Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r072-tall-174860068100762.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100762
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 255K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748835192787

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 03:33:13] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 03:33:13] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 89 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Transformed 196 places.
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Transformed 448 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 196 places and 448 transitions and 1952 arcs in 176 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 79 out of 196 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 196/196 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 193 transition count 436
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 193 transition count 436
Applied a total of 6 rules in 31 ms. Remains 193 /196 variables (removed 3) and now considering 436/448 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 272 rows 193 cols
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 27 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 260 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 103 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 258 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 548 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 432 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:33:14] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 103 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 104 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 106 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 9/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 272/465 variables, 193/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 103/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 465/465 variables, and 368 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, ReadFeed: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 432/432 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 59/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 272/465 variables, 193/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 103/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 432/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 465/465 variables, and 809 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, ReadFeed: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 432/432 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60218ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 432 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60231ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 193/196 places, 436/448 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60831 ms. Remains : 193/196 places, 436/448 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 193 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 436 transitions.
Support contains 77 out of 193 places (down from 79) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 2010 ms. (19 steps per ms) remains 39/73 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 38 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 39/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 38/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 38/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 36/38 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 36/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 35/36 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 35/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 34/34 properties
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 272 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 103 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
Problem AtomicPropp37 is UNSAT
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 149/193 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 5/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 272/465 variables, 193/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 103/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/465 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 465/465 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved in 3885 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, ReadFeed: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 33 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 150/192 variables, 8/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 3/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 8/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 9/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 3/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 3/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 272/465 variables, 193/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 103/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 32/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 1/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 465/465 variables, and 373 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 193/193 constraints, ReadFeed: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 32/34 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8920ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 32 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 40 out of 193 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 193 transition count 435
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 192 transition count 435
Performed 45 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 45 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 192 transition count 390
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 147 transition count 390
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 99 place count 140 transition count 362
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 140 transition count 362
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 128 transition count 350
Applied a total of 130 rules in 51 ms. Remains 128 /193 variables (removed 65) and now considering 350/436 (removed 86) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 128/193 places, 350/436 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 403 ms. (99 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 8 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 32/32 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 504150 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=167 ) properties seen :26 out of 32
Probabilistic random walk after 504150 steps, saw 102995 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=167 ) properties seen :26
[2025-06-02 03:34:28] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 186 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 186 rows 128 cols
[2025-06-02 03:34:28] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 107/124 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/128 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 186/314 variables, 128/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 82/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/314 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 314/314 variables, and 227 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 629 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 107/124 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/128 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 186/314 variables, 128/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 82/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 6/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/314 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 314/314 variables, and 238 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved in 845 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1486ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 6 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1280 ms.
Support contains 17 out of 128 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 350/350 transitions.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 128 transition count 342
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 120 transition count 342
Applied a total of 16 rules in 21 ms. Remains 120 /128 variables (removed 8) and now considering 342/350 (removed 8) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 120/128 places, 342/350 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 132 ms. (300 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (952 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (833 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 619575 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=206 ) properties seen :2 out of 6
Probabilistic random walk after 619575 steps, saw 125550 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=206 ) properties seen :2
