Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008200618.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200618
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 31K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 95K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 70K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749002063621

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-11
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 167 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Transformed 159 places.
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Transformed 334 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 159 places and 334 transitions and 879 arcs in 399 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 29 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 27 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 307/307 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 127 transition count 250
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 127 transition count 250
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 126 transition count 248
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 126 transition count 248
Applied a total of 66 rules in 52 ms. Remains 126 /159 variables (removed 33) and now considering 248/307 (removed 59) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 126 cols
[2025-06-04 01:54:26] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 394 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 323 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 791 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 247 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:54:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 204 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/368 variables, 126/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 5/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/369 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 369/369 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 30048 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 247/247 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 25/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 129 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 168 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 159 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 153 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 12/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 131 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 14/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 158 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 5/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 5/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 155 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 7/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 368/369 variables, and 226 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/247 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60379ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 247 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60405ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/159 places, 248/307 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61286 ms. Remains : 126/159 places, 248/307 transitions.
Support contains 101 out of 126 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 01:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 92 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 248 transitions.
Support contains 98 out of 126 places (down from 101) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2698 resets) in 2595 ms. (15 steps per ms) remains 38/89 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (43 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (41 resets) in 58 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 63 ms. (62 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (41 resets) in 54 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 37/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (39 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (35 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (39 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (42 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (37 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 49 ms. (80 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 35/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (41 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (40 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (34 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (21 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (39 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (37 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (24 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (38 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
[2025-06-04 01:55:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 243 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:55:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:55:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 33/83 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 43/126 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 35 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp83 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/368 variables, 126/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 145 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 7/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 8/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/368 variables, 9/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5104ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 4 solved, 31 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 41 out of 126 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 84 edges and 126 vertex of which 10 / 126 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 16 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 16 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 498 edges and 121 vertex of which 118 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 118 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 114 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 111 transition count 219
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 111 transition count 217
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 2 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 108 transition count 217
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 78 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 78 transition count 157
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 78 transition count 155
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 76 transition count 151
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 76 transition count 151
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 76 transition count 148
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 74 transition count 152
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 74 transition count 151
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 73 transition count 151
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 14 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 14 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 73 transition count 151
Applied a total of 116 rules in 107 ms. Remains 73 /126 variables (removed 53) and now considering 151/248 (removed 97) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 108 ms. Remains : 73/126 places, 151/248 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2609 resets) in 1289 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 25/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (67 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (61 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (65 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (62 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (56 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 23/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (62 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (62 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (65 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (61 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (60 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (59 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (58 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (61 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (64 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (58 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (62 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (62 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (66 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (58 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (64 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (60 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (64 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
[2025-06-04 01:55:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 149 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 149 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 01:55:35] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/73 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 149/222 variables, 73/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 222/222 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 648 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/73 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 149/222 variables, 73/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 22/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 16/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 3/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/222 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/222 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 222/222 variables, and 127 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved in 8097 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8776ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Fused 22 Parikh solutions to 17 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 21 properties in 1246 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 73 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 151/151 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 48 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 48 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 48 transition count 100
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 47 transition count 99
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -17
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 44 transition count 116
Free-agglomeration rule applied 5 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 44 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 39 transition count 111
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 39 transition count 108
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 20 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 20 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 39 transition count 108
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 39 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 38 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 38 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 38 transition count 102
Applied a total of 104 rules in 42 ms. Remains 38 /73 variables (removed 35) and now considering 102/151 (removed 49) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 43 ms. Remains : 38/73 places, 102/151 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 32059 steps (2352 resets) in 564 ms. (56 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 248 transitions.
