Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008300649.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-15, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008300649
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 556K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 149K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749005411845

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-15
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 02:50:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 02:50:14] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 02:50:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 335 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:15] [INFO ] Transformed 163 places.
[2025-06-04 02:50:15] [INFO ] Transformed 348 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:50:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 02:50:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 163 places and 348 transitions and 919 arcs in 572 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 38 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 29 transitions.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 98 out of 163 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 163/163 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 130 transition count 254
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 130 transition count 254
Applied a total of 66 rules in 75 ms. Remains 130 /163 variables (removed 33) and now considering 254/319 (removed 65) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:50:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 130 cols
[2025-06-04 02:50:15] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 535 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 440 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1059 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:50:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 203 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 165 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 164 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 148 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 4/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 242/372 variables, 130/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/373 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30063 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 32/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 242/372 variables, 130/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 253/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 5/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 372/373 variables, and 443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60430ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60457ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/163 places, 254/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61633 ms. Remains : 130/163 places, 254/319 transitions.
Support contains 98 out of 130 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 02:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 60 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 130 places (down from 98) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3700 resets) in 3380 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 29/66 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (48 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (49 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (43 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (44 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (50 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (47 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (50 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (49 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (44 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
[2025-06-04 02:51:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 11 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:51:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:51:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 40/130 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 242/372 variables, 130/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/373 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 373/373 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 2502 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 42/90 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 40/130 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 140 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 143 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 227 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 158 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 155 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 192 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 270 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 6/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 7592ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 48 out of 130 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 93 edges and 130 vertex of which 4 / 130 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 565 edges and 128 vertex of which 124 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.9 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 124 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 122 transition count 234
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 94 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 94 transition count 178
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 93 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 93 transition count 176
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -25
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 88 transition count 201
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 88 transition count 201
Applied a total of 77 rules in 118 ms. Remains 88 /130 variables (removed 42) and now considering 201/254 (removed 53) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 118 ms. Remains : 88/130 places, 201/254 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5336 resets) in 1025 ms. (38 steps per ms) remains 28/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (79 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (79 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (78 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (75 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (78 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (78 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (79 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (78 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (81 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (81 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (84 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 28/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (84 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 27/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (75 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (82 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (80 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (84 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (82 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (82 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (73 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (77 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (81 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (80 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 26/27 properties
[2025-06-04 02:51:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 197 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-04 02:51:26] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/88 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 197/285 variables, 88/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 23/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/285 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 285/285 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 1751 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 25/68 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/88 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 14/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 134 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 6/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/88 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 197/285 variables, 88/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 23/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 26/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/285 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/285 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/285 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 285/285 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved in 11431 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 88/88 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13211ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 26 unsolved
Fused 26 Parikh solutions to 24 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 92 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=92 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 26 properties in 1100 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 20 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 82 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 82 transition count 165
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 74 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 74 transition count 149
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 74 transition count 145
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 72 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 72 transition count 139
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 71 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 71 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 71 transition count 134
