409 transition count 551
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 386 transition count 518
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 386 transition count 518
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 386 transition count 513
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 376 transition count 495
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 376 transition count 495
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 369 transition count 486
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 369 transition count 486
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 369 transition count 484
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 173 place count 365 transition count 478
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 365 transition count 478
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 364 transition count 477
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 364 transition count 477
Applied a total of 179 rules in 43 ms. Remains 364 /450 variables (removed 86) and now considering 477/604 (removed 127) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 477 rows 364 cols
[2025-06-04 03:59:19] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 176 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 03:59:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 453 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 633 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 476 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 03:59:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/364 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 327 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 352 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 374 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 365 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 287 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 381 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 344 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 349 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 371 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 311 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 338 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 138 places in 277 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 366 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 266 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 223 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 221 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 192 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 203 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 217 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 201 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 364/841 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/364 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 476/476 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/364 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 205 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 03:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 232 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 286 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 216 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 269 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 256 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 274 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 261 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 231 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 201 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 195 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 11/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 361 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 312 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 358 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 354 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 318 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 238 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 6/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 246 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 364/841 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved in 30039 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/364 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/476 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60125ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 476 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60127ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 364/450 places, 477/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60808 ms. Remains : 364/450 places, 477/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 477 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10167052953286533579.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7568941536503255848.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10167052953286533579.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7568941536503255848.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.21352e+14,8.88617,166452,2,15530,5,494524,6,0,1935,1.02337e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11771356191710145802.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11771356191710145802.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11771356191710145802.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11771356191710145802.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11771356191710145802.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 172 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 27 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10730825522656943851.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 04:00:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10760571570778323151.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10730825522656943851.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10760571570778323151.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 524 edges and 450 vertex of which 73 / 450 are part of one of the 21 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 52 places
Ensure Unique test removed 59 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 59 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 171 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 171 transitions
Performed 171 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 171
Iterating post reduction 0 with 171 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 397 transition count 373
Reduce places removed 171 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 193 rules applied. Total rules applied 365 place count 226 transition count 351
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 376 place count 216 transition count 350
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 215 transition count 350
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 377 place count 215 transition count 345
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 387 place count 210 transition count 345
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 429 place count 168 transition count 267
Iterating global reduction 4 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 471 place count 168 transition count 267
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 477 place count 168 transition count 261
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 163 transition count 261
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 498 place count 147 transition count 236
Iterating global reduction 6 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 514 place count 147 transition count 236
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 6 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 522 place count 147 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 525 place count 145 transition count 227
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 529 place count 141 transition count 220
Iterating global reduction 8 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 533 place count 141 transition count 220
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 534 place count 140 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 535 place count 140 transition count 219
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 577 place count 119 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 584 place count 119 transition count 191
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 593 place count 110 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 9 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 602 place count 110 transition count 173
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 608 place count 104 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 9 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 614 place count 104 transition count 167
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 617 place count 101 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 620 place count 101 transition count 161
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 623 place count 98 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 626 place count 98 transition count 155
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 9 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 629 place count 95 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 9 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 632 place count 95 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 9 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 638 place count 95 transition count 143
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 5 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 5 transitions
Iterating global reduction 10 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 643 place count 95 transition count 138
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 645 place count 95 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 11 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 648 place count 93 transition count 135
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 12 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 649 place count 92 transition count 135
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 13 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 650 place count 91 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 13 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 651 place count 91 transition count 133
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 13 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 652 place count 90 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 13 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 653 place count 90 transition count 131
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 13 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 656 place count 87 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 13 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 659 place count 87 transition count 128
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 663 place count 85 transition count 126
