fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r072-tall-174860068100780
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 3600000.00 0.00 0.00 FFFFFFT?FFFTFTFT normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r072-tall-174860068100780.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06, examination is LTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100780
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 1.3M
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 22K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 133K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 753K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-00
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-01
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-02
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-03
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-04
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-05
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-06
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-07
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-08
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-09
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-10
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-11
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-12
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-13
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-14
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-15

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748839610026

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 129 ms
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Transformed 414 places.
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Transformed 1296 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 414 places and 1296 transitions and 5976 arcs in 221 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLFireability.xml in 9 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 3 formulas.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 54 out of 414 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 414/414 places, 1296/1296 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 387 transition count 1134
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 387 transition count 1134
Applied a total of 54 rules in 68 ms. Remains 387 /414 variables (removed 27) and now considering 1134/1296 (removed 162) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 540 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 540 rows 387 cols
[2025-06-02 04:46:51] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 25 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:46:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 443 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:46:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 540 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:46:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:46:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 179 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:46:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1097 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1570 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1128 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:46:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 540 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:46:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:46:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 179 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 214 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 183 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 170 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 155 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 171 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 164 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 136 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 132 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 150 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 161 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 188 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 188 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 181 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 181 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 157 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 150 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 151 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 161 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 151 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 177 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 160 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/927 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/387 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1128/1128 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 45/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 137 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 158 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 154 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 156 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 154 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 160 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 141 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 161 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 156 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 151 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 141 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 160 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 157 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 144 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 144 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 155 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 20/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 150 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 174 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 169 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 167 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 138 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 145 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 161 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 167 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 152 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 146 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 143 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 149 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 150 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 165 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 20/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 139 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/927 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/387 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1128 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60472ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1128 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60490ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 387/414 places, 1134/1296 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62154 ms. Remains : 387/414 places, 1134/1296 transitions.
Support contains 54 out of 387 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 04:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 85 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 1134 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1345 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 23/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 23/23 properties
[2025-06-02 04:47:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 540 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:47:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:47:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 179 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 344/381 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 6/387 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 165 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 142 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 157 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 540/927 variables, 387/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 179/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 106 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 1/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 164 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 132 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 138 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 125 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 7/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 0/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/927 variables, 0/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 927/927 variables, and 596 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 4254 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 387/387 constraints, ReadFeed: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 344/381 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 4/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 6/387 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 7/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 5/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 540/927 variables, 387/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 179/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 22/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 152 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 2/626 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 153 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 142 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/927 variables, 4/630 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 927/927 variables, and 630 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved in 5010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 387/387 constraints, ReadFeed: 179/179 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/23 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9283ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 22 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 36 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 387 transition count 1129
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 382 transition count 1129
Performed 111 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 111 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 382 transition count 1018
Deduced a syphon composed of 111 places in 3 ms
Reduce places removed 111 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 222 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 271 transition count 1018
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 234 place count 269 transition count 1006
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 269 transition count 1006
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 239 transition count 976
Applied a total of 296 rules in 122 ms. Remains 239 /387 variables (removed 148) and now considering 976/1134 (removed 158) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 122 ms. Remains : 239/387 places, 976/1134 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 592 ms. (67 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 21/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 21/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 20/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 324324 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=108 ) properties seen :4 out of 20
Probabilistic random walk after 324324 steps, saw 98861 distinct states, run finished after 3007 ms. (steps per millisecond=107 ) properties seen :4
[2025-06-02 04:48:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 382 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 382 rows 239 cols
[2025-06-02 04:48:07] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 204/231 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 8/239 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 125 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 382/621 variables, 239/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 169/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/621 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 621/621 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 1185 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, ReadFeed: 169/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 204/231 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 8/239 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 8/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 382/621 variables, 239/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 169/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 16/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 0/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/621 variables, 3/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 0/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/621 variables, 1/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/621 variables, 0/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/621 variables, 0/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 621/621 variables, and 464 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 6627 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 239/239 constraints, ReadFeed: 169/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7841ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 1660 ms.
Support contains 25 out of 239 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 239/239 places, 976/976 transitions.
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 239 transition count 973
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 236 transition count 973
Applied a total of 6 rules in 30 ms. Remains 236 /239 variables (removed 3) and now considering 973/976 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 236/239 places, 973/976 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 252 ms. (158 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 70 ms. (563 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 64 ms. (615 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (727 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (930 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (1025 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (1025 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (1025 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 39 ms. (1000 steps per ms) remains 14/14 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 314426 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=104 ) properties seen :0 out of 14
Probabilistic random walk after 314426 steps, saw 92610 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=104 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 04:48:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 379 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 379 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-02 04:48:20] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 5 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 203/228 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/236 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 379/615 variables, 236/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 169/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/615 variables, 0/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 615/615 variables, and 429 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 1475 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 169/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 203/228 variables, 12/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/228 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 8/236 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 3/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 379/615 variables, 236/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 169/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 14/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 1/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 3/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/615 variables, 0/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/615 variables, 0/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 615/615 variables, and 466 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved in 5589 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 169/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 14 unsolved
Fused 14 Parikh solutions to 13 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 6623 ms.
