About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DoubleExponent-PT-010
| Execution Summary | |||||
| Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
| 0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 ? 1 1 ? ? 1 1 ? ? 1 ? ? ? 1 ? | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r072-tall-174860067600493.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DoubleExponent-PT-010, examination is UpperBounds
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r072-tall-174860067600493
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 592K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.1K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 169K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of positive values
NUM_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-00
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-01
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-02
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-03
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-04
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-05
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-06
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-07
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-08
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-09
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-10
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-11
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-12
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-13
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-14
FORMULA_NAME DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-15
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748737805589
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=UpperBounds
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DoubleExponent-PT-010
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
UpperBounds PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-01 00:30:06] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, UpperBounds, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-01 00:30:06] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-01 00:30:06] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:06] [INFO ] Transformed 534 places.
[2025-06-01 00:30:06] [INFO ] Transformed 498 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:30:06] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 534 places and 498 transitions and 1404 arcs in 179 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/UpperBounds.xml in 7 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[+inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[+inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf, +inf]
// Phase 1: matrix 498 rows 534 cols
[2025-06-01 00:30:07] [INFO ] Computed 54 invariants in 91 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (329 resets) in 25 ms. (384 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 160001 steps (4516 resets) in 239 ms. (666 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
[2025-06-01 00:30:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 195 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 153 places in 262 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:08] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 157 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 153 places in 226 ms of which 82 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 155 places in 220 ms of which 90 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 169 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:09] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 764 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 30 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 215 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:10] [INFO ] Added : 127 causal constraints over 26 iterations in 1578 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 548 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 241 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 240 ms of which 92 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 243 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 161 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 133 places in 224 ms of which 91 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 196 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 198 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 198 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 191 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 195 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:14] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 10/9 trap constraints in 1922 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 21 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] Added : 305 causal constraints over 61 iterations in 2753 ms. Result :unknown
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned unsat
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned unsat
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 350 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 24 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 317 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 143 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 136 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 503 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 25 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:22] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 4
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:301)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.refineWithCausalOrder(DeadlockTester.java:1140)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:878)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2254)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:927)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:193)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:44)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:149)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:115)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:467)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:298)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:670)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:607)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1492)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1465)
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 211 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 193 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 184 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 26 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] Added : 420 causal constraints over 84 iterations in 4535 ms. Result :unknown
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 151 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 24 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 150 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 23 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:30] [INFO ] Added : 70 causal constraints over 14 iterations in 1275 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 662 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 21 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 256 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 297 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 188 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 24 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 401 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] Added : 288 causal constraints over 58 iterations in 4296 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 129 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 24 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 272 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:36] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 328 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:37] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 209 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 22 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:41] [INFO ] Added : 275 causal constraints over 55 iterations in 4385 ms. Result :unknown
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 341 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 27 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 368 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 26 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 167 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:47] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 9
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:301)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.refineWithCausalOrder(DeadlockTester.java:1131)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:878)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2254)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:927)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:193)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:44)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:149)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:115)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:467)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:298)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:670)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:607)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1492)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1465)
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 168 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 153 places in 148 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:48] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 18 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:48] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 165 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 153 places in 146 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 213 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:48] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 24 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:50] [INFO ] Added : 171 causal constraints over 35 iterations in 2055 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 663 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 256 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 169 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:51] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 246 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 162 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 113 places in 202 ms of which 72 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 115 places in 203 ms of which 75 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 106 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 116 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 107 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:54] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 15/14 trap constraints in 2077 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 26 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:30:55] [INFO ] Added : 20 causal constraints over 4 iterations in 1062 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 704 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 32 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 350 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 239 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:56] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:30:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 346 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 145 places in 137 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:30:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 212 ms
[2025-06-01 00:30:57] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 25 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:01] [INFO ] Added : 325 causal constraints over 65 iterations in 4361 ms. Result :unknown
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 443 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 31 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:02] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 17 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:03] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 423 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 101 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 103 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 110 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 108 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 116 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 128 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 116 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 103 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 107 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:05] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 15/14 trap constraints in 1988 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:05] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 22 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:07] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 13
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:301)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.refineWithCausalOrder(DeadlockTester.java:1140)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:878)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2254)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:927)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:193)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:44)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:149)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:115)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:467)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:298)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:670)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:607)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1492)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1465)
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 158 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 160 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 160 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 190 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:08] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 22 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:09] [INFO ] Added : 149 causal constraints over 31 iterations in 1273 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 712 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:10] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 628 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 163 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 51 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 630 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:12] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 497/963/497 causal constraints (skipped 0 transitions) in 25 ms.
