Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008200602.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-09, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200602
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 464K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 109K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 68K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749000703189

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-09
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 01:31:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 01:31:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 01:31:45] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 127 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:45] [INFO ] Transformed 157 places.
[2025-06-04 01:31:45] [INFO ] Transformed 327 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:31:45] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 01:31:45] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 157 places and 327 transitions and 859 arcs in 294 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 24 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 26 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 26 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 157 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 301/301 transitions.
Discarding 40 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 40 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 117 transition count 228
Iterating global reduction 0 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 117 transition count 228
Applied a total of 80 rules in 40 ms. Remains 117 /157 variables (removed 40) and now considering 228/301 (removed 73) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 223 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 439 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 223 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 398 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 893 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 227 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:31:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 223 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:31:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:31:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 243 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 145 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 230 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 207 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 172 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 111 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 214 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 225 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 15/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 213 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 19/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 134 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 138 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 127 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 142 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 137 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 117/340 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved in 30052 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 227/227 constraints, Known Traps: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 99/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 156 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 10/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 153 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 123 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 6/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60515ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 227 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60556ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/157 places, 228/301 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61536 ms. Remains : 117/157 places, 228/301 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 117 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 01:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 63 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 117 places (down from 76) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (2387 resets) in 2934 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 33/73 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 39 ms. (100 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (37 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (36 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (30 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (32 resets) in 58 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 32/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (29 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 31/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (33 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (36 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (35 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (34 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (20 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (34 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (32 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 30/31 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (35 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 30/30 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 29/30 properties
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 223 transitions (discarded 5 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp45 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp62 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 34/76 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 2/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 4 solved, 25 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 6/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 24 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/117 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 10/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 129 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 222/339 variables, 117/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 340/340 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 47/74 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 8/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 43/117 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 16/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 137 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 152 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 150 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 144 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 159 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 138 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 130 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 145 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 150 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 0)
(s9 1)
(s10 0)
(s11 0)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 1)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 0)
(s30 0)
(s31 timeout
0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 117/340 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 8/8 constraints, State Equation: 0/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/29 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10040ms problems are : Problem set: 6 solved, 23 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 27 out of 117 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 105 edges and 117 vertex of which 12 / 117 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 5 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 457 edges and 111 vertex of which 109 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 109 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 106 transition count 202
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 201
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 104 transition count 198
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 2 places
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 99 transition count 198
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 69 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 3 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 69 transition count 138
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 66 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 66 transition count 132
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 66 transition count 129
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 65 transition count 128
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -17
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 62 transition count 145
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 17 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 17 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 62 transition count 145
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 16 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 16 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 62 transition count 145
Applied a total of 134 rules in 104 ms. Remains 62 /117 variables (removed 55) and now considering 145/228 (removed 83) transitions.
Running 137 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:32:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 143 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 143 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-04 01:32:59] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:32:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 15 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/62 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 137 unsolved
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 143/205 variables, 62/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 15/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/205 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 205/205 variables, and 85 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved in 9524 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/61 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/62 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 143/205 variables, 62/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 15/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 120/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/205 variables, 2/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 205/205 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 1/1 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, ReadFeed: 15/15 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/137 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 29733ms problems are : Problem set: 17 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 17 dead transitions in 29735ms
Found 17 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 17 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 17 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 62/117 places, 128/228 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 252 edges and 62 vertex of which 61 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 60 transition count 127
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 60 transition count 127
Applied a total of 6 rules in 17 ms. Remains 60 /62 variables (removed 2) and now considering 127/128 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 29859 ms. Remains : 60/117 places, 127/228 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (7595 resets) in 1643 ms. (24 steps per ms) remains 20/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (132 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (143 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (138 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (133 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (136 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (156 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (132 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (141 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (152 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (138 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 19/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (151 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (143 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (153 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (139 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (141 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (142 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (142 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (147 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (143 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (144 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 19/19 properties
[2025-06-04 01:33:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 125 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 125 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 01:33:29] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 19/43 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 113/156 variables, 43/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 29/185 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 7/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/185 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 185/185 variables, and 81 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 1223 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 19/43 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 113/156 variables, 43/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 7/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 3/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 29/185 variables, 17/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 7/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 16/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/185 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 185/185 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 2783 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 14/14 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4023ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Fused 19 Parikh solutions to 18 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 17 properties in 1936 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 60 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 60/60 places, 127/127 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 60 transition count 119
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 51 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 51 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 48 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 48 transition count 98
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 45 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 43 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 43 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 43 transition count 87
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -4
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 40 transition count 91
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 40 transition count 90
Applied a total of 53 rules in 19 ms. Remains 40 /60 variables (removed 20) and now considering 90/127 (removed 37) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 19 ms. Remains : 40/60 places, 90/127 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (7972 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (1498 resets) in 25 ms. (1538 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (1496 resets) in 27 ms. (1428 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-06-04 01:33:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 40 cols
[2025-06-04 01:33:35] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 22/23 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 69/92 variables, 23/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 35/127 variables, 17/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 11/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 123 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 22/23 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 69/92 variables, 23/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 35/127 variables, 17/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 11/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 121 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 252ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 40 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 40/40 places, 90/90 transitions.