Support contains 25 out of 236 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 973/973 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 973/973 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 26 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 973/973 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 973/973 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 22 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 973/973 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:48:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 379 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:48:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 152 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:48:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 379 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:48:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:48:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 624 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 779 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 59 ms returned []
Running 967 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:48:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 379 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:48:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:48:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 131 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/615 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 967/967 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 55/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 11/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 12/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/615 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/967 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60214ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60217ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61091 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 973/973 transitions.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((G(!p0) U X((G(p1)&&(p2||F(p3))))))'
Support contains 10 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 27 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:49:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 522 rows 384 cols
[2025-06-02 04:49:35] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 290 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:49:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:49:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:49:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1157 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1450 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:49:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:49:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:49:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 118 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 118 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 155 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 146 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 148 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 139 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 141 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 137 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 139 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 169 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 162 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 165 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 167 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 165 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 164 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 153 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 141 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 169 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 172 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 150 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 156 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30257ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30261ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31745 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 577 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3), p0, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p3) p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1))]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-00
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 275 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 272 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0)))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge sufficient to adopt a stutter insensitive property.
Knowledge based reduction with 28 factoid took 174 ms. Reduced automaton from 12 states, 38 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 15 states, 49 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 594 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) p0 (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (OR (NOT p1) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p3), p0, (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p3) p0), (OR (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p3) (NOT p1)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), false, false, false]
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 24 to 22
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 428 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 16/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
[2025-06-02 04:50:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:50:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:50:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem apf5 is UNSAT
Problem apf10 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 14 unsolved
Problem apf1 is UNSAT
Problem apf14 is UNSAT
Problem apf16 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 205/215 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 36/251 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 7/258 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 368/626 variables, 258/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 74/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 36/662 variables, 16/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 12/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 0/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 106/768 variables, 4/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/768 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 4/772 variables, 2/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 134/906 variables, 110/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 78/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 0/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/906 variables, 0/567 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 906/906 variables, and 567 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved in 1538 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 384/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 205/215 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 36/251 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 7/258 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 368/626 variables, 258/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 74/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 2/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 0/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 36/662 variables, 16/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 12/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 0/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 106/768 variables, 4/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/768 variables, 0/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/772 variables, 2/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 11/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 167 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 6/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 0/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 134/906 variables, 110/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 78/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 0/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 906/906 variables, and 588 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 384/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/16 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6579ms problems are : Problem set: 5 solved, 11 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 10 out of 384 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 384/384 places, 1116/1116 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1110
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 378 transition count 1110
Performed 113 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 113 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 378 transition count 997
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 226 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 265 transition count 997
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 298 place count 235 transition count 967
Applied a total of 298 rules in 41 ms. Remains 235 /384 variables (removed 149) and now considering 967/1116 (removed 149) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 235/384 places, 967/1116 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 250 ms. (159 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 55 ms. (714 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 66 ms. (597 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 69 ms. (571 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 11/11 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 396816 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=132 ) properties seen :0 out of 11
Probabilistic random walk after 396816 steps, saw 115621 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=132 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 04:50:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 373 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 373 rows 235 cols
[2025-06-02 04:50:19] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 128/138 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/152 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 7/159 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 269/428 variables, 159/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 74/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 36/464 variables, 16/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 14/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 55/519 variables, 3/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/521 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/521 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 3/524 variables, 2/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 84/608 variables, 60/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/608 variables, 76/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/608 variables, 0/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/608 variables, 0/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 608/608 variables, and 418 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved in 1250 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 128/138 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/152 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 7/159 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 269/428 variables, 159/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 74/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/428 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 36/464 variables, 16/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 14/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 55/519 variables, 3/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/519 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/521 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/521 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/521 variables, 0/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 3/524 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 11/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 4/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/524 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 84/608 variables, 60/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/608 variables, 76/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/608 variables, 0/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/608 variables, 2/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/608 variables, 0/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 0/608 variables, 0/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 608/608 variables, and 443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved in 5323 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 235/235 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6590ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 11 unsolved
Fused 11 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1104 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 235 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 967/967 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 235 /235 variables (removed 0) and now considering 967/967 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 18 ms. Remains : 235/235 places, 967/967 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 235/235 places, 967/967 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 18 ms. Remains 235 /235 variables (removed 0) and now considering 967/967 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:50:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 373 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:50:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:50:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 373 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:50:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:50:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 636 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 828 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned []
Running 961 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:50:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 373 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:50:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:50:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 128 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 135 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 118 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 1.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 timeout
0.0)
(s123 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/608 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/235 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 961/961 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 67/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 17/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 18/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 128 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 131 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 136 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 14/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/608 variables, and 135 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/235 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/961 constraints, Known Traps: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60219ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 961 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60222ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61095 ms. Remains : 235/235 places, 967/967 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 832 edges and 235 vertex of which 36 / 235 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 30 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 114 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 570 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 684 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 44 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 44 transitions
Performed 44 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 44
Iterating post reduction 0 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 205 transition count 239
Reduce places removed 44 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 161 transition count 239
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 161 transition count 226
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 6 places
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 142 transition count 226
Performed 57 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 57 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 57 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 114 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 85 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 24 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 24 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 85 transition count 145
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 83 transition count 145
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 83 transition count 143
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 6 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 83 transition count 137
Free-agglomeration rule applied 33 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 304 place count 83 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 50 transition count 104
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 50 transition count 103
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 7 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 345 place count 50 transition count 103
Applied a total of 345 rules in 27 ms. Remains 50 /235 variables (removed 185) and now considering 103/967 (removed 864) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 11 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 103 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] After 39ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:11
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] After 91ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] After 78ms SMT Verify possible using 3 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 25 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 24 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] After 354ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
[2025-06-02 04:51:28] [INFO ] After 573ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :11
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 654 ms.
