Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008200642.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-14, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200642
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 540K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 138K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749004627552

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-14
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 171 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Transformed 162 places.
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Transformed 347 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 162 places and 347 transitions and 915 arcs in 399 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 29 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 29 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 29 transitions.
Support contains 97 out of 162 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 162/162 places, 318/318 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 129 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 129 transition count 258
Applied a total of 66 rules in 48 ms. Remains 129 /162 variables (removed 33) and now considering 258/318 (removed 60) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 252 rows 129 cols
[2025-06-04 02:37:10] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 22 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 480 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 404 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 955 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 257 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:37:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 187 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 144 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 10/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 148 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 148 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 9/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 4/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 251/380 variables, 129/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 380/381 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved in 30058 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 257/257 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/129 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 68/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 158 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 10/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 251/380 variables, 129/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 257/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/380 variables, 3/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 380/381 variables, and 488 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 257/257 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60382ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 257 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60409ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/162 places, 258/318 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61452 ms. Remains : 129/162 places, 258/318 transitions.
Support contains 97 out of 129 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 02:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 84 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 258 transitions.
Support contains 95 out of 129 places (down from 97) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 87 to 86
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3370 resets) in 2415 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 30/86 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (40 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 29/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (36 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (20 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (38 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (38 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 29/29 properties
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 252 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 39/84 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 45/129 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 28 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp33 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp77 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 17/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5094ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 24 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 33 out of 129 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 539 edges and 129 vertex of which 127 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 2 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 2 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 127 transition count 251
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 84 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 1 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 84 transition count 165
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 80 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 80 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 80 transition count 151
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -18
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 76 transition count 169
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 76 transition count 168
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 75 transition count 168
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 75 transition count 168
Applied a total of 119 rules in 117 ms. Remains 75 /129 variables (removed 54) and now considering 168/258 (removed 90) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 117 ms. Remains : 75/129 places, 168/258 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5168 resets) in 930 ms. (42 steps per ms) remains 22/24 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (75 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (77 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (73 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (77 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (77 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (81 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (76 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (74 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (76 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (80 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (75 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (74 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (74 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (76 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (78 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (63 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (75 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (83 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
Probabilistic random walk after 1000001 steps, saw 130729 distinct states, run finished after 2757 ms. (steps per millisecond=362 ) properties seen :20
[2025-06-04 02:38:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-04 02:38:22] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 38/43 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/75 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 160/235 variables, 75/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 188 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 38/43 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 32/75 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp76 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 75/235 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 368 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 570ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 258 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 129 places (down from 79) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 21 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 139 edges and 129 vertex of which 6 / 129 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 71 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 71 transition count 148
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 66 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 66 transition count 138
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 65 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 65 transition count 135
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 64 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 64 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 64 transition count 130
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 64 transition count 127
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 62 transition count 125
Applied a total of 135 rules in 62 ms. Remains 62 /129 variables (removed 67) and now considering 125/258 (removed 133) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 34 ms returned []
