Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008300650.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-15, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008300650
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 149K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749005496877

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-15
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 02:51:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 02:51:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 02:51:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 152 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:39] [INFO ] Transformed 163 places.
[2025-06-04 02:51:39] [INFO ] Transformed 348 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:51:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 02:51:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 163 places and 348 transitions and 919 arcs in 370 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 25 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 29 transitions.
Support contains 80 out of 163 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 163/163 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 116 transition count 230
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 116 transition count 230
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 114 transition count 226
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 114 transition count 226
Applied a total of 98 rules in 54 ms. Remains 114 /163 variables (removed 49) and now considering 226/319 (removed 93) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 219 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 114 cols
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 21 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 393 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 219 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 228 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 694 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 225 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 219 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:51:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 244 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 155 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 266 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 224 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 179 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 164 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 162 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 12/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 8/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 10/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 7/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 3/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 4/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 6.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/333 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/114 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 87/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 218/332 variables, 114/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 225/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/333 variables, 1/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 440 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 225/225 constraints, Known Traps: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60353ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 225 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60375ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/163 places, 226/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61158 ms. Remains : 114/163 places, 226/319 transitions.
Support contains 80 out of 114 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3684 resets) in 3099 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 30/70 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (54 resets) in 52 ms. (75 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (45 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 28/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (60 resets) in 45 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
[2025-06-04 02:52:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 219 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:52:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:52:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 28 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/83 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 27 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp26 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 31/114 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 5/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 218/332 variables, 114/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/333 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/333 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved in 3686 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/80 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 34/114 variables, 8/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 6/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 16/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 218/332 variables, 114/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 25/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/332 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/333 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved in 5008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 114/114 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/28 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8719ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 25 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 37 out of 114 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 44 edges and 114 vertex of which 2 / 114 are part of one of the 1 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 475 edges and 113 vertex of which 112 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 86 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 86 transition count 164
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 82 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 82 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 82 transition count 147
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 81 transition count 146
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 81 transition count 144
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 81 transition count 143
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 80 transition count 143
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 80 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 79 transition count 142
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 79 transition count 142
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 78 transition count 141
Applied a total of 82 rules in 140 ms. Remains 78 /114 variables (removed 36) and now considering 141/226 (removed 85) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 140 ms. Remains : 78/114 places, 141/226 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4016 resets) in 505 ms. (79 steps per ms) remains 16/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (53 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (54 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (55 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (55 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (57 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (53 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (56 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (50 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (53 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (51 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (53 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (53 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (53 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 141 rows 78 cols
[2025-06-04 02:52:52] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/52 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 26/78 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 19/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 141/219 variables, 78/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 2444 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 31/52 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 26/78 variables, 8/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 16/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 3/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 2/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 141/219 variables, 78/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 16/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 1956 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 78/78 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4417ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Fused 16 Parikh solutions to 14 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 14 properties in 1616 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 78 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 78/78 places, 141/141 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 78 edges and 78 vertex of which 4 / 78 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 337 edges and 76 vertex of which 72 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 72 transition count 136
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 71 transition count 136
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 55 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 55 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 55 transition count 104
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 52 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 52 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 50 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 50 transition count 92
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 48 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 48 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 48 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 46 transition count 81
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -19
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 44 transition count 100
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 44 transition count 97
Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 44 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 36 transition count 89
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 36 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 34 transition count 194
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 33 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 33 transition count 155
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 6 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 94 place count 32 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 32 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 32 transition count 144
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 32 transition count 137
Applied a total of 111 rules in 56 ms. Remains 32 /78 variables (removed 46) and now considering 137/141 (removed 4) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 57 ms. Remains : 32/78 places, 137/141 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 34360 steps (2560 resets) in 873 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
Support contains 46 out of 114 places (down from 50) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 154 edges and 114 vertex of which 6 / 114 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 63 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 63 transition count 132
