Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r072-tall-174860068100753.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100753
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 620K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 105K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 121K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748834165729

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-02 03:16:06] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-02 03:16:06] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 74 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Transformed 117 places.
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Transformed 216 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 117 places and 216 transitions and 900 arcs in 164 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 12 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 69 out of 117 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 115 transition count 210
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 115 transition count 210
Applied a total of 4 rules in 21 ms. Remains 115 /117 variables (removed 2) and now considering 210/216 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 147 rows 115 cols
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 230 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 52 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 167 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 429 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 207 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:16:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 52 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 346 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 15/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 7/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 147/262 variables, 115/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 52/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved in 14943 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 115/115 constraints, ReadFeed: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 25/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 147/262 variables, 115/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 52/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 207/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 3/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 416 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved in 20302 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 115/115 constraints, ReadFeed: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 35326ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35344ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/117 places, 210/216 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35817 ms. Remains : 115/117 places, 210/216 transitions.
Support contains 69 out of 115 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-02 03:16:43] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 2 formulas.
[2025-06-02 03:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:43] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 03:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
Support contains 56 out of 115 places (down from 69) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1869 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 9/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 323 ms. (123 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 175 ms. (227 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 88 ms. (449 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 147 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 52 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 94/110 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 5/115 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 147/262 variables, 115/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 52/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 230 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 115/115 constraints, ReadFeed: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp14 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp16 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp28 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 94/110 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 5/115 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 10/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 147/262 variables, 115/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 52/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 6/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved in 1355 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 115/115 constraints, ReadFeed: 52/52 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 6/9 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1591ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 6 unsolved
Fused 6 Parikh solutions to 5 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 4 properties in 459 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 115 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 207
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 84 transition count 179
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 80 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 80 transition count 167
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 74 transition count 161
Applied a total of 82 rules in 39 ms. Remains 74 /115 variables (removed 41) and now considering 161/210 (removed 49) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 39 ms. Remains : 74/115 places, 161/210 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 208 ms. (191 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 67 ms. (588 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Finished probabilistic random walk after 954 steps, run visited all 2 properties in 13 ms. (steps per millisecond=73 )
Probabilistic random walk after 954 steps, saw 486 distinct states, run finished after 16 ms. (steps per millisecond=59 ) properties seen :2
Successfully simplified 3 atomic propositions for a total of 11 simplifications.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 111 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 111 transition count 198
Applied a total of 8 rules in 5 ms. Remains 111 /115 variables (removed 4) and now considering 198/210 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 240 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:16:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 135/246 variables, 111/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 44/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:16:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 13491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 28/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 135/246 variables, 111/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 44/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 195/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 393 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 13373 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 26891ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26895ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/115 places, 198/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27144 ms. Remains : 111/115 places, 198/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11736095771012014892.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8173448316921353632.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11736095771012014892.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8173448316921353632.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,24617,1.32055,49012,2,11856,5,129101,6,0,645,141739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX((A(((((p33_2_1==0)||(p37_0_2==1))&&((p17_2==0)||(p18_0_1==1))) + EG((p08_0_1==1))) U !(((p18_0_2==1)&&((flag_2_waiting==0)||(p37_1_...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!((!((E(!(!(((p18_0_2==1)&&((flag_2_waiting==0)||(p37_1_1==1))))) U (!(((((p33_2_1==0)||(p37_0...407
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t42, t43,...683
(forward)formula 0,1,5.69934,175200,1,0,524,749755,429,232,4160,455367,462
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 207
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 84 transition count 179
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 80 transition count 167
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 80 transition count 167
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 75 transition count 162
