Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008200626.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-12, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200626
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 536K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 123K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749002868824

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-12
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 02:07:51] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 02:07:51] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 02:07:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 178 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:51] [INFO ] Transformed 160 places.
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Transformed 340 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 160 places and 340 transitions and 895 arcs in 422 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 29 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 28 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 28 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 160 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 160/160 places, 312/312 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 119 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 119 transition count 235
Applied a total of 82 rules in 50 ms. Remains 119 /160 variables (removed 41) and now considering 235/312 (removed 77) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 228 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 228 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 444 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 228 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:07:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:07:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 326 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 844 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 234 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:07:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 228 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:07:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:07:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 190 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 113 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 176 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 149 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 9/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 227/346 variables, 119/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/346 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/347 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/347 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 347/347 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved in 30057 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 234/234 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 41/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 120 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 227/346 variables, 119/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/346 variables, 234/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/346 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 346/347 variables, and 417 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 234/234 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60421ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 234 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60447ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/160 places, 235/312 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61379 ms. Remains : 119/160 places, 235/312 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 119 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 02:08:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 235 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 83 to 82
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2876 resets) in 2498 ms. (16 steps per ms) remains 39/82 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (33 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 59 ms. (66 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
[2025-06-04 02:08:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 228 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:08:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:08:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 33/89 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 30/119 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp9 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 7/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 119/347 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 37/89 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/89 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 30/119 variables, 8/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 17/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 227/346 variables, 119/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/346 variables, 37/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 346/347 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/39 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10054ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 37 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 52 out of 119 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 36 edges and 119 vertex of which 6 / 119 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 14 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 14 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 497 edges and 116 vertex of which 115 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 220
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 114 transition count 219
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 88 transition count 168
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 88 transition count 168
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 88 transition count 165
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 85 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 85 transition count 159
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 85 transition count 156
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 84 transition count 155
Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 84 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 81 transition count 152
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 81 transition count 152
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 81 transition count 151
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 80 transition count 150
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 80 transition count 150
Applied a total of 82 rules in 110 ms. Remains 80 /119 variables (removed 39) and now considering 150/235 (removed 85) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 110 ms. Remains : 80/119 places, 150/235 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3375 resets) in 1055 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 31/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (55 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (54 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (47 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (56 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (54 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (52 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (52 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (53 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (56 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (49 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (52 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (55 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (49 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (55 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (54 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (55 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (54 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (54 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (52 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (53 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (52 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (55 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (53 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
[2025-06-04 02:09:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 144 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 144 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-04 02:09:06] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 22/60 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 20/80 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 7/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 144/224 variables, 80/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 3/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/224 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 224/224 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 5810 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 22/60 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 20/80 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 24/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 144/224 variables, 80/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 3/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 31/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/224 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 224/224 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved in 4926 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 80/80 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10765ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 24 properties in 2457 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 80 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 80/80 places, 150/150 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 356 edges and 80 vertex of which 77 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 77 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 76 transition count 149