Computed a total of 11 stabilizing places and 18 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 67 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 67 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 67 transition count 129
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 60 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 60 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 60 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 58 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 58 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 56 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 56 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 56 transition count 93
Applied a total of 155 rules in 16 ms. Remains 56 /126 variables (removed 70) and now considering 93/248 (removed 155) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 56 cols
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 197 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 90 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:55:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 89/145 variables, 56/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 146/146 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 5114 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/56 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 89/145 variables, 56/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 92/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 146/146 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 11229 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 56/56 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16369ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16370ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 56/126 places, 93/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16585 ms. Remains : 56/126 places, 93/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14637816752799197155.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4421567963704406776.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14637816752799197155.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4421567963704406776.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19654e+06,0.160613,6616,2,994,5,12563,6,0,313,11622,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((((AX((p55==1)) * A(((p113==1)&&(p147==1)) U (p81==1))) * (EG(((p38==1)||(p148==1))) * EX(EX((p27==1))))) * ((p46==1) * AG(((p72==0...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * ((!(EX(!((p55==1)))) * !((E(!((p81==1)) U (!(((p113==1)&&(p147==1))) * !((p81==1)))) +...288
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t38, ...288
(forward)formula 0,0,3.54011,82596,1,0,394,541190,226,192,2395,428420,464
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 64 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 64 transition count 124
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 57 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 57 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 57 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 55 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 55 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 53 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 53 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 53 transition count 88
Applied a total of 160 rules in 22 ms. Remains 53 /126 variables (removed 73) and now considering 88/248 (removed 160) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 215 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 87 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:56:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/137 variables, 53/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 5084 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 84/137 variables, 53/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 87/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 13178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18295ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18295ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/126 places, 88/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18533 ms. Remains : 53/126 places, 88/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10294175314708025910.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7546766417889314141.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10294175314708025910.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7546766417889314141.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,792432,0.109201,7020,2,1002,5,14087,6,0,296,13176,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(EF((p47!=1)) U (p42==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(E(TRUE U (p47!=1)) U (p42==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t34, t35, t...272
(forward)formula 0,0,0.642549,21312,1,0,165,102167,194,77,2141,72234,202
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 61 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 61 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 65 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 65 transition count 128
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 65 transition count 125
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 60 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 60 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 60 transition count 112
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 59 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 59 transition count 109
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 58 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 58 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 58 transition count 104
Applied a total of 145 rules in 13 ms. Remains 58 /126 variables (removed 68) and now considering 104/248 (removed 144) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:56:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 103 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:56:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:56:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/158 variables, 58/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 159/159 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 7217 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/158 variables, 58/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 103/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/159 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/159 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 159/159 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 11634 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18871ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18873ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/126 places, 104/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19071 ms. Remains : 58/126 places, 104/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7185502239160432780.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1848433567070642995.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7185502239160432780.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1848433567070642995.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.10517e+06,0.242176,10332,2,1702,5,26236,6,0,332,28247,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(EX(A((p52==1) U (p144==1))) U (((EG((p7==1)) * (p17==1)) * ((p36==1)&&(p55==1))) * (p146==1))) + (p97==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p97==0))) * !(E(EX(!((E(!((p144==1)) U (!((p52==1)) * !((p144==1)))) + EG(!((p144==1))))...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...348
(forward)formula 0,0,6.06684,154964,1,0,409,917432,244,185,2467,903587,455
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 53 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 53 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 73 transition count 144
Iterating global reduction 0 with 53 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 73 transition count 144
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 73 transition count 141
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 70 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 70 transition count 135
Applied a total of 115 rules in 10 ms. Remains 70 /126 variables (removed 56) and now considering 135/248 (removed 113) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 134 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 132 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:56:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 131/201 variables, 70/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 202/202 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 9922 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 131/201 variables, 70/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 134/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/202 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 202/202 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved in 24403 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34355ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 134 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34355ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/126 places, 135/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34546 ms. Remains : 70/126 places, 135/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:57:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 135 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:57:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7349143630340337882.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11580008155292839755.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7349143630340337882.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11580008155292839755.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.5329e+06,1.47555,31456,2,5319,5,94967,6,0,411,138071,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((((EG(EX((p62==0))) * A(E((p118==1) U (p117==1)) U (p15!=1))) * (EF((p52==1)) * EG((p144==0)))) + EG((((EX((p102==1)) * ((p133==1)||(...430