Maximisation of solution failed !
Minimization took 0 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-03 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT RANDOM_WALK
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-02 1 TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL SAT_SMT RANDOM_WALK
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
Support contains 14 out of 534 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 534/534 places, 498/498 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 906 edges and 534 vertex of which 528 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 112 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 112 transitions
Performed 112 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 112
Iterating post reduction 0 with 115 rules applied. Total rules applied 116 place count 527 transition count 384
Reduce places removed 112 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 4 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 1 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 415 transition count 380
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 411 transition count 380
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 411 transition count 359
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 7 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 278 place count 390 transition count 359
Performed 85 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 85 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 85 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 170 rules applied. Total rules applied 448 place count 305 transition count 274
Performed 17 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 482 place count 288 transition count 274
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 288 transition count 273
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 484 place count 287 transition count 273
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 33 times.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 517 place count 287 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 550 place count 254 transition count 240
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 39 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 39 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 589 place count 254 transition count 240
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 590 place count 253 transition count 239
Applied a total of 590 rules in 169 ms. Remains 253 /534 variables (removed 281) and now considering 239/498 (removed 259) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 177 ms. Remains : 253/534 places, 239/498 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Found an invariant !
This invariant on transitions {36=1, 55=1, 57=1, 86=1, 89=1, 123=1, 171=1, 215=1, 230=1}
Produces a positive solution :{}
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization OK=successtook 0 ms.
This minimized invariant on transitions {36=1, 55=1, 57=1, 86=1, 89=1, 123=1, 171=1, 215=1, 230=1}
Produces a positive solution
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1273 resets, run finished after 31 ms. (steps per millisecond=322 ) properties (out of 14) seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Current structural bounds on expressions (after cover walk) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
// Phase 1: matrix 239 rows 253 cols
[2025-06-01 00:31:31] [INFO ] Computed 50 invariants in 15 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (128217 resets) in 981 ms. (1018 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 14000004 steps (1186796 resets) in 9272 ms. (1509 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 88 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 67 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 14 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 82 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 90 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 14 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 174 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] Added : 105 causal constraints over 21 iterations in 1518 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 299 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 107 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 149 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 109 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:45] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 137 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:45] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 14 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:48] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 325 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:48] [INFO ] Added : 218 causal constraints over 45 iterations in 3386 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 506 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 102 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 62 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 94 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 114 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:49] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 14 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 337 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] Added : 169 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 2453 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 633 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 92 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 81 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:52] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 91 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 274 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:53] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 102 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 12 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:31:56] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 260 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:56] [INFO ] Added : 210 causal constraints over 42 iterations in 2533 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 1083 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 20 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 75 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 40 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 15 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 73 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 63 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:57] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:58] [INFO ] Added : 120 causal constraints over 25 iterations in 1313 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 371 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 74 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 62 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 77 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 89 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:31:59] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:00] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 158 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] Added : 109 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 1184 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 332 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 19 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 108 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:01] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 105 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 298 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:02] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 185 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 14 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 106 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 112 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 113 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 122 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 142 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 116 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 108 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 110 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 111 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 107 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 114 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 112 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 113 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 99 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 115 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 108 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 107 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 113 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 98 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 106 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 104 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 102 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 109 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 109 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 127 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 129 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 106 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 126 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 119 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 108 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 109 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 115 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 112 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 43/42 trap constraints in 7679 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:12] [INFO ] Added : 210 causal constraints over 43 iterations in 10463 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 908 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:13] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 