About the Execution of ITS-Tools for HealthRecord-PT-12
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 79637.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.8393E+0009 ? 1 10 | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008200632.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-12, examination is StateSpace
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200632
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 123K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
no data necessary for post analysis
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749003623270
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=StateSpace
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-12
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
StateSpace PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 02:20:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StateSpace, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 02:20:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 02:20:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 167 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:25] [INFO ] Transformed 160 places.
[2025-06-04 02:20:25] [INFO ] Transformed 340 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:20:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 02:20:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 160 places and 340 transitions and 895 arcs in 388 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 41 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in STATESPACE mode, iteration 0 : 160/160 places, 299/299 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 27 ms returned []
Running 298 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 299 rows 160 cols
[2025-06-04 02:20:26] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 149/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/160 variables, 10/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 11/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 8/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 236 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 160 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 20/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 20/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 117 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 137 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 20/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 150 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 137 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 178 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 145 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 20/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 142 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 14/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/459 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved in 30043 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 160/160 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/160 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 298/298 constraints, Known Traps: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 149/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/160 variables, 10/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 11/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 8/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 95/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 180 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 150 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 157 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 13/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 3/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 177 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 142 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 8/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 191 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 7/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 9/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 2/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/459 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 160/160 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/160 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/298 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60357ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60387ms
Finished structural reductions in STATESPACE mode , in 1 iterations and 60604 ms. Remains : 160/160 places, 299/299 transitions.
Final net has 160 places and 299 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 107 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13727191798325695987.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13727191798325695987.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13727191798325695987.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13727191798325695987.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13727191798325695987.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 130 ms
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:21:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/StateSpace15136273178466127505.gal : 16 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/StateSpace15136273178466127505.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '--stats'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...220
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst\_mod\_flat,1.83934e+09,15.1394,366092,2015,2524,532008,69599,379,1.21816e+06,384,1.48425e+06,0
Total reachable state count : 1839343024
Max variable value : 1
STATE_SPACE MAX_TOKEN_IN_PLACE 1 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Maximum sum along a path : 10
STATE_SPACE MAX_TOKEN_PER_MARKING 10 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Exact state count : 1839343024
STATE_SPACE STATES 1839343024 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 77367 ms.
BK_STOP 1749003702907
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ StateSpace = StateSpace ]]
+ [[ -f modelMain.xml ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution StateSpace -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StateSpace -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-12"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StateSpace"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-12, examination is StateSpace"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200632"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-12.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-12 execution
cd execution
if [ "StateSpace" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StateSpace" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StateSpace" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StateSpace.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StateSpace" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StateSpace"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;