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * EX((((EG(EX((p62==0))) * !((E(!((p15!=1)) U (!(E((p118==1) U (p117==1))) * !((p15!=1)))) + EG(!(...545
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...454
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 01:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 01:57:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16338852125611818173.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16338852125611818173.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16338852125611818173.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16338852125611818173.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16338852125611818173.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 01:57:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 01:57:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 01:57:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14486380782828001847.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3685813094261641286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14486380782828001847.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3685813094261641286.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.5329e+06,0.074653,6640,163,247,3798,2073,206,6594,197,11981,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX((((EG(EX((i3.u4.p62==0))) * A(E((u13.p118==1) U (u13.p117==1)) U (u0.p15!=1))) * (EF((u2.p52==1)) * EG((u13.p144==0)))) + EG((((EX((i...539
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * EX((((EG(EX((i3.u4.p62==0))) * !((E(!((u0.p15!=1)) U (!(E((u13.p118==1) U (u13.p117==1))) * !((u...660
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t85, t89, t90, t91, t95, t99, u0.t66, u0.t67, u0.t68, u0.t69, u0.t70, u0.t71, u0.t72, u0....654
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,0.621687,28912,1,0,50079,10369,1535,78169,1012,36724,66770
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 159 edges and 126 vertex of which 8 / 126 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 55 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 55 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 66 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 55 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 66 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 66 transition count 132
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 60 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 60 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 60 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 59 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 59 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 58 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 58 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 58 transition count 105
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 58 transition count 102
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 56 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 55 transition count 99
Applied a total of 147 rules in 37 ms. Remains 55 /126 variables (removed 71) and now considering 99/248 (removed 149) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 92 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 92 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:57:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/50 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 5/55 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 91/146 variables, 55/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 146/147 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 5129 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/50 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 5/55 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 6/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 91/146 variables, 55/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 85/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/146 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 146/147 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 6971 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12114ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12115ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/126 places, 99/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12335 ms. Remains : 55/126 places, 99/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7312864121224400165.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6708595600898409090.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7312864121224400165.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6708595600898409090.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08983e+06,0.140405,7160,2,1736,5,14326,6,0,306,14428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E((!((!((((p28==1)&&(p5==1))||(p106==1))) + E(((p2==1)||(p93==1)) U AG(((p113==1)&&(p153==1)))))) + !(AF(AG((p139==1))))) U (p69==1)) * ...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * E((!((!((((p28==1)&&(p5==1))||(p106==1))) + E(((p2==1)||(p93==1)) U !(E(TRUE U !(((p113==1)&&(p15...281
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21...370
(forward)formula 0,1,4.33595,103440,1,0,347,578081,230,159,2403,531800,377
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 64 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 64 transition count 123
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 57 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 57 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 57 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 149 place count 55 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 55 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 53 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 53 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 53 transition count 88
Applied a total of 160 rules in 8 ms. Remains 53 /126 variables (removed 73) and now considering 88/248 (removed 160) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 175 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 87 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:58:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/137 variables, 53/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 5081 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 157 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 84/137 variables, 53/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 87/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 9536 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14648ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14651ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/126 places, 88/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14835 ms. Remains : 53/126 places, 88/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13481923638420470015.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13704324521099458534.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13481923638420470015.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13704324521099458534.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,734841,0.126849,7668,2,1321,5,17551,6,0,296,14430,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX((p12==1)) * A((p130==1) U ((p36==1)&&(p156==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX((p12==1))) * !(EG(!(((p36==1)&&(p156==1)))))) * !(E(!(((p36==1)&&(p156==1))) U (!((p130...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t41, t...262
(forward)formula 0,1,3.76009,106628,1,0,316,629208,200,156,2149,581183,370
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 69 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 69 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 69 transition count 134
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 63 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 63 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 63 transition count 119
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 60 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 60 transition count 110
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 58 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 58 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 58 transition count 100
