Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r086-smll-174860102500409.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r086-smll-174860102500409
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 504K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.3K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 119K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748917335392

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-03 02:22:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-03 02:22:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-03 02:22:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 161 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:17] [INFO ] Transformed 268 places.
[2025-06-03 02:22:17] [INFO ] Transformed 305 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:22:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-03 02:22:18] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 268 places and 305 transitions and 743 arcs in 367 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 38 ms.
Support contains 99 out of 268 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 268/268 places, 305/305 transitions.
Discarding 44 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 44 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 224 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 224 transition count 261
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 219 transition count 256
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 219 transition count 256
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 218 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 218 transition count 255
Applied a total of 100 rules in 76 ms. Remains 218 /268 variables (removed 50) and now considering 255/305 (removed 50) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 255 rows 218 cols
[2025-06-03 02:22:18] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 22 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 368 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:22:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 389 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 824 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 254 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:22:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 281 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 230 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 165 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 146 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 144 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 198 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 123 places in 163 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 9/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 262 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 255/473 variables, 218/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/473 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 473/473 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved in 29088 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 254/254 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 16/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 125 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 131 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 194 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 136 places in 189 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 137 places in 170 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 177 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 243 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 135 places in 174 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 173 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 134 places in 172 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 125 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 216 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 12/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 187 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 175 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 178 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 158 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 109 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 237 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 202 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 241 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 229 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 223 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 128 places in 219 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 130 places in 211 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 104 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 14/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 127 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 124 places in 138 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 255/473 variables, 218/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 254/530 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 135 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 131 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 157 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 473/473 variables, and 533 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved in 30040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 254/254 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 59324ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 254 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59346ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 218/268 places, 255/305 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60275 ms. Remains : 218/268 places, 255/305 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 218 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-03 02:23:18] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-03 02:23:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 91 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:18] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-03 02:23:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 255 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 218 places (down from 99) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (944 resets) in 2728 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 8/48 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (165 resets) in 248 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (177 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (176 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (172 resets) in 172 ms. (231 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (176 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (169 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (171 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (173 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-06-03 02:23:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 203/218 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 255/473 variables, 218/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/473 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 473/473 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved in 438 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 205/218 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 255/473 variables, 218/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 7/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 148 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/473 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/473 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/473 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 473/473 variables, and 234 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved in 1820 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 7/8 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2268ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 145 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=145 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Finished Parikh walk after 0 steps, including 0 resets, run visited all 0 properties in 1 ms. (steps per millisecond=0 )
Parikh walk visited 7 properties in 520 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 12 simplifications.
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 255 transitions.
Computed a total of 13 stabilizing places and 13 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 177 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 177 transition count 214
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 157 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 157 transition count 194