Found 6 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 p3)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (F p3), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3))))]
Knowledge based reduction with 34 factoid took 369 ms. Reduced automaton from 15 states, 49 edges and 4 AP (stutter insensitive) to 7 states, 18 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 259 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0), true, (NOT p3), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 275 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0), (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p3) p0), true, (NOT p3), (OR (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), false]
[2025-06-02 04:51:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 522 rows 384 cols
[2025-06-02 04:51:29] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 29 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 21 ms returned unsat
Proved EG (NOT p1)
[2025-06-02 04:51:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:51:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 28 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:30] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 74 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 857 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:31] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 15.0 s and query timeout 1500.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 6 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 735 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 04:51:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:51:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 164 Read/Feed constraints in 119 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 169 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 149 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 144 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 163 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] Trap strengthening procedure managed to obtain unsat after adding 6 trap constraints in 1245 ms
Proved EG (NOT p3)
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) (NOT p3)), (X (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p3)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1))), (X (NOT p1)), (X (NOT (AND p0 p1))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))), (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT p1))), (X (X (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 p2 (NOT p3))))), (X (X (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (X (NOT (OR (AND p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND p0 (NOT p2) (NOT p3)))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1 (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) p1)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 p1)))), (X (X (NOT p3))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p2 p3)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3)), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) p3)), (G (OR p0 (NOT p1) p2 (NOT p3))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1))), (G (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2) p3))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT (OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) (NOT p3))))), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3)))), (F p3), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (F p2), (F (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)))), (G (NOT p1)), (G (NOT p3))]
Property proved to be false thanks to negative knowledge :(G (NOT p1))
Knowledge based reduction with 34 factoid took 400 ms. Reduced automaton from 7 states, 18 edges and 3 AP (stutter insensitive) to 1 states, 1 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-00 finished in 118917 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((F(p0)&&G(p1)&&X(p2)))'
Support contains 6 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 23 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 282 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:51:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1228 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1521 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:51:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:51:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:51:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 110 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 154 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 147 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 131 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 147 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 139 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 166 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 174 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 175 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 171 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 164 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 170 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 128 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 162 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 172 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 172 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 142 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 1.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 1.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 1.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 0.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 1.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 1.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 1.0)
(s277 0.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 1.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/906 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1110/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 182 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 174 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 160 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 158 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/906 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60259ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60264ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61814 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 162 ms :[(OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), true, (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND p1 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-01
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-01 finished in 62003 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G((G(p0)||(X((G(p1)||X(p2)))&&F(p3)))))'
Support contains 8 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 385 transition count 1122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 385 transition count 1122
Applied a total of 4 rules in 21 ms. Remains 385 /387 variables (removed 2) and now considering 1122/1134 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:52:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 528 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 528 rows 385 cols
[2025-06-02 04:52:36] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 258 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:52:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 528 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:52:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:52:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1218 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1488 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:52:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 528 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:52:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:52:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 142 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 152 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 176 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 143 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 155 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 133 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 160 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 155 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 136 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 152 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 147 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 163 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 145 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 146 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 165 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:52:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 145 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 145 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 153 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 162 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 155 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 385/913 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/385 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1116/1116 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 54/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 146 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 173 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 157 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/385 variables, 5/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 151 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 153 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60339ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60344ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 385/387 places, 1122/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61862 ms. Remains : 385/387 places, 1122/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 420 ms :[(OR (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)) (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p3))), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p1)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), true, (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (NOT p1), (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-02
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 1188 reset in 262 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 122 steps with 2 reset with depth 117 and stack size 117 in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-02 finished in 62580 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(p0))'
Support contains 5 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 387 transition count 1128
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 381 transition count 1128
Performed 114 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 114 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 381 transition count 1014
Deduced a syphon composed of 114 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 114 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 228 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 267 transition count 1014
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 243 place count 264 transition count 996
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 264 transition count 996
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 306 place count 234 transition count 966
Applied a total of 306 rules in 63 ms. Remains 234 /387 variables (removed 153) and now considering 966/1134 (removed 168) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:53:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 372 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 372 rows 234 cols
[2025-06-02 04:53:39] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 241 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:53:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 372 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:53:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 702 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 944 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 960 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:53:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 372 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:53:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 128 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 234/606 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/234 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 960/960 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 80/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 122 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 15/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 9/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 17/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 234/606 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/234 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/960 constraints, Known Traps: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60191ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 960 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60193ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 234/387 places, 966/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61225 ms. Remains : 234/387 places, 966/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 40 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-03
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 273 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 10 steps with 0 reset with depth 11 and stack size 11 in 1 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-03 finished in 61557 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(X(F(p0)))))'
Support contains 1 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 10 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:54:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 522 rows 384 cols
[2025-06-02 04:54:40] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 304 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:54:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:54:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:54:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1219 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1539 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:54:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:54:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:54:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 151 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 148 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 151 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 149 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 143 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 162 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 140 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 130 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 130 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 167 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 162 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 162 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 168 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:54:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 158 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 159 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 168 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 150 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 136 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 171 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 168 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 152 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 163 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30297ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30301ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31856 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 131 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 167 reset in 176 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 34 steps with 0 reset with depth 35 and stack size 35 in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-05 finished in 32184 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(((F(p0) U X(p1)) U (G(!p1)||X(!p2)))))'