Applied a total of 147 rules in 5 ms. Remains 58 /126 variables (removed 68) and now considering 100/248 (removed 148) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 99 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:58:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 96/154 variables, 58/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 155/155 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 5970 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 96/154 variables, 58/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 99/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/155 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/155 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 155/155 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved in 13102 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 99 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19090ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/126 places, 100/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19244 ms. Remains : 58/126 places, 100/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16113938981098215944.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2841256721645207917.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16113938981098215944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2841256721645207917.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19922e+06,0.133559,7944,2,1646,5,18441,6,0,328,16481,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((AX((p150==1)) * EG((p100==0))) * (p83==0))) + AF(((EX((p152==0)) + AF((p142==0))) * E(E((p109==1) U (p117==1)) U EF((p43==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((!(EX(!((p150==1)))) * EG((p100==0))) * (p83==0))))),!(((EX((p152==0)) + !(EG(!((p142=...225
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, ...329
(forward)formula 0,1,6.33859,158264,1,0,439,945890,246,212,2404,881479,503
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 122 edges and 126 vertex of which 8 / 126 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 66 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 66 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 66 transition count 131
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 60 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 60 transition count 119
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 60 transition count 117
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 57 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 57 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 55 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 55 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 55 transition count 98
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 55 transition count 94
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 52 transition count 91
Applied a total of 155 rules in 23 ms. Remains 52 /126 variables (removed 74) and now considering 91/248 (removed 157) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 01:58:57] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:58:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:58:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:58:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 156 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:58:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:58:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:58:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 83/135 variables, 52/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 136/136 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 5886 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 83/135 variables, 52/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 90/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 136/136 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 9009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14917ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14919ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/126 places, 91/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15128 ms. Remains : 52/126 places, 91/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9837710880122943496.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3149354600543536366.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9837710880122943496.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3149354600543536366.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,648439,0.115301,7168,2,1104,5,14383,6,0,289,14298,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((!(A(((((p74==1)||(p16==1))||(((p17==1)&&(p156==1))||(p36==1)))&&(!((p101==1)&&(p55==1)))) U A((p40!=1) U ((p43==1)||(p118==1))))) * A...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(!((E(!(!((E(!(((p43==1)||(p118==1))) U (!((p40!=1)) * !(((p43==1)||(p118==1))))) + EG(!(((p43==1)|...549
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t18, t19, t20, t32, t3...301
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,6.98379,183660,1,0,576,1.05223e+06,220,329,2297,1.18713e+06,691
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 130 edges and 126 vertex of which 10 / 126 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 56 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 56 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 64 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 64 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 64 transition count 129
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 56 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 56 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 56 transition count 106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 54 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 54 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 52 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 52 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 52 transition count 90
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 52 transition count 86
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 50 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 48 transition count 82
Applied a total of 163 rules in 39 ms. Remains 48 /126 variables (removed 78) and now considering 82/248 (removed 166) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 68 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:59:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/122 variables, 48/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/123 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 3352 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 74/122 variables, 48/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 68/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/123 variables, and 130 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 4575 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7945ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7945ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/126 places, 82/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8190 ms. Remains : 48/126 places, 82/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7385416744981765364.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13582520637881884373.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7385416744981765364.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13582520637881884373.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,499936,0.225866,8428,2,1250,5,21272,6,0,262,22122,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p139==1))) U ((AG(AF((p33==1))) + E(EF((p29==1)) U ((p14==1)&&(p44==1)))) + ((p17==1)&&(p156==1))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p33==1))))))) + E(E(TRUE U (p29==1)) U ((p14==1)&&(p44==1)))) + ((p17==...472
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t27, t28, t32, t33...310
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,8.61058,193212,1,0,692,1.0723e+06,202,430,2006,1.33662e+06,720
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 179 edges and 126 vertex of which 10 / 126 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Discarding 57 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 57 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 64 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 57 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 64 transition count 131
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 64 transition count 128
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 57 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 57 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 57 transition count 110
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 139 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 54 transition count 101
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 51 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 51 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 51 transition count 86
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 51 transition count 82
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 47 transition count 78
Applied a total of 169 rules in 35 ms. Remains 47 /126 variables (removed 79) and now considering 78/248 (removed 170) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-04 01:59:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 70/117 variables, 47/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 3769 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 70/117 variables, 47/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 77/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/118 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 6823 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10607ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10608ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/126 places, 78/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10851 ms. Remains : 47/126 places, 78/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4174141435317425066.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9650020441326079037.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4174141435317425066.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9650020441326079037.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,306509,0.124535,6964,2,1277,5,14659,6,0,258,12841,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p158==0) + !(A((p77==1) U (p117==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p158==0))) * !(EG(!((p117==1))))) * !(E(!((p117==1)) U (!((p77==1)) * !((p117==1))))))]...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23, t24...280