[2025-06-02 03:34:34] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 178 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 178 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-02 03:34:34] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 104/113 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/120 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 178/298 variables, 120/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 82/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/298 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 298/298 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 513 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 104/113 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/120 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 178/298 variables, 120/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 82/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 4/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/298 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/298 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 298/298 variables, and 224 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 478 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1007ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Fused 4 Parikh solutions to 3 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 411 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 120 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 120/120 places, 342/342 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 120 transition count 340
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 118 transition count 340
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 117 transition count 336
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 117 transition count 336
Applied a total of 6 rules in 20 ms. Remains 117 /120 variables (removed 3) and now considering 336/342 (removed 6) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 20 ms. Remains : 117/120 places, 336/342 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 30 ms. (1290 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (1052 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 154806 states, properties seen :3
Probabilistic random walk after 774030 steps, saw 154806 distinct states, run finished after 2649 ms. (steps per millisecond=292 ) properties seen :3
Explored full state space saw : 154812 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 774060 steps, saw 154812 distinct states, run finished after 1528 ms. (steps per millisecond=506 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 15 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 436 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 185 transition count 404
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 185 transition count 404
Applied a total of 16 rules in 8 ms. Remains 185 /193 variables (removed 8) and now considering 404/436 (removed 32) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 240 rows 185 cols
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 245 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 400 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:34:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 3/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 240/425 variables, 185/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 79/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 60/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 240/425 variables, 185/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 79/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 400/739 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 1/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 425/425 variables, and 740 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60090ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60093ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/193 places, 404/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60432 ms. Remains : 185/193 places, 404/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 404 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7648985755530822140.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6681763562665819257.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7648985755530822140.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6681763562665819257.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:36:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:36:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13055101131246603721.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13055101131246603721.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13055101131246603721.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13055101131246603721.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13055101131246603721.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 536 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 199 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 131 labels/synchronizations in 43 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2550605602763435146.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13554736025159250180.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2550605602763435146.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13554736025159250180.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23893e+06,12.8265,295244,8437,1156,434241,8524,1038,1.07902e+06,183,142657,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((!(AX(AF((((i9.u2.turn_3==1)&&(i10.i0.u40.flag_3_idle==1))&&(i10.i0.u1.p25_1_0==1))))) + EG(((i6.i1.u35.flag_2_idle==1)&&(i6.i0.u23.p...1064
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((i9.u2.turn_3==1)&&(i10.i0.u40.flag_3_idle==1))&&(i10.i0.u1.p25_1_0==1)))))))))...1164
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t52, t53, t...1204
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 185 transition count 404
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 185 transition count 404
Applied a total of 16 rules in 10 ms. Remains 185 /193 variables (removed 8) and now considering 404/436 (removed 32) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 232 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:36:41] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:36:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 326 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 566 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 400 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:36:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:36:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 93 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 3/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 240/425 variables, 185/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 79/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 60/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 240/425 variables, 185/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 79/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 400/739 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 1/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/740 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 425/425 variables, and 740 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60107ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60108ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/193 places, 404/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60694 ms. Remains : 185/193 places, 404/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 404 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15518381432147751054.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6189955795807260539.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15518381432147751054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6189955795807260539.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13507160045246832204.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13507160045246832204.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13507160045246832204.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13507160045246832204.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13507160045246832204.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 541 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 155 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15185083130066958331.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5923876125833502026.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15185083130066958331.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5923876125833502026.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.23893e+06,11.104,253656,11494,1731,365683,17652,1072,899785,187,159528,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(AX((!(A(((i0.u1.turn_3==1)&&(i3.u14.p10_1_3==1)) U (i4.u11.p08_3_2==1))) * EF(AG((((i0.u1.turn_3==1)&&(i12.i0.u2.flag_3_waiting==1))&...610
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((!(!((E(!((i4.u11.p08_3_2==1)) U (!(((i0.u1.turn_3==1)&&(i3.u14.p10_1_3==1))) * !((i4.u11....1059
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t52, t53, t...1153
