Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r100-smll-174867008100570.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is HealthRecord-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008100570
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 580K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 154K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 113K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748998237690

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=HealthRecord-PT-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 00:50:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 00:50:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 00:50:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 103 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:39] [INFO ] Transformed 125 places.
[2025-06-04 00:50:39] [INFO ] Transformed 246 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:50:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 00:50:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 125 places and 246 transitions and 637 arcs in 255 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 21 ms.
Ensure Unique test removed 9 transitions
Reduce redundant transitions removed 9 transitions.
Support contains 93 out of 125 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 237/237 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 109 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 109 transition count 209
Applied a total of 32 rules in 29 ms. Remains 109 /125 variables (removed 16) and now considering 209/237 (removed 28) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 205 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 205 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 343 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 205 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 286 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 686 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 208 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 205 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:50:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 202 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 144 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 143 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 146 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 150 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 152 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 16/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 116 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 170 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 154 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 7/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 204/313 variables, 109/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 5/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 314/314 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved in 30043 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 208/208 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 6/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 53/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 204/313 variables, 109/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 208/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 1/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 314/314 variables, and 384 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 208/208 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60271ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 208 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60297ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/125 places, 209/237 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61044 ms. Remains : 109/125 places, 209/237 transitions.
Support contains 93 out of 109 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 00:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 209 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 109 places (down from 93) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 92 to 90
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (3699 resets) in 3957 ms. (10 steps per ms) remains 36/90 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (43 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 35/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (50 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (49 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (51 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (50 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (48 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (46 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (40 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (45 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (50 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (33 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (47 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (50 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (45 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (48 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 33/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (49 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (47 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (50 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (49 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (52 resets) in 10 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (49 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (48 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 33/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (46 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 31/33 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (46 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 31/31 properties
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 205 transitions (discarded 4 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 31 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp3 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp46 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp68 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp79 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 32/79 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 8/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 5/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 26 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 26 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 26 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp78 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 30/109 variables, 6/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 7 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp24 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 8/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 204/313 variables, 109/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/314 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 314/314 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved in 4852 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp85 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 14/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 37/109 variables, 6/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 14/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 204/313 variables, 109/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 20/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/314 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 314/314 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved in 4451 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/31 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9325ms problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 20 unsolved
Fused 20 Parikh solutions to 19 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 18 properties in 1361 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 109 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 153 edges and 109 vertex of which 4 / 109 are part of one of the 2 SCC in 3 ms
Free SCC test removed 2 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 9 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 384 edges and 107 vertex of which 103 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 103 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 101 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 99 transition count 193
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 53 transition count 101
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 53 transition count 101
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 43 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 43 transition count 81
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 43 transition count 77
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 132 place count 40 transition count 68
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 40 transition count 68
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 37 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 37 transition count 62
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 37 transition count 59
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -23
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 32 transition count 82
Free-agglomeration rule applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 157 place count 32 transition count 79
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 29 transition count 79
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 29 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 27 transition count 139
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 167 place count 26 transition count 105
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 26 transition count 105
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 7 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 25 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 25 transition count 103
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 25 transition count 99
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 25 transition count 99
Applied a total of 182 rules in 87 ms. Remains 25 /109 variables (removed 84) and now considering 99/209 (removed 110) transitions.
Running 83 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:51:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 73 transitions (discarded 26 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 73 rows 25 cols
[2025-06-04 00:51:53] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:51:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 11 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 83 unsolved
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 73/98 variables, 25/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 9 solved, 74 unsolved
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 11/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 98/98 variables, and 42 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved in 2067 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, ReadFeed: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/23 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/25 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 73/98 variables, 25/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 11/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 72/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/98 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 98/98 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved in 4283 ms.
