Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008200610.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-10, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200610
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 544K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.4K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 129K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749001368269

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-10
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 01:42:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 01:42:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 176 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Transformed 158 places.
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Transformed 333 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 158 places and 333 transitions and 875 arcs in 406 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 32 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 27 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 158 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 158/158 places, 306/306 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 114 transition count 224
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 114 transition count 224
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 113 transition count 222
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 113 transition count 222
Applied a total of 90 rules in 53 ms. Remains 113 /158 variables (removed 45) and now considering 222/306 (removed 84) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 216 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 216 rows 113 cols
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 23 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 416 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 216 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:42:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:42:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 374 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 864 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 221 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:42:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 216 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:42:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:42:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 211 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 14/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 143 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 215/328 variables, 113/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/329 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/329 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 329/329 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 221/221 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/113 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 215/328 variables, 113/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 221/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 6/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 3/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 4/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/329 variables, and 379 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 113/113 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 221/221 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60356ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 221 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60381ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/158 places, 222/306 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61337 ms. Remains : 113/158 places, 222/306 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 113 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 01:43:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 222 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2517 resets) in 3190 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 38/68 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 37/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (31 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 37/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (18 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 36/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (16 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (29 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (31 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (31 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
[2025-06-04 01:43:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 216 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:43:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:43:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 34/76 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 32 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp12 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 37/113 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 31 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 157 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 15/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 151 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 12/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 155 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5031ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 30 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 38 out of 113 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 83 edges and 113 vertex of which 8 / 113 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 4 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 15 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 15 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 467 edges and 109 vertex of which 106 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 3 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 3 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 106 transition count 204
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 103 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 101 transition count 198
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 101 transition count 196
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 1 places
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 98 transition count 196
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 80 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 80 transition count 160
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 78 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 78 transition count 156
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 78 transition count 153
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -20
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 73 transition count 173
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 73 transition count 170
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 17 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 17 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 73 transition count 170
Applied a total of 94 rules in 95 ms. Remains 73 /113 variables (removed 40) and now considering 170/222 (removed 52) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 95 ms. Remains : 73/113 places, 170/222 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2370 resets) in 1323 ms. (30 steps per ms) remains 19/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (60 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (52 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (22 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (52 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (49 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 18/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (49 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (50 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
[2025-06-04 01:44:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 160 transitions (discarded 10 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 01:44:00] [INFO ] Computed 8 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/32 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 41/73 variables, 7/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 160/233 variables, 73/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 15/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 96 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved in 835 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 5/32 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 41/73 variables, 7/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 160/233 variables, 73/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 15/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 18/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 15/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 233/233 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved in 5609 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6481ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 17 unsolved
Fused 17 Parikh solutions to 15 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 13 properties in 2668 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 73 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 170/170 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 56 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 56 transition count 136
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 56 transition count 134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 55 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 55 transition count 132
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 53 transition count 130
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -20
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 49 transition count 150
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 49 transition count 149
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 48 transition count 149
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 22 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 22 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 48 transition count 149
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 48 transition count 149
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 46 transition count 145
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 46 transition count 145
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 44 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 44 transition count 140
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 43 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 43 transition count 134
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 42 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 42 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 42 transition count 127
Applied a total of 97 rules in 59 ms. Remains 42 /73 variables (removed 31) and now considering 127/170 (removed 43) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 42/73 places, 127/170 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1706 resets) in 698 ms. (57 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (253 resets) in 111 ms. (357 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (367 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (411 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (389 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 7733 states, properties seen :3
Probabilistic random walk after 30924 steps, saw 7733 distinct states, run finished after 210 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties seen :3
Explored full state space saw : 7733 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 30924 steps, saw 7733 distinct states, run finished after 74 ms. (steps per millisecond=417 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 222 transitions.
