Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008200616.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-10, examination is StateSpace
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200616
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 544K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 129K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

no data necessary for post analysis


=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749001983198

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=StateSpace
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-10
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
StateSpace PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 01:53:05] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, StateSpace, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 01:53:05] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 01:53:06] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 145 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:06] [INFO ] Transformed 158 places.
[2025-06-04 01:53:06] [INFO ] Transformed 333 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:53:06] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 01:53:06] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 158 places and 333 transitions and 875 arcs in 347 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 40 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in STATESPACE mode, iteration 0 : 158/158 places, 293/293 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 36 ms returned []
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 293 rows 158 cols
[2025-06-04 01:53:06] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 21 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 147/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/158 variables, 10/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 11/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 8/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 163 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 20/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 179 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 119 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 20/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 202 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 162 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 150 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 142 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 174 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 20/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 132 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 11/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 160 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 6/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 155 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 1.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 1.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 1.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 1.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 158/451 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30049 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 158/158 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 147/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 11/158 variables, 10/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 11/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 8/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 81/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 169 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 203 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 197 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 200 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 12/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 156 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 1/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/158 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 293/451 variables, 158/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/451 variables, 292/720 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 148 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 141 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 143 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 451/451 variables, and 727 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 158/158 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 10/10 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 158/158 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 101/101 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60409ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60439ms
Finished structural reductions in STATESPACE mode , in 1 iterations and 60671 ms. Remains : 158/158 places, 293/293 transitions.
Final net has 158 places and 293 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 123 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 01:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8581840318257675576.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8581840318257675576.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8581840318257675576.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8581840318257675576.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8581840318257675576.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 01:54:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 01:54:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 01:54:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 91 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:54:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 144 ms
[2025-06-04 01:54:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 29 labels/synchronizations in 16 ms.
[2025-06-04 01:54:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/StateSpace12530115654898676662.gal : 16 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/StateSpace12530115654898676662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '--stats'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...220
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst\_mod\_flat,1.2277e+09,3.58305,74424,1591,2108,66417,39991,454,198168,280,480322,0
Total reachable state count : 1227696764

Max variable value : 1
STATE_SPACE MAX_TOKEN_IN_PLACE 1 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Maximum sum along a path : 10
STATE_SPACE MAX_TOKEN_PER_MARKING 10 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Exact state count : 1227696764
STATE_SPACE STATES 1227696764 TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 65905 ms.

BK_STOP 1749002051799

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ StateSpace = StateSpace ]]
+ [[ -f modelMain.xml ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution StateSpace -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination StateSpace -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="StateSpace"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-10, examination is StateSpace"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200616"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-10.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-10 execution
cd execution
if [ "StateSpace" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "StateSpace" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "StateSpace" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "StateSpace.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' StateSpace.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "StateSpace" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "Liveness" ] || [ "StateSpace" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME StateSpace"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;