Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r072-tall-174860068100761.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100761
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 636K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 255K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748835173927

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 88 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Transformed 196 places.
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Transformed 448 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 196 places and 448 transitions and 1952 arcs in 200 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 12 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 76 out of 196 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 196/196 places, 448/448 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 190 transition count 424
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 190 transition count 424
Applied a total of 12 rules in 34 ms. Remains 190 /196 variables (removed 6) and now considering 424/448 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 260 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 260 rows 190 cols
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 287 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 260 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:55] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 94 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:32:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 315 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 631 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 420 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:32:56] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 260 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:32:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:32:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 94 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 8/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 5/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 190/450 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 0/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 53/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 117 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 8/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 260/450 variables, 190/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 94/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 420/778 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 181 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 6/784 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 5/789 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 450/450 variables, and 789 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 72/72 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60225ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60238ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/196 places, 424/448 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60925 ms. Remains : 190/196 places, 424/448 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 190 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 03:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:56] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 03:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 424 transitions.
Support contains 67 out of 190 places (down from 76) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1536 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 10/45 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 145 ms. (274 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 175 ms. (227 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 87 ms. (454 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 72 ms. (548 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 260 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:33:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 94 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 159/179 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp20 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/186 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 260/446 variables, 186/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 94/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/450 variables, 4/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/450 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 450/450 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved in 492 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp44 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 161/178 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/186 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 260/446 variables, 186/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 94/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 4/450 variables, 4/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 5/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 3/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 7/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/450 variables, 0/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 450/450 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved in 3856 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 94/94 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/9 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 4359ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 2214 ms.
Support contains 5 out of 190 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 190 transition count 420
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 420
Performed 50 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 50 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 370
Deduced a syphon composed of 50 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 100 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 136 transition count 370
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 130 transition count 346
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 130 transition count 346
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 118 transition count 334
Applied a total of 144 rules in 48 ms. Remains 118 /190 variables (removed 72) and now considering 334/424 (removed 90) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 118/190 places, 334/424 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 250 ms. (159 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 96 ms. (412 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 192778 steps, run visited all 4 properties in 427 ms. (steps per millisecond=451 )
Probabilistic random walk after 192778 steps, saw 40539 distinct states, run finished after 430 ms. (steps per millisecond=448 ) properties seen :4
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 424 transitions.
Support contains 51 out of 190 places (down from 54) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 185 transition count 404
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 185 transition count 404
Applied a total of 10 rules in 13 ms. Remains 185 /190 variables (removed 5) and now considering 404/424 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 240 rows 185 cols
[2025-06-02 03:34:04] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 327 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 450 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 400 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 240 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:34:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 15/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 240/425 variables, 185/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 79/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 425/425 variables, and 334 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 57/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 240/425 variables, 185/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 79/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 400/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 3/741 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 105 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 4/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 425/425 variables, and 747 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 185/185 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 400/400 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60114ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 400 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60119ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 185/190 places, 404/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60585 ms. Remains : 185/190 places, 404/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 404 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15344139243419876220.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17861508957704337300.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15344139243419876220.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17861508957704337300.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14151487386050859698.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14151487386050859698.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14151487386050859698.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14151487386050859698.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14151487386050859698.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:35:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 531 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 285 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 151 labels/synchronizations in 55 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4216093630958299259.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1140955089636041366.ctl : 21 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4216093630958299259.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1140955089636041366.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.24069e+06,16.3032,415468,10728,1929,603113,37297,1084,1.38438e+06,187,298855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(((!(E(((i12.i0.u17.p37_1_1==0)||(i8.i2.u20.p37_3_1==1)) U ((i0.u1.p32_1==0)||(i4.u4.p10_0_2==1)))) * (i1.u3.p25_3_4==1)) * ((i5.u11...201
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * (!(E(((i12.i0.u17.p37_1_1==0)||(i8.i2.u20.p37_3_1==1)) U ((i0.u1.p32_1==0)||(i4.u4.p10...412
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t52, t53, t...1154
(forward)formula 0,0,21.8439,415596,1,0,603113,56804,4719,1.38438e+06,763,391053,2032698