Running 124 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:38:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 119/181 variables, 62/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 182/182 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 9712 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 119/181 variables, 62/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 124/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/182 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/182 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 182/182 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved in 18938 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 124/124 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28742ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 124 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28745ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/129 places, 125/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29095 ms. Remains : 62/129 places, 125/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:38:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 125 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:38:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10005003955753897016.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 02:38:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10655341401256848085.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10005003955753897016.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10655341401256848085.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.55591e+06,1.21478,32920,2,3467,5,121828,6,0,367,155693,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(EG(((((p116==1)&&(p147==1))&&(p97==1))||(!((p82==1)&&(p159==1))))))) U (!(((A((p65!=1) U (((p47==1)&&(p89==1))&&(p159==1))) + (p59...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(((!((E(!((((p47==1)&&(p89==1))&&(p159==1))) U (!((p65!=1)) * !((((p47==1)&&(p89==1))&&(p159=...1218
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t2...446
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3783293168495530471.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3783293168495530471.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3783293168495530471.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3783293168495530471.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3783293168495530471.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 126 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 106 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8994113608189056349.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12355754247593594586.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8994113608189056349.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12355754247593594586.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.55591e+06,0.19175,7112,147,177,4752,2036,242,10152,121,7068,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(EG(((((i8.u8.p116==1)&&(i9.u11.p147==1))&&(i8.u8.p97==1))||(!((u6.p82==1)&&(i9.u10.p159==1))))))) U (!(((A((u4.p65!=1) U (((u2.p47...389
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(((!((E(!((((u2.p47==1)&&(u7.p89==1))&&(i9.u10.p159==1))) U (!((u4.p65!=1)) * !((((u2.p47==1)...1532
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t71, t73, t74, t76, t78, t79, t80, t81, t85, t86, t90, t94, t106, t108, t115, u0.t58, u0.t59,...641
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,0,1.64641,48328,1,0,88467,8204,1627,138356,610,26132,148868
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 187 edges and 129 vertex of which 6 / 129 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 61 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 61 transition count 129
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 52 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 52 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 52 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 159 place count 50 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 50 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 163 place count 48 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 48 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 48 transition count 85
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 48 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 177 place count 46 transition count 81
Applied a total of 177 rules in 31 ms. Remains 46 /129 variables (removed 83) and now considering 81/258 (removed 177) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 76 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 76 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:39:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/46 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/121 variables, 46/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 4099 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/46 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/121 variables, 46/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 65/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 5065 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9183ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9184ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/129 places, 81/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9415 ms. Remains : 46/129 places, 81/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4439442342280304304.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8588915966019727920.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4439442342280304304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8588915966019727920.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3696 resets) in 243 ms. (163 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (406 resets) in 49 ms. (800 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8588915966019727920.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :27 after 486
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :486 after 1782
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :1782 after 1944
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1944 after 2592
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :2592 after 33777
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :33777 after 49572
Reachability property HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-01 is true.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 513 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,328365,0.142084,6264,2,911,14,13291,6,0,258,11405,0
Total reachable state count : 328365

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-01 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-01,1,0.142941,6392,2,47,14,13291,7,0,261,11405,0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 2024571 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 2082 ms. (steps per millisecond=972 )
Probabilistic random walk after 2024571 steps, saw 234086 distinct states, run finished after 2087 ms. (steps per millisecond=970 ) properties seen :1
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 130 edges and 129 vertex of which 6 / 129 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 68 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 68 transition count 142
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 60 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 60 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 60 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 59 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 59 transition count 112
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 59 transition count 110
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 57 transition count 108
Applied a total of 151 rules in 23 ms. Remains 57 /129 variables (removed 72) and now considering 108/258 (removed 150) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
Running 107 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:39:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/159 variables, 57/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 6165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/159 variables, 57/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 107/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved in 12951 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19138ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 107 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19139ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/129 places, 108/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19320 ms. Remains : 57/129 places, 108/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 108 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4389413197442181075.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:39:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1057400875157018890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4389413197442181075.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1057400875157018890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.28129e+06,0.457761,18140,2,2447,5,64764,6,0,330,75346,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(AG((p70!=1)) U ((EG((p103==1)) * !(((p106==1)||((p16==1)&&(p159==1))))) * ((E(((p116==1)&&(p139==1)) U (p7==1)) + (p70==1)) * (EF((p3...321
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(!(E(TRUE U !((p70!=1)))) U ((EG((p103==1)) * !(((p106==1)||((p16==1)&&(p159==1))))) * ((E(((p116==...415
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t2...362
(forward)formula 0,1,17.053,457832,1,0,764,2.64189e+06,273,386,2515,3.03267e+06,824