90 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:13] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 118 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:13] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 88 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:14] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 133 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:14] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 289 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] Added : 93 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 991 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 268 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 49 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 88 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 80 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 8 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:16] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 123 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:16] [INFO ] Added : 91 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 917 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 241 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 130 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 84 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 130 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 127 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 130 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:18] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 281 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 11 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:21] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 274 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:21] [INFO ] Added : 213 causal constraints over 43 iterations in 3228 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 773 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 77 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 105 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 116 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:25] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 448 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:25] [INFO ] Added : 183 causal constraints over 38 iterations in 2964 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 485 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 164 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 143 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:26] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 164 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 195 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:27] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 12 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:30] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 439 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:30] [INFO ] Added : 217 causal constraints over 45 iterations in 3521 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 925 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 71 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 46 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 75 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 12 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:32] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 131 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:32] [INFO ] Added : 54 causal constraints over 11 iterations in 530 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 233 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 112 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:32] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 126 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:33] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 48 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 92 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:33] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 165 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:32:33] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 221/1171/221 causal constraints (skipped 17 transitions) in 11 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:32:36] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 222 ms
[2025-06-01 00:32:36] [INFO ] Added : 209 causal constraints over 42 iterations in 3185 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 725 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
Support contains 14 out of 253 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 253/253 places, 239/239 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 253 /253 variables (removed 0) and now considering 239/239 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 13 ms. Remains : 253/253 places, 239/239 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 253/253 places, 239/239 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 253 /253 variables (removed 0) and now considering 239/239 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:33:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 627 ms returned [24, 30, 80, 87, 107, 114, 135, 140, 141, 169, 191, 199, 206, 214, 220, 243]
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [87, 206, 80, 140, 24, 30]
Discarding 6 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 632 ms to find 6 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 247/253 places, 239/239 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 247 transition count 237
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 245 transition count 237
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 245 transition count 237
Applied a total of 5 rules in 23 ms. Remains 245 /247 variables (removed 2) and now considering 237/239 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 237 rows 245 cols
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 22 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 500 ms returned [102, 109, 130, 135, 163, 185, 193, 207, 212, 235]
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [109, 102, 235]
Discarding 3 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 502 ms to find 3 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 242/253 places, 237/239 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 242 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 241 transition count 236
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 241 transition count 236
Applied a total of 3 rules in 22 ms. Remains 241 /242 variables (removed 1) and now considering 236/237 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 236 rows 241 cols
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 370 ms returned [127, 132, 160, 182, 190, 204, 209]
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [132, 127]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 373 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 239/253 places, 236/239 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 239 transition count 235
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 238 transition count 235
Applied a total of 2 rules in 29 ms. Remains 238 /239 variables (removed 1) and now considering 235/236 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 235 rows 238 cols
[2025-06-01 00:33:27] [INFO ] Computed 39 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 408 ms returned [157, 179, 187, 201, 206]
[2025-06-01 00:33:28] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [157]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 409 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 237/253 places, 235/239 transitions.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 237 transition count 235
Applied a total of 1 rules in 13 ms. Remains 237 /237 variables (removed 0) and now considering 235/235 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 235 rows 237 cols
[2025-06-01 00:33:28] [INFO ] Computed 38 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 329 ms returned [178, 186, 200, 205]
[2025-06-01 00:33:28] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [178, 186]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 331 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 235/253 places, 235/239 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 235 transition count 234
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 234 transition count 234
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 234 /235 variables (removed 1) and now considering 234/235 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 234 rows 234 cols
[2025-06-01 00:33:28] [INFO ] Computed 36 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 334 ms returned [197, 202]
[2025-06-01 00:33:29] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [197]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 335 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 6 : 233/253 places, 234/239 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 232 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 232 transition count 233
Applied a total of 2 rules in 13 ms. Remains 232 /233 variables (removed 1) and now considering 233/234 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 00:33:29] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 327 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:33:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:33:29] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:33:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1563 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1905 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 7 : 232/253 places, 233/239 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 7 iterations and 4612 ms. Remains : 232/253 places, 233/239 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Found an invariant !
This invariant on transitions {33=1, 52=1, 76=1, 105=1, 153=1, 196=1, 211=1, 222=1}
Produces a positive solution :{}
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization OK=successtook 0 ms.