Applied a total of 80 rules in 17 ms. Remains 75 /115 variables (removed 40) and now considering 162/210 (removed 48) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 209 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 99 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:17:19] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 13/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 99/174 variables, 75/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 44/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 174/174 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 9176 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 99/174 variables, 75/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 44/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 159/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/174 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/174 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 174/174 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 13069 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 22264ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 22265ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/115 places, 162/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 22503 ms. Remains : 75/115 places, 162/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 162 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13696926756156766367.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11887282657256883477.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13696926756156766367.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11887282657256883477.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6740,0.707215,34848,2,7570,5,82574,6,0,465,84014,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p18_1_2==0)&&(p08_1_1==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p18_1_2==0)&&(p08_1_1==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t16, t17, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33,...640
(forward)formula 0,1,5.71093,178344,1,0,465,958367,345,193,3205,477878,407
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 207
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 83 transition count 178
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 79 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 79 transition count 166
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 74 transition count 161
Applied a total of 82 rules in 17 ms. Remains 74 /115 variables (removed 41) and now considering 161/210 (removed 49) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 158 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 98 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:17:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 16/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 98/172 variables, 74/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 44/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/172 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 172/172 variables, and 148 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 6260 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/172 variables, 74/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 44/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 158/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/172 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 172/172 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved in 11882 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 18160ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 158 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18162ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/115 places, 161/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 18363 ms. Remains : 74/115 places, 161/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 161 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 2706 steps (0 resets) in 19 ms. (135 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7221413078139404810.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9343212757920517927.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7221413078139404810.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9343212757920517927.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 115 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 113 transition count 208
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 113 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 87 transition count 182
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 83 transition count 170
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 83 transition count 170
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 77 transition count 164
Applied a total of 76 rules in 15 ms. Remains 77 /115 variables (removed 38) and now considering 164/210 (removed 46) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 161 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 101 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 13/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 4/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 101/178 variables, 77/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 44/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 178/178 variables, and 150 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 6406 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 19/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 6/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 101/178 variables, 77/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 44/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 161/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 178/178 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved in 14182 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 161/161 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 20611ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 161 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 20613ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/115 places, 164/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 20807 ms. Remains : 77/115 places, 164/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 164 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13490619588585672686.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12865327359689610143.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13490619588585672686.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12865327359689610143.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6528,0.69079,30916,2,6977,5,74864,6,0,475,73559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p18_0_2==0) * AF(((EG((p33_1_0==0)) * EF((p18_2_3==1))) * EF((p34_2_1==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p18_0_2==0) * !(EG(!(((EG((p33_1_0==0)) * E(TRUE U (p18_2_3==1))) * E(TRUE U (p34_2_1==1))))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37,...649
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,10.182,284504,1,0,673,1.48637e+06,368,341,3419,880267,635
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 112 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 201
Applied a total of 6 rules in 7 ms. Remains 112 /115 variables (removed 3) and now considering 201/210 (removed 9) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 222 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:18:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 138/250 variables, 112/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 46/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 13368 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 25/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/250 variables, 112/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 46/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 198/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 4/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 2/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43410ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43411ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/115 places, 201/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43642 ms. Remains : 112/115 places, 201/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16503114306847724730.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8145502600839286158.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16503114306847724730.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8145502600839286158.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25695,1.52632,53088,2,12392,5,138717,6,0,652,150597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(((EF(((critical_section_1==0)&&(flag_2_active==1))) + (p08_0_1==1)) + ((EX(EF(((p33_0_2==0)||(p37_2_2==1)))) * (p10_2_1==1)) * ((p1...179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(EY(Init)) * !(((EX(E(TRUE U ((p33_0_2==0)||(p37_2_2==1)))) * (p10_2_1==1)) * ((p17_0==0)||(p27_0==1))))) ...244
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t42, t43, t44, t45,...691
(forward)formula 0,1,8.22576,228888,1,0,529,1.11126e+06,423,231,4172,582569,480
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 115 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 207
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 178
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 83 transition count 178
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 79 transition count 166