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 13 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 666 place count 85 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 13 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 667 place count 84 transition count 122
Applied a total of 667 rules in 66 ms. Remains 84 /450 variables (removed 366) and now considering 122/604 (removed 482) transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 112 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 112 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 134 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 112 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 150 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 112 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 04:01:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/84 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 111/195 variables, 84/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 196/196 variables, and 98 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 9559 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/84 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 111/195 variables, 84/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 107/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/196 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/196 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 196/196 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 13977 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 84/84 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23552ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23553ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 84/450 places, 122/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23923 ms. Remains : 84/450 places, 122/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15434867523361502331.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8719190526801017585.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15434867523361502331.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8719190526801017585.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.39394e+08,0.434211,11604,2,2831,5,39387,6,0,446,32006,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(AG((p80==0))) + ((p42==1)&&(p520==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p80==0))))) + ((p42==1)&&(p520==0))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t3, t6, t7, t9, t12, t13, t15, t17, t60, t65, t69, t70, t72, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82,...300
(forward)formula 0,1,5.28544,117776,1,0,260,690844,260,114,3008,515544,313
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 409 transition count 549
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 409 transition count 549
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 387 transition count 516
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 387 transition count 516
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 387 transition count 511
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 378 transition count 496
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 378 transition count 496
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 371 transition count 487
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 371 transition count 487
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 371 transition count 485
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 367 transition count 479
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 367 transition count 479
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 366 transition count 478
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 366 transition count 478
Applied a total of 175 rules in 52 ms. Remains 366 /450 variables (removed 84) and now considering 478/604 (removed 126) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 478 rows 366 cols
[2025-06-04 04:01:50] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:01:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:01:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 561 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 749 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 477 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:01:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/366 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 369 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 360 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 334 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 339 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 262 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 361 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 325 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 343 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 383 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 362 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 138 places in 349 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 353 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 299 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 300 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 306 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 361 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 138 places in 276 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 154 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 192 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 189 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 1.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 1.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 1.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 1.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 1.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 1.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 0.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 0.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 0.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 0.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 0.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 0.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 0.0)
(s353 0.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 366/844 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/366 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 477/477 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/366 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 319 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 187 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 289 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 340 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 336 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 326 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 288 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 267 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 192 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 197 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 180 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 279 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 283 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 279 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 256 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 230 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 185 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 18/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 281 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 366/844 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/366 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/477 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60112ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 477 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60114ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 366/450 places, 478/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60918 ms. Remains : 366/450 places, 478/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:02:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 478 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:02:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16020888988437595523.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 04:02:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14615717324005069994.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16020888988437595523.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14615717324005069994.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26786e+14,7.72365,157156,2,13256,5,469188,6,0,1944,962934,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((p61==0)||(p138==1))) U AX((p621==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((p621==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((p621==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((p61==0)||(p138==1)))) * !(...189
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t13, t14, t15, t18, t21, t23, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t34, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t44...912
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12123642496247518809.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12123642496247518809.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12123642496247518809.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12123642496247518809.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12123642496247518809.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 170 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1913622354986682620.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3404578599197315250.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1913622354986682620.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3404578599197315250.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26786e+14,8.25195,158932,3002,257,219347,3759,906,1.00053e+06,146,19800,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((i1.u10.p61==0)||(i4.i1.u24.p138==1))) U AX((i20.i3.u135.p621==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((i20.i3.u135.p621==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((i20.i3.u135.p621==1))))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((i1...242
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t90, t395, t424, t429, i1.t401, i1.t400, i1.t385, i1.t384, i1.t381, i1.t379, i1.t371, i1.t362...1786
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
(forward)formula 0,0,13.7192,219988,1,0,383300,5173,6973,1.14994e+06,845,19800,910245
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 529 edges and 450 vertex of which 76 / 450 are part of one of the 21 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 55 places
Ensure Unique test removed 63 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 63 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 174 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 174 transitions
Performed 174 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 174
Iterating post reduction 0 with 174 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 394 transition count 366
Reduce places removed 174 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 12 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 12 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 1 with 196 rules applied. Total rules applied 371 place count 220 transition count 344