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 58 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 58 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 58 transition count 110
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 54 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 54 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 53 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 53 transition count 99
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -23
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 48 transition count 122
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 48 transition count 118
Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 48 transition count 113
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 43 transition count 113
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 43 transition count 111
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 14 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 14 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 43 transition count 111
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 13 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 13 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 43 transition count 111
Applied a total of 105 rules in 45 ms. Remains 43 /80 variables (removed 37) and now considering 111/150 (removed 39) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 45 ms. Remains : 43/80 places, 111/150 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5782 resets) in 493 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (1386 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1399 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 7/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1304 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 5/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (1354 resets) in 121 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (1187 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (1276 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-06-04 02:09:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 19 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 02:09:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 30/43 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 92/135 variables, 43/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 23/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 506 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 4/13 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 30/43 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 92/135 variables, 43/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 23/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 5/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 554 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1085ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 178 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 43 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 111/111 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 42 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 42 transition count 109
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 41 transition count 108
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 37 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 36 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 36 transition count 99
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 36 transition count 99
Applied a total of 20 rules in 31 ms. Remains 36 /43 variables (removed 7) and now considering 99/111 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 31 ms. Remains : 36/43 places, 99/111 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (7233 resets) in 1384 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (1569 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1574 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1547 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 1346 steps, run visited all 3 properties in 21 ms. (steps per millisecond=64 )
Probabilistic random walk after 1346 steps, saw 459 distinct states, run finished after 29 ms. (steps per millisecond=46 ) properties seen :3
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 235 transitions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 15 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 161 edges and 119 vertex of which 8 / 119 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 62 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 62 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 62 transition count 124
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 55 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 55 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 55 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 54 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 54 transition count 104
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 53 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 53 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 53 transition count 99
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 53 transition count 96
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 51 transition count 94
Applied a total of 142 rules in 52 ms. Remains 51 /119 variables (removed 68) and now considering 94/235 (removed 141) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/51 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 87/138 variables, 51/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/139 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 3227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/51 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 87/138 variables, 51/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/139 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5192 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8463ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8463ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/119 places, 94/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8745 ms. Remains : 51/119 places, 94/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7089969826341562400.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3235861592474066852.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7089969826341562400.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3235861592474066852.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,549670,0.311936,9376,2,2170,5,26695,6,0,289,21932,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(EF(((AF((p52==1)) * (p47==1)) + (p124==1))) U (p46==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!((p52==1)))) * (p47==1)) + (p124==1)))) * (p46==1))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t23, t3...296
(forward)formula 0,0,7.57093,198884,1,0,393,1.21257e+06,216,215,2229,1.15115e+06,477
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 64 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 64 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 64 transition count 122
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 56 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 56 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 56 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 54 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 54 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 52 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 52 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 52 transition count 87
Applied a total of 149 rules in 15 ms. Remains 52 /119 variables (removed 67) and now considering 87/235 (removed 148) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:09:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 6002 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 86/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 7170 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13210ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13211ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/119 places, 87/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13416 ms. Remains : 52/119 places, 87/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1928878894669090668.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4423393871613345216.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1928878894669090668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4423393871613345216.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,540198,0.083042,6000,2,859,5,10997,6,0,288,9158,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A(EG(AX((p39==1))) U A((((p16==1)&&(p35==1))&&((p54==1)&&(p132==1))) U AX((p71==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!(EX(!((p71==1))))) U (!((((p16==1)&&(p35==1))&&((p54==1)&&(p132==1)))) * !(!...535
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t28, t29, t49, t50, t...267
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,0.843609,24548,1,0,215,115317,201,123,2181,105414,261
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 167 edges and 119 vertex of which 8 / 119 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 59 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 59 transition count 124
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 59 transition count 118
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 51 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 51 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 51 transition count 99
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 48 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 48 transition count 90
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 45 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 45 transition count 84
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 45 transition count 75