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 54 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 54 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 54 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 52 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 52 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 50 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 50 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 50 transition count 88
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 50 transition count 86
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 48 transition count 84
Applied a total of 143 rules in 28 ms. Remains 48 /114 variables (removed 66) and now considering 84/226 (removed 142) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/126 variables, 48/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 4650 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 78/126 variables, 48/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 70/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 7090 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11768ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11769ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/114 places, 84/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11946 ms. Remains : 48/114 places, 84/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability790528523044858660.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2962028379458540256.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability790528523044858660.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2962028379458540256.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,793885,0.698914,18752,2,2023,5,59309,6,0,268,67203,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(EG((p59!=1))) U (p45==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p45==1))))) * !(E(!((p45==1)) U (!(!(EG((p59!=1)))) * !((p45==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t29, t30, t31, t32...290
(forward)formula 0,0,9.75638,240580,1,0,437,1.44942e+06,190,220,1946,1.56072e+06,520
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 156 edges and 114 vertex of which 6 / 114 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 62 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 62 transition count 130
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 53 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 53 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 53 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 50 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 50 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 48 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 48 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 48 transition count 83
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 48 transition count 81
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 46 transition count 79
Applied a total of 147 rules in 29 ms. Remains 46 /114 variables (removed 68) and now considering 79/226 (removed 147) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 22 ms returned []
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/46 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 73/119 variables, 46/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 4049 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/46 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 73/119 variables, 46/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 65/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/120 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 6032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10101ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10103ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/114 places, 79/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10327 ms. Remains : 46/114 places, 79/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
RANDOM walk for 38844 steps (3956 resets) in 212 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 02:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7669404954484283697.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15935410778231736529.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7669404954484283697.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15935410778231736529.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 157 edges and 114 vertex of which 6 / 114 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 61 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 61 transition count 128
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 52 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 52 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 52 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 49 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 49 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 46 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 46 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 46 transition count 76
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 46 transition count 74
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 44 transition count 72
Applied a total of 154 rules in 31 ms. Remains 44 /114 variables (removed 70) and now considering 72/226 (removed 154) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 233 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned []
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 67 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/44 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 66/110 variables, 44/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/111 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 111/111 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 3533 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/44 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 66/110 variables, 44/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 58/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/111 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 111/111 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 4580 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8134ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/114 places, 72/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8431 ms. Remains : 44/114 places, 72/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1845031581910501533.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14039695210233284532.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1845031581910501533.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14039695210233284532.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,484789,0.293096,9524,2,1907,5,26379,6,0,240,22128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EF((p150==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p150==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, Intersection with reachable at e...220
(forward)formula 0,1,1.01169,21700,1,0,130,97440,165,57,1774,74256,153
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 72 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 72 transition count 146
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 67 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 67 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 67 transition count 133
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 66 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 66 transition count 130
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 65 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 65 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 65 transition count 127
Applied a total of 102 rules in 6 ms. Remains 65 /114 variables (removed 49) and now considering 127/226 (removed 99) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 126 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 124 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:53:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 123/188 variables, 65/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/189 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 189/189 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 8224 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 123/188 variables, 65/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 126/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/189 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/189 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 189/189 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 17333 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25617ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25618ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/114 places, 127/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25832 ms. Remains : 65/114 places, 127/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11777048600812660148.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4809572661657587091.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11777048600812660148.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4809572661657587091.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.39942e+06,0.61724,21924,2,2447,5,69156,6,0,383,82740,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((p94==1) * AG((p14==1))) + ((A(((p82==1)&&(p67==1)) U AG((p148==1))) + !((((p17==1)&&(p160==1))||(p99==1)))) * ((p49==1)||((p36==1)...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((p53==1)||(p115==1))) U (!((p47!=1)) * !(((p53==1)||(p115==1))))) + EG(!...820
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...511
(forward)formula 0,0,13.2444,330140,1,0,633,2.27807e+06,294,305,3013,1.59898e+06,713
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 68 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 68 transition count 137
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 61 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 61 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 61 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 59 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 59 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 57 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 57 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 57 transition count 99
Applied a total of 128 rules in 5 ms. Remains 57 /114 variables (removed 57) and now considering 99/226 (removed 127) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:54:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 94/151 variables, 57/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 152/152 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 6645 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 7/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 94/151 variables, 57/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 98/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 152/152 variables, and 176 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 12621 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19293ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19294ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/114 places, 99/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19526 ms. Remains : 57/114 places, 99/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6859508550240400749.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14049964205870430460.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6859508550240400749.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14049964205870430460.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,929970,0.583548,19772,2,4688,5,65539,6,0,321,68553,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p133!=1) U (!(EF(((p93==1)||(p9==1)))) * !(AX(E(!(((p69==1)&&(p160==1))) U ((p108==1)||(p31==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,(p133!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U ((p93==1)||(p9==1)))))) * !(E(!(((p69==1)&&(p160==1))) U ((p108==1)||(p3...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t...337
