Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r072-tall-174860068100769.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100769
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 960K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 102K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 460K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748835858168

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 106 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Transformed 295 places.
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Transformed 800 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 295 places and 800 transitions and 3600 arcs in 197 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 99 out of 295 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 295/295 places, 800/800 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 281 transition count 730
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 281 transition count 730
Applied a total of 28 rules in 54 ms. Remains 281 /295 variables (removed 14) and now considering 730/800 (removed 70) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 395 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 395 rows 281 cols
[2025-06-02 03:44:19] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 394 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 395 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 140 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 613 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1036 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 725 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 395 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:44:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 140 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 142 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 146 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 129 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 128 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 132 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 111 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 123 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 139 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 17/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 281/676 variables, and 84 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved in 30036 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/281 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 725/725 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 68/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 146 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 13/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 19/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 3/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 281/676 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/281 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/725 constraints, Known Traps: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60282ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 725 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60297ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 281/295 places, 730/800 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61418 ms. Remains : 281/295 places, 730/800 transitions.
Support contains 99 out of 281 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 730 transitions.
Support contains 96 out of 281 places (down from 99) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1399 ms. (28 steps per ms) remains 25/69 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 27 ms. (143 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 25/25 properties
[2025-06-02 03:45:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 395 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:45:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:45:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 140 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 25 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp54 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 233/271 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/281 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 395/676 variables, 281/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 140/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 0/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/676 variables, 0/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 676/676 variables, and 437 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved in 1377 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 281/281 constraints, ReadFeed: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 237/271 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/281 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 24 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 142 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 287 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 147 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 137 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp10 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 19/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 4/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/281 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 395/676 variables, 281/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 140/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 22/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 676/676 variables, and 482 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved in 5008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 281/281 constraints, ReadFeed: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/25 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6398ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 22 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 29 out of 281 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 281 transition count 726
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 277 transition count 726
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 277 transition count 661
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 212 transition count 661
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 144 place count 206 transition count 631
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 206 transition count 631
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 186 transition count 611
Applied a total of 190 rules in 89 ms. Remains 186 /281 variables (removed 95) and now considering 611/730 (removed 119) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 89 ms. Remains : 186/281 places, 611/730 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 553 ms. (72 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 670584 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=223 ) properties seen :18 out of 22
Probabilistic random walk after 670584 steps, saw 134399 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=223 ) properties seen :18
[2025-06-02 03:45:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 276 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 276 rows 186 cols
[2025-06-02 03:45:31] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/138 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/139 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/147 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 223/370 variables, 147/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 44/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 13/383 variables, 5/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 26/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 16/399 variables, 7/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 7/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 25/424 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/426 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 36/462 variables, 27/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 39/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 462/462 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 363 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/138 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/139 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/147 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 223/370 variables, 147/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 44/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/370 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 13/383 variables, 5/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 26/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 16/399 variables, 7/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 7/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/399 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 25/424 variables, 2/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/424 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 2/426 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 2/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 3/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/426 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 36/462 variables, 27/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 39/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 5/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/462 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/462 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 462/462 variables, and 334 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1914 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2288ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 811 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 186 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 186/186 places, 611/611 transitions.