Refiners :[Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, ReadFeed: 11/11 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/83 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6426ms problems are : Problem set: 11 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 11 dead transitions in 6427ms
Found 11 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 11 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) triggered by suspicious arc values removed 11 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 25/109 places, 88/209 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 77 edges and 25 vertex of which 24 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 5 ms. Remains 24 /25 variables (removed 1) and now considering 88/88 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 6523 ms. Remains : 24/109 places, 88/209 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 2079 steps (328 resets) in 51 ms. (39 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Successfully simplified 11 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 209 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 109 places (down from 77) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 22 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 153 edges and 109 vertex of which 6 / 109 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 48 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 48 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 57 transition count 112
Iterating global reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 57 transition count 112
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 47 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 117 place count 47 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 47 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 124 place count 45 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 45 transition count 81
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 128 place count 43 transition count 77
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 43 transition count 77
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 43 transition count 75
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 43 transition count 73
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 41 transition count 71
Applied a total of 138 rules in 25 ms. Remains 41 /109 variables (removed 68) and now considering 71/209 (removed 138) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 68 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:52:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/41 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 67/108 variables, 41/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/109 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 109/109 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 2716 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/41 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 67/108 variables, 41/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 57/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/109 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 109/109 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3286 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6020ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6021ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/109 places, 71/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6180 ms. Remains : 41/109 places, 71/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 71 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5756299317459173358.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10296858769341719797.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5756299317459173358.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10296858769341719797.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,44716,0.049392,4600,2,819,5,4375,6,0,231,3552,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p95==0) + AG((p70==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p95==0) + !(E(TRUE U !((p70==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...280
(forward)formula 0,1,0.409662,12536,1,0,176,41805,167,102,1622,47917,198
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 64 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 64 transition count 122
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 96 place count 58 transition count 110
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 58 transition count 110
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 58 transition count 109
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 56 transition count 103
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 56 transition count 103
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 54 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 54 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 54 transition count 97
Applied a total of 113 rules in 10 ms. Remains 54 /109 variables (removed 55) and now considering 97/209 (removed 112) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 96 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:52:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/149 variables, 54/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 65 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 7289 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/149 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 96/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/150 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 12681 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 19992ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19993ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/109 places, 97/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20188 ms. Remains : 54/109 places, 97/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3957210240211368131.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4007538244722907414.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3957210240211368131.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4007538244722907414.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,137709,0.08931,6504,2,712,5,12390,6,0,311,13569,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((p16==1)&&(p122==1)) + EF(EG((p30==1))))) * ((EX(((!(E(((p79==1)&&(p104==1)) U (p89==1))) + ((p26==0)&&((p79==0)||(p110==0)))) + AX...272
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(((p16==1)&&(p122==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U EG((p30==1)))))] = FALSE * [(((Init * !(!((E(!((p68!=1)) U...425
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...362
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.64533,47732,1,0,486,260062,255,252,2303,247611,554
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 63 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 63 transition count 120
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 53 transition count 100
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 53 transition count 100
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 53 transition count 97
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 51 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 51 transition count 91
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 49 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 49 transition count 87
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 49 transition count 86
Applied a total of 124 rules in 14 ms. Remains 49 /109 variables (removed 60) and now considering 86/209 (removed 123) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 85 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/133 variables, 49/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 59 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 4857 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/49 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/49 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 84/133 variables, 49/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 85/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved in 10286 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 15159ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 85 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15159ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 49/109 places, 86/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15319 ms. Remains : 49/109 places, 86/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8213000243985685214.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9568304069887533761.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8213000243985685214.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9568304069887533761.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,139113,0.067574,5764,2,460,5,8534,6,0,280,8535,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(((p16==1)&&(p122==1))) * ((EX((p13==1)) + (EF((p30==0)) * (((p33==0)||(p23==0))||((p16==1)&&(p122==1))))) + ((p5==1) * E(E((p5==1)...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(((p16==1)&&(p122==1))) * ((EX((p13==1)) + (E(TRUE U (p30==0)) * (((p33==0)||(p23==0))||((p16==1...250