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 40 transition count 89
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 37 transition count 86
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 36 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 36 transition count 84
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 36 transition count 83
Applied a total of 10 rules in 11 ms. Remains 36 /40 variables (removed 4) and now considering 83/90 (removed 7) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 36/40 places, 83/90 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (7500 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (1343 resets) in 32 ms. (1212 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 6129 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 21043 steps, saw 6129 distinct states, run finished after 64 ms. (steps per millisecond=328 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 6129 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 21043 steps, saw 6129 distinct states, run finished after 33 ms. (steps per millisecond=637 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 7 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 228 transitions.
Support contains 62 out of 117 places (down from 64) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 14 stabilizing places and 24 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 51 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 51 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 66 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 51 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 66 transition count 128
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 58 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 58 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 58 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 129 place count 56 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 56 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 54 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 54 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 54 transition count 87
Applied a total of 141 rules in 15 ms. Remains 54 /117 variables (removed 63) and now considering 87/228 (removed 141) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 190 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 86 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 84 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:33:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 68 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/137 variables, 54/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 4793 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 83/137 variables, 54/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 86/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved in 10616 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 86/86 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15440ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 86 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15443ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/117 places, 87/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15650 ms. Remains : 54/117 places, 87/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14774310923394487501.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11413593396320305993.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14774310923394487501.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11413593396320305993.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,694746,0.136365,6072,2,1174,5,10365,6,0,299,8462,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(!(((AF(((p55==1)&&(p154==1))) + E(((p17==1)&&(p154==1)) U (p150==1))) + (p149==1))) U !((!(EX(((p17==1)&&(p154==1)))) * (EG((p95==1)...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(!(((!(EG(!(((p55==1)&&(p154==1))))) + E(((p17==1)&&(p154==1)) U (p150==1))) + (p149==1))) U !((!(EX...336
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22, t24, t...277
(forward)formula 0,1,5.41185,136836,1,0,651,824782,220,357,2142,797121,712
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 166 edges and 117 vertex of which 12 / 117 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 60 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 60 transition count 123
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 50 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 50 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 7 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 7 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 50 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 47 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 47 transition count 87
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 44 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 44 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 44 transition count 72
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 44 transition count 70
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 43 transition count 69
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 42 transition count 68
Applied a total of 154 rules in 32 ms. Remains 42 /117 variables (removed 75) and now considering 68/228 (removed 160) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned []
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 60 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:33:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/42 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 59/101 variables, 42/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 101/102 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1824 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/42 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 59/101 variables, 42/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 54/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/102 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 3004 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4858ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4858ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/117 places, 68/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5059 ms. Remains : 42/117 places, 68/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 68 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
RANDOM walk for 4691 steps (480 resets) in 34 ms. (134 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10214509782953564936.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3237901754073228977.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10214509782953564936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3237901754073228977.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 69 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 69 transition count 134
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 103 place count 62 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 62 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 62 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 60 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 60 transition count 106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 58 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 58 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 58 transition count 96
Applied a total of 132 rules in 13 ms. Remains 58 /117 variables (removed 59) and now considering 96/228 (removed 132) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:34:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 204 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:34:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 92/150 variables, 58/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 6402 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/150 variables, 58/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 95/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 151/151 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 9410 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15842ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15843ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/117 places, 96/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16060 ms. Remains : 58/117 places, 96/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9677034758134600091.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13009796870953305739.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9677034758134600091.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13009796870953305739.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.08063e+06,0.087068,6724,2,1438,5,11735,6,0,324,10946,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(AG(AX((p4==0)))) + AX(EF(((AG((p104==1)) + E(((p111==1)&&(p126==1)) U (p104==1))) + AG((p121==0)))))) + EF((EX(AG((p65==0))) * EG((p...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((Init * !(E(TRUE U (EX(!(E(TRUE U !((p65==0))))) * EG((p92==0)))))) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p4==0)))))...284
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...337
(forward)formula 0,1,1.08387,29200,1,0,230,143682,216,105,2339,108091,261
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 72 transition count 140
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 72 transition count 140
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 63 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 63 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 63 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 62 transition count 113