Support contains 6 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 18 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:55:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:55:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 281 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:55:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:55:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:55:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1483 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:55:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:55:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:55:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 166 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 148 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 148 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 137 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 127 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 149 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 140 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 175 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 144 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 176 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 159 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 167 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 167 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 170 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 167 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 155 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 141 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 172 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 178 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 151 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/906 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1110/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 131 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 166 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 170 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 159 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 149 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 162 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/906 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60235ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60239ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61746 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 488 ms :[(AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2), (AND p1 p2), false, false, (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2), (AND (NOT p1) p2), (AND (NOT p0) p1), false, false, (NOT p0), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-06
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 295 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 33333 reset in 309 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0) (NOT p2)), (X (NOT p0)), (X (X (NOT p2))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 p2)))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0) p2)))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0) p2))))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(X (AND p1 (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND p1 (NOT p0)))), (X (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p1), (X (NOT p1)), (X (X p1)), (X (X (NOT p1)))]
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 16 ms. Reduced automaton from 13 states, 26 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-06 finished in 62894 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!p0 U (p1||G(!p0))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 387 transition count 1129
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 382 transition count 1129
Performed 113 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 113 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 382 transition count 1016
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 226 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 269 transition count 1016
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 239 place count 266 transition count 998
Iterating global reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 266 transition count 998
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 236 transition count 968
Applied a total of 302 rules in 57 ms. Remains 236 /387 variables (removed 151) and now considering 968/1134 (removed 166) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:56:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 374 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-02 04:56:15] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 225 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:56:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:56:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:56:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 769 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1004 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned []
Running 962 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:56:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:56:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:56:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/610 variables, and 74 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 962/962 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 55/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:56:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/610 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/962 constraints, Known Traps: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60226ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60228ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/387 places, 968/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61313 ms. Remains : 236/387 places, 968/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) p0), (AND (NOT p1) p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-07
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 175 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 195 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 105 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 87 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 116 ms. (341 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4817 steps (1 resets) in 16 ms. (283 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0)))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 234 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 80 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Support contains 4 out of 236 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 25 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 968/968 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:57:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:57:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:57:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:57:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:57:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 745 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 950 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 962 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:57:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:57:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:57:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 122 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/610 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 962/962 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 10/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 1)
(s6 0)
(s7 0)
(s8 1)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 1)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 1)
(s15 0)
(s16 0)
(s17 1)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 1)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 1)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 1)
(s30 0)
(s31 0)
(s32 0)
(s33 0)
(s34 0)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 0)
(s51 0)
(s52 0)
(s53 0)
(s54 0)
(s55 0)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/610 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/962 constraints, Known Traps: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60208ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60210ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61213 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 97 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 75 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 194 ms. (205 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 1659 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (207 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
Knowledge obtained : [(AND (NOT p0) p1), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1)))), (X (NOT p0)), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT (AND p0 (NOT p1))))), (X (X (NOT p0))), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p1)), (F (NOT (OR (NOT p0) p1))), (F p0), (F (NOT (OR p0 p1)))]
Knowledge based reduction with 9 factoid took 196 ms. Reduced automaton from 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive) to 2 states, 4 edges and 2 AP (stutter insensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 69 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 64 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 71 ms :[(AND p0 (NOT p1)), (AND p0 (NOT p1))]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 165 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 196 ms.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13747713628576298227
[2025-06-02 04:58:20] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 968 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:58:20] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 4 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 04:58:20] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 968 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:58:20] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 3 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 04:58:20] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 968 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:58:20] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 32 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 04:58:20] [INFO ] Built C files in 239ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13747713628576298227
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13747713628576298227;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2899 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13747713628576298227;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 62 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13747713628576298227;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased5581577435167738568.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
Support contains 4 out of 236 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 20 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 968/968 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:58:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:58:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:58:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:58:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:58:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 740 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 979 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
Running 962 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:58:36] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:58:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:58:36] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 130 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/610 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 962/962 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 10/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 14/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/610 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/962 constraints, Known Traps: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60185ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60187ms
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61208 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin2579660395827410097
[2025-06-02 04:59:36] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 968 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:59:36] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 04:59:36] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 968 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:59:36] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 04:59:36] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 968 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:59:36] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 64 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 04:59:36] [INFO ] Built C files in 230ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin2579660395827410097
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2579660395827410097;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 2746 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin2579660395827410097;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 47 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin2579660395827410097;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased16376208300617332640.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
WARNING : LTS min runner thread was asked to interrupt. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 04:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL2979671160713585220.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 04:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL6318952574744091643.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL2979671160713585220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-hoa' '/tmp/aut8917131125076401787.hoa' '-atoms' '/tmp/LTL6318952574744091643.prop' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...317
Loading property file /tmp/LTL6318952574744091643.prop.
Loaded 2 atomic propositions.