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 185 edges and 129 vertex of which 6 / 129 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 62 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 62 transition count 131
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 52 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 52 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 52 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 49 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 49 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 49 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 47 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 47 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 47 transition count 81
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 47 transition count 79
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 45 transition count 77
Applied a total of 180 rules in 25 ms. Remains 45 /129 variables (removed 84) and now considering 77/258 (removed 181) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:40:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/45 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/116 variables, 45/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 117/117 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 3350 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/45 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 71/116 variables, 45/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 61/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 117/117 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 3625 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6988ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6989ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/129 places, 77/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7172 ms. Remains : 45/129 places, 77/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15095564909612752059.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2429728940849360915.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15095564909612752059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2429728940849360915.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,566437,0.342116,10672,2,1577,5,32335,6,0,250,28449,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(AG((p50!=1))) U (p32==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EG(!(E(TRUE U !((p50!=1)))))) * (p32==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t26, t27, t31, t32, Intersection wit...236
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,5.43515,143104,1,0,304,883805,183,170,1892,868412,319
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 148 edges and 129 vertex of which 4 / 129 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 65 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 65 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 61 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 61 transition count 128
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 52 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 52 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 52 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 50 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 50 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 50 transition count 92
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 49 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 49 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 49 transition count 87
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 49 transition count 85
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 176 place count 47 transition count 83
Applied a total of 176 rules in 24 ms. Remains 47 /129 variables (removed 82) and now considering 83/258 (removed 175) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
Running 67 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:40:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/47 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/124 variables, 47/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 125/125 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 4494 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/47 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/124 variables, 47/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 67/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 125/125 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 5803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10311ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10312ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/129 places, 83/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10500 ms. Remains : 47/129 places, 83/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14362614092385105180.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3810443410456974109.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14362614092385105180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3810443410456974109.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,439593,0.114191,6116,2,1171,5,11733,6,0,264,9888,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AF((p114==0))) + EF(AG(AF((((p16==1)&&(p35==1))&&((p54==1)&&(p138==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((((p16==1)&&(p35==1))&&((p54==1)&&(p138==1)))))))))))),TRUE),!...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t19, Intersection with rea...231
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 81/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,2.88102,75172,1,0,283,430292,198,137,2102,391657,352
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 60 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 60 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 69 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 69 transition count 141
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 63 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 63 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 63 transition count 120
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 61 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 61 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 59 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 59 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 59 transition count 104
Applied a total of 155 rules in 7 ms. Remains 59 /129 variables (removed 70) and now considering 104/258 (removed 154) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 103 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:40:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/159 variables, 59/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 7920 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/159 variables, 59/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 103/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 12145 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20091ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20092ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/129 places, 104/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20314 ms. Remains : 59/129 places, 104/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8886367318063174135.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:40:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability341858998178824094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8886367318063174135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability341858998178824094.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.53836e+06,0.213699,10952,2,1894,5,33901,6,0,336,34394,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(A(((A((p106==1) U (p96==1)) + A((p28==1) U (p60==1))) + AF((p32==1))) U EG(AX((p74==1))))) * EG(AF((p112==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(EG(!(EX(!((p74==1))))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!(EX(!((p74==1)))))) U (!(((!((E(!((p96==1)) ...401
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t...318
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,5.98139,163248,1,0,327,939742,233,186,2524,993087,364
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 76 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 76 transition count 153
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 70 transition count 141
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 70 transition count 141
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 70 transition count 133