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 45 transition count 72
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 43 transition count 70
Applied a total of 164 rules in 43 ms. Remains 43 /119 variables (removed 76) and now considering 70/235 (removed 165) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 198 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned []
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 64 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/43 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/106 variables, 43/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 106/107 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 2538 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/43 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/106 variables, 43/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 54/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 106/107 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 2199 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4751ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4752ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/119 places, 70/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5026 ms. Remains : 43/119 places, 70/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 70 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 3190 steps (290 resets) in 48 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3008235351387864068.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18311841441155935931.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3008235351387864068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality18311841441155935931.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 76 transition count 153
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 76 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 76 transition count 149
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 70 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 70 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 70 transition count 134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 69 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 69 transition count 131
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 68 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 68 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 68 transition count 126
Applied a total of 112 rules in 8 ms. Remains 68 /119 variables (removed 51) and now considering 126/235 (removed 109) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 164 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:09:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/190 variables, 68/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/191 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 191/191 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 13003 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 10/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/190 variables, 68/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 125/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/191 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 191/191 variables, and 220 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 27040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40062ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40062ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/119 places, 126/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40235 ms. Remains : 68/119 places, 126/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7212711656493803189.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:10:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11740280878375148322.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7212711656493803189.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11740280878375148322.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.8059e+06,0.582304,16328,2,3045,5,57136,6,0,394,63922,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((E(EG((((p111==1)&&(p37==1))||(!((p35==1)&&(p157==1))))) U EF(!(A((p47==1) U (p59==1))))) + ((!(((EX((p41==1)) + (p116==1)) + (E((p79==...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(E(EG((((p111==1)&&(p37==1))||(!((p35==1)&&(p157==1))))) U E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p59==1)) U (!((p47==1)...378
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...537
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 02:11:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12513034848782980440.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12513034848782980440.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12513034848782980440.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12513034848782980440.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12513034848782980440.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 78 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 98 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9180646473370446141.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2072439582503538280.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9180646473370446141.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2072439582503538280.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.8059e+06,0.132253,6868,203,179,5112,1146,208,8971,163,6435,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((E(EG((((i8.u10.p111==1)&&(u1.p37==1))||(!((u1.p35==1)&&(u13.p157==1))))) U EF(!(A((u2.p47==1) U (u3.p59==1))))) + ((!(((EX((u2.p41==1)...337
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(E(EG((((i8.u10.p111==1)&&(u1.p37==1))||(!((u1.p35==1)&&(u13.p157==1))))) U E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((u3.p5...452
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t76, t77, t78, t79, t80, t81, t82, t84, t85, t86, t88, t91, t97, t107, t108, t109, u0.t71...732
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,1.43197,38868,1,0,75778,6228,1477,121085,819,19891,81940
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 72 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 72 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 72 transition count 143
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 65 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 65 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 65 transition count 126
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 64 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 64 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 63 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 63 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 63 transition count 118
Applied a total of 119 rules in 8 ms. Remains 63 /119 variables (removed 56) and now considering 118/235 (removed 117) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 190 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 114 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:11:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 113/176 variables, 63/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 177/177 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 8043 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 113/176 variables, 63/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 117/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/177 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/177 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 177/177 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 22630 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 30703ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30703ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/119 places, 118/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30902 ms. Remains : 63/119 places, 118/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2357830119131710433.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:11:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10979014002480337058.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2357830119131710433.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10979014002480337058.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.32673e+06,1.02509,26088,2,6758,5,78547,6,0,364,102001,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(EX(AF(AX((p99==1)))) U ((EG((p105!=1)) + ((AX(A((p104==1) U ((p114==1)&&(p121==1)))) * AX((p143==1))) * (p11!=1))) + (AG(((p73==1)&&(...364
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((p90==1) + !(EX(!((p136==1))))))) U (!(E((((p42!=1)||(p21!=1))||(((p16==1)&&(p...1794
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...450
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17450147397562301047.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17450147397562301047.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17450147397562301047.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17450147397562301047.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17450147397562301047.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 112 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 23 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2609050460319886550.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15657618950142978666.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2609050460319886550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15657618950142978666.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.32673e+06,0.083449,6876,222,135,5534,834,255,9850,113,4104,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(EX(AF(AX((i8.u10.p99==1)))) U ((EG((i8.u10.p105!=1)) + ((AX(A((i8.u10.p104==1) U ((i8.u10.p114==1)&&(i10.u11.p121==1)))) * AX((i10.u1...479
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U ((u4.p90==1) + !(EX(!((i10.u13.p136==1))))))) U (!(E((((u2.p42!=1)||(u1.p21!=1)...2281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t64, t65, t66, t67, t77, t80, t82, t87, t88, t90, t91, t93, t99, t100, t108, u0.t57, u0.t...648