Checking formula 0 provided in automaton : /tmp/aut8917131125076401787.hoa
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL14914498920496670656.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL297770189492281145.ltl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL14914498920496670656.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL297770189492281145.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...275
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F((!("(((turn_0==1)&&(flag_0_idle==1))&&(p25_1_6==1))"))U((G(!("(((turn_0==1)&&(flag_0_idle==1))&&(p25_1_6==1))")))||("((p17_0!=1...216
Formula 0 simplified : FG("(((turn_0==1)&&(flag_0_idle==1))&&(p25_1_6==1))" M !"((p17_0!=1)&&(!(((turn_0==1)&&(flag_0_idle==1))&&(p25_1_6==1))))")
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15400344516581608295.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15400344516581608295.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15400344516581608295.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15400344516581608295.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15400344516581608295.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1791 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 196 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 344 labels/synchronizations in 44 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTL10884855228341416750.gal : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTL7294168936655683654.ltl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTL10884855228341416750.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTL7294168936655683654.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...255
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F((!("(((i9.i0.u0.turn_0==1)&&(i4.i1.u12.flag_0_idle==1))&&(i9.i0.u0.p25_1_6==1))"))U((G(!("(((i9.i0.u0.turn_0==1)&&(i4.i1.u12.fl...307
Formula 0 simplified : FG("(((i9.i0.u0.turn_0==1)&&(i4.i1.u12.flag_0_idle==1))&&(i9.i0.u0.p25_1_6==1))" M !"((i7.u24.p17_0!=1)&&(!(((i9.i0.u0.turn_0==1)&&(...209
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-07 finished in 262019 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(F(G(p0)))'
Support contains 4 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 387 transition count 1128
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 381 transition count 1128
Performed 113 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 113 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 381 transition count 1015
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 226 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 268 transition count 1015
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 240 place count 266 transition count 1003
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 266 transition count 1003
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 302 place count 236 transition count 973
Applied a total of 302 rules in 45 ms. Remains 236 /387 variables (removed 151) and now considering 973/1134 (removed 161) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:00:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 379 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 379 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-02 05:00:37] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 297 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 379 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 754 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1053 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
Running 967 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 379 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:00:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 169 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/615 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 967/967 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 80/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 115 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 19/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 17/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/615 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/967 constraints, Known Traps: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60195ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 967 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60196ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 236/387 places, 973/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61320 ms. Remains : 236/387 places, 973/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 38 ms :[(NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 172 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 13 steps with 0 reset with depth 14 and stack size 14 in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-08 finished in 61547 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(X((p0&&F(p1))))&&F(p2)))'
Support contains 5 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 14 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:01:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 522 rows 384 cols
[2025-06-02 05:01:39] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 280 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:01:39] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:01:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:01:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 995 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1276 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:01:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:01:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:01:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 116 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 152 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 148 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 136 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 161 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 137 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 170 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 139 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 141 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 170 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 180 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 167 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 166 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 163 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 168 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 132 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 158 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 162 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 132 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 171 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 139 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 141 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 191 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 167 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 151 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/906 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1110/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 134 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 167 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 171 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 162 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 141 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/906 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60231ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60233ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61528 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 190 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), (NOT p2), (OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-09
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 2 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-09 finished in 61742 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(p0)&&(F(G(p1))||((p2 U p3)&&F(p4)))))'
Support contains 7 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 18 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:02:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:02:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:02:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:02:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:02:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1392 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:02:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:02:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:02:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 109 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 153 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 144 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 126 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 158 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 140 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 172 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 164 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 164 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 167 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 167 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 127 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 165 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 133 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 139 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 165 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 166 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 152 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30180ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30182ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31596 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 211 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p4))), (NOT p0), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p4) (NOT p1)), true]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-10
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-10 finished in 31832 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(G(p0)))'
Support contains 3 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 25 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:03:12] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:03:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 272 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:03:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:03:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:03:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1271 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1544 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:03:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:03:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:03:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 113 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 161 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 154 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 125 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 156 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 146 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 172 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 131 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 169 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 162 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 167 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 160 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 155 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 161 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 156 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 125 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 154 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 138 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 136 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 167 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 169 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/906 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1110/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 129 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 174 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 162 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 150 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 181 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/906 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30031 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60228ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60231ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61806 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 68 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-12
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-12 finished in 61887 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(F((G(p0)||G(F((!p1 U (p2||G(!p1)))))||(F((!p1 U (p2||G(!p1))))&&X(p3)))))))'
Support contains 7 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 18 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:04:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:04:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 255 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:04:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:04:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:04:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1125 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1382 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:04:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:04:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:04:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 113 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 159 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 154 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 133 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 148 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 137 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 160 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 146 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 145 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 132 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 171 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 165 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 164 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 166 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 166 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 144 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 157 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 155 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 128 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 161 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 145 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 141 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 173 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 172 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/906 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1110/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 126 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 172 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 167 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 163 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 145 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 159 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 145 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/906 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60220ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60225ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61630 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 209 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) p1 (NOT p2))]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-13
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 272 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 286 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1) p3), (X (X p2))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 2 factoid took 85 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 10 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 9 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 226 ms :[(AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p0) (NOT p2) p1 (NOT p3))]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 208 ms. (191 steps per ms) remains 8/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 69 ms. (571 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 8/8 properties
[2025-06-02 05:05:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:05:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:05:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem apf4 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 7 unsolved
Problem apf2 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 182/189 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 49/239 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 19/258 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 368/626 variables, 258/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 74/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 0/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/662 variables, 16/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 12/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 106/768 variables, 4/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/768 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/772 variables, 2/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 0/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 134/906 variables, 110/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 78/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 0/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/906 variables, 0/570 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 906/906 variables, and 570 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved in 1408 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 384/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 182/189 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 49/239 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 19/258 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 368/626 variables, 258/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 74/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 0/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/662 variables, 16/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 12/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 106/768 variables, 4/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/768 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/772 variables, 2/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 6/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 135 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 137 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 8/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 0/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 134/906 variables, 110/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 78/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 0/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/906 variables, 0/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 906/906 variables, and 584 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved in 3175 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 384/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/8 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4596ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 6 unsolved
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1097 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 384 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 384/384 places, 1116/1116 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1110
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 378 transition count 1110
Performed 113 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 113 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 378 transition count 997
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 226 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 265 transition count 997
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 236 transition count 968
Applied a total of 296 rules in 36 ms. Remains 236 /384 variables (removed 148) and now considering 968/1116 (removed 148) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 36 ms. Remains : 236/384 places, 968/1116 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 159 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (655 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (930 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 471030 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 ) properties seen :0 out of 6