(forward)formula 0,1,2.73258,75656,1,0,300,424415,177,140,1858,411731,325
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 58 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 58 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 68 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 68 transition count 134
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 68 transition count 131
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 61 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 61 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 61 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 59 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 59 transition count 105
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 145 place count 57 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 57 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 57 transition count 96
Applied a total of 152 rules in 8 ms. Remains 57 /126 variables (removed 69) and now considering 96/248 (removed 152) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 200 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:59:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/149 variables, 57/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 6564 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/149 variables, 57/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 95/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 172 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 11838 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18437ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18442ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/126 places, 96/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18650 ms. Remains : 57/126 places, 96/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15628719374308984628.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2374912201957271251.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15628719374308984628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2374912201957271251.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65079e+06,0.275622,9408,2,1476,5,23067,6,0,320,24132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(A(E(AG((p38==1)) U (AG((p64==1)) * AX((p8==1)))) U (EF((p6==1)) + E(((p113==1)&&(p128==1)) U ((p98==1)&&(p12==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(EY(Init),!((E(TRUE U (p6==1)) + E(((p113==1)&&(p128==1)) U ((p98==1)&&(p12==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !...411
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t23, t...322
(forward)formula 0,0,1.72395,39200,1,0,245,217985,233,115,2390,160251,292
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 62 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 62 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 64 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 64 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 64 transition count 123
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 57 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 57 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 57 transition count 104
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 55 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 55 transition count 98
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 53 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 53 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 53 transition count 89
Applied a total of 159 rules in 6 ms. Remains 53 /126 variables (removed 73) and now considering 89/248 (removed 159) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 118 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 86 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:00:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 85/138 variables, 53/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/139 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 5225 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 85/138 variables, 53/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 88/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/139 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 8011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13250ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13251ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/126 places, 89/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13457 ms. Remains : 53/126 places, 89/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 89 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10098251456946095503.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11813277092142359480.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10098251456946095503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11813277092142359480.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,852210,0.198906,7664,2,1205,5,17072,6,0,297,15808,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((p30==0) * EF((AG((((p17==0)||(p36==0))||((p55==0)||(p139==0)))) + (p22==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !((p30==0)))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !((((p17==0)||(p36==0))||((p55==0)||(p...192
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t37, t38, t...262
(forward)formula 0,1,1.05729,24520,1,0,166,114097,199,78,2172,79384,205
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 74 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 74 transition count 146
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 74 transition count 144
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 70 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 70 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 70 transition count 133
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 68 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 68 transition count 127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 67 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 67 transition count 125
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 67 transition count 124
Applied a total of 124 rules in 11 ms. Remains 67 /126 variables (removed 59) and now considering 124/248 (removed 124) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 121 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:00:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/187 variables, 67/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 188/188 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 7742 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/67 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/187 variables, 67/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 123/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/187 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/188 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/188 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 188/188 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 19187 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 26961ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26962ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/126 places, 124/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27165 ms. Remains : 67/126 places, 124/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability659451277497252181.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5535217865829047417.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability659451277497252181.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5535217865829047417.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.20553e+06,1.21666,25504,2,3441,5,84748,6,0,388,105080,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EG(EX(!(((p113==1)&&(p132==1))))) + ((EX(EX((((p23==1)&&(p55==1))&&(p156==1)))) * (((p12!=1)||(p99==1)) + (((EF((p145==1)) * (p113==1)...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(EG(EX(!(((p113==1)&&(p132==1))))) + ((EX(EX((((p23==1)&&(p55==1))&&(p156==1)))) * (((p12!=1)||(p99=...444
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...423
(forward)formula 0,0,3.37904,57488,1,0,263,290337,268,109,2726,210944,287
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 133 edges and 126 vertex of which 10 / 126 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 61 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 61 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 61 transition count 123
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 53 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 53 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 53 transition count 101
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 50 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 50 transition count 92