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 127 place count 157 transition count 189
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 131 place count 153 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 135 place count 153 transition count 185
Applied a total of 135 rules in 23 ms. Remains 153 /218 variables (removed 65) and now considering 185/255 (removed 70) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 185 rows 153 cols
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 217 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 322 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 184 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:23:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 112 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 185/338 variables, 153/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/338 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 338/338 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 16016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/153 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 3/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 185/338 variables, 153/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 184/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 4/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 4/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 338/338 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 46090ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 184 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46094ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/218 places, 185/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 46442 ms. Remains : 153/218 places, 185/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 185 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14499427048870554410.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9794543804825166872.ctl : 6 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14499427048870554410.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9794543804825166872.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.75569e+07,2.10989,49288,2,9796,5,168543,6,0,799,261646,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX((AX((p31!=1)) * EX((((p178!=1)&&(p27==1))&&(p105==0))))) U A((AG((((p110!=1)||(p44==0))||((p252==1)||(p126==1)))) + (p62==1)) U (EF(...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((p180==1) + E((p58==1) U (p223==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !(EX(TRUE)))))) U (!((!(E(...1183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t7, t14, t19, t20, t21, t25, t32, t35, t36, t47, t48, t50, t52, t57, t61, t62...374
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:24:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph303539792951577144.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph303539792951577144.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph303539792951577144.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph303539792951577144.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph303539792951577144.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:24:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:24:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:24:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 97 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:24:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6377130564086843740.gal : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 02:24:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12770677158110892565.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6377130564086843740.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12770677158110892565.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.75569e+07,0.266976,12068,821,105,16225,805,558,26428,100,1666,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EX((AX((i1.i1.u4.p31!=1)) * EX((((i7.u40.p178!=1)&&(i0.i1.u6.p27==1))&&(i3.i0.u25.p105==0))))) U A((AG((((i5.i1.u27.p110!=1)||(i1.i2.u1...317
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((i7.u41.p180==1) + E((i3.i1.u15.p58==1) U (i8.u47.p223==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !(...1575
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t20, t48, t78, t79, t155, t156, t158, i0.t157, i0.i0.t120, i0.i1.u6.t125, i0.i2.t4, i0.i2...629
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,19.8009,488868,1,0,878139,4150,3258,1.66189e+06,483,10360,1278096
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 172 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 172 transition count 209
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 148 transition count 185
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 148 transition count 185
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 148 transition count 180
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 152 place count 141 transition count 173
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 141 transition count 173
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 141 transition count 170
Applied a total of 162 rules in 15 ms. Remains 141 /218 variables (removed 77) and now considering 170/255 (removed 85) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 170 rows 141 cols
[2025-06-03 02:25:00] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:25:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 205 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 356 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 169 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:25:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 170/311 variables, 141/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/311 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 311/311 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 14731 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/141 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 170/311 variables, 141/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 169/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 99 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 5/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 114 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 3/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/311 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 311/311 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 169/169 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 44775ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 169 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44776ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/218 places, 170/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45148 ms. Remains : 141/218 places, 170/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 170 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2690555542418936742.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:25:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16217304912634019321.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2690555542418936742.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16217304912634019321.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17932e+07,4.67685,98816,2,12207,5,341701,6,0,736,556381,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG((AX(!(A((p153==1) U (p199==1)))) * ((p195==0)||(p30==1)))) + AX(FALSE)) + EF(AG(AF(((p103==0)||(p261==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((p103==0)||(p261==1))))))))))) * !(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(!(!((E(!((...274
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t5, t6, t7, t17, t20, t24, t27, t29, t33, t34, t46, t47, t49, t51, t54, t56, t60,...372
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17699666463173596093.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17699666463173596093.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17699666463173596093.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17699666463173596093.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17699666463173596093.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 54 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13057371411039876914.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1779195531728267846.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13057371411039876914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1779195531728267846.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17932e+07,0.714817,17888,980,203,24597,1969,497,48946,122,5263,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG((AX(!(A((i5.i0.u33.p153==1) U (i7.u41.p199==1)))) * ((i7.u39.p195==0)||(i0.i0.u7.p30==1)))) + AX(FALSE)) + EF(AG(AF(((i4.i0.u23.p103...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!(((i4.i0.u23.p103==0)||(i3.i2.u44.p261==1))))))))))) * !(!(E(TRUE U ...341