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 62 transition count 113
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 61 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 61 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 61 transition count 109
Applied a total of 120 rules in 7 ms. Remains 61 /117 variables (removed 56) and now considering 109/228 (removed 119) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 149 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 108 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 106 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 105/166 variables, 61/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 167/167 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 5245 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/61 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 105/166 variables, 61/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 108/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/167 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 167/167 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved in 11519 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 108/108 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16779ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 108 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16781ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/117 places, 109/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16937 ms. Remains : 61/117 places, 109/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4707739733369771774.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14362128201674762906.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4707739733369771774.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14362128201674762906.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.94863e+06,0.90475,22444,2,2864,5,78154,6,0,349,78447,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((A((p45==1) U (p149==1)) + EG((p141==0))) + (!(E(((p48!=1) * (!(((p30==1)||(p134==1))) + EF((p33==1)))) U AG(EX((p81==1))))) * AG((p34==...160
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !((!((E(!((p149==1)) U (!((p45==1)) * !((p149==1)))) + EG(!((p149==1))))) + EG((p141==0))))),((p...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...363
(forward)formula 0,1,8.71322,208380,1,0,516,1.33736e+06,254,250,2657,1.12066e+06,588
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 165 edges and 117 vertex of which 12 / 117 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 61 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 61 transition count 125
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 50 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 50 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 50 transition count 93
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 47 transition count 84
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 47 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 44 transition count 78
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 44 transition count 78
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 44 transition count 70
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 153 place count 44 transition count 68
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 43 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 42 transition count 66
Applied a total of 156 rules in 23 ms. Remains 42 /117 variables (removed 75) and now considering 66/228 (removed 162) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 42 cols
[2025-06-04 01:34:45] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:34:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 193 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 58 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/42 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 57/99 variables, 42/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 99/100 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1994 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/42 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 57/99 variables, 42/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 52/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/99 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/99 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 99/100 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2765 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 42/42 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4776ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4777ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 42/117 places, 66/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5024 ms. Remains : 42/117 places, 66/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4141771752227509436.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9338220114409798420.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4141771752227509436.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9338220114409798420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,178204,0.06882,5116,2,694,5,5300,6,0,220,5438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF((p30==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p30==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t26, t27, Intersection with reac...230
(forward)formula 0,0,0.309555,9468,1,0,122,31002,144,56,1568,22266,137
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 69 transition count 134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 69 transition count 134
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 59 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 59 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 59 transition count 105
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 56 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 56 transition count 96
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 134 place count 53 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 53 transition count 90
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 53 transition count 82
Applied a total of 145 rules in 7 ms. Remains 53 /117 variables (removed 64) and now considering 82/228 (removed 146) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 245 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:34:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 78/131 variables, 53/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 132/132 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 5446 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/131 variables, 53/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 81/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 2/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/132 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/132 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/132 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 132/132 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 10559 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/117 places, 82/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16288 ms. Remains : 53/117 places, 82/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15340910291573381267.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5462855468286762641.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15340910291573381267.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5462855468286762641.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.05106e+06,0.323228,14360,2,3575,5,48341,6,0,290,38441,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX(((AX((p79==0)) * (p51==0)) * A((p76==1) U (p102==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((!(EX(!((p79==0)))) * (p51==0)) * !((E(!((p102==1)) U (!((p76==1)) * !((p102==1)))) ...191
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t20, t21, t22, t29, t30, t...307
(forward)formula 0,1,12.5227,288364,1,0,465,1.52543e+06,199,254,2108,1.76314e+06,475
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 65 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 65 transition count 126
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 55 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 55 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 55 transition count 97
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 136 place count 52 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 52 transition count 88
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 49 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 49 transition count 82
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 49 transition count 73
Applied a total of 154 rules in 13 ms. Remains 49 /117 variables (removed 68) and now considering 73/228 (removed 155) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 70 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 69/118 variables, 49/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 119/119 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 3590 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/118 variables, 49/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 72/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/119 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/119 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 119/119 variables, and 137 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 6850 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10454ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10455ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/117 places, 73/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10634 ms. Remains : 49/117 places, 73/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 73 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12530008475264963522.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6821220577669544321.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12530008475264963522.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6821220577669544321.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,484794,0.224988,9364,2,2129,5,25928,6,0,265,16460,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(AX(AF(((p106==1)||((p55==1)&&(p154==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(EG(!(((p106==1)||((p55==1)&&(p154==1))))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, Intersection with reachab...227