Applied a total of 125 rules in 15 ms. Remains 71 /130 variables (removed 59) and now considering 134/254 (removed 120) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 130 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 130 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 130 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 155 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 133 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 130 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:51:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 129/200 variables, 71/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/201 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 201/201 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved in 13090 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 9/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 129/200 variables, 71/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 133/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/201 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/201 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 201/201 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved in 28713 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 133/133 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 41881ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 133 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41882ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/130 places, 134/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42121 ms. Remains : 71/130 places, 134/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 134 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9044052378156591773.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7723762011113110177.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9044052378156591773.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7723762011113110177.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.59328e+06,3.6947,87032,2,12134,5,293256,6,0,412,410102,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(!(((p88==0)||(p115==1))) U (p107==1)) + (A(AX((p106!=1)) U A(((p108==0)||(p87==1)) U (((p30==0)||(p71==1))||(p67==1)))) * (A(((AF((...294
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(!(((p88==0)||(p115==1))) U (p107==1)) + (!((E(!(!((E(!((((p30==0)||(p71==1))||(p67==1))) U (!(((p1...1107
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...568
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11575598122326812185.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11575598122326812185.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11575598122326812185.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11575598122326812185.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11575598122326812185.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 103 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10089261761913627197.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5567695162415666166.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10089261761913627197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5567695162415666166.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.59328e+06,0.394378,10212,318,180,10138,1135,270,20958,110,4283,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(!(((u7.p88==0)||(i7.u9.p115==1))) U (i7.u10.p107==1)) + (A(AX((i7.u10.p106!=1)) U A(((i7.u10.p108==0)||(u7.p87==1)) U (((u1.p30==0)...381
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(!(((u7.p88==0)||(i7.u9.p115==1))) U (i7.u10.p107==1)) + (!((E(!(!((E(!((((u1.p30==0)||(u4.p71==1))...1354
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t83, t86, t88, t89, t90, t92, t99, t100, t101, t102, t104, t105, t10...797
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,3.25287,84452,1,0,158986,5324,1773,268441,618,19585,273990
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 68 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 68 transition count 138
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 58 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 58 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 58 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 56 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 56 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 54 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 54 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 54 transition count 94
Applied a total of 166 rules in 14 ms. Remains 54 /130 variables (removed 76) and now considering 94/254 (removed 160) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:52:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:52:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/144 variables, 54/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 6833 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 90/144 variables, 54/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 93/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 11321 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18190ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18192ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/130 places, 94/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18464 ms. Remains : 54/130 places, 94/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5473561648058834469.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10609632583143984833.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5473561648058834469.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10609632583143984833.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05657e+06,0.157773,8788,2,1419,5,21673,6,0,306,16244,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((p69==0) * (!(E((p43==0) U ((p112==0)||(p82==1)))) + AG((p46==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !((p69==0)))] = FALSE * [(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(!(E((p43==0) U ((p112==0)||(p82==1)))))),TRUE) * !((p...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t36, t37, t...272
(forward)formula 0,0,0.708382,23340,1,0,168,98550,207,73,2398,91076,204
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 66 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 66 transition count 134
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 56 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 56 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 56 transition count 106
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 53 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 53 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 50 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 50 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 50 transition count 82
Applied a total of 177 rules in 10 ms. Remains 50 /130 variables (removed 80) and now considering 82/254 (removed 172) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:53:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/128 variables, 50/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 3537 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/50 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/128 variables, 50/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 81/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 8522 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12081ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12082ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/130 places, 82/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12284 ms. Remains : 50/130 places, 82/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6088801015665485186.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8608775596560150265.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6088801015665485186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8608775596560150265.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,599976,0.244614,9560,2,1920,5,27177,6,0,278,24520,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((p42==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((p42==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 79/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,0.780499,18124,1,0,11,73070,20,4,1527,49663,10
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 68 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 68 transition count 137
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 59 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 59 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 59 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 57 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 57 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 55 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 55 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 55 transition count 95
Applied a total of 164 rules in 19 ms. Remains 55 /130 variables (removed 75) and now considering 95/254 (removed 159) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:53:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 90/145 variables, 55/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 146/146 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 7019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 90/145 variables, 55/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 94/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 146/146 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 11392 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18437ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18439ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/130 places, 95/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18687 ms. Remains : 55/130 places, 95/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8375108631477318273.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5831173706714433965.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8375108631477318273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5831173706714433965.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,791703,0.518398,15336,2,4125,5,54645,6,0,308,48692,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(!(E(AX((p21==0)) U EG((p99==0)))) U EF(AX((p33==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p33==1))))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p33==1)))))) U (!(!(E(!(EX...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t...302
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,10.1282,240308,1,0,360,1.32478e+06,225,173,2398,1.36425e+06,410
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 172 edges and 130 vertex of which 6 / 130 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 61 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 61 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 65 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 65 transition count 135