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 186 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 186 transition count 408
Applied a total of 14 rules in 24 ms. Remains 186 /193 variables (removed 7) and now considering 408/436 (removed 28) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:38:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 186 cols
[2025-06-02 03:38:42] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:38:42] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:38:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:38:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 346 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 539 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 404 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:38:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:38:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:38:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 11/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 115 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 14/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 7/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 186/430 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 74/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 7/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 244/430 variables, 186/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 82/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 404/766 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 0/766 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 430/430 variables, and 766 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60078ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60080ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60646 ms. Remains : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 408 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8660990430141951911.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4148472427741687135.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8660990430141951911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4148472427741687135.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18252679638516135640.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18252679638516135640.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18252679638516135640.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18252679638516135640.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18252679638516135640.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 517 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 133 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14903507192334072498.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5661745944807518613.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14903507192334072498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5661745944807518613.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.30493e+06,15.873,291816,7138,1445,334714,9194,1029,1.07815e+06,204,165036,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((!(A(E(((i7.i1.u32.flag_3_idle==1)&&(i2.u14.p09_1_3==1)) U ((i10.u2.turn_1==1)&&(i2.u10.p10_1_0==1))) U AF((((i10.u2.turn_3==1)&&(i9.u...388
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(EG(!((((i10.u2.turn_3==1)&&(i9.u0.flag_3_active==1))&&(i5.i2.u1.p25_1_3==1)))))))...934
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t56, t57, t58, t59, t...1170
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,0,29.5194,454504,1,0,649538,98506,4892,1.9106e+06,857,443956,2145667
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 18 rules in 5 ms. Remains 184 /193 variables (removed 9) and now considering 400/436 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 271 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 413 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:40:43] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 396/725 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 5/730 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 420/420 variables, and 731 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60097ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60099ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/193 places, 400/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60518 ms. Remains : 184/193 places, 400/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12801925052313448255.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13435561222309063393.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12801925052313448255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13435561222309063393.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12388792697387746246.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12388792697387746246.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12388792697387746246.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12388792697387746246.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12388792697387746246.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 534 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 155 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5306015106102062445.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7681477381336489307.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5306015106102062445.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7681477381336489307.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,12.6516,295172,10159,2474,439416,23703,1028,968031,187,199067,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX((i4.u9.p08_2_2==1)) * (((i0.u3.turn_2==0)||(i10.i1.u1.flag_2_waiting==0))||(i10.i1.u1.p25_1_2==0))) * ((((i0.u3.turn_0==1)&&(i10....258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((((i0.u3.turn_0==1)&&(i10.i1.u1.flag_0_active==1))&&(i8.i1.u0.p25_0_4==1))||((i7.i1.u2...310
(forward)formula 0,1,12.8209,295172,1,0,439416,23703,1602,968031,292,199067,56117
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 186 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 186 transition count 408
Applied a total of 14 rules in 13 ms. Remains 186 /193 variables (removed 7) and now considering 408/436 (removed 28) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:42:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 186 cols
[2025-06-02 03:42:26] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:42:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:42:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 296 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 410 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 404 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 244/430 variables, 186/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 82/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 3/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 4/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 430/430 variables, and 321 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 40/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 6/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 12/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 6/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 186/430 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/404 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60094ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60095ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60519 ms. Remains : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 408 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3489640597448557650.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5450943757784592548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3489640597448557650.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5450943757784592548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8595146604276326423.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8595146604276326423.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8595146604276326423.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8595146604276326423.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8595146604276326423.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 527 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 108 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11715771960461117792.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14424830011651073953.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11715771960461117792.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14424830011651073953.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29194e+06,7.58878,193716,7967,1617,299196,13393,1036,641756,186,125255,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((((((i0.u4.turn_1==0)||(i1.u6.p07_0==0))&&(i10.i0.u2.flag_0_active==1))&&((i1.u28.p18_0_0==1)&&(i11.u3.flag_3_active==1)))&&(i4.i0.u2...323
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U (((((i0.u4.turn_1==0)||(i1.u6.p07_0==0))&&(i10.i0.u2.flag_0_active==1))&&((i1.u28.p18_0...383
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t...1299
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