(forward)formula 0,1,4.0787,104780,1,0,288,647451,170,147,1935,542698,344
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 50 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 50 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 67 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 67 transition count 130
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 110 place count 57 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 57 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 57 transition count 101
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 55 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 55 transition count 95
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 135 place count 53 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 53 transition count 91
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 53 transition count 85
Applied a total of 143 rules in 7 ms. Remains 53 /117 variables (removed 64) and now considering 85/228 (removed 143) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 01:35:34] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 84 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:35:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/134 variables, 53/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 6752 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/134 variables, 53/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 84/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 156 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved in 9835 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 84/84 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16613ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 84 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16614ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/117 places, 85/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 16792 ms. Remains : 53/117 places, 85/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13085967643006510490.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10460945242805115478.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13085967643006510490.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10460945242805115478.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,734112,0.385144,12124,2,2480,5,38056,6,0,293,26988,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((E((p44==1) U (p7==1)) + EX((((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p144==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(p44==1)) * (p7==1))] != FALSE + [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1...181
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 82/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.414962,12380,1,0,8,38056,15,1,531,26988,4
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 71 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 71 transition count 138
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 62 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 62 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 62 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 61 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 61 transition count 108
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 122 place count 60 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 60 transition count 106
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 60 transition count 103
Applied a total of 126 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /117 variables (removed 57) and now considering 103/228 (removed 125) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 100 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 100 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 217 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 102 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 100 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:35:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 99/159 variables, 60/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 160/160 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved in 7832 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 4/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 99/159 variables, 60/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 102/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/160 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/160 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 160/160 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved in 14933 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22786ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 102 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22786ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/117 places, 103/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 23011 ms. Remains : 60/117 places, 103/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2389733781617474069.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability631440441059377320.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2389733781617474069.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability631440441059377320.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.7778e+06,0.654083,16320,2,4130,5,49771,6,0,339,50381,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(A((((p25==1)&&(p26==1))||(p79==1)) U (p97==1)))) U EX((E(!(AF((p55==1))) U A(((p36==1)&&(p154==1)) U ((p36==1)&&(p154==1)))) * (((...204
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((E(!(!(EG(!((p55==1))))) U !((E(!(((p36==1)&&(p154==1))) U (!(((p36==1)&&(p154==1))) * !(((p...817
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...363
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16530108539739361019.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16530108539739361019.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16530108539739361019.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16530108539739361019.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16530108539739361019.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 57 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1129444899904165771.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3910774704455914150.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1129444899904165771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3910774704455914150.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.7778e+06,0.108611,7480,235,94,4650,855,270,19966,86,2846,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(A((((i0.u1.p25==1)&&(i0.u1.p26==1))||(i6.u9.p79==1)) U (i8.u11.p97==1)))) U EX((E(!(AF((i2.u3.p55==1))) U A(((i0.u2.p36==1)&&(i10....290
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX((E(!(!(EG(!((i2.u3.p55==1))))) U !((E(!(((i0.u2.p36==1)&&(i10.u16.p154==1))) U (!(((i0.u2.p3...1123
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t5, t59, t60, t66, t73, t77, t81, t84, t85, i0.t50, i0.u1.t49, i0.u1.t51, i2.t45, i2.u4.t44, ...522
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,1,1.11777,36664,1,0,48392,2973,1558,135138,401,9574,82316
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 132 edges and 117 vertex of which 10 / 117 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 5 places
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 67 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 67 transition count 136
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 59 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 59 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 59 transition count 114
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 56 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 56 transition count 105
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 120 place count 53 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 53 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 53 transition count 91
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 53 transition count 89
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 52 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 51 transition count 87
Applied a total of 136 rules in 25 ms. Remains 51 /117 variables (removed 66) and now considering 87/228 (removed 141) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 51 cols