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 153 place count 47 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 47 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 165 place count 47 transition count 77
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 47 transition count 73
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 45 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 175 place count 43 transition count 69
Applied a total of 175 rules in 19 ms. Remains 43 /126 variables (removed 83) and now considering 69/248 (removed 179) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 62 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/43 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/104 variables, 43/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/105 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 2617 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/43 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/104 variables, 43/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 55/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/105 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 3046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5674ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5674ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/126 places, 69/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5879 ms. Remains : 43/126 places, 69/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14055696828561661096.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7668395729662765336.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14055696828561661096.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7668395729662765336.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,266656,0.09074,6680,2,762,5,12410,6,0,229,11439,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((AG((p35==0)) + EG(EF(((p55==0)||(p156==0))))) + EF((((p17==0)||(p36==0))||((p55==0)||(p146==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (((p17==0)||(p36==0))||((p55==0)||(p146==0)))))) * !(EG(E(TRUE U ((p55==0)...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t27, t28, Intersection with reac...230
(forward)formula 0,1,0.879013,25420,1,0,171,127704,156,81,1699,104790,198
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 67 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 67 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 67 transition count 129
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 61 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 61 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 61 transition count 114
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 59 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 59 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 57 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 57 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 57 transition count 98
Applied a total of 150 rules in 3 ms. Remains 57 /126 variables (removed 69) and now considering 98/248 (removed 150) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 95 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 02:01:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 94/151 variables, 57/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 3/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 152/152 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 7407 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 94/151 variables, 57/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 97/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 152/152 variables, and 172 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 12807 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 57/57 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20245ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20246ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/126 places, 98/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20425 ms. Remains : 57/126 places, 98/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17535035474691200761.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2340138063959183200.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17535035474691200761.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2340138063959183200.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12048e+06,0.258925,10872,2,1530,5,30368,6,0,322,32591,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((((p53==1)&&(p150!=1)) * (EX(EX(AG((p84==1)))) * ((p55!=1)||(p156!=1)))) * ((AG((p9==0)) + (p84==0)) + ((p28==0)||(((p113==0)||(p144=...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (((p53==1)&&(p150!=1)) * (EX(EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p84==1)))))) * ((p55!=1)||(p156!=1))))) * !...503
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t25, ...333
(forward)formula 0,0,1.29408,33512,1,0,204,170641,220,88,2351,133902,234
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 126/126 places, 248/248 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 183 edges and 126 vertex of which 10 / 126 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 59 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 59 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 61 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 61 transition count 126
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 61 transition count 123
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 130 place count 53 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 53 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 53 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 147 place count 51 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 51 transition count 94
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 151 place count 49 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 49 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 49 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 163 place count 49 transition count 80
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 167 place count 47 transition count 78
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 169 place count 45 transition count 76
Applied a total of 169 rules in 12 ms. Remains 45 /126 variables (removed 81) and now considering 76/248 (removed 172) transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 69 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 02:01:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/113 variables, 45/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 113/114 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 2909 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 68/113 variables, 45/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 62/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 113/114 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 3757 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6677ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6677ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/126 places, 76/248 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6825 ms. Remains : 45/126 places, 76/248 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality177070468010094385.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7813653681766156895.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality177070468010094385.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7813653681766156895.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (4037 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...327
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (574 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7813653681766156895.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 4
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :4 after 48
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :48 after 71
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :71 after 78
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :78 after 120
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :120 after 5184
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :5184 after 7800
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :7800 after 84888
Reachability property HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-15 is true.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 513 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,291280,0.163536,6760,2,924,15,12807,6,0,244,12343,0
Total reachable state count : 291280

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-15 is true.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
HealthRecord-PT-11-CTLFireability-2023-15,1,0.165118,6760,2,46,15,12807,7,0,247,12343,0
Finished probabilistic random walk after 65540 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 181 ms. (steps per millisecond=362 )
Probabilistic random walk after 65540 steps, saw 10891 distinct states, run finished after 188 ms. (steps per millisecond=348 ) properties seen :1
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 02:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Total runtime 425848 ms.

BK_STOP 1749002492034

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-11"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-11, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200618"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-11.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-11 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;