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t20, t46, t73, t74, t101, t144, t146, t147, u42.t7, u42.t17, i0.i0.t109, i0.i0.u7.t112, i...638
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,20.7111,462396,1,0,803424,16524,2699,1.74023e+06,536,50567,1431112
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 193 edges and 218 vertex of which 24 / 218 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 5 ms
Free SCC test removed 20 places
Ensure Unique test removed 20 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 20 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 197 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 150 transition count 185
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 148 transition count 185
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 148 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 137 transition count 174
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 166 place count 92 transition count 129
Iterating global reduction 3 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 92 transition count 129
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 92 transition count 127
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 90 transition count 127
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 221 place count 84 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 84 transition count 121
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 84 transition count 115
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 75 transition count 106
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 253 place count 73 transition count 104
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 73 transition count 104
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 73 transition count 102
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 3 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 3 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 73 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 71 transition count 97
Applied a total of 262 rules in 99 ms. Remains 71 /218 variables (removed 147) and now considering 97/255 (removed 158) transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 64 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 94 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:26:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/71 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/164 variables, 71/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 164/165 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 3252 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/71 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 93/164 variables, 71/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 64/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/164 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 164/165 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved in 2791 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 64 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6059ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/218 places, 97/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6414 ms. Remains : 71/218 places, 97/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5706520244433574104.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9369843913285930185.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5706520244433574104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9369843913285930185.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,894400,0.083296,5304,2,610,5,7219,6,0,380,5734,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG((((p165!=0)&&(p239!=1))&&((p40!=0)&&(p198!=1))))) * !(E((p149==1) U (p222==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((((p165!=0)&&(p239!=1))&&((p40!=0)&&(p198!=1)))))))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,(...187
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 95/0/2
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t18, t22, t32, t81, t83, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/re...188
(forward)formula 0,0,0.806795,20884,1,0,154,99421,220,66,2285,75164,204
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 202 edges and 218 vertex of which 26 / 218 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 22 places
Ensure Unique test removed 23 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 23 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 195 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 146 transition count 182
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 146 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 133 transition count 169
Discarding 47 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 47 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 86 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 86 transition count 122
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 86 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 223 place count 84 transition count 120
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 229 place count 78 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 78 transition count 114
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 241 place count 78 transition count 108
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 70 transition count 100
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 260 place count 67 transition count 97
Iterating global reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 67 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 67 transition count 94
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 67 transition count 90
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 67 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 65 transition count 88
Applied a total of 273 rules in 53 ms. Remains 65 /218 variables (removed 153) and now considering 88/255 (removed 167) transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-03 02:26:43] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:26:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:26:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 85 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:26:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/65 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/149 variables, 65/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 149/150 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 2503 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/65 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 84/149 variables, 65/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 58/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/149 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 149/150 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 2234 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4748ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4748ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/218 places, 88/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4990 ms. Remains : 65/218 places, 88/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 88 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14558717192004789610.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7485207778699462313.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14558717192004789610.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7485207778699462313.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,615160,0.056736,4784,2,279,5,4436,6,0,347,3277,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AG((p91==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((p91==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,0.128749,5936,1,0,8,11178,21,2,1654,5963,7
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 173 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 173 transition count 210
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 150 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 150 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 150 transition count 181
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 148 place count 144 transition count 175
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 144 transition count 175
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 144 transition count 173
Applied a total of 156 rules in 15 ms. Remains 144 /218 variables (removed 74) and now considering 173/255 (removed 82) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 144 cols