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 79 transition count 166
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 73 transition count 160
Applied a total of 84 rules in 34 ms. Remains 73 /115 variables (removed 42) and now considering 160/210 (removed 50) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 176 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 97 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 44/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 5523 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 22/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 44/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 157/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 12000 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 17538ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 17538ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/115 places, 160/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 17760 ms. Remains : 73/115 places, 160/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10405760619148467333.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9969466802289952932.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10405760619148467333.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9969466802289952932.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5613,0.734683,33120,2,7184,5,76817,6,0,455,76547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(AF((p33_1_0==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p33_1_0==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28,...638
(forward)formula 0,0,6.16599,167688,1,0,485,872666,352,207,3258,456733,442
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 111 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 111 transition count 198
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 111 /115 variables (removed 4) and now considering 198/210 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 135 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 246 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:19:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 135/246 variables, 111/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 44/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 13317 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 28/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 135/246 variables, 111/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 44/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 195/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 393 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 13298 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 26633ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26634ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/115 places, 198/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26883 ms. Remains : 111/115 places, 198/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7427195046873125833.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17215163132466840222.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7427195046873125833.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17215163132466840222.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,24617,1.4363,49100,2,11856,5,129101,6,0,645,141739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(((p09_2_1==0)||(p12_2_0==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((p09_2_1==0)||(p12_2_0==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t42, t43,...683
(forward)formula 0,1,6.16449,169316,1,0,484,695897,417,202,4137,407284,410
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 111 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 111 transition count 198
Applied a total of 8 rules in 3 ms. Remains 111 /115 variables (removed 4) and now considering 198/210 (removed 12) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 135 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:20:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 44 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 135/246 variables, 111/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 44/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 13193 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 28/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 135/246 variables, 111/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 44/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 195/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 5/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 393 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 13307 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 111/111 constraints, ReadFeed: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 26518ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26519ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/115 places, 198/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26725 ms. Remains : 111/115 places, 198/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5734862498059442503.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13687457957090904641.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5734862498059442503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13687457957090904641.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,24617,1.3776,49136,2,11856,5,129101,6,0,645,141739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG(EF((p18_1_1==0))) * AF((AX(((p34_2_1==0)||(p39_0==1))) + (p32_2==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U (p18_1_1==0))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(EX(!(((p34_2_1=...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t34, t35, t42, t43,...683
(forward)formula 0,0,5.72487,156372,1,0,486,604238,420,208,4149,380148,410
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 115/115 places, 210/210 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 112 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 112 transition count 201
Applied a total of 6 rules in 3 ms. Remains 112 /115 variables (removed 3) and now considering 201/210 (removed 9) transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 138 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 218 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 198 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 138 transitions (discarded 63 similar events)
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 46 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 20/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 138/250 variables, 112/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 46/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 13220 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 25/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/112 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 138/250 variables, 112/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 46/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 198/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 4/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 2/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/7 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 3/3 constraints, State Equation: 112/112 constraints, ReadFeed: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43264ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 198 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43265ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/115 places, 201/210 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43486 ms. Remains : 112/115 places, 201/210 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-02 03:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11892003106745381467.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13090123188108363445.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11892003106745381467.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13090123188108363445.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,25695,1.47964,52884,2,12392,5,138717,6,0,652,150597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(!(A((p19_1_0==1) U ((p33_2_1==0)||(p33_1_0==1))))) * EF(((((p15_1==0)||(p09_1_2==1)) * EG(((p25_0_3==0)||(p25_0_2==1)))) + ((((fla...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(!((E(!(((p33_2_1==0)||(p33_1_0==1))) U (!((p19_1_0==1)) * !(((p33_2_1==0)||(p3...558
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31, t32, t33, t42, t43, t44, t45,...691
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,14.967,415640,1,0,503,2.66732e+06,450,214,4349,984770,433
FORMULA EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-02 03:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-02 03:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Total runtime 350868 ms.

BK_STOP 1748834517805

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r072-tall-174860068100753"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03.tgz
mv EisenbergMcGuire-PT-03 execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;