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 186 transition count 601
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 176 transition count 601
Applied a total of 20 rules in 22 ms. Remains 176 /186 variables (removed 10) and now considering 601/611 (removed 10) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 22 ms. Remains : 176/186 places, 601/611 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 154 ms. (258 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 33 ms. (1176 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 73 ms. (540 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (1212 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 684294 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=228 ) properties seen :0 out of 4
Probabilistic random walk after 684294 steps, saw 135518 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=228 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-02 03:45:38] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 266 rows 176 cols
[2025-06-02 03:45:38] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 120/129 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/138 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 214/352 variables, 138/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 44/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 13/365 variables, 5/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 26/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 16/381 variables, 7/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 7/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 24/405 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/407 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 35/442 variables, 26/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/442 variables, 39/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/442 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/442 variables, 0/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 442/442 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 356 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 120/129 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 8/138 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 214/352 variables, 138/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 44/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 13/365 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 26/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 16/381 variables, 7/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 7/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/381 variables, 0/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 24/405 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 2/407 variables, 1/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 3/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 35/442 variables, 26/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/442 variables, 39/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/442 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/442 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 442/442 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1171 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1535ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 566 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 176 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 601/601 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 176 /176 variables (removed 0) and now considering 601/601 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 17 ms. Remains : 176/176 places, 601/601 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 176/176 places, 601/601 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 17 ms. Remains 176 /176 variables (removed 0) and now considering 601/601 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 157 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 394 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 552 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 37 ms returned []
Running 596 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 266 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:45:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 15/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 12/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 176/442 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 596/596 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 64/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 13/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 8/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 8/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 176/442 variables, and 126 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/176 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/596 constraints, Known Traps: 110/110 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60126ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 596 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60128ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 60743 ms. Remains : 176/176 places, 601/601 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (trivial) has 508 edges and 176 vertex of which 23 / 176 are part of one of the 5 SCC in 2 ms
Free SCC test removed 18 places
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 67 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 323 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 390 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 32 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 32 transitions
Performed 32 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 32
Iterating post reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 158 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 126 transition count 179
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 126 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Ensure Unique test removed 4 places
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 112 transition count 169
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 76 transition count 133
Ensure Unique test removed 19 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 19 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 76 transition count 114
Performed 10 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -56
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 200 place count 66 transition count 170
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 4 transitions
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 205 place count 66 transition count 165
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 4 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 209 place count 66 transition count 161
Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 211 place count 66 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 64 transition count 159
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 17 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 17 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 64 transition count 159
Applied a total of 230 rules in 25 ms. Remains 64 /176 variables (removed 112) and now considering 159/601 (removed 442) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 4 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 159 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 11 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] After 139ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:4
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive and 1 generalized place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] After 50ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] After 18ms SMT Verify possible using 4 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 33 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] After 113ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] After 219ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :4
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 396 ms.
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 730 transitions.
Support contains 82 out of 281 places (down from 87) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 281 transition count 725
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 725
Performed 75 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 75 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 650
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 201 transition count 650
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 165 place count 196 transition count 625
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 170 place count 196 transition count 625
Performed 18 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 18
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 178 transition count 607
Applied a total of 206 rules in 52 ms. Remains 178 /281 variables (removed 103) and now considering 607/730 (removed 123) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 178 cols
[2025-06-02 03:46:41] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 451 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 403 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 866 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 13 ms returned []
Running 602 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 14/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 11/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 10/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 8/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 178/450 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/178 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 83/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 11/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 11/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 4/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 6/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 178/450 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/178 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/602 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60111ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 178/281 places, 607/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61049 ms. Remains : 178/281 places, 607/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:47:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 607 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:47:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6185091131178305368.gal : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14969900736732469476.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6185091131178305368.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14969900736732469476.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:48:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4820138449287464932.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4820138449287464932.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4820138449287464932.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4820138449287464932.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4820138449287464932.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:48:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:48:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:48:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1029 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 190 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 226 labels/synchronizations in 63 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1171757646778216537.gal : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2452641784550646703.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1171757646778216537.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2452641784550646703.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 281 transition count 725