[2025-06-03 02:26:48] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:26:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 310 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 172 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:26:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 173/317 variables, 144/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/317 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 317/317 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 11487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/144 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 173/317 variables, 144/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 172/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 110 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 9/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 317/317 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 144/144 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 41515ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 172 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41516ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 144/218 places, 173/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41843 ms. Remains : 144/218 places, 173/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 173 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13984031787113588182.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 02:27:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15040779821452768760.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13984031787113588182.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15040779821452768760.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.27021e+07,1.55341,39980,2,8636,5,151721,6,0,751,186327,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p242==1) * (EX(((p199==0)&&(p5==1))) + AX(((p260==0)&&(p78==1))))) * (AX(EG(E((p229==1) U (p213==0)))) + (p142==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p242==1) * (EX(((p199==0)&&(p5==1))) + !(EX(!(((p260==0)&&(p78==1)))))))) * !(EX(!(EG(E(...315
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t5, t7, t10, t18, t20, t23, t27, t32, t36, t37, t48, t49, t51, t53, t58, t62, t63...351
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1448534006845748995.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1448534006845748995.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1448534006845748995.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1448534006845748995.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1448534006845748995.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 64 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6227553537421724752.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6336769013648269829.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6227553537421724752.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6336769013648269829.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.27021e+07,0.428206,11376,747,119,15539,819,501,21019,103,2180,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((i9.u44.p242==1) * (EX(((i8.u35.p199==0)&&(i2.i1.u12.p5==1))) + AX(((i1.u45.p260==0)&&(i4.i0.u19.p78==1))))) * (AX(EG(E((i9.u42.p229...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i9.u44.p242==1) * (EX(((i8.u35.p199==0)&&(i2.i1.u12.p5==1))) + !(EX(!(((i1.u45.p260==0)&...421
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t23, t48, t49, t75, t76, t103, t147, t149, t150, i0.i1.u2.t117, i0.i1.u5.t118, i0.i2.t113...549
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,1,4.7991,124528,1,0,229812,4153,2730,347337,497,17041,346894
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 196 edges and 218 vertex of which 20 / 218 are part of one of the 3 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 17 places
Ensure Unique test removed 18 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 18 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 200 transition count 187
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 151 transition count 187
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 151 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 140 transition count 176
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 162 place count 99 transition count 135
Iterating global reduction 2 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 99 transition count 135
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 203 place count 99 transition count 132
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 96 transition count 132
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 214 place count 91 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 91 transition count 127
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 91 transition count 122
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 78 transition count 109
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 78 transition count 105
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 78 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 76 transition count 103
Applied a total of 257 rules in 73 ms. Remains 76 /218 variables (removed 142) and now considering 103/255 (removed 152) transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:28:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-03 02:28:05] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:28:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:28:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 124 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 72 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:28:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 2 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:28:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/76 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/176 variables, 76/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 176/177 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 3941 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/76 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/176 variables, 76/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 72/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 176/177 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved in 3323 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7281ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 72 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7283ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/218 places, 103/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7578 ms. Remains : 76/218 places, 103/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:28:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 103 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:28:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12161081521930088693.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5510966748561290390.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12161081521930088693.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5510966748561290390.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.26605e+06,0.126231,6132,2,499,5,11577,6,0,407,9149,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AG((EG((p39==1)) + (p223==0))) U A((((!((p5==0)||(p120==1)))||(p15==0))||(p126==1)) U EG((p184==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(!((E(!(EG((p184==1))) U (!((((!((p5==0)||(p120==1)))||(p15==0))||(p126==1))) * !(EG((p184...717
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t16, t20, t24, t30, t87, t91, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroy...194
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
(forward)formula 0,1,14.2766,337080,1,0,710,1.8022e+06,248,445,2673,2.1781e+06,824
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 172 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 172 transition count 209
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 150 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 150 transition count 187
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 150 transition count 182
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 145 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 145 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 145 transition count 174
Applied a total of 154 rules in 10 ms. Remains 145 /218 variables (removed 73) and now considering 174/255 (removed 81) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 145 cols