(forward)formula 0,1,23.609,565640,1,0,944639,61297,5296,1.89462e+06,833,384927,3373060
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 18 rules in 5 ms. Remains 184 /193 variables (removed 9) and now considering 400/436 (removed 36) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 112 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 272 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:44:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 41/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 6/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 184/420 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/396 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60070ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60072ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/193 places, 400/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60467 ms. Remains : 184/193 places, 400/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability634100542876433439.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16196251946253817751.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability634100542876433439.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16196251946253817751.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:45:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17726550833785187927.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17726550833785187927.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17726550833785187927.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17726550833785187927.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17726550833785187927.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 539 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 142 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10747271993544670062.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4410177533458025136.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10747271993544670062.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4410177533458025136.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,11.6306,236844,8665,2237,350408,19785,1041,702234,175,171907,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((i4.u12.p12_0_1==0) * !(A(AX((((i0.u2.turn_0==1)&&(i5.u19.p37_0_0==1))||(((i0.u2.turn_0==1)&&(i11.u1.flag_0_active==1))&&(i11.u1.p25_...338
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i4.u12.p12_0_1==0)),!(!((E(TRUE U (i0.u2.critical_section_2==1)) * !((E(!((((i0.u...1333
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1146
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 186 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 186 transition count 408
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 186 /193 variables (removed 7) and now considering 408/436 (removed 28) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 186 cols
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 309 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 402 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 404 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:46:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 16/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 11/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 244/430 variables, 186/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 82/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 4/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 430/430 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 52/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 244/430 variables, 186/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 82/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 404/737 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 4/741 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 3/744 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 430/430 variables, and 746 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60084ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60085ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60493 ms. Remains : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 408 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18296513673491342408.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3086482375251639183.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18296513673491342408.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3086482375251639183.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13097690728191997100.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13097690728191997100.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13097690728191997100.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13097690728191997100.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13097690728191997100.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 538 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 128 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5325997008864824694.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12510262774098549227.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5325997008864824694.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12510262774098549227.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.28636e+06,9.38437,227756,9209,2286,335134,22229,1002,701319,187,171825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((A(EX(!(AX((((i0.u3.turn_1==1)&&(i8.u0.flag_1_active==1))&&(i0.u3.p25_3_2==1))))) U (E(EF((((i0.u3.turn_2==1)&&(i8.u0.flag_2_active==1))...870
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(Init,!((E(E(TRUE U (((i0.u3.turn_2==1)&&(i8.u0.flag_2_active==1))&&(i9.i1.u1.p25_1_0==1))) U !(!((E(...2275
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t...1165
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 186 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 186 transition count 408
Applied a total of 14 rules in 4 ms. Remains 186 /193 variables (removed 7) and now considering 408/436 (removed 28) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 186 cols
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 259 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 362 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 404 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 6/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 7/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 186/430 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 67/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 244/430 variables, 186/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 82/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 404/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 6/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 5/763 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 430/430 variables, and 765 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60081ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60083ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60450 ms. Remains : 186/193 places, 408/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 408 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7335840090859168704.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5663940426701039042.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7335840090859168704.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5663940426701039042.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5741971405090945473.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5741971405090945473.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5741971405090945473.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5741971405090945473.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5741971405090945473.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 536 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 150 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16948971647035169418.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9656838250324972192.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16948971647035169418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9656838250324972192.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27877e+06,14.0955,330812,5892,1718,507480,19416,1115,1.04591e+06,184,178176,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((!(E(((A(((i6.i1.u0.flag_1_active==1)&&(i2.u5.p09_0_1==1)) U (((i0.u2.turn_2==1)&&(i7.i1.u40.flag_2_active==1))&&(i0.u1.p25_2_0==1))) ...540
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(Init),((!((E(!((((i0.u2.turn_2==1)&&(i7.i1.u40.flag_2_active==1))&&(i0.u1.p25_2_0==1))) U (!(((i6.i1....797
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t55, t...1136
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
(forward)formula 0,0,25.6661,484156,1,0,810528,52132,5355,1.65205e+06,794,378990,2651760
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 193 transition count 432
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 432
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 381
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 138 transition count 381