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 725
Performed 78 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 78 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 647
Deduced a syphon composed of 78 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 198 transition count 647
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 172 place count 192 transition count 617
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 192 transition count 617
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 216 place count 173 transition count 598
Applied a total of 216 rules in 33 ms. Remains 173 /281 variables (removed 108) and now considering 598/730 (removed 132) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 263 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 263 rows 173 cols
[2025-06-02 03:48:43] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 364 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:48:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 263 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:48:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 440 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 804 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 9 ms returned []
Running 593 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 263 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 7/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 6/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 263/436 variables, 173/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/436 variables, 116/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 436/436 variables, and 365 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 173/173 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 593/593 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 60/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 263/436 variables, 173/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/436 variables, 116/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/436 variables, 593/963 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/436 variables, 14/977 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 436/436 variables, and 977 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 173/173 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 593/593 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60138ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 593 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60139ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 173/281 places, 598/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60991 ms. Remains : 173/281 places, 598/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 598 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 909 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality117927256117881634.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1532932588815544527.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality117927256117881634.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1532932588815544527.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 275 transition count 700
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 275 transition count 700
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 275 /281 variables (removed 6) and now considering 700/730 (removed 30) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 275 cols
[2025-06-02 03:49:44] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 584 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 846 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 695 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 132 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 126 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 118 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 135 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 133 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 124 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 134 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 134 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 275/640 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/275 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 695/695 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 89/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 138 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 131 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 125 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 6/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 113 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 135 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 127 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 13/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 140 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60170ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60173ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61029 ms. Remains : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 700 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12316183662848958690.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10229071673130854842.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12316183662848958690.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10229071673130854842.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8383409005313183389.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8383409005313183389.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8383409005313183389.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8383409005313183389.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8383409005313183389.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1063 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 69 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 240 labels/synchronizations in 22 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10580396829196733456.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality380759670517224245.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10580396829196733456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality380759670517224245.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 281 transition count 726
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 277 transition count 725
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 725
Performed 76 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 76 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 649
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 200 transition count 649
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 168 place count 194 transition count 619
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 194 transition count 619
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 174 transition count 599
Applied a total of 214 rules in 34 ms. Remains 174 /281 variables (removed 107) and now considering 599/730 (removed 131) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 264 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 264 rows 174 cols
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 264 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 408 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 598 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 594 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 264 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:51:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 12/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 3/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 174/438 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/174 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 594/594 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 59/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 18/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 174/438 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/174 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/594 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60129ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 594 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60132ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 174/281 places, 599/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60783 ms. Remains : 174/281 places, 599/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 599 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8229901124963752071.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16981877791066697067.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8229901124963752071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16981877791066697067.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8248023446775738732.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8248023446775738732.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8248023446775738732.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8248023446775738732.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8248023446775738732.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1018 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 193 labels/synchronizations in 15 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18253557311592971447.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1285731400877156065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18253557311592971447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1285731400877156065.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 275 transition count 700
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 275 transition count 700
Applied a total of 12 rules in 13 ms. Remains 275 /281 variables (removed 6) and now considering 700/730 (removed 30) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 275 cols
[2025-06-02 03:53:47] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:53:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:53:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:53:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 552 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 751 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 695 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:48] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:53:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:53:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 112 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 116 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 125 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 108 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 124 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30151ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30154ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30921 ms. Remains : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 700 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4326413777414642060.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12964823997522904132.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4326413777414642060.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12964823997522904132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4354946651134084361.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4354946651134084361.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4354946651134084361.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4354946651134084361.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4354946651134084361.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1051 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 251 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5941299538846337226.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10720914145066072020.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5941299538846337226.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10720914145066072020.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 276 transition count 705