This minimized invariant on transitions {33=1, 52=1, 76=1, 105=1, 153=1, 196=1, 211=1, 222=1}
Produces a positive solution
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1469 resets, run finished after 49 ms. (steps per millisecond=204 ) properties (out of 14) seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Current structural bounds on expressions (after cover walk) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, +inf]
[2025-06-01 00:34:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 5]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144421 resets) in 890 ms. (1122 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 14000003 steps (1279979 resets) in 8350 ms. (1676 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 5]
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 85 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 62 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 82 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 69 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 101 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] Added : 40 causal constraints over 8 iterations in 494 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 285 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 109 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 105 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 101 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 94 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:09] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 12 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:10] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 118 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:10] [INFO ] Added : 135 causal constraints over 27 iterations in 1633 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 425 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 74 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 115 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 71 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 159 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:11] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 8 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 104 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 99 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:14] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 8/7 trap constraints in 995 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:14] [INFO ] Added : 152 causal constraints over 32 iterations in 2979 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 420 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 168 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 66 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 174 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 205 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:15] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 11 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:17] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 136 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] Added : 152 causal constraints over 32 iterations in 2199 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 461 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 70 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 31 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 71 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:18] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 66 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:19] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 14 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:19] [INFO ] Added : 91 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 830 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 300 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 80 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 62 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 145 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:20] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 11 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 110 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] Added : 76 causal constraints over 17 iterations in 702 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 341 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 96 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 84 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 474 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 11 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 11/10 trap constraints in 1465 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:28] [INFO ] Added : 206 causal constraints over 42 iterations in 6395 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 2081 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 85 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 103 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 145 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:31] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 8 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:34] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 123 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:34] [INFO ] Added : 176 causal constraints over 37 iterations in 2715 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 463 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:34] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 90 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:34] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 37 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 96 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 77 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:35] [INFO ] Added : 60 causal constraints over 12 iterations in 376 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 358 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 230 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 86 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 228 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 121 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:36] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 100 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 609 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:41] [INFO ] Added : 211 causal constraints over 43 iterations in 4590 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 985 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 82 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 53 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 188 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:42] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:45] [INFO ] Added : 182 causal constraints over 38 iterations in 2925 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 1120 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 141 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 106 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 141 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 137 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 11 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:50] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 487 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:50] [INFO ] Added : 169 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 2830 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 615 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 59 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 81 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:35:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 118 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] Added : 35 causal constraints over 7 iterations in 344 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 289 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 168 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 137 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 102 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 194 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:35:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 12 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 98 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 95 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 97 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 98 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 95 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 98 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 111 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 115 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 102 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 90 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 94 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 99 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 94 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 96 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 100 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 106 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 100 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 97 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 98 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 109 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 99 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:36:02] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 42/41 trap constraints in 5437 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 91 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 104 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 105 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 94 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 104 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 101 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 95 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 96 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 100 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 92 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 95 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 102 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 95 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 96 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 94 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:36:06] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 35/34 trap constraints in 4489 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:06] [INFO ] Added : 213 causal constraints over 44 iterations in 13661 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 1143 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 5]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 5]
Support contains 14 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 233/233 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 233/233 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 232/232 places, 233/233 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 233/233 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 232 /232 variables (removed 0) and now considering 233/233 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:36:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 327 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:36:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:36:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1608 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1936 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 12 ms returned []
Running 232 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:36:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:36:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 23/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/232 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 20/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 97 places in 85 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 10/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 233/465 variables, 232/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 31/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/465 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 465/465 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 23/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/232 variables, 10/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 33/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 95 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 3/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 233/465 variables, 232/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 31/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 232/566 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 93 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 94 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/465 variables, 20/586 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 465/465 variables, and 586 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 232/232 constraints, ReadFeed: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 232/232 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60113ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 232 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60120ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62086 ms. Remains : 232/232 places, 233/233 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Found an invariant !
This invariant on transitions {33=1, 52=1, 76=1, 105=1, 153=1, 196=1, 211=1, 222=1}
Produces a positive solution :{}
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization OK=successtook 1 ms.
This minimized invariant on transitions {33=1, 52=1, 76=1, 105=1, 153=1, 196=1, 211=1, 222=1}
Produces a positive solution
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1425 resets, run finished after 17 ms. (steps per millisecond=588 ) properties (out of 14) seen :[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
Current structural bounds on expressions (after cover walk) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 5]
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5751 resets) in 1118 ms. (35 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (361 resets) in 88 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (382 resets) in 61 ms. (64 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (382 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (367 resets) in 44 ms. (88 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (364 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (368 resets) in 33 ms. (117 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
[2025-06-01 00:39:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 123 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (369 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (362 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
[2025-06-01 00:39:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (366 resets) in 53 ms. (74 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
[2025-06-01 00:39:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15163887327444159123.gal : 23 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (348 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
[2025-06-01 00:39:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12314411366849176653.prop : 1 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (371 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15163887327444159123.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12314411366849176653.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (363 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (361 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (360 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (377 resets) in 36 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12314411366849176653.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (356 resets) in 64 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (378 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :8 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :27 after 47
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :47 after 140
SDD proceeding with computation,27 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :140 after 509
Invariant property MIN12 does not hold.