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 96/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,8.86647,179460,1,0,294,980680,227,127,2549,919450,312
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 69 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 69 transition count 140
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 62 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 62 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 62 transition count 118
Applied a total of 112 rules in 4 ms. Remains 62 /114 variables (removed 52) and now considering 118/226 (removed 108) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 115 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:54:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/176 variables, 62/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 177/177 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 8215 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/176 variables, 62/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 117/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 177/177 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 16051 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24291ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/114 places, 118/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24455 ms. Remains : 62/114 places, 118/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17198235020998922407.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7290741542582318418.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17198235020998922407.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7290741542582318418.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.90124e+06,0.4633,14248,2,2107,5,50790,6,0,362,47108,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX((((p61==1) * A((p111==1) U ((p90==1)&&(p160==1)))) * (AG((p9==1)) * !((AX((p22==1)) * (p143==1)))))) U AF(((p140==1) * E(EF((p100==1...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EX(!((((p61==1) * !((E(!(((p90==1)&&(p160==1))) U (!((p111==1)) * !(((p90==1)&&(p160==1))))) + EG(...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...410
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,10.072,247732,1,0,470,1.46753e+06,282,259,2838,1.49766e+06,480
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 144 edges and 114 vertex of which 6 / 114 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 65 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 65 transition count 136
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 57 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 57 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 57 transition count 110
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 54 transition count 101
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 51 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 51 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 51 transition count 87
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 51 transition count 85
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 49 transition count 83
Applied a total of 143 rules in 18 ms. Remains 49 /114 variables (removed 65) and now considering 83/226 (removed 143) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 02:55:22] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 69 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/49 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/126 variables, 49/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 4319 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/49 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 77/126 variables, 49/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 69/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved in 6837 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11170ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 69 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11171ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/114 places, 83/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11454 ms. Remains : 49/114 places, 83/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5017672797865351821.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10659286584529375391.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5017672797865351821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10659286584529375391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.10614e+06,0.564666,18256,2,2177,5,57259,6,0,271,66289,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p97==0) * EF(((((p36==1)||(p50==0))||(p60==0)) * AG((p75==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p97==0) * E(TRUE U ((((p36==1)||(p50==0))||(p60==0)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p75==0)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t14, t15, t16, t17, t29, t30, t33, t34...310
(forward)formula 0,1,1.68364,41628,1,0,194,225052,190,83,1981,172706,197
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 156 edges and 114 vertex of which 6 / 114 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 62 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 62 transition count 130
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 53 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 53 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 53 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 50 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 50 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 47 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 47 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 47 transition count 78
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 47 transition count 76
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 45 transition count 74
Applied a total of 152 rules in 15 ms. Remains 45 /114 variables (removed 69) and now considering 74/226 (removed 152) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/113 variables, 45/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 3390 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 68/113 variables, 45/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 60/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 3416 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6816ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6817ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/114 places, 74/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6969 ms. Remains : 45/114 places, 74/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10001959382187298709.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11901923588797981770.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10001959382187298709.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11901923588797981770.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,550399,0.125268,7812,2,1330,5,18988,6,0,246,18180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p53==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p53==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 70/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.344082,13060,1,0,9,48883,19,4,1337,33792,8
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 64 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 64 transition count 130
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 56 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 56 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 56 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 53 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 53 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 50 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 50 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 50 transition count 82
Applied a total of 145 rules in 5 ms. Remains 50 /114 variables (removed 64) and now considering 82/226 (removed 144) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:55:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/128 variables, 50/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 3724 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/128 variables, 50/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 81/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 6614 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10356ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10356ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/114 places, 82/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10512 ms. Remains : 50/114 places, 82/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6511677847302005485.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7503322052906174979.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6511677847302005485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7503322052906174979.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,599976,0.276866,9560,2,2000,5,27339,6,0,278,24818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(EX(!(A((p55==1) U (p35==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U EX(!(!((E(!((p35==1)) U (!((p55==1)) * !((p35==1)))) + EG(!((p35==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t34, t35, Intersection wi...237
(forward)formula 0,1,7.55549,158916,1,0,409,830466,196,221,2086,963135,453
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 64 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 64 transition count 130
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 57 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 57 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 57 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 54 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 54 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 51 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 51 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 51 transition count 83
Applied a total of 144 rules in 7 ms. Remains 51 /114 variables (removed 63) and now considering 83/226 (removed 143) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 203 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:56:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 79/130 variables, 51/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/131 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 131/131 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 4476 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 79/130 variables, 51/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 82/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/131 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/131 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 131/131 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 7463 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11966ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11966ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/114 places, 83/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12180 ms. Remains : 51/114 places, 83/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15793895330226368456.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3959122250067125335.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15793895330226368456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3959122250067125335.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,651006,0.371058,11228,2,2862,5,33755,6,0,283,33327,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((p107==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((p107==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t18, t20, t21, t22, t59, t66, ...252
(forward)formula 0,0,1.14469,26144,1,0,190,95213,184,94,2048,100765,200
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 68 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 68 transition count 137