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t22, t36, t37, t...317
(forward)formula 0,0,0.605068,19224,1,0,267,70832,213,146,2031,95086,276
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 62 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 118
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 54 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 54 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 54 transition count 99
Applied a total of 113 rules in 11 ms. Remains 54 /109 variables (removed 55) and now considering 99/209 (removed 110) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 206 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:52:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 97/151 variables, 54/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 152/152 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 6169 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 97/151 variables, 54/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 98/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/152 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 152/152 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 10793 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 16987ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16988ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/109 places, 99/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17205 ms. Remains : 54/109 places, 99/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 99 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16748202144898207963.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5951759332998694327.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16748202144898207963.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5951759332998694327.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,111789,0.098014,7036,2,1718,5,13360,6,0,313,17614,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AG((((p85==0)||(p101==0))&&(p36==0)))) + A((((p16==1)&&(p105==1)) + AX(AF((p91==1)))) U ((((!(((p16==1)&&(p122==1))||(p101==1)))&&(p1...186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((((p85==0)||(p101==0))&&(p36==0))))))] != FALSE + [((Init * !(EG(!(((((!(((p16==1)&&(p1...453
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...367
(forward)formula 0,0,2.23405,67388,1,0,446,345496,237,222,2322,370270,512
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 68 transition count 130
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 68 transition count 130
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 88 place count 62 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 118
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 62 transition count 117
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 97 place count 60 transition count 111
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 60 transition count 111
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 101 place count 58 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 103 place count 58 transition count 107
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 58 transition count 105
Applied a total of 105 rules in 10 ms. Remains 58 /109 variables (removed 51) and now considering 105/209 (removed 104) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 104 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 104 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:53:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 103/161 variables, 58/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 162/162 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 7726 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 103/161 variables, 58/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 104/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/161 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/162 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/162 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 162/162 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved in 14646 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22387ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 104 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22387ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/109 places, 105/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22525 ms. Remains : 58/109 places, 105/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7913811322073688899.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14319952705871000062.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7913811322073688899.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14319952705871000062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,232003,0.863603,18756,2,3038,5,53718,6,0,335,82980,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((((!(AF((p30==1))) * (AF(AX((p18==1))) + (p120==1))) * (EX(EG(((p78==1)||((p52==1)&&(p122==1))))) * !(((p5==1)||(p77==1))))) * (p15==...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!((((!(!(EG(!((p30==1))))) * (!(EG(!(!(EX(!((p18==1))))))) + (p120==1))) * (EX(EG(((p78==1)||((p52...974
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...419
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 90/14/15
(forward)formula 0,1,10.117,212356,1,0,555,1.11492e+06,269,288,2581,1.33432e+06,612
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 62 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 118
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 52 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 52 transition count 98
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 52 transition count 94
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 49 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 49 transition count 85
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 127 place count 46 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 46 transition count 79
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 46 transition count 76
Applied a total of 133 rules in 14 ms. Remains 46 /109 variables (removed 63) and now considering 76/209 (removed 133) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 75 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 75 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:53:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 74/120 variables, 46/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 121/121 variables, and 57 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 5409 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 74/120 variables, 46/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 75/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/121 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 121/121 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved in 8612 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 75 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/109 places, 76/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14227 ms. Remains : 46/109 places, 76/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 76 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13363439402805417667.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8943650923643629426.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13363439402805417667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8943650923643629426.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,101961,0.07927,5524,2,602,5,7733,6,0,258,8189,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF(EG(((p117==0) * AG((p37==1))))) * (AG(AX((((p30==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p122==1)))) + (!(E((p36==1) U EG((p115==1)))) * AX((AG((p35==1)) ...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U EG(((p117==0) * !(E(TRUE U !((p37==1))))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((((p30==1)&&(p16==1))&...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t15, t17, t19, t31, t32, t33, t34, t49, t...292
(forward)formula 0,0,0.422211,12948,1,0,178,43976,200,90,1940,43326,223
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 62 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 118
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 54 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 54 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 54 transition count 98