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 186 transition count 408
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 408
Applied a total of 8 rules in 15 ms. Remains 186 /190 variables (removed 4) and now considering 408/424 (removed 16) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 186 cols
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 165 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 326 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 494 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 404 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 244 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:35:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 82 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 123 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 12/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 17/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 244/430 variables, 186/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 82/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 430/430 variables, and 346 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 65/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 3/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/186 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 244/430 variables, 186/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 82/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 404/757 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/430 variables, 1/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 430/430 variables, and 758 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 186/186 constraints, ReadFeed: 82/82 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 404/404 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60093ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 404 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 186/190 places, 408/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60607 ms. Remains : 186/190 places, 408/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 408 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7043854041542711212.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:36:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8182911902286494113.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7043854041542711212.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8182911902286494113.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12684445429606211169.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12684445429606211169.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12684445429606211169.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12684445429606211169.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12684445429606211169.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 561 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 103 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4966161458337724847.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6440449760162655739.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4966161458337724847.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6440449760162655739.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3072e+06,9.02498,249592,7649,1078,414734,6737,1022,818736,167,65927,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EX(AG(((i2.u13.p10_3_2==0)&&(i13.u27.p19_1_2==1)))) * (i7.u38.p18_3_1==0)) * (E(((EX((i7.u39.p19_3_1==1)) * (i0.u43.p27_1==0)) * ((i...434
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u13.p10_3_2==0)&&(i13.u27.p19_1_2==1)))))) * (i7.u38.p18_3_1=...1098
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1220
(forward)formula 0,0,14.0772,261192,1,0,443529,20631,4829,947421,663,125304,1852217
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 190 transition count 420
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 420
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 371
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 137 transition count 371
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 131 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 131 transition count 347
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 120 transition count 336
Applied a total of 140 rules in 34 ms. Remains 120 /190 variables (removed 70) and now considering 336/424 (removed 88) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 172 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 125 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:37:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:37:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 449 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 576 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned []
Running 332 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:37:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:37:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:37:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 8/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 5/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 8/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 5/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 172/292 variables, 120/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 76/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 332/332 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 3/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 3/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 172/292 variables, 120/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 76/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 332/606 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/607 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/607 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 607 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 120/120 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 332/332 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60074ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 120/190 places, 336/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60715 ms. Remains : 120/190 places, 336/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 336 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13896105288523067092.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:38:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17035267799699566568.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13896105288523067092.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17035267799699566568.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,186085,24.364,632112,2,80657,5,1.52541e+06,6,0,819,1.69628e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7697045954357932361.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7697045954357932361.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7697045954357932361.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7697045954357932361.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7697045954357932361.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 506 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 116 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8643649572368174549.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6378194368676106461.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8643649572368174549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6378194368676106461.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,186085,6.98085,163028,6163,732,226827,2738,883,608063,153,48445,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((EF((i2.u9.p08_2_2==0)) * AF(((i1.u8.p15_1==0)&&(i6.u17.p18_1_2==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (i2.u9.p08_2_2==0)) * !(EG(!(((i1.u8.p15_1==0)&&(i6.u17.p18_1_2==1)))...172
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t27, t28, t33, t36, t37, t39, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t...1115
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,0,10.0485,173652,1,0,240054,23872,4131,792665,560,135401,1113213
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 190 transition count 420
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 420
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 369
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 135 transition count 369
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 129 transition count 345
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 129 transition count 345
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 117 transition count 333
Applied a total of 146 rules in 26 ms. Remains 117 /190 variables (removed 73) and now considering 333/424 (removed 91) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:39:24] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-02 03:39:24] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 426 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 213 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 658 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 329 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:39:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 71 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 17/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 1/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 6/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/286 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 2/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 286/286 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 48/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 329/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 6/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 286/286 variables, and 594 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60075ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/190 places, 333/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60784 ms. Remains : 117/190 places, 333/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 333 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5915969094089115935.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16440620425152550268.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5915969094089115935.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16440620425152550268.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 262 ms. (152 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 61 ms. (645 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 258 steps, run visited all 1 properties in 5 ms. (steps per millisecond=51 )
Probabilistic random walk after 258 steps, saw 200 distinct states, run finished after 7 ms. (steps per millisecond=36 ) properties seen :1