Support contains 67 out of 113 places (down from 73) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 9 stabilizing places and 15 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 62 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 62 transition count 123
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 56 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 56 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 56 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 54 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 54 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 52 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 52 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 52 transition count 86
Applied a total of 137 rules in 13 ms. Remains 52 /113 variables (removed 61) and now considering 86/222 (removed 136) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 198 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:44:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 6416 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 85/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 10762 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17209ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17210ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/113 places, 86/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17422 ms. Remains : 52/113 places, 86/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5285752997746502713.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1554711048472690642.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5285752997746502713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1554711048472690642.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,538011,0.10213,6372,2,895,5,12208,6,0,290,10323,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EX(AG((p125==1))) + AG((p24==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY(Init)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p125==1)))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((p24==0)))))] != FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t38, t39, t58, t...257
(forward)formula 0,0,0.693606,17848,1,0,156,79454,192,75,2162,58145,194
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 65 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 65 transition count 129
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 59 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 59 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 59 transition count 109
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 56 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 56 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 54 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 54 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 54 transition count 90
Applied a total of 132 rules in 18 ms. Remains 54 /113 variables (removed 59) and now considering 90/222 (removed 132) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 213 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:44:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 86/140 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 141/141 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 5512 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 86/140 variables, 54/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 89/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 141/141 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 9313 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14859ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14861ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/113 places, 90/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15093 ms. Remains : 54/113 places, 90/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10610250489048929702.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1871415075591318435.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10610250489048929702.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1871415075591318435.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,828153,0.133954,8300,2,1032,5,20298,6,0,302,19980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX(((p49==0) * EX((p122==1)))) * (p135==1)) * ((p23==1)&&(p76==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p23==1)&&(p76==1))) * (p135==1))) * (p49==0))) * (p122==1))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.142366,8556,1,0,13,20298,11,4,459,19980,6
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 67 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 67 transition count 133
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 61 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 61 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 61 transition count 112
Applied a total of 113 rules in 6 ms. Remains 61 /113 variables (removed 52) and now considering 112/222 (removed 110) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 126 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 111 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 109 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:44:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/169 variables, 61/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 6314 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 108/169 variables, 61/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 111/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved in 11329 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17669ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 111 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17669ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/113 places, 112/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17804 ms. Remains : 61/113 places, 112/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 112 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7630719447527209330.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4964583236863520557.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7630719447527209330.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4964583236863520557.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09278e+06,0.211909,8076,2,1563,5,17580,6,0,352,16709,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(AF(EG(A((((((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p60==1)))&&(((p65==1)&&(p72==1))&&((p79==1)&&(p86==1))))&&((p112==1)&&(p156==1))) U (p11...265
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,E(!(EG(!(EG(!((E(!((p111==1)) U (!((((((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p60==1)))&&(((p65==1)&&(p7...649
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...373
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,8.59862,213808,1,0,569,1.2922e+06,277,357,2784,1.2123e+06,743
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 155 edges and 113 vertex of which 8 / 113 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 61 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 61 transition count 126
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 53 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 53 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 53 transition count 100
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 51 transition count 94
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 51 transition count 94
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 49 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 49 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 49 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 49 transition count 81
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 47 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 46 transition count 78
Applied a total of 143 rules in 32 ms. Remains 46 /113 variables (removed 67) and now considering 78/222 (removed 144) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 72 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/46 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 71/117 variables, 46/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 117/118 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 2584 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/46 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 71/117 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 62/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/117 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 117/118 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 3793 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6391ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6391ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/113 places, 78/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6592 ms. Remains : 46/113 places, 78/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1906510334219265912.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4838158838627992129.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1906510334219265912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4838158838627992129.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3140 resets) in 254 ms. (156 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties

BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (406 resets) in 181 ms. (219 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4838158838627992129.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :8 after 48
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :48 after 264
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :264 after 2352
Invariant property HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-04 does not hold.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
Found states matching all0 target predicate
Will report total states built up to this point. Computation was interrupted after 65 fixpoint passes
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,196994,0.071539,4604,2,785,11,4261,6,0,252,2541,0
Total reachable state count : 196994

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Invariant property HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-04 does not hold.