Applied a total of 126 rules in 6 ms. Remains 70 /129 variables (removed 59) and now considering 133/258 (removed 125) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 132 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 128 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:41:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 2/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 127/197 variables, 70/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 198/198 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 8374 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 9/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 127/197 variables, 70/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 132/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 198/198 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved in 19084 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27490ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 132 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27491ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/129 places, 133/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27691 ms. Remains : 70/129 places, 133/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 133 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6430735560324774156.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15916968402492519414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6430735560324774156.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15916968402492519414.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.56026e+06,1.91421,50132,2,7639,5,168420,6,0,403,184884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((A((EX((p102==1)) * ((AX(((p16==1)&&(p159==1))) + (p29!=1)) + (p110==1))) U !(((p75==1)&&(p159==1)))) * E((p57==1) U !((AX((p23==1)) * ...420
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(!((E(!(!(((p75==1)&&(p159==1)))) U (!((EX((p102==1)) * ((!(EX(!(((p16==1)&&(p159==1))))) + (...2150
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...445
(forward)formula 0,1,19.2654,436104,1,0,429,1.8042e+06,302,216,3136,2.42491e+06,467
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 65 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 65 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 64 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 64 transition count 131
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 56 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 56 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 56 transition count 107
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 54 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 52 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 52 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 52 transition count 91
Applied a total of 168 rules in 4 ms. Remains 52 /129 variables (removed 77) and now considering 91/258 (removed 167) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:41:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/139 variables, 52/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 140/140 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 4865 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 87/139 variables, 52/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 140/140 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 10809 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15693ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15694ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/129 places, 91/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15845 ms. Remains : 52/129 places, 91/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9759737386605409418.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14291335362136202060.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9759737386605409418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14291335362136202060.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,564255,0.124618,6768,2,1023,5,14690,6,0,295,11957,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(EF(EG((p34==1))) U EX(E((p133==1) U ((p54==1)&&(p159==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U EG((p34==1))))),(p133==1)) * ((p54==1)&&(p159==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t38, t39, t84, ...252
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 88/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,2.31587,69856,1,0,285,341786,217,152,2332,434354,353
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 67 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 67 transition count 137
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 58 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 58 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 58 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 56 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 56 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 56 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 158 place count 55 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 55 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 55 transition count 97
Applied a total of 162 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /129 variables (removed 74) and now considering 97/258 (removed 161) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:42:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/148 variables, 55/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 6303 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 93/148 variables, 55/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 96/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 11713 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/129 places, 97/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18200 ms. Remains : 55/129 places, 97/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16298582828109800018.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2697513059008287938.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16298582828109800018.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2697513059008287938.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.17467e+06,0.790402,27152,2,2992,5,102139,6,0,313,116813,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(!(AF((p33==1))) U ((AF((p111!=1)) * EX((p13==1))) * (E((p79==1) U (p26==1)) + !(EX((p45==1)))))) U (p130==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(!(!(EG(!((p33==1))))) U ((!(EG(!((p111!=1)))) * EX((p13==1))) * (E((p79==1) U (p26==1)) + !(EX((p4...189
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t28, t29, t36, t...327
(forward)formula 0,1,15.0527,378924,1,0,599,1.9881e+06,234,313,2318,2.6465e+06,648
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 67 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 67 transition count 137
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 59 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 59 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 59 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 150 place count 58 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 58 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 57 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 57 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 57 transition count 104
Applied a total of 156 rules in 5 ms. Remains 57 /129 variables (removed 72) and now considering 104/258 (removed 154) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 103 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:42:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 100/157 variables, 57/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/158 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 6662 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/157 variables, 57/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 103/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/158 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/158 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 158/158 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 16459 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23141ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23141ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/129 places, 104/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23297 ms. Remains : 57/129 places, 104/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15515635947993733333.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13152701394824444754.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15515635947993733333.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13152701394824444754.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.4619e+06,0.245281,11232,2,1257,5,34552,6,0,328,36037,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(A(EF(((((EG((p81==1)) * (p82==1)) * (p159==1)) + ((p27==1)&&(p66==1))) + ((p68==1)&&(p159==1)))) U AX((AF((p6==1)) * AF(((p82==1)&&(p1...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!((!(EG(!((p6==1)))) * !(EG(!(((p82==1)&&(p159==1)))))))))) U (!(E(TRUE U ((((EG((...410
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t23, t25, t29, t30, t...333
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,8.63186,237000,1,0,587,1.39332e+06,261,309,2580,1.46162e+06,709
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 65 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 65 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 64 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 65 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 64 transition count 131
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 56 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 56 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 56 transition count 107
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 54 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 160 place count 52 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 52 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 52 transition count 91