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL PROBABILISTIC_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 190 transition count 420
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 420
Performed 51 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 51 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 369
Deduced a syphon composed of 51 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 51 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 102 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 135 transition count 369
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 129 transition count 345
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 129 transition count 345
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 117 transition count 333
Applied a total of 146 rules in 23 ms. Remains 117 /190 variables (removed 73) and now considering 333/424 (removed 91) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 169 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 89 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:40:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 207 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 297 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 9 ms returned []
Running 329 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:40:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 169 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:40:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:40:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 6/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 2/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 286/286 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 54/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 169/286 variables, 117/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 76/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 329/590 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 5/595 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/595 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/286 variables, 1/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 286/286 variables, and 597 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 329/329 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 329 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60071ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/190 places, 333/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60408 ms. Remains : 117/190 places, 333/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 333 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 157 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12746950746394409682.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2346912924677283257.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12746950746394409682.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2346912924677283257.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 184 /190 variables (removed 6) and now considering 400/424 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 412 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:41:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 317 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 757 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:41:27] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:41:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:41:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30120ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30121ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30888 ms. Remains : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9227193496528611656.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:41:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1906794786663239299.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9227193496528611656.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1906794786663239299.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13663720132214016793.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13663720132214016793.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13663720132214016793.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13663720132214016793.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13663720132214016793.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 528 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 119 labels/synchronizations in 35 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14604311992286949998.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8299543011087436337.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14604311992286949998.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8299543011087436337.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,12.9256,319292,10384,2094,436557,26194,934,1.03934e+06,183,285961,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EX(((i9.i1.u50.p37_2_1==0)&&(i0.u0.p25_0_1==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX(((i9.i1.u50.p37_2_1==0)&&(i0.u0.p25_0_1==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1144
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 12 rules in 8 ms. Remains 184 /190 variables (removed 6) and now considering 400/424 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:42:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:42:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 121 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:42:57] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:42:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 316 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 448 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:42:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:42:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:42:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 40/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 8/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 396/729 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 4/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 420/420 variables, and 734 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60083ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60085ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60542 ms. Remains : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:43:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:43:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9904524661562577147.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:43:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17891626089060817117.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9904524661562577147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17891626089060817117.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10038763331362793515.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10038763331362793515.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10038763331362793515.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10038763331362793515.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10038763331362793515.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 505 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 49 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 117 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10404912359567860464.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1729050111702310435.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10404912359567860464.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1729050111702310435.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,15.1357,359368,9394,2163,526053,29301,1024,1.05415e+06,193,237861,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AX((AG((i7.i0.u22.p17_1==0)) * (i12.i1.u53.p37_1_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i7.i0.u22.p17_1==0)))) * (i12.i1.u53.p37_1_2==1)))))))))] != FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1265
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 184 /190 variables (removed 6) and now considering 400/424 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 330 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 501 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:44:58] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:44:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:44:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 124 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 103 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 40/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 122 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 8/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 396/729 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 4/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 420/420 variables, and 734 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60575 ms. Remains : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14945770557912703301.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:45:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11669350555966918528.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14945770557912703301.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11669350555966918528.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10262231253915705422.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10262231253915705422.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10262231253915705422.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10262231253915705422.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10262231253915705422.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 519 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 136 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5771007373762545579.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7545985242563119457.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5771007373762545579.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7545985242563119457.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,14.823,261020,8501,945,371931,6014,1049,979547,181,80883,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EX((i11.i1.u28.p19_1_3==1)) + (i1.u21.p15_1==0)) + (AF((i10.i1.u31.p19_2_3==0)) + (EF((i4.i0.u44.p33_0_1==0)) * EF((i1.u13.p08_1_0==...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX((i11.i1.u28.p19_1_3==1)) + (i1.u21.p15_1==0)))) * !((E(TRUE U (i4.i0.u44.p33_0_1...232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1119