[2025-06-03 02:28:27] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:28:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 295 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 173 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:28:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 174/319 variables, 145/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 319/319 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 14164 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 174/319 variables, 145/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 173/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 7/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 4/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 319/319 variables, and 341 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 44209ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44210ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/218 places, 174/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44516 ms. Remains : 145/218 places, 174/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 174 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18134550009742101777.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9475144577883740483.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18134550009742101777.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9475144577883740483.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.60008e+07,1.60675,39288,2,8954,5,142870,6,0,756,189459,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((EF(((p177==0)&&(p239==1))) * !(E(((p236==1)||(p187==1)) U (((p71==1)||(p206==0))||(p70==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((p177==0)&&(p239==1))) * !(E(((p236==1)||(p187==1)) U (((p71==1)||(p206==0))|...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t11, t18, t22, t25, t29, t34, t38, t39, t50, t51, t53, t55, t60, t64, t65, t7...353
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10609282320373395938.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10609282320373395938.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10609282320373395938.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10609282320373395938.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10609282320373395938.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 52 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7152311069145343644.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17236711134482778336.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7152311069145343644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17236711134482778336.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.60008e+07,0.434952,11372,644,186,13670,2480,485,22636,117,7423,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((EF(((i7.u36.p177==0)&&(i8.u43.p239==1))) * !(E(((i8.u42.p236==1)||(i7.u37.p187==1)) U (((i3.i0.u14.p71==1)||(i8.u41.p206==0))||(i3...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U ((i7.u36.p177==0)&&(i8.u43.p239==1))) * !(E(((i8.u42.p236==1)||(i7.u37.p187==1...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t38, t50, t51, t77, t106, t149, t150, t151, i0.i1.u4.t119, i0.i1.u5.t120, i0.i2.t115, i1....559
(forward)formula 0,1,9.25134,216044,1,0,377854,7838,2698,705706,557,47115,673022
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 42 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 42 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 176 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 176 transition count 213
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 104 place count 156 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 156 transition count 193
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 156 transition count 189
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 133 place count 151 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 151 transition count 184
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 151 transition count 182
Applied a total of 140 rules in 15 ms. Remains 151 /218 variables (removed 67) and now considering 182/255 (removed 73) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 182 rows 151 cols
[2025-06-03 02:29:51] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:29:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 251 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 366 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 181 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:29:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 182/333 variables, 151/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/333 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 159 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 16788 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 151/151 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/151 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 182/333 variables, 151/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 181/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 105 places in 156 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 142 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 0/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 351 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 151/151 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 181/181 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 46832ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 181 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46843ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 151/218 places, 182/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47226 ms. Remains : 151/218 places, 182/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 182 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1429505553997524099.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 02:30:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1766306898019609679.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1429505553997524099.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1766306898019609679.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.51921e+07,2.12395,44504,2,9362,5,163928,6,0,788,216984,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(EG((EG(((p11==0)||(p160==1))) + EG(((p49==0)||(p240==1)))))) + (((p17==1) * EX((p48==0))) * (AG(EF(((p175==0)||(p27==1)))) + ((AX(...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(EG((EG(((p11==0)||(p160==1))) + EG(((p49==0)||(p240==1)))))))) * !((p17==1)))] = FAL...823
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t9, t14, t20, t23, t27, t32, t39, t50, t51, t53, t55, t60, t64, t65, t78, t79...360
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9433116812707263417.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9433116812707263417.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9433116812707263417.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9433116812707263417.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9433116812707263417.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 77 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2482319602875545221.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10552555769943298844.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2482319602875545221.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10552555769943298844.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.51921e+07,0.245922,10652,680,102,13015,1317,559,21227,102,2751,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((EX(EG((EG(((i0.i0.u2.p11==0)||(i7.u36.p160==1))) + EG(((i0.i0.u11.p49==0)||(i8.u46.p240==1)))))) + (((i0.i1.u3.p17==1) * EX((i0.i0.u1...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(EG((EG(((i0.i0.u2.p11==0)||(i7.u36.p160==1))) + EG(((i0.i0.u11.p49==0)||(i8.u46.p240...1108
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t51, t78, t79, t108, t153, t154, t156, t178, i0.t111, i0.i0.u2.t132, i0.i1.u10.t113, i1.t...580
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,11.9434,294172,1,0,548443,5535,3228,860883,490,15757,776246
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 173 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 173 transition count 210
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 151 transition count 188
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 151 transition count 188
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 151 transition count 182
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 146 place count 145 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 145 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 145 transition count 174
Applied a total of 154 rules in 8 ms. Remains 145 /218 variables (removed 73) and now considering 174/255 (removed 81) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 145 cols