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 79 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:36:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/51 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 78/129 variables, 51/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/130 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 3574 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/51 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/129 variables, 51/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 73/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/130 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 7111 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 51/51 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10702ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10704ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 51/117 places, 87/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10881 ms. Remains : 51/117 places, 87/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6584889936608802418.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13007528298894340090.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6584889936608802418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13007528298894340090.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,389887,0.24765,9156,2,1192,5,21509,6,0,277,25935,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((((p82==0)&&(p152==0))&&(((p51==0)||(p6==0))&&((p89==1)||(p105==1))))||((p36==1)&&(p154==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((((p82==0)&&(p152==0))&&(((p51==0)||(p6==0))&&((p89==1)||(p105==1))))||((p36==1)...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t22...330
(forward)formula 0,0,1.23235,30552,1,0,193,156030,186,80,2002,124315,198
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 70 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 70 transition count 136
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 63 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 63 transition count 122
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 63 transition count 116
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 61 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 61 transition count 110
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 60 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 60 transition count 108
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 60 transition count 105
Applied a total of 123 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /117 variables (removed 57) and now considering 105/228 (removed 123) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 01:36:58] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:36:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:36:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:36:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:36:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 104 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:36:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 102 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:36:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:36:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/161 variables, 60/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 8017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/161 variables, 60/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 104/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 11762 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19802ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19803ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/117 places, 105/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 19934 ms. Remains : 60/117 places, 105/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14265638993047062135.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1408540487687461760.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14265638993047062135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1408540487687461760.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15256e+06,0.205448,9812,2,2372,5,23845,6,0,341,29275,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p115==1) * ((p121==1) + (EG((p156==1)) * ((!(E((p124==1) U (p41==1))) * ((p111!=1)||(p134!=1))) + (AX(((p17==1)&&(p154==1))) * EF((p...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p115==1)) * (p121==1))] != FALSE + ([((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p115==1)) * EG((p156==1))) * ...341
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...328
(forward)formula 0,0,1.03359,25792,1,0,217,105659,239,98,2475,89868,260
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 140 edges and 117 vertex of which 12 / 117 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 62 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 62 transition count 127
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 51 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 51 transition count 105
Ensure Unique test removed 10 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 10 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 51 transition count 95
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 48 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 48 transition count 86
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 45 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 45 transition count 80
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 45 transition count 71
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 45 transition count 69
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 44 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 43 transition count 67
Applied a total of 155 rules in 27 ms. Remains 43 /117 variables (removed 74) and now considering 67/228 (removed 161) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 01:37:19] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 59 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/43 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 8/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 58/101 variables, 43/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 101/102 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 2817 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/43 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 9/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 58/101 variables, 43/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 53/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/101 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 101/102 variables, and 116 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 2864 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5693ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5695ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/117 places, 67/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5880 ms. Remains : 43/117 places, 67/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8707412246809959333.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4491951588259161273.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8707412246809959333.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4491951588259161273.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,174244,0.065272,5116,2,791,5,5134,6,0,225,5305,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(((p36==1)&&(p154==1))) U A((p103==1) U (p102==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(((p36==1)&&(p154==1)))) * !(EG(!((p102==1))))) * !(E(!((p102==1)) U (!((p103==1)) * !((p102==1)))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t43...275
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 43/0/24
(forward)formula 0,1,1.42624,36560,1,0,281,198011,160,129,1670,188339,296
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 160 edges and 117 vertex of which 12 / 117 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 63 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 63 transition count 129
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 54 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 54 transition count 111
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 54 transition count 102
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 52 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 52 transition count 96
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 50 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 50 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 50 transition count 86
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 50 transition count 84
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 49 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 48 transition count 82
Applied a total of 141 rules in 20 ms. Remains 48 /117 variables (removed 69) and now considering 82/228 (removed 146) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 68 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 74 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 73/121 variables, 48/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/122 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 2703 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/48 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 73/121 variables, 48/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 68/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/122 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved in 3862 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6583ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 68 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6583ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/117 places, 82/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6765 ms. Remains : 48/117 places, 82/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14814803856588375671.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability196736098739722874.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14814803856588375671.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability196736098739722874.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,282100,0.230866,8044,2,2100,5,17048,6,0,260,18901,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(E((((p24!=1)||(p44!=1))||(p139==1)) U AG(EF((p132==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(E((((p24!=1)||(p44!=1))||(p139==1)) U !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p132==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t21...280