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 12 rules in 3 ms. Remains 184 /190 variables (removed 6) and now considering 400/424 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 311 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 445 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:46:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 105 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30104ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30105ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30556 ms. Remains : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6052797399951034630.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:47:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9366465281141658146.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6052797399951034630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9366465281141658146.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13632571041491414451.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13632571041491414451.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13632571041491414451.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13632571041491414451.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13632571041491414451.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 539 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 135 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5550587526303997317.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11793150828993937723.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5550587526303997317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11793150828993937723.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,13.9077,337204,8378,1288,516897,20858,1024,1.08743e+06,183,264971,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((AG(((i3.u13.p12_1_3==0)&&(i12.i1.u1.p25_3_4==1))) * AX(((i1.u24.p08_0_0==0)&&(i12.i2.u22.p37_3_1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.u13.p12_1_3==0)&&(i12.i1.u1.p25_3_4==1))))) * !(EX(!(((i1.u24.p08_0_0...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1148
(forward)formula 0,0,18.8963,337332,1,0,516897,60487,4549,1.35862e+06,731,362447,1925220
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 190 transition count 420
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 420
Performed 52 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 52 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 368
Deduced a syphon composed of 52 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 104 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 134 transition count 368
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 117 place count 129 transition count 348
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 129 transition count 348
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 117 transition count 336
Applied a total of 146 rules in 17 ms. Remains 117 /190 variables (removed 73) and now considering 336/424 (removed 88) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 172 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 231 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 352 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 332 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 172 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:48:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 79 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 6/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 172/289 variables, 117/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 79/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/289 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 289/289 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved in 23578 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 332/332 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 38/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 172/289 variables, 117/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 79/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 332/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 3/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/600 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/601 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 289/289 variables, and 601 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, ReadFeed: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 332/332 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 53637ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 332 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53638ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/190 places, 336/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54021 ms. Remains : 117/190 places, 336/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 336 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
RANDOM walk for 410 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (68 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10922294868119639679.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8596615462566460649.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10922294868119639679.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8596615462566460649.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 12 rules in 2 ms. Remains 184 /190 variables (removed 6) and now considering 400/424 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 324 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 473 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:49:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 109 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 420/420 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 40/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 8/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 396/729 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 4/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 420/420 variables, and 734 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 184/184 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 396/396 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60069ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60546 ms. Remains : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16748427824931802269.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16160315915887413896.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16748427824931802269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16160315915887413896.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph581031630478010434.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph581031630478010434.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph581031630478010434.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph581031630478010434.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph581031630478010434.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 520 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 140 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17132154880652052887.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:50:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17913860792652446074.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17132154880652052887.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17913860792652446074.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,9.81508,247020,8336,899,407684,7678,1047,765957,188,85448,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((i5.i0.u17.p37_1_1==0) * EX((i4.i0.u48.p33_0_0==1))) * (EF(((i8.i2.u54.p33_3_0==0)&&(i11.u46.critical_section_0==1))) + EG(EF(((i11....198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i5.i0.u17.p37_1_1==0) * EX((i4.i0.u48.p33_0_0==1)))),TRUE) * ((i8.i2.u54.p33_3_0==0...350
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1148
(forward)formula 0,1,23.512,441212,1,0,684728,37611,5216,1.50083e+06,785,226772,3319910
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 190 transition count 420
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 420
Performed 49 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 49 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 186 transition count 371
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 137 transition count 371
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 131 transition count 347
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 131 transition count 347
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 119 transition count 335
Applied a total of 142 rules in 25 ms. Remains 119 /190 variables (removed 71) and now considering 335/424 (removed 89) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 171 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 171 rows 119 cols
[2025-06-02 03:51:07] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:51:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 171 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:51:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:51:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 196 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 306 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 331 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:51:08] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 171 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:51:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:51:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 13/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 171/290 variables, 119/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 76/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 0/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 290/290 variables, and 252 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved in 24089 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 331/331 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 44/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 4/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 5/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 171/290 variables, 119/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 76/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 331/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 3/600 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/601 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 3/604 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 290/290 variables, and 604 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 4/4 constraints, State Equation: 119/119 constraints, ReadFeed: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 331/331 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 54150ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 331 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54150ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 119/190 places, 335/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54488 ms. Remains : 119/190 places, 335/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 335 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2074754210785758794.