Applied a total of 168 rules in 3 ms. Remains 52 /129 variables (removed 77) and now considering 91/258 (removed 167) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:43:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 87/139 variables, 52/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 140/140 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 6619 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 87/139 variables, 52/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 90/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 140/140 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 9221 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15854ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15854ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/129 places, 91/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16005 ms. Remains : 52/129 places, 91/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8775449233614300606.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16794257245175244668.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8775449233614300606.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16794257245175244668.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,681624,0.157376,8860,2,1386,5,24936,6,0,295,23141,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AF(EX((p15==1))) + (p27==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EG(!(EX((p15==1))))) + (p27==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t37, t38, t...267
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,5.1586,145236,1,0,406,809901,207,240,2238,911309,403
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 70 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 70 transition count 142
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 65 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 65 transition count 132
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 64 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 64 transition count 129
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 63 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 63 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 63 transition count 124
Applied a total of 135 rules in 5 ms. Remains 63 /129 variables (removed 66) and now considering 124/258 (removed 134) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 120 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:43:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 119/182 variables, 63/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/183 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 183/183 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 8768 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 119/182 variables, 63/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 123/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/183 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/183 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 183/183 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 16357 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 25152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25153ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/129 places, 124/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25359 ms. Remains : 63/129 places, 124/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8219903899537451591.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8321652938267007126.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8219903899537451591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8321652938267007126.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.1234e+06,0.746098,19836,2,8949,5,65826,6,0,369,76565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG((!(((AG((p136==1)) + (p54==1)) + ((p116==1)&&(p141==1)))) * EX(((p39==1)||((p122==1)&&(p24==1)))))) U EF((EX(!(EF((p4==1)))) * AX(((...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(FwdU(Init,EG((!(((!(E(TRUE U !((p136==1)))) + (p54==1)) + ((p116==1)&&(p141==1)))) * EX(((p39==1)||((p12...275
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...350
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,6.90798,169356,1,0,295,832179,285,141,3101,797650,348
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 64 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 64 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 65 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 65 transition count 133
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 58 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 58 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 58 transition count 115
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 55 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 55 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 55 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 53 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 53 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 53 transition count 95
Applied a total of 163 rules in 6 ms. Remains 53 /129 variables (removed 76) and now considering 95/258 (removed 163) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:44:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 91/144 variables, 53/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 6067 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/144 variables, 53/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 94/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 10764 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16846ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16848ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/129 places, 95/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16979 ms. Remains : 53/129 places, 95/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6944031471394694021.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15681871420814555401.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6944031471394694021.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15681871420814555401.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,709326,0.211464,8536,2,1453,5,23620,6,0,303,21746,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!((((AX((p122==1)) * (p35==1)) * ((p11==1)&&(p5!=1))) * (p122!=1)))) U !(EF(((!(AG((p35==1))) * (p116==1)) * (p125==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!((((!(EX(!((p122==1)))) * (p35==1)) * ((p11==1)&&(p5!=1))) * (p122!=1))))))) * !(E(TRUE U ((...221
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t41, t42, t...277
(forward)formula 0,1,1.31788,38456,1,0,190,189796,221,83,2362,167230,229
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 129/129 places, 258/258 transitions.
Discarding 63 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 63 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 66 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 63 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 66 transition count 135
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 57 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 57 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 57 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 156 place count 54 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 54 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 54 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 164 place count 52 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 52 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 52 transition count 86
Applied a total of 172 rules in 4 ms. Remains 52 /129 variables (removed 77) and now considering 86/258 (removed 172) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:44:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 5780 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 85/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 9934 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15726ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15726ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/129 places, 86/258 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15866 ms. Remains : 52/129 places, 86/258 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12068387134479168290.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6385789004568112065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12068387134479168290.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6385789004568112065.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,614314,0.238807,11356,2,3500,5,35025,6,0,290,33866,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(E(((p16==1)&&(p159==1)) U (p151==1)) U (AG((EG((p37==1)) + !((((p82==1)&&(p159==1))||(p18==1))))) + AG(AX(AF((p118==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !((EG((p37==1)) + !((((p82==1)&&(p159==1))||(p18==1))))))) + !(E(TRUE U...491
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t38, t39, ...313
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 83/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,9.32271,237876,1,0,493,1.26784e+06,220,249,2280,1.49494e+06,561
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-14-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 02:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 463286 ms.

BK_STOP 1749005093576

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-14"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-14, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200642"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-14.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-14 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;