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 60 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 60 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 60 transition count 113
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 57 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 57 transition count 104
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 54 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 54 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 54 transition count 90
Applied a total of 136 rules in 7 ms. Remains 54 /114 variables (removed 60) and now considering 90/226 (removed 136) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 169 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:56:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/139 variables, 54/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 140/140 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 6558 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/139 variables, 54/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 89/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 140/140 variables, and 160 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 9654 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16233ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16233ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/114 places, 90/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16412 ms. Remains : 54/114 places, 90/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3455354281735029294.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16181936425329483650.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3455354281735029294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16181936425329483650.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,782227,0.37395,15012,2,3022,5,46073,6,0,299,48420,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((((p111==0) + ((p21==0) * EX((p16==0)))) + (EX((p14==0)) * EF((p6==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((((p111==0) + ((p21==0) * EX((p16==0)))) + (EX((p14==0)) * E(TRUE U (p6==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t21, t39, t40, t41, t42, t...272
(forward)formula 0,1,4.9353,117728,1,0,221,634458,203,106,2271,539191,266
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 64 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 64 transition count 130
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 56 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 56 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 56 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 53 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 53 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 50 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 50 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 50 transition count 82
Applied a total of 145 rules in 18 ms. Remains 50 /114 variables (removed 64) and now considering 82/226 (removed 144) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:56:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/128 variables, 50/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 5503 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/128 variables, 50/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 81/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 6988 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12509ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12509ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/114 places, 82/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12740 ms. Remains : 50/114 places, 82/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3887098960431300377.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15626167722468206434.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3887098960431300377.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15626167722468206434.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,599976,0.170508,9560,2,2000,5,27339,6,0,278,24818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((p23==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (p23==1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,0.27146,9944,1,0,9,28225,9,1,559,25939,4
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 63 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 63 transition count 128
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 55 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 55 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 55 transition count 103
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 52 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 52 transition count 94
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 49 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 49 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 49 transition count 79
Applied a total of 148 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /114 variables (removed 65) and now considering 79/226 (removed 147) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:56:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 75/124 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 125/125 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3992 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/124 variables, 49/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 78/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 125/125 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 6636 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10639ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10639ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/114 places, 79/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10764 ms. Remains : 49/114 places, 79/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13517813183032676943.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9461082874287159276.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13517813183032676943.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9461082874287159276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,484794,0.136917,8376,2,1824,5,21471,6,0,271,19214,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(EF((p55==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U (p55==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, Intersection with reachab...227
(forward)formula 0,0,0.651541,22560,1,0,140,99061,175,65,2009,82906,169
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 155 edges and 114 vertex of which 6 / 114 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 62 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 62 transition count 130
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 53 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 53 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 53 transition count 103
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 50 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 50 transition count 94
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 48 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 48 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 48 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 48 transition count 82
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 46 transition count 80
Applied a total of 146 rules in 15 ms. Remains 46 /114 variables (removed 68) and now considering 80/226 (removed 146) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/46 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/120 variables, 46/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 3245 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/46 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 74/120 variables, 46/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 66/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 3960 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7219ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7219ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/114 places, 80/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7410 ms. Remains : 46/114 places, 80/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15409581911534726021.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18103882209109941100.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15409581911534726021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18103882209109941100.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,656833,0.236047,10628,2,1753,5,32472,6,0,256,29079,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p16==1) + EF((p136==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p16==1) + E(TRUE U (p136==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t14, t15, t33, t34, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,1.34684,34476,1,0,151,172190,176,66,1850,137497,179
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 114/114 places, 226/226 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 69 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 69 transition count 140
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 62 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 62 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 62 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 61 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 61 transition count 114
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 60 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 60 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 60 transition count 109
Applied a total of 120 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /114 variables (removed 54) and now considering 109/226 (removed 117) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 02:57:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:57:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:57:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:57:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 105/165 variables, 60/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 4/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 6259 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 13/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 105/165 variables, 60/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 108/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/165 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/166 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 15970 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22256ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22257ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/114 places, 109/226 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22447 ms. Remains : 60/114 places, 109/226 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3801746712744943511.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7633239392962388449.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3801746712744943511.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7633239392962388449.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27284e+06,0.417332,14716,2,2868,5,51877,6,0,345,53358,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(EF((p99==0))) + E((AX((p162!=1)) * !(((p74==1)||((p6==1)&&(p15==1))))) U (p45==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((!(EX(!((p162!=1)))) * !(((p74==1)||((p6==1)&&(p15==1))))) U (p45==1)))) * !(EX(E(TRUE ...178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...408
(forward)formula 0,0,2.97349,76864,1,0,381,370482,243,197,2580,499803,357
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 02:57:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Total runtime 355917 ms.

BK_STOP 1749005855418

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-15"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-15, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008300650"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-15.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-15 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;