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12436075906791728316.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2074754210785758794.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12436075906791728316.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,158914,17.0381,483036,2,71352,5,1.13426e+06,6,0,814,1.20135e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14453873669731431399.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14453873669731431399.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14453873669731431399.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14453873669731431399.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14453873669731431399.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 519 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 96 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14848871486481772889.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1913754395014981655.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14848871486481772889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1913754395014981655.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,158914,9.20007,240816,9631,1300,360686,8099,832,665103,158,63680,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A(((i3.u3.flag_3_waiting==0)||(u9.p08_2_3==1)) U AG(((EG((i4.u13.p19_0_2==1)) + (i1.u19.critical_section_3==1)) + ((i2.u4.p25_2_0==0)|...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(E(TRUE U !(((EG((i4.u13.p19_0_2==1)) + (i1.u19.critical_section_3==1)) + ((i...539
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t25, t26, t31, t32, t33, t37, t38, t39, t41, t42, t43, t44, t...1133
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
(forward)formula 0,0,27.2126,645492,1,0,981734,28458,4604,1.7442e+06,667,183269,5508713
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 12 rules in 10 ms. Remains 184 /190 variables (removed 6) and now considering 400/424 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:52:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-02 03:52:59] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:52:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:52:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:52:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:53:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 329 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 478 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:00] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:53:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:53:00] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30099ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30101ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30592 ms. Remains : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10940880302993487586.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:53:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4017096015538866181.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10940880302993487586.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4017096015538866181.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13674498479545207373.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13674498479545207373.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13674498479545207373.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13674498479545207373.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13674498479545207373.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 528 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 141 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4251717865896990241.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12408623860860217217.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4251717865896990241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12408623860860217217.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,14.1987,323752,8654,1826,439467,18273,984,1.07964e+06,169,266548,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EF(EG((i4.u5.p08_0_2==1))) * (i4.u5.p08_0_2==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EG((i4.u5.p08_0_2==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !((i4.u5.p08_0_2==0)))] = FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1148
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 424/424 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 184 transition count 400
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 184 transition count 400
Applied a total of 12 rules in 7 ms. Remains 184 /190 variables (removed 6) and now considering 400/424 (removed 24) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:54:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:54:30] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:54:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:54:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 333 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 450 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 396 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:54:31] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 236 transitions (discarded 164 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:54:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:54:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 76 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 11/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/184 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 236/420 variables, 184/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 76/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/420 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30102ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 396 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30104ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30563 ms. Remains : 184/190 places, 400/424 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 400 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15071749990178020585.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4067641090542449785.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15071749990178020585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4067641090542449785.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2969231171276120812.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2969231171276120812.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2969231171276120812.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2969231171276120812.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2969231171276120812.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 532 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 148 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14552626984711980920.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3163967170850800614.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14552626984711980920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3163967170850800614.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19718e+06,13.8259,337692,7366,1437,520491,22414,1042,1.07271e+06,149,186902,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX((i6.i0.u2.p25_2_4==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX((i6.i0.u2.p25_2_4==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t40, t41, t42, t43, t44, t45, t46, t47, t48, t49, t50, t51, t...1117
(forward)formula 0,0,17.5548,338076,1,0,520491,43856,4337,1.07271e+06,593,288319,1404433
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-02 03:55:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1758626790741488635.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1758626790741488635.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1758626790741488635.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1758626790741488635.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1758626790741488635.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 559 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 147 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7449009014254450979.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:55:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6953249228764059834.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7449009014254450979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6953249228764059834.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.51e+06,11.3775,269172,9988,2487,383860,27768,1093,850771,219,223744,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(EX(((i7.u50.p37_2_1==0)&&(i1.u43.p25_0_1==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U EX(((i7.u50.p37_2_1==0)&&(i1.u43.p25_0_1==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t16, t17, t18, t40, t41, t44, t45, t50, t51, t52, t53, t54, t...1234
(forward)formula 0,1,54.6301,1216408,1,0,1.96871e+06,153761,4941,3.58795e+06,866,1.05689e+06,7017245
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AX(AX((AG((i12.i0.u25.p17_1==0)) * (i1.u52.p37_1_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i12.i0.u25.p17_1==0)))) * (i1.u52.p37_1_2==1)))))))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 1,0,79.0707,1815064,1,0,2.98513e+06,173629,4952,5.16682e+06,869,1.24527e+06,10098318
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(((EX((i12.i1.u38.p19_1_3==1)) + (i1.u43.p15_1==0)) + (AF((i14.u41.p19_2_3==0)) + (EF((i10.u51.p33_0_1==0)) * EF((i3.u10.p08_1_0==0))))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((EX((i12.i1.u38.p19_1_3==1)) + (i1.u43.p15_1==0)))) * !((E(TRUE U (i10.u51.p33_0_1==...227
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 2,1,79.9101,1834136,1,0,3.0144e+06,177243,5473,5.24703e+06,915,1.26125e+06,10207412
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AX((EF(EG((i0.u9.p08_0_2==1))) * (i0.u9.p08_0_2==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U EG((i0.u9.p08_0_2==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !((i0.u9.p08_0_2==0)))] = FALSE)
(forward)formula 3,1,122.034,2218076,1,0,3.71622e+06,191903,3084,6.23168e+06,570,1.38038e+06,1758558
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1496457 ms.

BK_STOP 1748836671614

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100761"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04.tgz
mv EisenbergMcGuire-PT-04 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;