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,0.518081,19932,1,0,31542,2980,1511,57842,604,7161,50591
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 63 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 63 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 63 transition count 121
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 55 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 55 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 55 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 52 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 52 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 49 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 49 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 49 transition count 78
Applied a total of 158 rules in 8 ms. Remains 49 /119 variables (removed 70) and now considering 78/235 (removed 157) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 192 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:12:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 74/123 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 124/124 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 3535 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/123 variables, 49/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 77/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/124 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 7067 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10622ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10623ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/119 places, 78/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10826 ms. Remains : 49/119 places, 78/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1662822555704699928.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability517404287790240228.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1662822555704699928.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability517404287790240228.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,492813,0.069181,5884,2,777,5,9358,6,0,270,7949,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF((p72==1)) * AF(EX(((p16==0)||(p157==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p72==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(((p16==0)||(p157==0)))))] = FA...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,0,0.2865,11900,1,0,130,41296,174,63,1952,31992,166
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 65 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 65 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 65 transition count 125
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 59 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 59 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 59 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 58 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 58 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 57 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 57 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 57 transition count 102
Applied a total of 136 rules in 7 ms. Remains 57 /119 variables (removed 62) and now considering 102/235 (removed 133) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:12:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 98/155 variables, 57/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/156 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 156/156 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 5604 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 98/155 variables, 57/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 101/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/156 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 156/156 variables, and 172 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 11215 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16836ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16837ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/119 places, 102/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17077 ms. Remains : 57/119 places, 102/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11901280170963137331.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16097153768169836325.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11901280170963137331.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16097153768169836325.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,732655,0.293827,10196,2,2207,5,28725,6,0,326,23549,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX((AF((p131==0)) + E((p77!=1) U ((p114==1)&&(p137==1))))) * ((p155==1) + AG(((p111==0)&&(p136==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * EX((!(EG(!((p131==0)))) + E((p77!=1) U ((p114==1)&&(p137==1)))))) * (p155==1))] != FALSE + [((EY(...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t22, t23, t25, t27, ...304
(forward)formula 0,0,2.61936,65552,1,0,288,369207,236,141,2456,275931,344
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 64 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 64 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 64 transition count 123
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 57 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 57 transition count 109
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 54 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 54 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 51 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 51 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 51 transition count 85
Applied a total of 151 rules in 9 ms. Remains 51 /119 variables (removed 68) and now considering 85/235 (removed 150) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:12:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/132 variables, 51/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 133/133 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 5660 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/51 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/132 variables, 51/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 84/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/133 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 133/133 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 8845 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14541ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/119 places, 85/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14693 ms. Remains : 51/119 places, 85/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3211496781846990792.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8755812606767146494.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3211496781846990792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8755812606767146494.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,576648,0.272988,9308,2,1931,5,24961,6,0,285,23842,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p15==0) + EX(AX(AX((p144==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p15==0))) * !(EX(!(EX(!(!(EX(!((p144==0))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t40, t41, t...262
(forward)formula 0,1,0.850873,22940,1,0,161,95336,185,73,1998,89077,182
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 79 edges and 119 vertex of which 8 / 119 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 63 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 63 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 63 transition count 129
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 55 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 55 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 55 transition count 110
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 52 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 52 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 50 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 50 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 50 transition count 91
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 50 transition count 88
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 48 transition count 86
Applied a total of 148 rules in 18 ms. Remains 48 /119 variables (removed 71) and now considering 86/235 (removed 149) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 87 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned []
Running 70 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:12:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:12:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/48 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 79/127 variables, 48/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/128 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 3048 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/48 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/127 variables, 48/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 70/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/128 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved in 5005 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 70 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8067ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/119 places, 86/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8238 ms. Remains : 48/119 places, 86/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14301910172111447731.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2781329156743889895.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14301910172111447731.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2781329156743889895.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,635692,0.174007,9156,2,1037,5,24928,6,0,269,27741,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((AF((((((p17==0)||(p36==0))||((p55==0)||(p60==0)))||(((p67==0)||(p74==0))||((p81==0)||(p88==0))))||((p114==0)||(p158==0)))) * AG((p2...292
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U ((!(EG(!((((((p17==0)||(p36==0))||((p55==0)||(p60==0)))||(((p67==0)||(p74==0))||((p81==0...386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t19, t29, t30, t34, t35...300