Probabilistic random walk after 471030 steps, saw 121912 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=156 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 05:05:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 374 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-02 05:05:26] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 109/116 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/152 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/160 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 270/430 variables, 160/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 74/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/466 variables, 16/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 14/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 56/522 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/522 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/526 variables, 2/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 84/610 variables, 60/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 76/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/610 variables, 0/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 610/610 variables, and 421 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 880 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 109/116 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/152 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/160 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 270/430 variables, 160/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 74/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/466 variables, 16/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 14/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 56/522 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/522 variables, 0/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/526 variables, 2/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 6/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 4/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 84/610 variables, 60/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 76/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/610 variables, 0/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 610/610 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 1817 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2714ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 2 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 369 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 236 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 968/968 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 968/968 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:05:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 679 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 869 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 962 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:05:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 122 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/610 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 962/962 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 74/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 127 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 18/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 110 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 7/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/610 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/962 constraints, Known Traps: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60211ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60213ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61122 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 849 edges and 236 vertex of which 36 / 236 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 1 ms
Free SCC test removed 30 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 114 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 569 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 683 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 206 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 161 transition count 240
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 161 transition count 228
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 144 transition count 228
Performed 59 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 85 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 85 transition count 142
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 82 transition count 142
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 82 transition count 139
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 82 transition count 132
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 82 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 81 transition count 131
Free-agglomeration rule applied 32 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 81 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 49 transition count 99
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 49 transition count 99
Applied a total of 353 rules in 18 ms. Remains 49 /236 variables (removed 187) and now considering 99/968 (removed 869) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 6 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-02 05:06:30] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] After 32ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:6
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] After 52ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] After 44ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 62 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 29 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] After 223ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] After 353ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :6
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 410 ms.
Found 2 invariant AP formulas.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 p0 (NOT p1) p3), (X (X p2)), (G (OR (NOT p0) p2 p1)), (G (OR p0 p2 (NOT p1)))]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p3))]
Knowledge based reduction with 4 factoid took 120 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 9 edges and 4 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 179 ms :[false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 166 ms :[false, false, false, false, false]
Support contains 7 out of 384 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 384/384 places, 1116/1116 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 384 /384 variables (removed 0) and now considering 1116/1116 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 522 rows 384 cols
[2025-06-02 05:06:31] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 265 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:06:32] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:06:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:06:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1112 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1379 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:06:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:06:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:06:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 130 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 115 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 154 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 150 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 145 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 149 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 144 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 142 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 128 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 170 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 164 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 165 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 166 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 173 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 161 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 131 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 160 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 156 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 140 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 141 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 165 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 172 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 150 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 137 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/906 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1110/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 128 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 169 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 157 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 144 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 153 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 133 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/906 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60229ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60232ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61627 ms. Remains : 384/384 places, 1116/1116 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) p3)]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 81 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 195 ms :[false, false, false, false, false]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 173 ms. (229 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 45 ms. (869 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (952 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (1081 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
[2025-06-02 05:07:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:07:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:07:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 182/189 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 49/239 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 19/258 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 368/626 variables, 258/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 74/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 0/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 36/662 variables, 16/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 12/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 0/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 106/768 variables, 4/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/768 variables, 0/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/772 variables, 2/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 134/906 variables, 110/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 78/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 0/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/906 variables, 0/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 906/906 variables, and 568 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 1075 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 384/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 182/189 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 49/239 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/239 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 19/258 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 368/626 variables, 258/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 74/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/626 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/662 variables, 16/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 12/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/662 variables, 0/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 106/768 variables, 4/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/768 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/772 variables, 2/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 5/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 133 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 5/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/772 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 134/906 variables, 110/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 78/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/906 variables, 0/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/906 variables, 0/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 906/906 variables, and 579 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 2637 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 384/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3720ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 948 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 384 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 384/384 places, 1116/1116 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 6 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 6 transitions
Performed 6 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1110
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 378 transition count 1110
Performed 113 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 113 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 378 transition count 997
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 113 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 226 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 265 transition count 997
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 296 place count 236 transition count 968
Applied a total of 296 rules in 31 ms. Remains 236 /384 variables (removed 148) and now considering 968/1116 (removed 148) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 31 ms. Remains : 236/384 places, 968/1116 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 54 ms. (727 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 58 ms. (678 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 51 ms. (769 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 36 ms. (1081 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 488061 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=162 ) properties seen :0 out of 5
Probabilistic random walk after 488061 steps, saw 126830 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=162 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 05:07:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 374 rows 236 cols
[2025-06-02 05:07:41] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 109/116 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/152 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/160 variables, 2/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 270/430 variables, 160/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 74/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 36/466 variables, 16/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 14/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 56/522 variables, 4/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/522 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 4/526 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 0/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 84/610 variables, 60/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 76/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 0/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/610 variables, 0/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 610/610 variables, and 422 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 774 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 109/116 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/152 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 8/160 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/160 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 270/430 variables, 160/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 74/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 36/466 variables, 16/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 14/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/466 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 56/522 variables, 4/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/522 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/526 variables, 2/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 5/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 5/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 84/610 variables, 60/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 76/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 0/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/610 variables, 0/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 610/610 variables, and 433 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 1971 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 236/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2753ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Fused 5 Parikh solutions to 4 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 775 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 236 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 968/968 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 236 /236 variables (removed 0) and now considering 968/968 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:07:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:07:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:07:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:07:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:07:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 699 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 901 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 962 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:07:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 374 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:07:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:07:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/610 variables, and 90 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 962/962 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 71/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 124 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 19/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 124 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 120 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 18/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 20/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/610 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/236 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/962 constraints, Known Traps: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60215ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 962 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60217ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61162 ms. Remains : 236/236 places, 968/968 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 849 edges and 236 vertex of which 36 / 236 are part of one of the 6 SCC in 0 ms
Free SCC test removed 30 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 114 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 569 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 683 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 45 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 45 transitions
Performed 45 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 45
Iterating post reduction 0 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 206 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 45 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 161 transition count 240
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 161 transition count 228
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 5 places
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 144 transition count 228
Performed 59 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 85 transition count 169
Ensure Unique test removed 27 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 27 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 85 transition count 142
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 82 transition count 142
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 274 place count 82 transition count 139
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 7 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 7 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 82 transition count 132
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 82 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 81 transition count 131
Free-agglomeration rule applied 32 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 315 place count 81 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 347 place count 49 transition count 99
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 353 place count 49 transition count 99
Applied a total of 353 rules in 12 ms. Remains 49 /236 variables (removed 187) and now considering 99/968 (removed 869) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 5 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] Computed 14 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] After 61ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:5
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] After 42ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] After 32ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 94 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] After 203ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
[2025-06-02 05:08:46] [INFO ] After 315ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :5
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 394 ms.