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 705
Applied a total of 10 rules in 5 ms. Remains 276 /281 variables (removed 5) and now considering 705/730 (removed 25) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 370 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 370 rows 276 cols
[2025-06-02 03:55:18] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 370 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 578 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 787 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 700 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 370 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:55:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 118 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 12/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 276/646 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/276 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 700/700 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 55/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 3/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 124 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 276/646 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/276 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/700 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60114ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60117ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 276/281 places, 705/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60912 ms. Remains : 276/281 places, 705/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 705 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17308504488211083333.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2721416822565600336.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17308504488211083333.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2721416822565600336.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:56:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph348873443755343336.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph348873443755343336.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph348873443755343336.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph348873443755343336.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph348873443755343336.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:56:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:56:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:56:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1082 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 247 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2224830796226577711.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10911089305586363082.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2224830796226577711.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10911089305586363082.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 281 transition count 726
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 277 transition count 725
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 725
Performed 79 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 79 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 646
Deduced a syphon composed of 79 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 197 transition count 646
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 174 place count 191 transition count 616
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 191 transition count 616
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 171 transition count 596
Applied a total of 220 rules in 30 ms. Remains 171 /281 variables (removed 110) and now considering 596/730 (removed 134) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 261 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 171 cols
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 142 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 261 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 420 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 563 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 591 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 261 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:57:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 17/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 11/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30125ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 591 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30126ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/281 places, 596/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30731 ms. Remains : 171/281 places, 596/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 596 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 162 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-02 03:57:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7875745480226962892.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5071429666754972042.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7875745480226962892.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5071429666754972042.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 277 transition count 710
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 277 transition count 710
Applied a total of 8 rules in 4 ms. Remains 277 /281 variables (removed 4) and now considering 710/730 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 375 rows 277 cols
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 124 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 658 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 840 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 705 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:57:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 124 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 121 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 114 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 119 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 114 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 8/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 277/652 variables, and 71 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/277 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 705/705 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 55/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 118 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 117 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 2/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 375/652 variables, 277/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/652 variables, 124/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/652 variables, 705/1183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 652/652 variables, and 1183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 277/277 constraints, ReadFeed: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 705/705 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60127ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60130ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 277/281 places, 710/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60977 ms. Remains : 277/281 places, 710/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 710 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10771216541054465176.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4665442138667141295.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10771216541054465176.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4665442138667141295.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1435129379873217535.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1435129379873217535.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1435129379873217535.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1435129379873217535.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1435129379873217535.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1088 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 243 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18303080134173847140.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3890898906399845195.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18303080134173847140.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3890898906399845195.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 275 transition count 700
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 275 transition count 700
Applied a total of 12 rules in 9 ms. Remains 275 /281 variables (removed 6) and now considering 700/730 (removed 30) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:59:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 275 cols
[2025-06-02 03:59:52] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:59:52] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:59:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:59:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 555 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 739 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 695 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:59:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:59:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:59:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 113 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 125 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 132 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 121 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 122 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 124 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 109 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
(s207 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 1.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 1.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 1.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 1.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 275/640 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/275 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 695/695 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 89/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 118 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 6/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 123 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 111 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 13/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 126 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 122 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60202ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60205ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60957 ms. Remains : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 700 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11837236902231111458.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16275437555112633285.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11837236902231111458.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16275437555112633285.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14094746804486466141.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14094746804486466141.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14094746804486466141.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14094746804486466141.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14094746804486466141.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1067 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 259 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality576924085251412879.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11360369164249222685.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality576924085251412879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11360369164249222685.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 276 transition count 705