(forward)formula 0,0,4.09839,101704,1,0,342,576918,209,160,2055,613787,395
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 66 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 66 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 66 transition count 129
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 58 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 58 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 58 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 56 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 56 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 54 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 54 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 54 transition count 94
Applied a total of 143 rules in 7 ms. Remains 54 /119 variables (removed 65) and now considering 94/235 (removed 141) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 93 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:13:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 90/144 variables, 54/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 145/145 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 5785 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 90/144 variables, 54/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 93/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/145 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 145/145 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved in 8482 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14290ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 93 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14291ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/119 places, 94/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14448 ms. Remains : 54/119 places, 94/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18391817038066015387.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10228074260561380087.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18391817038066015387.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10228074260561380087.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,972738,0.238665,10676,2,1331,5,29010,6,0,306,31733,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(EF((p6!=1))) U (AG(((p3==1) + EX(((p23==1)&&(p101==1))))) + ((EF((!(AG((p152==1))) + EF(((p19==1)&&(p157==1))))) * (p19==1)) * (p157...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p6!=1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p3==1) + EX(((p23==1)&&(p101==1))))))))] != FAL...417
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t23, t...332
(forward)formula 0,1,1.36321,35972,1,0,207,165856,212,87,2343,158702,222
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 73 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 73 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 73 transition count 140
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 68 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 68 transition count 130
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 68 transition count 127
Applied a total of 111 rules in 5 ms. Remains 68 /119 variables (removed 51) and now considering 127/235 (removed 108) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 126 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 123 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:13:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/190 variables, 68/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/191 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 191/191 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 10491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/190 variables, 68/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 126/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 4/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/191 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/191 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 191/191 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 16491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27011ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27013ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/119 places, 127/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27256 ms. Remains : 68/119 places, 127/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 127 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11031599368316676103.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10412705319467771514.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11031599368316676103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10412705319467771514.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57684e+06,0.716629,19416,2,7086,5,77757,6,0,392,53117,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((A((AF((p126==1)) * (p149!=1)) U AX((p63==1))) + AX(AF(E((p44==1) U (((p16==1)&&(p35==1))&&((p54==1)&&(p140==1))))))) + ((!(A((p138==...369
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((p63==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((p63==1))))) U (!((!(EG(!((p126==1)))) * (p149!=1))...800
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21, t23, t24, t26, ...399
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12075526417884847681.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12075526417884847681.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12075526417884847681.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12075526417884847681.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12075526417884847681.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 125 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 42 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12488131578598399177.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11365921507689957380.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12488131578598399177.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11365921507689957380.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.57684e+06,0.050344,5524,119,81,2496,976,278,4472,129,3553,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((A((AF((i10.u16.p126==1)) * (u14.p149!=1)) U AX((u6.p63==1))) + AX(AF(E((i2.u3.p44==1) U (((u0.p16==1)&&(i0.u2.p35==1))&&((i2.u4.p54=...515
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((u6.p63==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((u6.p63==1))))) U (!((!(EG(!((i10.u16.p126==1)))...1006
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t81, t83, t84, t86, t87, u6.t51, u6.t52, i0.t66, i0.t65, i0.u1.t62, i0.u1.t64, i0.u2.t67...567
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,0.404818,19988,1,0,35951,4040,1842,51096,668,9537,43590
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 163 edges and 119 vertex of which 8 / 119 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 62 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 62 transition count 129
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 62 transition count 123
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 54 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 54 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 54 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 52 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 52 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 50 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 50 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 50 transition count 88
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 50 transition count 85
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 48 transition count 83
Applied a total of 153 rules in 35 ms. Remains 48 /119 variables (removed 71) and now considering 83/235 (removed 152) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 77 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 77 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 77 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:14:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 76/124 variables, 48/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 125/125 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 4582 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 76/124 variables, 48/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 82/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/125 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 125/125 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 7744 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12350ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12350ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/119 places, 83/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12655 ms. Remains : 48/119 places, 83/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15672136704210619304.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8214405672872573562.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15672136704210619304.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8214405672872573562.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,508037,0.114682,7348,2,1097,5,17098,6,0,268,15456,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((((p75==0)&&(p47==1))&&(p106==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((p75==0)&&(p47==1))&&(p106==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 74/18/9
(forward)formula 0,1,0.262552,10804,1,0,9,39153,19,2,1495,19588,9
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 63 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 63 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 63 transition count 121
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 55 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 55 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 55 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 52 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 52 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 49 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 49 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 49 transition count 78