(forward)formula 0,0,1.35834,29580,1,0,172,137214,189,79,2008,108927,194
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 130 edges and 117 vertex of which 12 / 117 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Discarding 43 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 43 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 68 transition count 138
Iterating global reduction 0 with 43 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 68 transition count 138
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 58 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 58 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 58 transition count 112
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 56 transition count 106
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 56 transition count 106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 54 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 54 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 54 transition count 96
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 54 transition count 94
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 53 transition count 93
Applied a total of 131 rules in 18 ms. Remains 53 /117 variables (removed 64) and now considering 93/228 (removed 135) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 29 ms returned []
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:37:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 84/137 variables, 53/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 6620 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/53 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 84/137 variables, 53/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 92/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 10232 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 53/53 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16871ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16871ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 53/117 places, 93/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17099 ms. Remains : 53/117 places, 93/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:37:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9283539179717723631.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:37:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability193160673360857094.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9283539179717723631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability193160673360857094.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,967253,0.353619,10728,2,2019,5,27773,6,0,296,33101,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((A(((p55==1)&&(p154==1)) U (p3==1)) * (p101==1)) * E((AF((p38==1)) + !(((p67==1) + E((p41==1) U (p29==1))))) U A((p54==1) U (p24!=1))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!((E(!((p3==1)) U (!(((p55==1)&&(p154==1))) * !((p3==1)))) + EG(!((p3==1))))) * (p10...308
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t20, t21, t3...341
(forward)formula 0,1,9.03488,207876,1,0,575,1.17031e+06,231,287,2147,1.34105e+06,629
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 70 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 70 transition count 136
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 62 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 62 transition count 120
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 62 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 60 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 60 transition count 111
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 59 transition count 109
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 59 transition count 109
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 59 transition count 106
Applied a total of 122 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /117 variables (removed 58) and now considering 106/228 (removed 122) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 187 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 105 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 103 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 01:38:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 102/161 variables, 59/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 8206 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/161 variables, 59/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 105/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved in 13810 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 105 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/117 places, 106/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22235 ms. Remains : 59/117 places, 106/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15193817178146456520.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9566645728359709041.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15193817178146456520.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9566645728359709041.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.59239e+06,0.178401,9568,2,1521,5,22149,6,0,338,25603,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(E(EF(EG((p38==1))) U (((AX((p43==1)) * (((p7!=1)||(p141==1))||(p90==1))) + AF((p138==1))) + (((p17==1)&&(p36==1))&&((p55==1)&&(p150=...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(E(TRUE U EG((p38==1))) U (((!(EX(!((p43==1)))) * (((p7!=1)||(p141==1))||(p90==1))) + !(E...234
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...358
(forward)formula 0,1,7.36626,184760,1,0,485,1.13506e+06,248,243,2520,1.10352e+06,528
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 228/228 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 136 edges and 117 vertex of which 12 / 117 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 6 places
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 66 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 66 transition count 135
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 56 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 56 transition count 115
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 56 transition count 106
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 55 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 55 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 54 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 54 transition count 101
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 54 transition count 99
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 54 transition count 97
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 53 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 52 transition count 95
Applied a total of 129 rules in 18 ms. Remains 52 /117 variables (removed 65) and now considering 95/228 (removed 133) transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned []
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 8 similar events)
[2025-06-04 01:38:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/52 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 86/138 variables, 52/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/139 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 4202 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/52 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 86/138 variables, 52/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 81/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/139 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 7625 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11840ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11841ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/117 places, 95/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12038 ms. Remains : 52/117 places, 95/228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-04 01:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13986666544745610453.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10169694034964855893.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13986666544745610453.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10169694034964855893.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,458860,0.187695,9464,2,1497,5,20000,6,0,289,27429,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((p33==1)) + E(E(!(EG((p92==1))) U !(AF((p22==1)))) U A(((EF((p34==1)) + ((p17==1)&&(p154==1))) + (p97==1)) U (p9==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((p33==1)) + E(E(!(EG((p92==1))) U !(!(EG(!((p22==1)))))) U !((E(!((p9==1)) U (!(((E(TRUE U (p34==...243
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...390
(forward)formula 0,1,11.0609,249688,1,0,817,1.44618e+06,238,472,2167,1.59136e+06,902
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-09-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 01:38:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 01:38:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Total runtime 429094 ms.

BK_STOP 1749001134692

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-09"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-09, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008200602"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-09.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-09 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;