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 276 transition count 705
Applied a total of 10 rules in 14 ms. Remains 276 /281 variables (removed 5) and now considering 705/730 (removed 25) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:01:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 370 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 370 rows 276 cols
[2025-06-02 04:01:53] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:01:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 370 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:01:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 642 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 827 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 700 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:01:54] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 370 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:01:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:01:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 120 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 130 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 121 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 121 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 13/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 7/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 276/646 variables, and 76 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/276 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 700/700 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 60/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 10/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 114 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 118 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 20/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 276/646 variables, and 129 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/276 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/120 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/700 constraints, Known Traps: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60128ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 700 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60131ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 276/281 places, 705/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60975 ms. Remains : 276/281 places, 705/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 705 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2628937805858985203.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 04:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16416417695732314857.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2628937805858985203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16416417695732314857.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10320402258892627242.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10320402258892627242.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10320402258892627242.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10320402258892627242.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10320402258892627242.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1032 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 210 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15147365565239525866.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5795011251016173479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15147365565239525866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5795011251016173479.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 277 transition count 710
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 277 transition count 710
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 277 /281 variables (removed 4) and now considering 710/730 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 375 rows 277 cols
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 192 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 124 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 625 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 828 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 705 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:03:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 124 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 120 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 111 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 132 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 132 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 115 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 117 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 125 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 113 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 7/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 277/652 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/277 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 705/705 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 67/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 14/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 126 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 117 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 125 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 114 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 119 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 113 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60119ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60120ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 277/281 places, 710/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60954 ms. Remains : 277/281 places, 710/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:04:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 710 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:04:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1203212178338883185.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 04:04:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2082708406364276363.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1203212178338883185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2082708406364276363.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11740650530734069948.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11740650530734069948.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11740650530734069948.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11740650530734069948.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11740650530734069948.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1080 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 275 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15566660344724771725.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 04:05:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6747260164419620227.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15566660344724771725.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6747260164419620227.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 275 transition count 700
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 275 transition count 700
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 275 /281 variables (removed 6) and now considering 700/730 (removed 30) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:05:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 365 rows 275 cols
[2025-06-02 04:05:56] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:05:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 182 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:05:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:05:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:05:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:05:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 537 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 720 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 695 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:05:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:05:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:05:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 99 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 118 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 114 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 123 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 121 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 1.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 1.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 275/640 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/275 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 695/695 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 90/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 126 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 8/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 4/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 7/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 111 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 275/640 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/275 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/695 constraints, Known Traps: 129/129 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60125ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60127ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60855 ms. Remains : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 700 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7780039434054969660.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 04:06:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6831389742050204290.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7780039434054969660.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6831389742050204290.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12815810256263250698.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12815810256263250698.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12815810256263250698.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12815810256263250698.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12815810256263250698.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1069 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 269 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1040146025793555576.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 04:07:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11974469552786908560.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1040146025793555576.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11974469552786908560.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 275 transition count 700
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 275 transition count 700