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p2 (NOT p1) p3)]
False Knowledge obtained : [(F (NOT p3))]
Knowledge based reduction with 1 factoid took 76 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive) to 5 states, 7 edges and 3 AP (stutter sensitive).
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 148 ms :[false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 153 ms :[false, false, false, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 180 ms :[false, false, false, false, false]
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 276 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 25000 reset in 286 ms.
Applying partial POR strategy [false, true, true, false, false]
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 183 ms :[false, false, false, false, false]
Support contains 7 out of 384 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 384/384 places, 1116/1116 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Iterating post reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Performed 107 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 1 with 107 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1284
Deduced a syphon composed of 113 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 107 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 384 transition count 1284
Performed 35 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 148 places in 0 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 384 transition count 1284
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 154 place count 378 transition count 1278
Deduced a syphon composed of 142 places in 1 ms
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 378 transition count 1278
Deduced a syphon composed of 142 places in 1 ms
Applied a total of 160 rules in 72 ms. Remains 378 /384 variables (removed 6) and now considering 1278/1116 (removed -162) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 30 ms returned []
Running 1272 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:08:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 600 transitions (discarded 678 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 600 rows 378 cols
[2025-06-02 05:08:48] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 265 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1272 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1272 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD199 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem TDEAD49 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD50 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD51 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD52 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD53 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD54 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD57 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD58 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD59 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD60 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD78 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD79 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD80 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD83 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD84 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD88 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD89 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD90 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD97 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD98 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD99 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD100 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD101 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD107 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD110 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD111 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD112 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD113 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD114 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD117 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD122 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD123 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD124 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD125 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD127 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD128 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD129 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD130 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD131 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD132 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD133 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD134 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD135 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD136 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD137 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD138 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD151 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD152 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD153 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD154 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD159 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD160 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD161 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD162 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD163 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD164 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD165 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD166 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD167 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD193 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD195 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD197 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD199 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD201 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD203 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD209 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD211 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD213 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD215 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD217 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD219 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD221 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD223 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD225 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD227 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD229 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD231 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD233 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD235 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD819 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD820 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD821 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD822 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD823 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD824 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD826 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD827 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD828 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD829 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD830 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD832 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD833 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD834 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD835 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD836 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD838 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD839 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD840 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD841 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD842 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD844 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD845 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD846 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD847 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD848 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD851 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD852 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD853 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD854 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD855 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD858 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD859 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD860 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD861 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD862 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD863 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD864 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD865 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD866 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD867 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD868 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD871 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD872 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD873 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD874 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD875 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD876 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD877 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD878 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD879 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD880 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD881 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD884 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD885 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD886 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD887 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD888 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD889 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD890 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD891 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD892 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD893 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD894 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD897 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD898 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD899 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD900 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD901 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD902 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD903 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD904 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD905 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD906 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD907 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD912 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD913 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD914 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD915 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD916 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD917 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD918 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD919 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD920 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1200 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1202 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1204 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1208 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1210 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1212 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1214 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1216 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1218 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1220 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1222 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1224 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1226 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1228 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1230 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1232 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1234 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1236 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1238 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1240 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1242 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1244 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1246 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1248 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1250 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1252 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1254 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1256 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1257 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1260 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1261 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1264 