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 210 transition count 344
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 381 place count 210 transition count 339
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 391 place count 205 transition count 339
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 433 place count 163 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 3 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 475 place count 163 transition count 260
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 481 place count 163 transition count 254
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 486 place count 158 transition count 254
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 502 place count 142 transition count 229
Iterating global reduction 5 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 518 place count 142 transition count 229
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 5 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 526 place count 142 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 529 place count 140 transition count 220
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 533 place count 136 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 537 place count 136 transition count 213
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 538 place count 135 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 539 place count 135 transition count 212
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 581 place count 114 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 588 place count 114 transition count 184
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 597 place count 105 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 8 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 606 place count 105 transition count 166
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 612 place count 99 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 618 place count 99 transition count 160
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 621 place count 96 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 624 place count 96 transition count 154
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 627 place count 93 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 630 place count 93 transition count 148
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 8 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 633 place count 90 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 8 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 636 place count 90 transition count 142
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 642 place count 90 transition count 136
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 646 place count 90 transition count 132
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 9 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 648 place count 90 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 10 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 650 place count 88 transition count 130
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 11 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 651 place count 87 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 652 place count 87 transition count 128
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 11 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 653 place count 86 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 654 place count 86 transition count 126
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 11 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 657 place count 83 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 11 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 660 place count 83 transition count 123
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 664 place count 81 transition count 121
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 11 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 667 place count 81 transition count 118
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 11 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 668 place count 80 transition count 117
Applied a total of 668 rules in 58 ms. Remains 80 /450 variables (removed 370) and now considering 117/604 (removed 487) transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 107 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 107 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 107 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 04:03:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/80 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 106/186 variables, 80/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/187 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/187 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 187/187 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 8770 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/80 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 106/186 variables, 80/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 101/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/187 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/187 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 187/187 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 9606 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18406ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18407ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 80/450 places, 117/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18722 ms. Remains : 80/450 places, 117/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11922779144327141269.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8421675062306423341.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11922779144327141269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8421675062306423341.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17792e+08,0.21375,10304,2,2005,5,31523,6,0,426,24192,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p39==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p39==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 115/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.97591,23572,1,0,9,105299,20,4,2143,69384,8
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 36 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 36 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 414 transition count 556
Iterating global reduction 0 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 414 transition count 556
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 392 transition count 523
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 392 transition count 523
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 392 transition count 519
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 383 transition count 502
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 383 transition count 502
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 376 transition count 493
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 376 transition count 493
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 376 transition count 491
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 372 transition count 486
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 372 transition count 486
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 371 transition count 484
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 371 transition count 484
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 370 transition count 482
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 370 transition count 482
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 370 transition count 479
Applied a total of 169 rules in 47 ms. Remains 370 /450 variables (removed 80) and now considering 479/604 (removed 125) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 479 rows 370 cols
[2025-06-04 04:03:55] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:03:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 367 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 573 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 478 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:03:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/370 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 349 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 370 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 335 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 309 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 336 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 199 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 281 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 294 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 254 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 249 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 260 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 256 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 207 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 208 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 15/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 370/849 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/370 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 478/478 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/370 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 15/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 137 places in 325 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 344 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 300 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 334 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 331 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 348 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 309 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 353 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 312 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 290 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 264 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 286 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 296 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 362 ms of which 70 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 259 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 352 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 246 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 276 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 243 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 280 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 239 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 280 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 320 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 271 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 290 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 315 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 286 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 256 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 8/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 292 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 370/849 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/370 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/478 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60105ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60107ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 370/450 places, 479/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60728 ms. Remains : 370/450 places, 479/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:04:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 479 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:04:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality975415368604380088.