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 53 transition count 95
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 53 transition count 95
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 52 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 52 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 52 transition count 92
Applied a total of 119 rules in 10 ms. Remains 52 /109 variables (removed 57) and now considering 92/209 (removed 117) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 52 cols
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 194 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 91 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:53:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 90/142 variables, 52/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 143/143 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 6393 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/51 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/52 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 90/142 variables, 52/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 91/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 143/143 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 12084 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 52/52 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18493ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18494ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 52/109 places, 92/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18699 ms. Remains : 52/109 places, 92/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 92 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15265219155165940627.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5897965785824888246.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15265219155165940627.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5897965785824888246.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,72100,0.100805,6100,2,1255,5,9909,6,0,298,10510,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(AF((p81==1))) + AX(AG(((p23==1)&&(p62==1))))) + (EF((p103!=1)) * A((p106==1) U (p116==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(((Init * !((E(TRUE U (p103!=1)) * !((E(!((p116==1)) U (!((p106==1)) * !((p116==1)))) + EG(!((p116==1))...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, ...353
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,1.94459,47900,1,0,447,241041,229,234,2217,269539,543
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 62 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 62 transition count 118
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 54 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 54 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 54 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 51 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 51 transition count 91
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 48 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 48 transition count 85
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 48 transition count 83
Applied a total of 126 rules in 6 ms. Remains 48 /109 variables (removed 61) and now considering 83/209 (removed 126) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 48 cols
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 153 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 82 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:54:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/129 variables, 48/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 5569 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/48 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/48 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 81/129 variables, 48/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 82/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 8874 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 48/48 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 14462ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14462ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 48/109 places, 83/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14623 ms. Remains : 48/109 places, 83/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10364133175851768745.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8800196147780810255.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10364133175851768745.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8800196147780810255.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,77527,0.159891,8664,2,2497,5,19788,6,0,273,25158,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((EG((((p13==1)||(((((p5==1)&&(p17==1))&&((p25==1)&&(p32==1)))&&(((p39==1)&&(p46==1))&&((p53==1)&&(p79==1))))&&(p123==1)))||(p43==1)))...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(EG((((p13==1)||(((((p5==1)&&(p17==1))&&((p25==1)&&(p32==1)))&&(((p39==1)&&(p46==1))&&((p53==1)&&(p7...385
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t21, t23, t24, t...337
(forward)formula 0,0,5.5801,136444,1,0,498,712173,208,247,1989,807126,582
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 65 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 65 transition count 122
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 98 place count 55 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 55 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 55 transition count 99
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 54 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 54 transition count 96
Applied a total of 113 rules in 4 ms. Remains 54 /109 variables (removed 55) and now considering 96/209 (removed 113) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 93 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:54:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/146 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 147/147 variables, and 69 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 8454 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/53 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/54 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 92/146 variables, 54/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 95/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/147 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/147 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 147/147 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 10173 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18646ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18646ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/109 places, 96/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18831 ms. Remains : 54/109 places, 96/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6974981066348556415.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14056369459680340633.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6974981066348556415.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14056369459680340633.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,85708,0.2828,11868,2,2415,5,29790,6,0,304,43950,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(!(A(EX((p97==1)) U (p73==1)))) * AF((((!(E((p6!=1) U E((p34==1) U (p5==1)))) * !(A((p29==1) U (p29==1)))) * ((p18==0)&&(p27==0))) * (...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!((p73==1))))) * !(E(!((p73==1)) U (!(EX((p97==1))) * !((p73==1))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,...319
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t...372
(forward)formula 0,0,5.14035,132072,1,0,474,629575,228,241,2124,898223,474
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 52 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 52 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 57 transition count 108
Iterating global reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 57 transition count 108
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 47 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 47 transition count 88
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 47 transition count 84
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 44 transition count 75
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 44 transition count 75
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 137 place count 41 transition count 69
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 41 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 41 transition count 66