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 119 place count 129 transition count 345
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 129 transition count 345
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 117 transition count 333
Applied a total of 152 rules in 51 ms. Remains 117 /193 variables (removed 76) and now considering 333/436 (removed 103) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 240 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 398 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
Running 329 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:50:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 6/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 2/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 87 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 3/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/286 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 286/286 variables, and 244 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 38/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 6/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 329/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 2/598 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 2/600 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 286/286 variables, and 600 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/193 places, 333/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60544 ms. Remains : 117/193 places, 333/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 333 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17623446468214980602.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3781215840032963751.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17623446468214980602.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3781215840032963751.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (1481 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 5913 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=328 )
Probabilistic random walk after 5913 steps, saw 2402 distinct states, run finished after 25 ms. (steps per millisecond=236 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 193 transition count 432
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 432
Performed 52 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 52 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 380
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 137 transition count 380
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 128 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 128 transition count 344
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 116 transition count 332
Applied a total of 154 rules in 44 ms. Remains 116 /193 variables (removed 77) and now considering 332/436 (removed 104) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 168 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 191 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 168 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 209 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 422 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 328 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 168 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:51:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 103 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 6/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 6/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 168/284 variables, 116/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 76/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/284 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 284/284 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 27498 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 168/284 variables, 116/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 76/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 328/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 3/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 3/595 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 2/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 284/284 variables, and 599 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57546ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57547ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/193 places, 332/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58023 ms. Remains : 116/193 places, 332/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14012268844674550544.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10933128969396600437.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14012268844674550544.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10933128969396600437.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145270,17.9751,520976,2,70848,5,1.20656e+06,6,0,799,1.28994e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5243930304170766446.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5243930304170766446.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5243930304170766446.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5243930304170766446.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5243930304170766446.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 511 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 89 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8853249197219511460.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1999543173370253674.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8853249197219511460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1999543173370253674.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145270,7.95293,208308,6332,868,316742,5792,833,595790,168,61877,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((((i0.u2.turn_0==0)||(i7.u18.flag_0_active==0))||(i6.u1.p25_1_3==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((((i0.u2.turn_0==0)||(i7.u18.flag_0_active==0))||(i6.u1.p25_1_3==0)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t24, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t37, t38, t39, t...1122
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,0,27.3491,637808,1,0,1.05857e+06,28210,4472,1.8392e+06,678,202471,4153559
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 193 transition count 433
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 190 transition count 433
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 190 transition count 382
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 139 transition count 382
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 130 transition count 346
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 130 transition count 346
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 119 transition count 335
Applied a total of 148 rules in 17 ms. Remains 119 /193 variables (removed 74) and now considering 335/436 (removed 101) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 171 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-02 03:53:15] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 122 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:53:15] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 171 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:53:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:53:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 345 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 331 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:16] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 171 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:53:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:53:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 6/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 7/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 171/290 variables, 119/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 76/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 290/290 variables, and 255 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved in 23627 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 331/331 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 47/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 8/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 7/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 171/290 variables, 119/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 76/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 331/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 1/610 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 290/290 variables, and 610 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 331/331 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 53699ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53700ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/193 places, 335/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54072 ms. Remains : 119/193 places, 335/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 335 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2340287625223101574.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8304382404374550725.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2340287625223101574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8304382404374550725.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,154121,23.251,605332,2,78017,5,1.39486e+06,6,0,814,1.59216e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11495260679258479046.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11495260679258479046.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11495260679258479046.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11495260679258479046.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11495260679258479046.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 487 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 99 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12647028646067829414.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8086451787963531760.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12647028646067829414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8086451787963531760.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,154121,13.6778,355388,7807,1779,519067,18260,830,1.00994e+06,188,230925,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((i8.u6.p12_2_3==1) + EF(!(E((((i0.u17.flag_3_idle==1)&&(i5.i0.u24.p33_0_3==1))||(((i0.u2.turn_3==1)&&(u0.flag_3_waiting==1))&&(i9.u1....240