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 54 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 54 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 54 transition count 104
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 157 place count 51 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 51 transition count 95
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 48 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 48 transition count 89
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 48 transition count 80
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 48 transition count 78
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 46 transition count 76
Applied a total of 181 rules in 40 ms. Remains 46 /130 variables (removed 84) and now considering 76/254 (removed 178) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:53:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/41 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 5/46 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 69/115 variables, 46/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 4310 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/41 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/46 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 69/115 variables, 46/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 62/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/116 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 4269 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8595ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8596ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/130 places, 76/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8825 ms. Remains : 46/130 places, 76/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16103722763282401858.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3057705457034794915.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16103722763282401858.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3057705457034794915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,599971,0.242377,8612,2,1400,5,23361,6,0,249,22181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(AG(((p37==1) * EF(((p4==0)||(p65==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p37==1) * E(TRUE U ((p4==0)||(p65==1))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t32, t33, Intersection with reac...230
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,4.80635,110880,1,0,333,546560,179,215,1909,721549,361
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 176 edges and 130 vertex of which 6 / 130 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 67 transition count 139
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 67 transition count 139
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 56 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 56 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 56 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 53 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 53 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 51 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 51 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 51 transition count 88
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 51 transition count 86
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 49 transition count 84
Applied a total of 173 rules in 19 ms. Remains 49 /130 variables (removed 81) and now considering 84/254 (removed 170) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 5/49 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 77/126 variables, 49/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 3929 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/44 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/49 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 77/126 variables, 49/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 70/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 3934 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7874ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7875ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/130 places, 84/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8047 ms. Remains : 49/130 places, 84/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12103460847043052112.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18202809181956369659.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12103460847043052112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18202809181956369659.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,987799,0.448246,12728,2,2548,5,41693,6,0,269,46622,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(AF((((p87==0)&&(p31==1))||(((p140==0)&&(p50==1))&&(p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((((p87==0)&&(p31==1))||(((p140==0)&&(p50==1))&&(p40==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t14, t15, t19, t20, t29, t30, t31, t32...320
(forward)formula 0,0,7.02914,150616,1,0,324,797261,193,141,1993,991639,350
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 170 edges and 130 vertex of which 6 / 130 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 66 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 66 transition count 136
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 57 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 57 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 57 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 56 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 56 transition count 108
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 56 transition count 106
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 54 transition count 104
Applied a total of 154 rules in 18 ms. Remains 54 /130 variables (removed 76) and now considering 104/254 (removed 150) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:54:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/49 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 5/54 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 96/150 variables, 54/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 7509 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/49 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/54 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 96/150 variables, 54/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 90/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 151/151 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 7495 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15036ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/130 places, 104/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15282 ms. Remains : 54/130 places, 104/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3458391877219356738.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12465273102825690701.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3458391877219356738.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12465273102825690701.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,799717,0.66319,20576,2,12517,5,65446,6,0,306,68580,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((E((p133==1) U (p144==1)) + ((E((p155==0) U ((p70==0)||(p2==1))) * (p21==1)) * ((p131==0)||(p122==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((E((p133==1) U (p144==1)) + ((E((p155==0) U ((p70==0)||(p2==1))) * (p21==1)) * ((p131==0)||(p122...174
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...281
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,8.82516,191304,1,0,496,976319,239,281,2391,989923,560
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 67 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 67 transition count 135
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 58 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 58 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 58 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 56 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 56 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 55 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 55 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 55 transition count 100
Applied a total of 159 rules in 5 ms. Remains 55 /130 variables (removed 75) and now considering 100/254 (removed 154) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 02:54:51] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:54:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 138 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:54:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:54:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:54:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/150 variables, 55/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 7022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 5/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/150 variables, 55/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 99/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 151/151 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 11817 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18867ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18869ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/130 places, 100/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19083 ms. Remains : 55/130 places, 100/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9306452154645827144.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality446762573132693258.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9306452154645827144.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality446762573132693258.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,760356,0.222368,8660,2,1550,5,22930,6,0,313,21070,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AG(EF((((p65==1)&&(p46==1))||((p126==0)&&(p132==1)))))) * AX(EG(EF((p140!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((p65==1)&&(p46==1))||((p126==0)&&(p132==1)))))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) *...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t...278
(forward)formula 0,0,3.7261,84480,1,0,243,462746,222,115,2537,407582,303
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 71 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 71 transition count 143