[2025-06-03 02:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 111 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 235 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 348 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 173 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:31:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 174/319 variables, 145/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 319/319 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 14520 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 174/319 variables, 145/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 173/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 6/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/319 variables, 0/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/319 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 319/319 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 145/145 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 44558ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 44559ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 145/218 places, 174/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 44915 ms. Remains : 145/218 places, 174/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 174 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16275760237826597966.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4377737145383099268.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16275760237826597966.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4377737145383099268.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.42526e+07,3.28136,69340,2,9753,5,226398,6,0,756,377393,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((AG((p175==0)) + (((p187==1)&&(p83==0))&&(((p135==0)||(p127==0))||(p247==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p175==0)))) + (((p187==1)&&(p83==0))&&(((p135==0)||(p127==0))||(p247==1))))))...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t8, t18, t21, t25, t30, t35, t37, t48, t50, t52, t57, t58, t63, t76, t77, t79...337
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12537410358191036676.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12537410358191036676.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12537410358191036676.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12537410358191036676.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12537410358191036676.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 57 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10894006045971539087.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12448614638743192433.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10894006045971539087.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12448614638743192433.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.42526e+07,0.191016,9124,523,144,9281,1390,514,15893,114,4798,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((AG((i6.i0.u36.p175==0)) + (((i6.i1.u38.p187==1)&&(i2.i2.u16.p83==0))&&(((i4.i0.u26.p135==0)||(i5.i0.u30.p127==0))||(i8.u43.p247==1...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i6.i0.u36.p175==0)))) + (((i6.i1.u38.p187==1)&&(i2.i2.u16.p83==0))&&(((i4.i0....224
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t21, t57, t76, t104, t146, t147, t148, t149, i0.i0.u2.t106, i0.i1.u9.t108, i1.i1.u5.t117,...538
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
(forward)formula 0,0,15.9627,308292,1,0,541491,22546,2937,884441,535,113680,1022023
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 45 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 45 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 173 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 173 transition count 210
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 152 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 152 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 137 place count 152 transition count 184
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 146 transition count 178
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 149 place count 146 transition count 178
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 151 place count 146 transition count 176
Applied a total of 151 rules in 19 ms. Remains 146 /218 variables (removed 72) and now considering 176/255 (removed 79) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 176 rows 146 cols
[2025-06-03 02:32:52] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:32:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 171 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 175 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:32:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 176/322 variables, 146/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 11980 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 146/146 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 2/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 176/322 variables, 146/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 175/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 4/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 146/146 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 175/175 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 42009ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 175 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42009ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 146/218 places, 176/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42361 ms. Remains : 146/218 places, 176/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:33:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 176 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:33:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7150811617799787296.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 02:33:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3156086980098772979.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7150811617799787296.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3156086980098772979.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.55079e+07,1.74525,41020,2,8761,5,148647,6,0,762,200512,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(E(!((((p220==0)||(p42==1))&&(p194==1))) U (EF((p83==1)) + EX((p217==1))))) + (p60==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(E(!((((p220==0)||(p42==1))&&(p194==1))) U (E(TRUE U (p83==1)) + EX((p217==1))))))) + (p...173
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t13, t15, t19, t22, t26, t31, t35, t36, t47, t48, t50, t52, t57, t61, t62, t7...354
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15186612003306494427.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15186612003306494427.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15186612003306494427.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15186612003306494427.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15186612003306494427.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:34:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:34:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:34:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 73 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:34:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2371375505446149624.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2978966502195852817.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2371375505446149624.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2978966502195852817.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.55079e+07,0.33777,10156,637,98,12012,1048,525,19999,92,2438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(E(!((((i8.u46.p220==0)||(i0.i1.u8.p42==1))&&(i6.u44.p194==1))) U (EF((i2.i1.u18.p83==1)) + EX((i8.u47.p217==1))))) + (i2.i0.u14.p6...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(E(!((((i8.u46.p220==0)||(i0.i1.u8.p42==1))&&(i6.u44.p194==1))) U (E(TRUE U (i2.i1.u18.p...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t22, t47, t48, t74, t105, t148, t150, t151, i0.i0.u11.t107, i0.i1.u9.t109, i1.i1.u4.t118,...577
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,6.38665,139564,1,0,233855,5869,2949,465660,439,20135,494763
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Discarding 41 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 41 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 177 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 0 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 177 transition count 214
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 105 place count 154 transition count 191
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 154 transition count 191
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 133 place count 154 transition count 186
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 149 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 143 place count 149 transition count 181
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 149 transition count 180