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((i8.u6.p12_2_3==1) + E(TRUE U !(E((((i0.u17.flag_3_idle==1)&&(i5.i0.u24.p33_0_3==1))||(((i0.u2.tur...291
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t29, t32, t33, t34, t35, t38, t39, t42, t43, t44, t45, t47, t...1065
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,1,29.2451,640356,1,0,1.03839e+06,98805,3793,1.78502e+06,786,599387,4358140
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 193 transition count 432
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 432
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 383
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 140 transition count 383
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 131 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 131 transition count 347
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 120 transition count 336
Applied a total of 146 rules in 16 ms. Remains 120 /193 variables (removed 73) and now considering 336/436 (removed 100) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 172 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 229 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 321 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 332 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:55:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 172/292 variables, 120/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 76/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 3/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 timeout
0.0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 332/332 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 44/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 3/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 172/292 variables, 120/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 76/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 332/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/601 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/603 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 603 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 332/332 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60075ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/193 places, 336/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60426 ms. Remains : 120/193 places, 336/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 336 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16932389858760804294.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6357057238944623727.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16932389858760804294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6357057238944623727.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,168489,19.1857,550472,2,76809,5,1.26719e+06,6,0,819,1.3362e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11581720891524534269.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11581720891524534269.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11581720891524534269.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11581720891524534269.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11581720891524534269.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 489 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 120 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability665160896540333365.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:56:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11576502432318817178.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability665160896540333365.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11576502432318817178.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,168489,9.01187,194892,5168,1004,262413,7651,848,607918,176,68072,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(E((!(((i7.u0.flag_1_idle==1)&&(i6.u17.p18_3_1==1))) + EG((i0.u1.p19_0_2==1))) U AF(((i7.u0.flag_1_idle==1)&&(i5.u12.p33_2_1==1))))...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E((!(((i7.u0.flag_1_idle==1)&&(i6.u17.p18_3_1==1))) + EG((i0.u1.p19_0_2=...337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t33, t34, t35, t36, t39, t42, t43, t44, t45, t48, t51, t52, t...1074
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 193 transition count 433
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 190 transition count 433
Performed 52 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 52 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 190 transition count 381
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 138 transition count 381
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 118 place count 130 transition count 349
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 130 transition count 349
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 118 transition count 337
Applied a total of 150 rules in 25 ms. Remains 118 /193 variables (removed 75) and now considering 337/436 (removed 99) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 173 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 173 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 173 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 307 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 333 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 173 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:57:10] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 15/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 6/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 173/291 variables, 118/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 79/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 1/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/291 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 291/291 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 333/333 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 47/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 3/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 4/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 173/291 variables, 118/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 79/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 333/604 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 5/609 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 3/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 291/291 variables, and 612 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 333/333 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 333 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 118/193 places, 337/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60401 ms. Remains : 118/193 places, 337/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:58:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 337 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:58:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8899929568990704545.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7429612810190463394.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8899929568990704545.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7429612810190463394.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,156731,19.5927,559360,2,69500,5,1.26348e+06,6,0,812,1.37984e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13727250483737051884.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13727250483737051884.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13727250483737051884.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13727250483737051884.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13727250483737051884.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Removed a total of 487 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18243899464857017212.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12600358123107651908.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18243899464857017212.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12600358123107651908.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,156731,8.2448,221116,7897,1697,355604,14474,830,599002,187,160018,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((((i0.u1.turn_2==0)||(i10.u23.flag_2_active==0))||(i9.i0.u22.p25_1_4==0)) * ((!(E(((u2.turn_1==1)&&(i3.u7.p10_2_0==1)) U AG(((i0.u1.t...234