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-04,1,0.07245,4604,2,47,11,4261,7,0,258,2541,0
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Finished probabilistic random walk after 220734 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 346 ms. (steps per millisecond=637 )
Probabilistic random walk after 220734 steps, saw 31672 distinct states, run finished after 354 ms. (steps per millisecond=623 ) properties seen :1
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 62 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 62 transition count 123
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 56 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 56 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 56 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 54 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 54 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 52 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 52 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 52 transition count 86
Applied a total of 137 rules in 15 ms. Remains 52 /113 variables (removed 61) and now considering 86/222 (removed 136) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 83 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:45:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 6002 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 82/134 variables, 52/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 85/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 9376 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15400ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15400ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/113 places, 86/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15578 ms. Remains : 52/113 places, 86/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2268500180285821481.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5777300561536828170.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2268500180285821481.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5777300561536828170.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,478962,0.080169,6116,2,913,5,10395,6,0,290,8724,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(AX((p136==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE))) * !((p136==0)))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,0.096115,6372,1,0,8,10395,9,2,499,8724,3
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 67 transition count 133
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 67 transition count 133
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 61 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 61 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 61 transition count 116
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 59 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 59 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 58 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 58 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 58 transition count 106
Applied a total of 117 rules in 7 ms. Remains 58 /113 variables (removed 55) and now considering 106/222 (removed 116) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 248 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:45:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/160 variables, 58/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 161/161 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 6070 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/160 variables, 58/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 105/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 161/161 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 12803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18908ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18909ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/113 places, 106/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19164 ms. Remains : 58/113 places, 106/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7388459130104309850.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6575543248433065023.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7388459130104309850.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6575543248433065023.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.7522e+06,0.21133,8028,2,1018,5,17985,6,0,334,19578,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p117!=1) U (E(!(EX((p23==1))) U (p104==1)) + ((EF((p29==1)) * AF(!(A(((p112==1)&&(p131==1)) U (p77==1))))) * EF(!(E((p63==1) U (p44==1...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,(p117!=1)),!(EX((p23==1)))) * (p104==1))] != FALSE + [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,(p117!=1)) * (E(TRUE U ...309
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 101/0/5
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t22, t...353
(forward)formula 0,1,0.764283,18640,1,0,204,71033,236,88,2532,70031,226
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 62 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 62 transition count 123
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 55 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 55 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 55 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 52 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 52 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 49 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 49 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 49 transition count 76
Applied a total of 146 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /113 variables (removed 64) and now considering 76/222 (removed 146) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 75 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:45:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/121 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 4132 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/121 variables, 49/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 75/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 7499 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11641ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11642ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/113 places, 76/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11803 ms. Remains : 49/113 places, 76/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16468322716935322360.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1377054987152463952.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16468322716935322360.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1377054987152463952.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,492813,0.072097,5580,2,620,5,7622,6,0,268,6552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(AX(EF((p70==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(EY(Init))) * !(E(TRUE U (p70==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,0,0.301046,10316,1,0,130,34938,169,64,1942,22428,165
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 38 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 38 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 75 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 0 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 75 transition count 149
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 82 place count 69 transition count 137
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 69 transition count 137
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 69 transition count 132
Applied a total of 93 rules in 5 ms. Remains 69 /113 variables (removed 44) and now considering 132/222 (removed 90) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 69 cols
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 131 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 129 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:46:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 128/197 variables, 69/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 198/198 variables, and 82 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved in 8743 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 128/197 variables, 69/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 131/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/198 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/198 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 198/198 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved in 20019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 28798ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28803ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/113 places, 132/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 29034 ms. Remains : 69/113 places, 132/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16388691735990866265.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2803674750906600701.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16388691735990866265.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2803674750906600701.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.38352e+06,0.855514,21968,2,2230,5,78298,6,0,404,90580,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((A((A((p147==1) U (p10==1)) * ((p14==1)||(p111==1))) U ((p112==1)&&(p133==1))) + (p58==1)) + (((p47==1) * ((A((p5==1) U (p27==1)) + (p...268
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U (p44==1)) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(((p87==1)&&(p27==1)))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX(!((E(...676
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, ...457
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,22.2918,493336,1,0,796,2.84308e+06,323,420,3138,2.9316e+06,938