Applied a total of 144 rules in 8 ms. Remains 149 /218 variables (removed 69) and now considering 180/255 (removed 75) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 149 cols
[2025-06-03 02:34:11] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:34:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 251 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 352 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 179 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:34:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 150 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 180/329 variables, 149/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 114 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/329 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 329/329 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved in 18862 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/149 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 7/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 180/329 variables, 149/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 179/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 125 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 3/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 116 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/329 variables, 0/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 329/329 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 179/179 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 48908ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 179 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48909ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/218 places, 180/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 49272 ms. Remains : 149/218 places, 180/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:35:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 180 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:35:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16879000594208361453.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15458297619761392837.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16879000594208361453.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15458297619761392837.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.94244e+07,2.18662,48796,2,11316,5,179173,6,0,778,244863,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((((p194==0)&&(p144==1))&&((p25==0)||(p202==1))) U EX((((p205==0)||(p106==1))&&((!((p39==0)||(p178==1)))||((p150==0)&&((p51==0)||(p162...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(EX((((p205==0)||(p106==1))&&((!((p39==0)||(p178==1)))||((p150==0)&&((p51==0)||(p162==1)))...477
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t4, t6, t16, t18, t21, t25, t30, t35, t44, t48, t49, t51, t53, t58, t62, t63, t75, t7...366
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12290614022844958250.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12290614022844958250.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12290614022844958250.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12290614022844958250.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12290614022844958250.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 73 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17123938836999530504.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11525411506557905001.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17123938836999530504.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11525411506557905001.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.94244e+07,0.496276,14804,777,154,20869,1470,521,33821,104,3357,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A((((i7.i1.u42.p194==0)&&(i4.i2.u28.p144==1))&&((i0.i1.u4.p25==0)||(i7.i0.u35.p202==1))) U EX((((i8.u45.p205==0)||(i3.i2.u23.p106==1))&...340
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,!((E(!(EX((((i8.u45.p205==0)||(i3.i2.u23.p106==1))&&((!((i0.i0.u6.p39==0)||(i6.u37.p178==1)))||(...729
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t49, t75, t103, t151, t152, t153, t154, t176, i0.i0.u5.t115, i0.i1.u2.t119, i0.i1.u4.t121...607
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,1,12.8237,276436,1,0,544142,4474,2679,736335,507,20270,786143
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 255/255 transitions.
Graph (trivial) has 200 edges and 218 vertex of which 26 / 218 are part of one of the 4 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 22 places
Ensure Unique test removed 23 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 23 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 195 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 148 transition count 183
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 147 transition count 183
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 147 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 134 transition count 170
Discarding 46 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 46 rule applications. Total rules 169 place count 88 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 88 transition count 124
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 88 transition count 123
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 217 place count 87 transition count 123
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 81 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 81 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 81 transition count 111
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 72 transition count 102
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 256 place count 69 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 69 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 69 transition count 96
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 69 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 67 transition count 90
Applied a total of 268 rules in 34 ms. Remains 67 /218 variables (removed 151) and now considering 90/255 (removed 165) transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:35:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 67 cols
[2025-06-03 02:35:43] [INFO ] Computed 6 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-03 02:35:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:35:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:35:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 87 transitions (discarded 3 similar events)
[2025-06-03 02:35:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/67 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 86/153 variables, 67/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 153/154 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 3127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/67 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 86/153 variables, 67/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 60/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/153 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 153/154 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2704 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 67/67 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5849ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5851ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 67/218 places, 90/255 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6110 ms. Remains : 67/218 places, 90/255 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-06-03 02:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4892044646420917908.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4584050052449831040.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4892044646420917908.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4584050052449831040.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,781040,0.093674,5596,2,524,5,8725,6,0,357,6732,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p259!=1) U AG(EF((p193!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p259!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p193!=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total) :0...163
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 88/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.976793,25672,1,0,135,125781,202,58,2256,90958,188
FORMULA FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-03 02:35:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-03 02:35:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Total runtime 813417 ms.

BK_STOP 1748918151042

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r086-smll-174860102500409"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b.tgz
mv FlexibleBarrier-PT-04b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;