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 04:04:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2507426986884710338.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality975415368604380088.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2507426986884710338.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39931e+14,9.69623,204876,2,17739,5,611872,6,0,1961,1.29633e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9751758613601650561.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9751758613601650561.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9751758613601650561.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9751758613601650561.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9751758613601650561.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 165 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12001838816424821880.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 04:05:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5319164634825571325.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12001838816424821880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5319164634825571325.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.39931e+14,14.3326,208572,4704,381,277878,3696,931,930312,184,36200,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((E(AX(A(((i20.u140.p611==0)||(i15.i1.u94.p392==1)) U ((i19.i1.u121.p509==0)||(i11.i1.u89.p380==1)))) U !(((i6.i0.u37.p221!=1) + E(((i20...392
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,(E(!(EX(!(!((E(!(((i19.i1.u121.p509==0)||(i11.i1.u89.p380==1))) U (!(((i20.u140.p611==0)||(i15.i...575
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t88, t428, t433, i0.i0.u3.t408, i2.i0.t364, i2.i0.t373, i2.i0.t374, i2.i0.t379, i2.i0.t380, i...1845
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 409 transition count 549
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 409 transition count 549
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 387 transition count 517
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 387 transition count 517
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 387 transition count 512
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 378 transition count 497
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 378 transition count 497
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 371 transition count 488
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 371 transition count 488
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 371 transition count 486
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 367 transition count 480
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 367 transition count 480
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 366 transition count 479
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 366 transition count 479
Applied a total of 175 rules in 48 ms. Remains 366 /450 variables (removed 84) and now considering 479/604 (removed 125) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 479 rows 366 cols
[2025-06-04 04:05:56] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:05:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 218 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:05:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:05:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 381 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 613 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 478 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:05:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/366 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 313 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 383 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 108 places in 379 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 381 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 366 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 357 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 334 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 332 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 272 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 139 places in 344 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 344 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 336 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 354 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 267 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 223 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 184 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 314 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 273 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 244 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 199 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 366/845 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/366 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 478/478 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/366 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 322 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 312 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 340 ms of which 61 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 333 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 117 places in 321 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 281 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 347 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 328 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 273 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 228 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 271 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 277 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 288 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 279 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 242 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 238 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 226 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 249 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 217 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 288 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 20/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 333 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 171 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 256 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 1)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 1)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 0)
(s74 0)
(s75 0)
(s76 0)
(s77 0)
(s78 0)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 1)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(s97 0)
(s98 0)
(s99 0)
(s100 0)
(s101 0)
(s102 0)
(s103 0)
(s104 0)
(s105 0)
(s106 0)
(s107 0)
(s108 0)
(s109 0)
(s110 0)
(s111 0)
(s112 0)
(s113 0)
(s114 0)
(s115 0)
(s116 0)
(s117 0)
(s118 0)
(s119 0)
(s120 0)
(s121 0)
(s122 0)
(s123 0)
(s124 0)
(s125 0)
(s126 0)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 1)
(s135 0)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 0)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 0)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0)
(s146 0)
(s147 0)
(s148 0)
(s149 0)
(s150 0)
(s151 0)
(s152 0)
(s153 0)
(s154 0)
(s155 0)
(s156 0)
(s157 0)
(s158 0)
(s159 0)
(s160 0)
(s161 0)
(s162 0)
(s163 0)
(s164 0)
(s165 0)
(s166 0)
(s167 0)
(s168 0)
(s169 0)
(s170 0)
(s171 0)
(s172 0)
(s173 0)
(s174 0)
(s175 0)
(s176 0)
(s177 0)
(s178 0)
(s179 0)
(s180 0)
(s181 0)
(s182 1)
(s183 0)
(s184 0)
(s185 0)
(s186 0)
(s187 0)
(s188 0)
(s189 0)
(s190 0)
(s191 0)
(s192 0)
(s193 1)
(s194 0)
(s195 0)
(s196 0)
(s197 0)
(s198 0)
(s199 0)
(s200 0)
(s201 0)
(s202 0)
(s203 0)
(s204 0)
(s205 0)
(s206 0)
(s207 timeout
0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 366/845 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/366 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/478 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60135ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 478 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60137ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 366/450 places, 479/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60800 ms. Remains : 366/450 places, 479/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 479 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18437905754173524438.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 04:06:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17795247440851410126.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18437905754173524438.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17795247440851410126.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23554e+14,9.39863,167452,2,15629,5,497035,6,0,1945,1.02939e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 04:07:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:07:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7069419198884066660.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7069419198884066660.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7069419198884066660.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7069419198884066660.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7069419198884066660.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 04:07:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:07:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:07:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 176 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 21 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:07:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12107241636834981025.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5008727208854223274.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12107241636834981025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5008727208854223274.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23554e+14,9.92102,221392,3134,176,258330,2574,813,1.69859e+06,107,12995,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AX(((u85.p386==0)&&(i5.u26.p165==1))) * (i5.u23.p147==1)) * (i5.u28.p178==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i5.u28.p178==0)) * (i5.u23.p147==1)) * !(EX(!(((u85.p386==0)&&(i5.u26.p165==1))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t301, t302, t352, t395, t396, t425, t430, u85.t162, i2.t401, i2.t386, i2.t384, i2.t382, i2.t3...1540
(forward)formula 0,0,12.2144,221392,1,0,258330,3214,4505,1.69859e+06,447,14013,517488
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 407 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 407 transition count 547
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 383 transition count 512
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 383 transition count 512