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 149 edges and 113 vertex of which 8 / 113 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 64 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 64 transition count 131
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 56 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 56 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 56 transition count 105
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 54 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 54 transition count 99
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 123 place count 52 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 52 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 52 transition count 91
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 52 transition count 88
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 49 transition count 85
Applied a total of 138 rules in 20 ms. Remains 49 /113 variables (removed 64) and now considering 85/222 (removed 137) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 6 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/127 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 128/128 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 3121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/127 variables, 49/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 84/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/128 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 128/128 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 8063 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11197ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11197ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/113 places, 85/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11386 ms. Remains : 49/113 places, 85/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18262056201659691932.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11810481398210057144.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18262056201659691932.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11810481398210057144.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,730301,0.209046,8768,2,1074,5,22235,6,0,274,21491,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p48==0) * (E((p47==1) U (p58==1)) + A((p12==1) U (p61==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p48==0) * (E((p47==1) U (p58==1)) + !((E(!((p61==1)) U (!((p12==1)) * !((p61==1...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t17, t30, t31, t32, t33, t40...265
(forward)formula 0,0,4.03541,103760,1,0,325,612878,201,157,2052,613011,377
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 138 edges and 113 vertex of which 8 / 113 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 4 places
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 63 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 63 transition count 129
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 100 place count 56 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 56 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 56 transition count 107
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 53 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 53 transition count 98
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 50 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 50 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 50 transition count 83
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 50 transition count 79
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 46 transition count 75
Applied a total of 148 rules in 25 ms. Remains 46 /113 variables (removed 67) and now considering 75/222 (removed 147) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 25 ms returned []
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:47:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 67/113 variables, 46/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 4404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 67/113 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 74/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/114 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 6471 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10895ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10896ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/113 places, 75/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11115 ms. Remains : 46/113 places, 75/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8069775286387073848.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7262129607400492008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8069775286387073848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7262129607400492008.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,203156,0.038157,5036,2,572,5,5431,6,0,251,4681,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((p106==1)||((p112==1)&&(p152==1)))||(((p21==1)&&(p19==1))&&(p155==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p106==1)||((p112==1)&&(p152==1)))||(((p21==1)&&(p19==1))&&(p155==1)))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t16, t18, t33, t34, Intersection wit...236
(forward)formula 0,0,0.145516,8364,1,0,126,21408,164,58,1808,16246,152
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 66 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 66 transition count 130
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 59 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 59 transition count 116
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 59 transition count 108
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 57 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 57 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 55 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 55 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 55 transition count 92
Applied a total of 130 rules in 5 ms. Remains 55 /113 variables (removed 58) and now considering 92/222 (removed 130) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 88 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:47:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 87/142 variables, 55/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 143/143 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 5998 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/55 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 8/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 87/142 variables, 55/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 91/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 143/143 variables, and 161 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 9258 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 55/55 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15271ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15272ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/113 places, 92/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15424 ms. Remains : 55/113 places, 92/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1470798671025272186.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2291816865876538153.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1470798671025272186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2291816865876538153.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,813574,0.115662,7416,2,1156,5,15460,6,0,305,15207,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(AX((((p41==1)||(p68==1)) * EF((p106==1))))) * EX(AG(((p81==0)&&(p6==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((((p41==1)||(p68==1)) * E(TRUE U (p106==1))))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t12, t13, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t24, t32, t33, t38, t...287
(forward)formula 0,0,1.30701,39340,1,0,205,206756,203,98,2293,175413,249
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 151 edges and 113 vertex of which 10 / 113 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 59 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 59 transition count 123
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 52 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 52 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 52 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 50 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 50 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 48 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 48 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 48 transition count 86
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 48 transition count 82
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 46 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 44 transition count 78
Applied a total of 142 rules in 24 ms. Remains 44 /113 variables (removed 69) and now considering 78/222 (removed 144) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 71 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned []
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 71 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/44 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 70/114 variables, 44/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/115 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 2996 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/44 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 70/114 variables, 44/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 62/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/115 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 3728 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6746ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6746ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/113 places, 78/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6976 ms. Remains : 44/113 places, 78/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8306598320274504485.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2246953311405151825.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8306598320274504485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2246953311405151825.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,210928,0.102552,5712,2,1947,5,9447,6,0,243,7660,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(!(((p112==1)&&(p117==1))) U (p126==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(((p112==1)&&(p117==1)))) * (p126==1))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 66/0/12