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 65 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 65 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 65 transition count 126
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 63 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 63 transition count 120
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 61 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 61 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 61 transition count 111
Applied a total of 148 rules in 6 ms. Remains 61 /130 variables (removed 69) and now considering 111/254 (removed 143) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 107 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 107 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 107 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:55:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 106/167 variables, 61/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 7471 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 106/167 variables, 61/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 110/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved in 13258 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20761ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20762ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/130 places, 111/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20991 ms. Remains : 61/130 places, 111/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 111 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7640757121432910447.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3247220751868255673.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7640757121432910447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3247220751868255673.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.70247e+06,1.36622,30928,2,9486,5,106120,6,0,349,112627,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p138==0) U ((p14==1) * !(EX(E(((p145==0)||(p93==1)) U (((p96==1)||(p23==0))||(p110==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((p14==1) * !(EX(E(((p145==0)||(p93==1)) U (((p96==1)||(p23==0))||(p110==1)))))))))) * !(E(!(((...350
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...345
(forward)formula 0,0,20.8444,409864,1,0,335,2.24753e+06,248,148,2677,1.85321e+06,382
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 150 edges and 130 vertex of which 4 / 130 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 68 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 68 transition count 140
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 58 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 58 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 58 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 56 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 56 transition count 105
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 54 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 54 transition count 95
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 54 transition count 93
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 52 transition count 91
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 52 transition count 91
Applied a total of 169 rules in 35 ms. Remains 52 /130 variables (removed 78) and now considering 91/254 (removed 163) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 02:55:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:55:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/47 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/52 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 84/136 variables, 52/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 5286 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/47 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 9/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 5/52 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 84/136 variables, 52/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 77/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 8129 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13433ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13434ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/130 places, 91/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13692 ms. Remains : 52/130 places, 91/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9667582621627380121.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7761198250476906025.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9667582621627380121.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7761198250476906025.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,719044,0.13536,8324,2,1933,5,21799,6,0,288,20716,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF(((p37==0)&&(p8==1))) + ((p112==0) * EF((!(E((p108==0) U (p113==0))) * ((p150==0)||(p86==1)))))) + ((p160==1) * AG((p151!=0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(TRUE U ((p37==0)&&(p8==1))) + ((p112==0) * E(TRUE U (!(E((p108==0) U (p113==0))) * ((...381
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t20, t21, t22, t23...295
(forward)formula 0,0,1.0164,32060,1,0,213,138977,206,90,2211,152762,241
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 82 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 82 transition count 164
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 78 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 78 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 78 transition count 153
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 77 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 77 transition count 150
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 76 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 76 transition count 148
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 76 transition count 147
Applied a total of 112 rules in 7 ms. Remains 76 /130 variables (removed 54) and now considering 147/254 (removed 107) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 142 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 146 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 142 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:56:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 141/217 variables, 76/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 218/218 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 18380 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 141/217 variables, 76/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 146/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/218 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 218/218 variables, and 245 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved in 29296 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 47717ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 146 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47719ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/130 places, 147/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47921 ms. Remains : 76/130 places, 147/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 147 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9890178452697389401.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:56:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2350264681697537771.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9890178452697389401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2350264681697537771.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.24574e+06,6.29932,119796,2,26697,5,414729,6,0,441,604016,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EG(A((p9==1) U (p66==1))) + EG(AX(E(((p89==0)||(p159==1)) U ((p97==0)||(p64==1)))))) + (A(EF((p124==1)) U AX((p50==1))) * EX((((p70==...404
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,((EG(!((E(!((p66==1)) U (!((p9==1)) * !((p66==1)))) + EG(!((p66==1)))))) + EG(!(EX(!(E(((p89...1694
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, ...638
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9829943714299155004.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9829943714299155004.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9829943714299155004.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9829943714299155004.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9829943714299155004.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 122 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17243393261644121489.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14693757873312528078.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17243393261644121489.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14693757873312528078.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.24574e+06,0.134954,8728,318,156,9371,986,325,16154,136,3511,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((EG(A((i0.u0.p9==1) U (u6.p66==1))) + EG(AX(E(((u9.p89==0)||(i9.u14.p159==1)) U ((i8.u12.p97==0)||(i3.u5.p64==1)))))) + (A(EF((i9.u15....542
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,((EG(!((E(!((u6.p66==1)) U (!((i0.u0.p9==1)) * !((u6.p66==1)))) + EG(!((u6.p66==1)))))) + EG...2106
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t82, t83, t85, t89, t90, t91, t93, t95, t96, t97, t102, t103, t104, t105, t106, t108, t11...857
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,2.68294,100120,1,0,202535,4765,2079,348453,745,12482,221321
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 176 edges and 130 vertex of which 6 / 130 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 66 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 66 transition count 138
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 57 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 57 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 57 transition count 114
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 54 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 54 transition count 105
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 51 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 51 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 51 transition count 90
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 51 transition count 87
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 49 transition count 85