Applied a total of 143 rules in 3 ms. Remains 41 /109 variables (removed 68) and now considering 66/209 (removed 143) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 65 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/105 variables, 41/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:54:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 106/106 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 2643 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 64/105 variables, 41/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 65/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 106/106 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 4601 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7254ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7254ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/109 places, 66/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7394 ms. Remains : 41/109 places, 66/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12050023642029847012.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1219412137866778348.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12050023642029847012.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1219412137866778348.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,29898,0.050758,5244,2,1268,5,6445,6,0,228,5670,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EG((p16==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(p16==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 59/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.271043,11644,1,0,12,33905,20,4,1269,30860,12
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Discarding 49 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 49 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 60 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 60 transition count 114
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 51 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 51 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 51 transition count 93
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 49 transition count 87
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 49 transition count 87
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 125 place count 47 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 47 transition count 83
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 47 transition count 81
Applied a total of 129 rules in 11 ms. Remains 47 /109 variables (removed 62) and now considering 81/209 (removed 128) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 47 cols
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:55:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:55:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 1 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:55:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:55:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 79/126 variables, 47/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 127/127 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 4542 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/47 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 79/126 variables, 47/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 80/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/127 variables, 0/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 127/127 variables, and 140 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 8510 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 47/47 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 13068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13069ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 47/109 places, 81/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13232 ms. Remains : 47/109 places, 81/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15182352401946539130.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability434624916957905276.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15182352401946539130.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability434624916957905276.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,58086,0.04832,5184,2,1130,5,6367,6,0,267,5534,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF((p50==1))) * EF((AF(((AF(((p52==1)&&(p122==1))) + ((p79==1)&&(p96==1))) + (p5==1))) + (p111==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!((p50==1)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (!(EG(!(((!(EG(!(((p52==1)&&(p122==1))))) + ((p79==1...208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21, t23, t...307
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 78/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,1.34839,41168,1,0,413,218575,206,223,2082,219985,451
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 109/109 places, 209/209 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 109 edges and 109 vertex of which 6 / 109 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 3 places
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 58 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 58 transition count 114
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 49 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 49 transition count 96
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 49 transition count 91
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 48 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 48 transition count 88
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 47 transition count 86
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 47 transition count 86
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 47 transition count 85
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 2 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 47 transition count 83
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 45 transition count 81
Applied a total of 129 rules in 22 ms. Remains 45 /109 variables (removed 64) and now considering 81/209 (removed 128) transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Computed 7 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 97 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 67 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 78 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-04 00:55:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 1 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/122 variables, 45/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/123 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 3872 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 7/45 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/122 variables, 45/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 67/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/123 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/123 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved in 8279 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, ReadFeed: 1/1 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12163ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 67 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12163ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/109 places, 81/209 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12332 ms. Remains : 45/109 places, 81/209 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-04 00:55:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7364029965258080715.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7726439293658214533.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7364029965258080715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7726439293658214533.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,65371,0.069924,5120,2,989,5,5445,6,0,257,5491,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(((p43==1) * ((((p97==1)||((p79==1)&&(p119==1))) * E((p108==1) U ((p16==1)&&(p122==1)))) + !(EF((p69==1))))) U ((p16==1)&&(p122==1))...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(((p16==1)&&(p122==1))) U (!(((p43==1) * ((((p97==1)||((p79==1)&&(p119==1))) * E((p108==1) U...291
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...325
(forward)formula 0,0,1.19296,31836,1,0,306,163628,196,145,1919,167577,331
FORMULA HealthRecord-PT-05-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 00:55:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 00:55:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Total runtime 293456 ms.

BK_STOP 1748998533142

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="HealthRecord-PT-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is HealthRecord-PT-05, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r100-smll-174867008100570"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/HealthRecord-PT-05.tgz
mv HealthRecord-PT-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;