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 383 transition count 507
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 373 transition count 489
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 373 transition count 489
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 365 transition count 479
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 365 transition count 479
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 365 transition count 477
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 360 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 360 transition count 469
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 358 transition count 466
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 358 transition count 466
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 357 transition count 464
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 357 transition count 464
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 357 transition count 461
Applied a total of 196 rules in 57 ms. Remains 357 /450 variables (removed 93) and now considering 461/604 (removed 143) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 461 rows 357 cols
[2025-06-04 04:07:39] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:07:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 392 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 572 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 460 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:07:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/357 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 377 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 322 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 348 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 305 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 311 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 374 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 343 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 364 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 319 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 332 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 317 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 299 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 202 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 333 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 234 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 329 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 228 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 239 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 257 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 357/818 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/357 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 460/460 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/357 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 21/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 342 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 325 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 310 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 216 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 184 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 220 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 247 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 253 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 264 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 238 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 201 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 243 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 195 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 230 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 218 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 193 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 17/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 158 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 203 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 357/818 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/357 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/460 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60089ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60090ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 357/450 places, 461/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60721 ms. Remains : 357/450 places, 461/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 461 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2203064400622399793.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 04:08:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3100159792852361354.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2203064400622399793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3100159792852361354.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02798e+14,7.29575,145284,2,13045,5,443079,6,0,1891,876332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((p514==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((p514==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t13, t14, t15, t18, t21, t23, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t34, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t44...885
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13143447055589024391.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13143447055589024391.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13143447055589024391.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13143447055589024391.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13143447055589024391.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 175 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 25 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10842761280529560972.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17694195862557786851.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10842761280529560972.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17694195862557786851.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02798e+14,4.40865,79248,2189,56,119217,826,878,334016,82,3904,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((i19.i1.u115.p514==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((i19.i1.u115.p514==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t86, t412, t417, i2.i0.t355, i2.i0.t357, i2.i0.t369, i2.i0.t371, i2.i0.t373, i2.i0.t382, i2.i...1779
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 408 transition count 548
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 408 transition count 548
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 385 transition count 514
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 385 transition count 514
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 385 transition count 510
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 375 transition count 492
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 375 transition count 492
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 161 place count 368 transition count 483
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 368 transition count 483
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 368 transition count 482
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 363 transition count 474
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 179 place count 363 transition count 474
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 181 place count 361 transition count 471
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 361 transition count 471
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 360 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 360 transition count 469
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 360 transition count 466
Applied a total of 188 rules in 47 ms. Remains 360 /450 variables (removed 90) and now considering 466/604 (removed 138) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 466 rows 360 cols
[2025-06-04 04:09:40] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:09:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 414 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 583 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 465 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:09:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/360 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 217 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 199 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 324 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 377 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 375 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 211 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 352 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 316 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 326 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 188 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 319 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 266 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 308 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 240 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 194 places in 436 ms of which 106 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 200 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 206 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 205 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/360 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 308 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 216 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 198 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 360 ms of which 94 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30305ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 465 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30307ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 360/450 places, 466/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30941 ms. Remains : 360/450 places, 466/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 466 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6290351902044983797.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1914720457422194135.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6290351902044983797.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1914720457422194135.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09776e+14,8.05071,144820,2,13060,5,443156,6,0,1908,876032,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX((EG(AX((p42==0))) + (EG(EF(((p169==0)||(p556==1)))) * AF((p19==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),!(EX(!((p42==0)))))] != FALSE + [((EY(EY(Init)) * EG(E(TRUE U ((p169==0)||(p556==1))))) * !(...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t13, t14, t15, t18, t21, t23, t25, t28, t30, t31, t33, t34, t35, t36, t39, t40, t41, t44...891