Applied a total of 173 rules in 15 ms. Remains 49 /130 variables (removed 81) and now considering 85/254 (removed 169) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:57:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/49 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 79/128 variables, 49/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 4017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/49 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/128 variables, 49/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 71/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 6680 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10712ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10712ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/130 places, 85/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10887 ms. Remains : 49/130 places, 85/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5874966250995389825.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16627504341645932143.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5874966250995389825.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16627504341645932143.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,964229,0.581302,14952,2,2777,5,46817,6,0,273,47462,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((p116==0)) * A(((p35==0)||(p38==1)) U AF((p106==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((Init * EG((p116==0))) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((p106==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EG(!((p106==1))))) U (!(((p35==0)||(p38==1)...196
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t15, t16, t17, t18, t33, t34, t35, t36...310
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,11.3543,242456,1,0,514,1.46798e+06,200,289,2076,1.4356e+06,597
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 61 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 61 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 69 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 69 transition count 140
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 60 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 60 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 60 transition count 117
Applied a total of 145 rules in 4 ms. Remains 60 /130 variables (removed 70) and now considering 117/254 (removed 137) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 02:57:54] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:57:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:57:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 202 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:57:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:57:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:57:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 113/173 variables, 60/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/174 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 174/174 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 7805 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 113/173 variables, 60/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 116/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/174 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 174/174 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 17065 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24903ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24905ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/130 places, 117/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25111 ms. Remains : 60/130 places, 117/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:58:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:58:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality662851856810767847.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality211976172880799807.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality662851856810767847.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality211976172880799807.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52338e+06,0.693463,16068,2,2290,5,55648,6,0,353,55815,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((E(!(((p9==0)||(p20==1))) U ((EG((p139==1)) * AG(((p46==0)||(p84==1)))) * (p17==0))) + EG(AG(AX(((p16==0)&&(p96==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((p9==0)||(p20==1)))) * (p17==0)) * EG((p139==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p46==0)||(p84==1...254
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...383
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 112/5/5
(forward)formula 0,1,2.2849,45028,1,0,286,221050,268,118,2841,196942,320
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 74 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 74 transition count 148
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 66 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 66 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 66 transition count 130
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 64 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 64 transition count 124
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 62 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 62 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 62 transition count 115
Applied a total of 143 rules in 3 ms. Remains 62 /130 variables (removed 68) and now considering 115/254 (removed 139) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 110 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 110 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 231 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 114 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 110 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:58:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/171 variables, 62/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/172 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 172/172 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 8686 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 6/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 109/171 variables, 62/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 114/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/172 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 172/172 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 15642 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 24361ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 24362ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/130 places, 115/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 24596 ms. Remains : 62/130 places, 115/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16838071976397861946.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:58:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality971185199847902323.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16838071976397861946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality971185199847902323.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.20159e+06,0.98859,27304,2,5922,5,104318,6,0,354,105308,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG((A(EX(((p89==0)||(p123==1))) U !(((p24==0)||(p105==1)))) + (((p120==0)&&(p121==1)) * AG(((p79==0)&&(p143==1)))))) + AF(((p12==0)&&...167
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(E(TRUE U !((!((E(!(!(((p24==0)||(p105==1)))) U (!(EX(((p89==0)||(p123==1)))) * !(!(...323
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...393
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 109/0/6
(forward)formula 0,0,18.1649,378248,1,0,395,2.04401e+06,264,176,2798,2.28914e+06,429
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 130/130 places, 254/254 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 70 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 70 transition count 142
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 61 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 61 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 61 transition count 115
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 59 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 59 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 57 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 57 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 57 transition count 99
Applied a total of 161 rules in 8 ms. Remains 57 /130 variables (removed 73) and now considering 99/254 (removed 155) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:59:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/152 variables, 57/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/153 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 6193 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 95/152 variables, 57/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 98/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/153 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 12364 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18580ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18580ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/130 places, 99/254 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18770 ms. Remains : 57/130 places, 99/254 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:59:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12939919907829638064.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13845338288711093692.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12939919907829638064.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13845338288711093692.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3958e+06,0.81944,20300,2,4259,5,71792,6,0,323,78339,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((EG((p74==0)) + ((p75==0)&&(p53==1))) + ((p107==0)&&(p46==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((EG((p74==0)) + ((p75==0)&&(p53==1))) + ((p107==0)&&(p46==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t...322
(forward)formula 0,0,9.62483,223752,1,0,348,1.29077e+06,218,157,2363,1.36993e+06,380
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-15-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 02:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:59:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Total runtime 559231 ms.

BK_STOP 1749005973828

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-15"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-15, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008300649"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-15.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-15 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;