About the Execution of ITS-Tools for EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 277602.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | TFTTFTFFFFTFFTTT | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r072-tall-174860068100763.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04, examination is LTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100763
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 255K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-00
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-01
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-02
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-03
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-04
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-05
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-06
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-07
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-08
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-09
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-10
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-11
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-12
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-13
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-14
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748835235728
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=LTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
LTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 03:33:56] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, LTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 03:33:56] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 96 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Transformed 196 places.
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Transformed 448 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 196 places and 448 transitions and 1952 arcs in 191 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/LTLCardinality.xml in 10 ms.
Working with output stream class java.io.PrintStream
Initial state reduction rules removed 4 formulas.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 17 out of 196 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 196/196 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 24 rules in 42 ms. Remains 184 /196 variables (removed 12) and now considering 400/448 (removed 48) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 294 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 355 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 679 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 37/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 6/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 396/723 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 4/727 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 420/420 variables, and 731 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60172ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60185ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/196 places, 400/448 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60941 ms. Remains : 184/196 places, 400/448 transitions.
Support contains 17 out of 184 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 50 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1205 ms. (33 steps per ms) remains 1/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 183 ms. (217 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 42/44 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 33/77 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 13/90 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 118/208 variables, 90/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 10/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 16/224 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 10/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 28/252 variables, 12/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 8/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 74/326 variables, 4/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 4/330 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 90/420 variables, 78/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 48/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/420 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 204 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 42/44 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 33/77 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 13/90 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/90 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 118/208 variables, 90/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 10/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 16/224 variables, 4/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 10/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/224 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 28/252 variables, 12/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 8/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 74/326 variables, 4/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 4/330 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/330 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 90/420 variables, 78/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 48/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/420 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 420/420 variables, and 277 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 347 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 73 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 184 transition count 396
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 180 transition count 396
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 180 transition count 345
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 129 transition count 345
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 117 transition count 333
Applied a total of 134 rules in 50 ms. Remains 117 /184 variables (removed 67) and now considering 333/400 (removed 67) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 50 ms. Remains : 117/184 places, 333/400 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 226 ms. (176 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 190183 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 407 ms. (steps per millisecond=467 )
Probabilistic random walk after 190183 steps, saw 39972 distinct states, run finished after 410 ms. (steps per millisecond=463 ) properties seen :1
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X((p0&&X(F((p1||X(p2)))))))'
Support contains 5 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 184 /184 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 110 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 309 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 421 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30087ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30095ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30526 ms. Remains : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 291 ms :[(AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2)), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), (OR (NOT p0) (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p2))), true]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-04
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 1 steps with 0 reset in 2 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-04 finished in 30876 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!((X(((X(p0) U p0)&&X(p1))) U X(p1)))'
Support contains 4 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 184 /184 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 332 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 442 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:35:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30144ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30158ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30607 ms. Remains : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 164 ms :[(OR (NOT p0) (NOT p1)), true, (NOT p1), (NOT p1), (NOT p1)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-05
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 372 ms.
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 50000 reset in 207 ms.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Knowledge obtained : [(AND p1 p0), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) p0))), (X (NOT (AND (NOT p1) (NOT p0)))), (X p0), (X p1), (X (X (NOT (OR (NOT p1) (NOT p0))))), (X (X p0)), (X (X p1))]
False Knowledge obtained : []
Property proved to be true thanks to knowledge (Minato strategy)
Knowledge based reduction with 8 factoid took 42 ms. Reduced automaton from 5 states, 6 edges and 2 AP (stutter sensitive) to 1 states, 0 edges and 0 AP (stutter insensitive).
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES KNOWLEDGE
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-05 finished in 31419 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(X(X(G(p0))))'
Support contains 2 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 184 /184 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 570 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 315 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 896 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30117ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30119ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31022 ms. Remains : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 138 ms :[true, (NOT p0), (NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-06
Entered a terminal (fully accepting) state of product in 142 steps with 0 reset in 1 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES STUTTER_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-06 finished in 31189 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(((F(p0) U X(!p1)) U (G((F(p0) U X(!p1)))||((F(p0) U X(!p1))&&(X(p2) U ((p2&&X(p2))||X(G(p2))))))))'
Support contains 4 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 184 /184 variables (removed 0) and now considering 400/400 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:36:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 321 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 437 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:36:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 315 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 42/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 396/716 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 6/722 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 2/724 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 420/420 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60085ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60087ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60533 ms. Remains : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 377 ms :[p1, (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (AND (NOT p0) p1), p1, (AND (NOT p2) (NOT p0) p1), (AND p1 (NOT p2)), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-08
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 560 reset in 100 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 14 steps with 0 reset with depth 15 and stack size 15 in 0 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-08 finished in 61046 ms.
Running Spot : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.ltl.spot.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/ltl2tgba-linux64' '--check=stutter' '--hoaf=tv' '-f' '!(G(F(p0)))'
Support contains 2 out of 184 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 0 : 184/184 places, 400/400 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 184 transition count 396
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 180 transition count 396
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 180 transition count 345
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 129 transition count 345
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 117 transition count 333
Applied a total of 134 rules in 33 ms. Remains 117 /184 variables (removed 67) and now considering 333/400 (removed 67) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:37:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-02 03:37:34] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:37:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:37:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:37:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 212 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 305 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 329 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:37:35] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:37:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:37:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/286 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/286 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 286/286 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 27804 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 44/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 329/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 286/286 variables, and 595 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57862ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57863ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/184 places, 333/400 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58229 ms. Remains : 117/184 places, 333/400 transitions.
Stuttering acceptance computed with spot in 82 ms :[(NOT p0), (NOT p0)]
Running random walk in product with property : EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-11
Product exploration explored 100000 steps with 0 reset in 130 ms.
Stack based approach found an accepted trace after 11 steps with 0 reset with depth 12 and stack size 12 in 1 ms.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES STACK_TEST
Treatment of property EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-LTLCardinality-11 finished in 58463 ms.
All properties solved by simple procedures.
Total runtime 276333 ms.
BK_STOP 1748835513330
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ LTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination LTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="LTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04, examination is LTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100763"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04.tgz
mv EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "LTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "LTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "LTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "LTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "LTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME LTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;