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((((i0.u1.turn_2==0)||(i10.u23.flag_2_active==0))||(i9.i0.u22.p25_1_4==0))))] = FALSE * [(...334
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t24, t25, t26, t27, t32, t34, t35, t36, t37, t41, t42, t44, t45, ...1144
(forward)formula 0,0,12.4711,222644,1,0,355604,43698,3631,599002,772,248605,1727546
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 436/436 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 193 transition count 432
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 432
Performed 52 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 52 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 189 transition count 380
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 137 transition count 380
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 121 place count 128 transition count 344
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 128 transition count 344
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 116 transition count 332
Applied a total of 154 rules in 18 ms. Remains 116 /193 variables (removed 77) and now considering 332/436 (removed 104) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 168 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 168 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 168 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 225 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 312 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 328 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 168 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:58:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 6/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 6/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 7/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 168/284 variables, 116/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 76/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/284 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 284/284 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 27447 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 168/284 variables, 116/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 76/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 328/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 3/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 3/595 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/284 variables, 2/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 284/284 variables, and 599 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 116/116 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 328/328 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57523ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 328 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57524ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 116/193 places, 332/436 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57862 ms. Remains : 116/193 places, 332/436 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 332 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8927080228855859157.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:59:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6890410649699665980.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8927080228855859157.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6890410649699665980.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145270,19.0118,520524,2,70848,5,1.20656e+06,6,0,799,1.28994e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6362878702070015413.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6362878702070015413.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6362878702070015413.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6362878702070015413.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6362878702070015413.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 494 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 121 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4936851027604576048.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12739131888739118943.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4936851027604576048.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12739131888739118943.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,145270,12.2406,308316,9288,1667,423845,14703,866,1.03395e+06,186,155105,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(A(((i9.i0.u2.flag_0_active==1)&&(i10.u27.p33_3_0==1)) U ((i3.u1.flag_3_idle==1)&&(i9.i1.u26.p33_2_3==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((i3.u1.flag_3_idle==1)&&(i9.i1.u26.p33_2_3==1))) U (!(((i9.i0.u2.flag_0...320
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t24, t27, t28, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, ...1087
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 0,0,16.4874,308316,1,0,423845,30874,3946,1.03395e+06,766,175750,2097332
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1450170961787871437.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1450170961787871437.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1450170961787871437.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1450170961787871437.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1450170961787871437.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 642 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 126 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-02 04:00:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6260022586152728654.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 04:00:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability513178349512164534.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6260022586152728654.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability513178349512164534.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.62094e+06,15.0438,351072,9805,972,545590,6600,1125,1.2422e+06,151,85013,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((!(AX(AF((((i1.u3.turn_3==1)&&(i0.u0.flag_3_idle==1))&&(i2.i0.u5.p25_1_0==1))))) + EG(((i6.i2.u4.flag_2_idle==1)&&(i5.u24.p33_3_2==1)...1081
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((!(!(EX(!(!(EG(!((((i1.u3.turn_3==1)&&(i0.u0.flag_3_idle==1))&&(i2.i0.u5.p25_1_0==1))))))))) + EG(...1181
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t5, t6, t7, t12, t13, t15, t42, t43, t44, t45, t58, t59, t60, t61, t76, t77, ...1455
(forward)formula 0,0,58.6163,1050988,1,0,1.68858e+06,33031,5373,3.49448e+06,625,216764,5699189
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E(!(AX((!(A(((i1.u3.turn_3==1)&&(i1.u11.p10_1_3==1)) U (i3.u7.p08_3_2==1))) * EF(AG((((i1.u3.turn_3==1)&&(i7.i1.u45.flag_3_waiting==1))&&...601
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,!(!(EX(!((!(!((E(!((i3.u7.p08_3_2==1)) U (!(((i1.u3.turn_3==1)&&(i1.u11.p10_1_3==1))) * !((i3.u7.p0...1044
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
(forward)formula 1,1,81.1973,1626424,1,0,2.57934e+06,37219,6841,5.59267e+06,698,274027,9276324
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(((i10.i0.u2.p12_0_1==0) * !(A(AX((((i0.u0.turn_0==1)&&(i0.u20.p37_0_0==1))||(((i0.u0.turn_0==1)&&(i8.i0.u6.flag_0_active==1))&&(i2.i0....353
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i10.i0.u2.p12_0_1==0)),!(!((E(TRUE U (i10.i0.u46.critical_section_2==1)) * !((E(!...1367
(forward)formula 2,1,91.027,1872056,1,0,2.99198e+06,38947,6998,6.38465e+06,701,299217,10648256
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: ((A(EX(!(AX((((i9.i0.u1.turn_1==1)&&(i7.i1.u45.flag_1_active==1))&&(i8.i0.u6.p25_3_2==1))))) U (E(EF((((i10.i0.u2.turn_2==1)&&(i6.i2.u4.f...923
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(((FwdU(Init,!((E(E(TRUE U (((i10.i0.u2.turn_2==1)&&(i6.i2.u4.flag_2_active==1))&&(i2.i0.u5.p25_1_0==1))) U ...2406
(forward)formula 3,1,106.93,2198580,1,0,3.56046e+06,40860,7190,7.3739e+06,707,318686,12435113
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((AF(E((!(((i10.i0.u2.flag_1_idle==1)&&(i8.i1.u41.p18_3_1==1))) + EG((i6.i2.u33.p19_0_2==1))) U AF(((i10.i0.u2.flag_1_idle==1)&&(i10.i1...287
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E((!(((i10.i0.u2.flag_1_idle==1)&&(i8.i1.u41.p18_3_1==1))) + EG((i6.i2.u...365
(forward)formula 4,1,185.754,2200244,1,0,3.56254e+06,40864,4177,9.07263e+06,460,318869,8929531
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1830332 ms.

BK_STOP 1748837024398

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100762"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04.tgz
mv EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;