Applied a total of 158 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /119 variables (removed 70) and now considering 78/235 (removed 157) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 74/123 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 124/124 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 5255 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/123 variables, 49/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 77/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/124 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 124/124 variables, and 143 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 7948 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13216ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13217ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/119 places, 78/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13384 ms. Remains : 49/119 places, 78/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8151198118438568291.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7152575948326883300.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8151198118438568291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7152575948326883300.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,435222,0.099676,6528,2,849,5,13001,6,0,270,10842,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(A(!(AG((p43==1))) U ((p35==1)&&(p157==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!((E(!(((p35==1)&&(p157==1))) U (!(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p43==1)))))) * !(((p35==1)&&(p157=...209
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t31, t32, t56, Intersection wi...237
(forward)formula 0,1,3.1099,74496,1,0,297,439079,182,147,2038,423900,350
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 64 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 64 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 64 transition count 122
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 57 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 57 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 57 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 56 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 56 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 55 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 55 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 55 transition count 97
Applied a total of 140 rules in 7 ms. Remains 55 /119 variables (removed 64) and now considering 97/235 (removed 138) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 195 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:14:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/147 variables, 55/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 5584 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/147 variables, 55/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 96/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 9045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14647ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14647ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/119 places, 97/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14852 ms. Remains : 55/119 places, 97/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16114116485574589273.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7968664142757715429.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16114116485574589273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7968664142757715429.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,588312,0.11004,5920,2,907,5,10312,6,0,310,7851,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AX(!(A(EF((p96==1)) U (((p54==1)&&(p157==1))&&((p87==1)&&(p157==1)))))) * AF(AG(((p69==0)&&(((p16==0)||(p35==0))||((p54==0)||(p140==0...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EX(!(!(!((E(!((((p54==1)&&(p157==1))&&((p87==1)&&(p157==1)))) U (!(E(TRUE U (p96==1))) * !((((p54=...357
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t...297
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,5.08496,128076,1,0,376,737172,230,185,2447,715522,437
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 66 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 66 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 66 transition count 126
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 59 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 59 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 59 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 58 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 58 transition count 107
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 57 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 57 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 57 transition count 102
Applied a total of 135 rules in 4 ms. Remains 57 /119 variables (removed 62) and now considering 102/235 (removed 133) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 101 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:15:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/154 variables, 57/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 7774 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 97/154 variables, 57/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 101/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved in 10007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17803ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17804ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/119 places, 102/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17953 ms. Remains : 57/119 places, 102/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 102 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12869984742097937814.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4278622355750870846.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12869984742097937814.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4278622355750870846.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,877725,0.209024,10320,2,1373,5,27097,6,0,323,29003,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EF(EG(((p34==0) + EG(((p80==1)&&(p157==1)))))) + A(((((p54==1)&&(p157==1)) + EX((p102==1))) * !(((((p28==1)&&(p114==1))&&(p127==1))||...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(((p87==1)&&(p157==1))) U (!(((((p54==1)&&(p157==1)) + EX((p102==1))) * !(((((p28==...327
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...323
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,6.55419,148016,1,0,369,862324,233,196,2529,914339,400
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 119/119 places, 235/235 transitions.
Discarding 54 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 54 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 65 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 65 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 65 transition count 125
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 58 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 58 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 58 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 56 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 56 transition count 102
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 55 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 55 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 55 transition count 97
Applied a total of 140 rules in 5 ms. Remains 55 /119 variables (removed 64) and now considering 97/235 (removed 138) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 164 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:15:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/148 variables, 55/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/149 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 6015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 93/148 variables, 55/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 96/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/149 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 14730 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20769ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20769ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/119 places, 97/235 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20939 ms. Remains : 55/119 places, 97/235 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:15:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability34564586974128565.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:15:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12789666353799489014.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability34564586974128565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12789666353799489014.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,809199,0.171132,9084,2,1418,5,21468,6,0,313,23025,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(AX(EG((p25==0)))) + EG(!(E(((p99==1)&&(p52==1)) U AG(((p114==1)&&(p135==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(EG((p25==0)))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(EY(Init),!(E(((p99==1)&&(p52==1)) U !(E(TRUE U...197
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t24, t...317
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,5.27301,127576,1,0,379,783246,218,180,2358,762980,421
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-12-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 02:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 02:16:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Total runtime 492993 ms.

BK_STOP 1749003364603

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-12"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-12, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200626"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-12.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-12 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;