(forward)formula 0,0,0.271323,8656,1,0,8,21247,16,1,489,21954,4
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 66 transition count 131
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 66 transition count 131
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 62 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 62 transition count 123
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 62 transition count 122
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 60 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 60 transition count 116
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 58 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 58 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 58 transition count 106
Applied a total of 117 rules in 7 ms. Remains 58 /113 variables (removed 55) and now considering 106/222 (removed 116) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:47:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:47:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:47:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:47:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/160 variables, 58/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 161/161 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 5220 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 5/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/160 variables, 58/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 105/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/161 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/161 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 161/161 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 11809 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/113 places, 106/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17273 ms. Remains : 58/113 places, 106/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3544517102444590363.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17265640771266387367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3544517102444590363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17265640771266387367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30127e+06,0.222954,10204,2,1702,5,26497,6,0,334,26617,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG((p120==0)) * EG(EX((p3==0)))) * (AG(((p43==0)||(p34==0))) * !(A(E(((p54==1)&&(p155==1)) U ((p112==1)&&(p129==1))) U EX((p89==1)))...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(E(TRUE U !((p120==0)))) * EG(EX((p3==0))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p43==0)||(p34==0)))...403
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...348
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,2.56029,67160,1,0,287,354234,251,140,2594,297853,332
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 158 edges and 113 vertex of which 10 / 113 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 60 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 60 transition count 125
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 53 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 53 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 53 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 51 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 51 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 49 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 49 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 49 transition count 85
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 49 transition count 81
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 47 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 45 transition count 77
Applied a total of 143 rules in 14 ms. Remains 45 /113 variables (removed 68) and now considering 77/222 (removed 145) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 7 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:48:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/45 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/114 variables, 45/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/115 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 1989 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 8/45 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 69/114 variables, 45/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 61/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/115 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 4420 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6431ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6432ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/113 places, 77/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6608 ms. Remains : 45/113 places, 77/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6094991623018547650.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3291238213482054318.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6094991623018547650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3291238213482054318.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,212872,0.107816,6192,2,902,5,10863,6,0,246,8904,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(EF((p124==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p124==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t16, t17, t19, t20, Intersectio...241
(forward)formula 0,0,0.642842,16704,1,0,142,68663,171,70,1870,51645,174
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 113/113 places, 222/222 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 133 edges and 113 vertex of which 10 / 113 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 62 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 62 transition count 128
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 54 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 54 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 54 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 51 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 51 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 126 place count 48 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 48 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 48 transition count 79
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 48 transition count 75
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 46 transition count 73
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 44 transition count 71
Applied a total of 147 rules in 16 ms. Remains 44 /113 variables (removed 69) and now considering 71/222 (removed 151) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 55 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 63 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/44 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 62/106 variables, 44/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 106/107 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 2695 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/38 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 6/44 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 62/106 variables, 44/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 55/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 106/107 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved in 3294 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5996ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 55 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5996ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/113 places, 71/222 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6156 ms. Remains : 44/113 places, 71/222 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability415334196288074930.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2361978207855915771.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability415334196288074930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2361978207855915771.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,266980,0.083524,5404,2,809,5,7495,6,0,233,6441,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(!(A((((((p35==1)&&(p155==1))||(p76==1))&&(p10==1))&&((p35==1)&&(p155==1))) U A((p150==1) U (p57==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((p57==1)) U (!((p150==1)) * !((p57==1)))) + EG(!((p57==1)))))) U (!(((...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t13, t14, t18, t19, t32, t33, t41, t42, t48, t4...256
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,0,3.19673,88280,1,0,341,495200,177,240,1817,537149,441
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-10-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 01:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:48:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 333686 ms.

BK_STOP 1749001704546

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-10"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-10, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200610"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-10.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-10 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;