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1265 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1268 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1269 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1272 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1273 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD1276 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 145 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 162 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 154 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 154 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 148 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 169 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 155 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 151 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 164 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 139 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 171 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 136 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 145 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 139 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 378/978 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/378 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/265 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1272/1272 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 60/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 142/378 variables, 12/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 6/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 164 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 134 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 131 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 133 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 159 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 150 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 154 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 145 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 140 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 136 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 137 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 135 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 20/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 142 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 155 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 143 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 139 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 159 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 156 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60339ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 310 solved, 962 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 310 dead transitions in 60342ms
Found 310 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 310 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 310 transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 378/384 places, 968/1116 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 2186 edges and 378 vertex of which 236 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 142 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 142 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 23 ms. Remains 236 /378 variables (removed 142) and now considering 968/968 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 2 : 236/384 places, 968/1116 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60473 ms. Remains : 236/384 places, 968/1116 transitions.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin11808894307195804114
[2025-06-02 05:09:48] [INFO ] Built C files in 9ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin11808894307195804114
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11808894307195804114;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '3' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
Compilation finished in 1768 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin11808894307195804114;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 41 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin11808894307195804114;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '--when' '--hoa' '/tmp/stateBased6440585791682980514.hoa' '--buchi-type=spotba'
LTSmin run took 249 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES EXPLICIT LTSMIN SAT_SMT
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-13 finished in 336339 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((G(p0)||F(p1)) U X(G(((p2 U X(p1)) U p3)))))'
Support contains 9 out of 387 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 387/387 places, 1134/1134 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 384 transition count 1116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 384 transition count 1116
Applied a total of 6 rules in 17 ms. Remains 384 /387 variables (removed 3) and now considering 1116/1134 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:09:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 522 rows 384 cols
[2025-06-02 05:09:51] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 255 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 05:09:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:09:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 05:09:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1375 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 1110 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:09:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 522 transitions (discarded 594 similar events)
[2025-06-02 05:09:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 05:09:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 164 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 104 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 156 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 151 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 129 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 150 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 138 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 157 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 140 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 138 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 135 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 174 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 168 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 167 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 173 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 165 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 20/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 161 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 153 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 136 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 141 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 155 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 139 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 156 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 175 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 168 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 149 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 147 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/906 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1110/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 6/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 56/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 130 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 170 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 169 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 162 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 143 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 163 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 11/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/906 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved in 30040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 6/6 constraints, State Equation: 0/384 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/1110 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60248ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1110 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60251ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61648 ms. Remains : 384/387 places, 1116/1134 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 337 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3) (NOT p0)), (NOT p1), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (NOT p3), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p3)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0))]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-14
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 273 reset in 172 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 64 steps with 0 reset with depth 65 and stack size 65 in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06-LTLFireability-14 finished in 62183 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F((!p0 U (p1||G(!p0))))))'
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
Using solver Z3 to compute partial order matrices.
Built C files in :
/tmp/ltsmin13057737218366241861
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may disable matrix : 1134 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Computation of Complete disable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Computing symmetric may enable matrix : 1134 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Computation of Complete enable matrix. took 1 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5337161748317546603.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5337161748317546603.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5337161748317546603.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5337161748317546603.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5337161748317546603.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Computing Do-Not-Accords matrix : 1134 transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Computation of Completed DNA matrix. took 14 ms. Total solver calls (SAT/UNSAT): 0(0/0)
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Built C files in 292ms conformant to PINS (ltsmin variant)in folder :/tmp/ltsmin13057737218366241861
Running compilation step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13057737218366241861;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/limit_time.pl' '720' 'gcc' '-c' '-I/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/include/' '-I.' '-std=c99' '-fPIC' '-O0' 'model.c'
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1927 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 104 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 369 labels/synchronizations in 30 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability5570026571745047446.gal : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 05:10:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability10965399801919257942.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability5570026571745047446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability10965399801919257942.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F((!("(((i0.u5.turn_0==1)&&(i13.i0.u4.flag_0_idle==1))&&(i14.i0.u1.p25_1_6==1))"))U(("((i11.i0.u55.p17_0!=1)&&(!(((i0.u5.turn_0==...305
Formula 0 simplified : FG("(((i0.u5.turn_0==1)&&(i13.i0.u4.flag_0_idle==1))&&(i14.i0.u1.p25_1_6==1))" M !"((i11.i0.u55.p17_0!=1)&&(!(((i0.u5.turn_0==1)&&(i...209
Compilation finished in 3469 ms.
Running link step : cd /tmp/ltsmin13057737218366241861;'gcc' '-shared' '-o' 'gal.so' 'model.o'
Link finished in 52 ms.
Running LTSmin : cd /tmp/ltsmin13057737218366241861;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.ltsmin.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/pins2lts-mc-linux64' './gal.so' '--threads=8' '-p' '--pins-guards' '--when' '--ltl' '[](<>((!(LTLAPp0==true) U ((LTLAPp1==true)||[](!(LTLAPp0==true))))))' '--buchi-type=spotba'
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 2137 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 245 ms
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 128 labels/synchronizations in 30 ms.
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/LTLFireability3438519959765539912.gal : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 05:38:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/LTLFireability10387349744544478225.ltl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '-i' '/tmp/LTLFireability3438519959765539912.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-LTL' '/tmp/LTLFireability10387349744544478225.ltl' '-c' '-stutter-deadlock'

its-ltl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ltl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 -i /tmp/L...277
Read 1 LTL properties
Checking formula 0 : !((G(F((!("(((u8.turn_0==1)&&(u9.flag_0_idle==1))&&(u1.p25_1_6==1))"))U(("((u3.p17_0!=1)&&(!(((u8.turn_0==1)&&(u9.flag_0_idle==1))&&(u...246
Formula 0 simplified : FG("(((u8.turn_0==1)&&(u9.flag_0_idle==1))&&(u1.p25_1_6==1))" M !"((u3.p17_0!=1)&&(!(((u8.turn_0==1)&&(u9.flag_0_idle==1))&&(u1.p25_...167

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06, examination is LTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100780"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06.tgz
mv EisenbergMcGuire-PT-06 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' LTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;