Applied a total of 12 rules in 14 ms. Remains 275 /281 variables (removed 6) and now considering 700/730 (removed 30) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:07:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:07:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:07:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 170 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:07:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:07:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:07:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:07:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 521 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 692 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 695 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:07:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 365 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:07:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:07:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 116 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 105 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 120 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 114 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 105 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 111 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 116 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 110 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 116 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 106 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 107 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 121 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 275/640 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/275 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 695/695 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 92/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 113 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 4/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/275 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 365/640 variables, 275/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/640 variables, 116/503 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/640 variables, 695/1198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 640/640 variables, and 1200 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 275/275 constraints, ReadFeed: 116/116 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 695/695 constraints, Known Traps: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60130ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 695 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60132ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60840 ms. Remains : 275/281 places, 700/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 700 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5166869604480145196.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 04:08:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13481825328342408890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5166869604480145196.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13481825328342408890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1512223660622109333.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1512223660622109333.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1512223660622109333.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1512223660622109333.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1512223660622109333.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1073 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 227 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16436718255975524119.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 04:09:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13568634171499895966.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16436718255975524119.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13568634171499895966.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 730/730 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 277 transition count 710
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 277 transition count 710
Applied a total of 8 rules in 9 ms. Remains 277 /281 variables (removed 4) and now considering 710/730 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:09:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 375 rows 277 cols
[2025-06-02 04:09:58] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:09:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 184 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 04:09:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:09:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:09:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 124 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 04:09:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 666 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 850 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 705 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:09:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 375 transitions (discarded 335 similar events)
[2025-06-02 04:09:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 04:09:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 124 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 117 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 119 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 117 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 108 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 10/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 277/652 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/277 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 705/705 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 5/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 56/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 115 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 116 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 125 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 112 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 118 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 106 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 5/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 111 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 115 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 123 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 109 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 119 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 117 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 14/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 277/652 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/277 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/705 constraints, Known Traps: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60123ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 705 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60126ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 277/281 places, 710/730 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60989 ms. Remains : 277/281 places, 710/730 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 710 transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5329679321930896219.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 04:10:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17417696852027630360.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5329679321930896219.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17417696852027630360.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3585526362396128443.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3585526362396128443.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3585526362396128443.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3585526362396128443.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3585526362396128443.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1085 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 244 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12906272753397389452.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 04:11:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9178359719217277078.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12906272753397389452.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9178359719217277078.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18271612527499977573.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18271612527499977573.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18271612527499977573.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18271612527499977573.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18271612527499977573.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1122 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 255 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16359728208586774213.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 04:12:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6649298743769267661.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16359728208586774213.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6649298743769267661.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 12 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.1285e+07,143.862,2376752,33917,3314,3.51983e+06,40409,1699,6.53862e+06,268,379172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i14.u27.p34_1_3==1) U E(EF((AG(((i2.u20.p10_2_4==0)||(i6.i0.u29.p37_2_2==1))) + !(((i6.i0.u29.p33_2_2==0)||(i3.u37.p15_4==1))))) U (!(...285
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u20.p10_2_4==0)||(i6.i0.u29.p37_2_2==1))))) + !(((i6.i0.u29.p33_2...898
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t62, t63, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t7...2205
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,1155.47,4984312,1,0,8.53076e+06,221510,4789,1.51547e+07,720,1.41305e+06,10382940
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(EG((AG(((i16.i1.u80.p34_3_2==0)||(i11.i0.u46.p18_2_3==1))) + AX(FALSE))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((!(E(TRUE U !(((i16.i1.u80.p34_3_2==0)||(i11.i0.u46.p18_2_3==1))))) + !(EX(!(FALSE)))))))] = FAL...157
(forward)formula 1,0,1415.27,7176020,1,0,1.18541e+07,221510,5126,2.07007e+07,718,1.56718e+06,3471097
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG(EF((EF((i4.u22.p09_3_2==1)) * ((i12.i1.u49.p17_3==1)||((i11.i0.u48.p19_2_4==0)&&(i14.u74.p33_1_0==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U (i4.u22.p09_3_2==1)) * ((i12.i1.u49.p17_3==1)||((i11.i0.u48.p19_2_4==0)&&(i14.u74....181
(forward)formula 2,1,1532.12,7176020,1,0,1.18541e+07,221510,6748,2.07007e+07,861,1.56718e+06,20743778
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!(((!(AG(((i8.i0.u40.p18_0_0==1)&&((i7.u34.p33_4_3==0)||(i3.u14.p09_4_1==1))))) + (E((i4.u22.p12_3_1==1) U (i16.i1.u79.p34_3_1==1)) * E...350
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(FwdU(Init,!(((!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i8.i0.u40.p18_0_0==1)&&((i7.u34.p33_4_3==0)||(i3.u14.p09_4_1==1))))))) + (...558
(forward)formula 3,1,1702.72,7910996,1,0,1.33386e+07,221510,3925,2.23172e+07,625,1.56718e+06,1953
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 1266 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 120 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12242040062355901782.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 04:41:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10845636191545349145.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12242040062355901782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10845636191545349145.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.1285e+07,116.084,2457856,28942,18101,2.91688e+06,323281,1044,5.28897e+06,697,3.92743e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E((EF(AG((u1.p34_3_1==1))) * ((!(EX(((u4.p09_1_2==0)||(u3.p10_0_3==1)))) + (u7.turn_0==1)) + (u2.p19_4_2==1))) U AF(!((((u2.p25_4_3==1)...217
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,E((E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((u1.p34_3_1==1))))) * ((!(EX(((u4.p09_1_2==0)||(u3.p10_0_3==1)))) + (u...294
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t3, t4, t6, t8, t24, t34, t62, t63, t66, t67, t68, t69, t70, t71, t72, t73, t74, t75, t76...2647
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100769"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05.tgz
mv EisenbergMcGuire-PT-05 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;