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15504764408202708659.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15504764408202708659.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15504764408202708659.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15504764408202708659.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15504764408202708659.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 172 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 17 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11155197177356918979.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 04:10:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2217394900689609650.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11155197177356918979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2217394900689609650.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09776e+14,5.92819,100612,2842,69,149559,831,926,416887,97,3187,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX((EG(AX((i1.i0.u7.p42==0))) + (EG(EF(((i4.i0.u19.p169==0)||(i23.i0.u126.p556==1)))) * AF((i1.i0.u5.p19==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(EY(Init)),!(EX(!((i1.i0.u7.p42==0)))))] != FALSE + [((EY(EY(Init)) * EG(E(TRUE U ((i4.i0.u19.p169==0)|...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t85, t417, t422, i1.i0.t355, i1.i0.t365, i1.i0.t370, i1.i0.t372, i1.i0.t374, i1.i0.t375, i1.i...1791
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 22
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 23
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 450/450 places, 604/604 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 407 transition count 547
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 407 transition count 547
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 383 transition count 512
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 383 transition count 512
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 383 transition count 507
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 373 transition count 489
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 373 transition count 489
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 365 transition count 479
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 365 transition count 479
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 365 transition count 477
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 182 place count 360 transition count 469
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 360 transition count 469
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 189 place count 358 transition count 466
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 358 transition count 466
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 192 place count 357 transition count 464
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 193 place count 357 transition count 464
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 357 transition count 461
Applied a total of 196 rules in 65 ms. Remains 357 /450 variables (removed 93) and now considering 461/604 (removed 143) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 461 rows 357 cols
[2025-06-04 04:11:11] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 155 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 04:11:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 452 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 618 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 460 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:11:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/357 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 340 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 241 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 245 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 237 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 252 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 191 places in 225 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 215 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 236 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 207 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 225 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 223 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 212 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 250 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 247 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 180 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 306 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 186 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 200 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 311 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 357/818 variables, and 39 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/357 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 460/460 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/357 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 21/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 293 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 304 ms of which 60 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 204 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 177 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 191 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 157 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 146 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 174 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 164 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 158 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 171 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 175 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 143 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 213 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 17/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 162 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 04:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 156 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 461/818 variables, 357/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/818 variables, 460/875 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 818/818 variables, and 875 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 357/357 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 460/460 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60112ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 460 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60113ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 357/450 places, 461/604 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60799 ms. Remains : 357/450 places, 461/604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 461 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality792285067346825154.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13280707086712002013.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality792285067346825154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13280707086712002013.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.02798e+14,7.02179,144796,2,13045,5,443079,6,0,1891,876332,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,7.08419,144796,1,0,6,443079,7,1,2219,876332,1
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7023120972984681302.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7023120972984681302.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7023120972984681302.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7023120972984681302.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7023120972984681302.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 236 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 36 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17168775865131029873.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 04:12:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7997521430530601776.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17168775865131029873.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7997521430530601776.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.10182e+14,71.9334,1126088,11330,3636,1.1993e+06,289702,1183,5.77274e+06,187,2.53359e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((E((EX(((i4.i1.u165.p604==0)||(i14.i0.u112.p380==1))) * (i5.i0.u29.p113!=1)) U (i7.i2.u52.p206==0)) * AG((i7.i4.u62.p247==0))) * ((i3...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((EX(((i4.i1.u165.p604==0)||(i14.i0.u112.p380==1))) * (i5.i0.u29.p113!=1)) U (i7.i2.u52...373
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t87, t115, t116, t118, t369, t435, t507, t508, t521, t522, t523, t524, t525, t537, t542,...2487
(forward)formula 0,0,192.703,2364540,1,0,3.07465e+06,398675,7474,1.00113e+07,929,2.53359e+06,6717644
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(EX(EG(((i3.i3.u20.p80==0)||(i7.i4.u54.p230==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),((i3.i3.u20.p80==0)||(i7.i4.u54.p230==1)))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 56 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 110 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9651779735640549698.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 04:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12432484954768791051.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9651779735640549698.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12432484954768791051.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.10182e+14,13.5794,275752,1987,8557,287353,176959,584,1.34986e+06,742,1.55134e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(EG(((i0.i0.i0.u4.p80==0)||(i0.i0.u6.p230==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)),((i0.i0.i0.u4.p80==0)||(i0.i0.u6.p230==1)))] != FALSE
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
(forward)formula 0,1,1029.91,15658668,1,0,1.93567e+07,5.12605e+06,1430,7.80603e+07,3218,3.31593e+07,236837
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-17-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E((E(AX(A(((i1.u18.p611==0)||(i0.i1.i0.u14.p392==1)) U ((i1.u17.p509==0)||(i0.i1.i0.i0.u13.p380==1)))) U !(((i0.i0.u6.p221!=1) + E(((i1.u...425
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(FwdU(Init,(E(!(EX(!(!((E(!(((i1.u17.p509==0)||(i0.i1.i0.i0.u13.p380==1))) U (!(((i1.u18.p611==0)||(i0.i1.i...608
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t537, t542, t565, i0.i0.u6.t314, i0.i0.u6.t315, i0.i0.u6.t317, i0.i0.u6.t318, i0.i0.u6.t319, ...3139
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 04:43:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 417 ms
[2025-06-04 04:43:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 604 transitions.
[2025-06-04 04:43:32] [INFO ] Transformed 450 places.
[2025-06-04 04:43:32] [INFO ] Transformed 604 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-04 04:43:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9849110417335525271.gal : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 04:43:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2567265049296683955.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9849110417335525271.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2567265049296683955.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...328
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 3 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-17"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-17, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008300665"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-17.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-17 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;