Reachability property MAX12 is true.
Invariant property MIN4 does not hold.
Reachability property MAX4 is true.
Invariant property MIN0 does not hold.
Reachability property MAX0 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,21 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :509 after 1443
SDD proceeding with computation,21 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1443 after 8719
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (354 resets) in 67 ms. (58 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,21 properties remain. new max is 2048
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (384 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
SDD size :8719 after 45016
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (378 resets) in 30 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (361 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (360 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (358 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
Invariant property MIN8 does not hold.
Reachability property MAX8 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,19 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :45016 after 134223
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (381 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (370 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (362 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (377 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 27/27 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,19 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :134223 after 227362
SDD proceeding with computation,19 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :227362 after 427558
SDD proceeding with computation,19 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :427558 after 2.48667e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,19 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :2.48667e+06 after 1.21608e+08
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 264695 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=88 ) properties seen :8 out of 27
Probabilistic random walk after 264695 steps, saw 132353 distinct states, run finished after 3004 ms. (steps per millisecond=88 ) properties seen :8
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 157/167 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Problem MAX13 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 60/227 variables, 23/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 18 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,19 properties remain. new max is 65536
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD size :1.21608e+08 after 6.61221e+08
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 105 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 107 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 151 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 165 ms of which 96 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 117 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 127 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 107 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 108 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 118 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 12/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 107 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 153 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 125 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 141 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 129 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 8/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 121 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5034ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 18 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 10 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 233/233 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 230 transition count 231
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 229 transition count 231
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 229 transition count 230
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 228 transition count 230
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 228 transition count 227
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 225 transition count 227
Applied a total of 14 rules in 42 ms. Remains 225 /232 variables (removed 7) and now considering 227/233 (removed 6) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 225/232 places, 227/233 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5823 resets) in 808 ms. (49 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (353 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (375 resets) in 22 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (378 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (369 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (361 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (358 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (379 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (370 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (385 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (364 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (369 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (373 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (368 resets) in 27 ms. (142 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (374 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (367 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (348 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (335 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (382 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 18/18 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,19 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :6.61221e+08 after 2.44273e+09
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 244636 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties seen :0 out of 18
Probabilistic random walk after 244636 steps, saw 122327 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=81 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 227 rows 225 cols
[2025-06-01 00:39:21] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 11 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/139 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 81/220 variables, 26/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 124 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 106 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 227/447 variables, 220/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 33/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 5/452 variables, 5/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/452 variables, 0/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 452/452 variables, and 313 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved in 3161 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 225/225 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/139 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 81/220 variables, 26/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 110 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 134 ms of which 65 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 91 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 93 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 93 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 111 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 115 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 95 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 146 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 103 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 122 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 105 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 97 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 86 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 20/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 93 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 99 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 101 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 88 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 91 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 86 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 102 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 89 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 93 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 94 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 89 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 92 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 95 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 101 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 96 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 96 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 15/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 58 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 103 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 19/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 101 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 91 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 91 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 105 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 99 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 93 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 109 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 103 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 97 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 93 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 96 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 94 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 95 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 101 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 20/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 102 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 96 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 4/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 107 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 99 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 88 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 103 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 5/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 98 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 102 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 92 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 9/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 107 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 106 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 227/447 variables, 220/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 18 unsolved
Invariant property MIN5 does not hold.
Reachability property MAX5 is true.
SDD proceeding with computation,17 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :2.44273e+09 after 7.62505e+09
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 33/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 16/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 102 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 94 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 89 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 4/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 4/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 2/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 121 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 110 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 110 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 4/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 108 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 2/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 129 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 101 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 2/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 102 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 4/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 113 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 101 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 116 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 3/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,17 properties remain. new max is 262144
[2025-06-01 00:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SDD size :7.62505e+09 after 1.31505e+10
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 4/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 0/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 5/452 variables, 5/503 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 2/505 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 2/507 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 2/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 93 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 0/452 variables, 2/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (OVERLAPS) 0/452 variables, 0/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-01 00:39:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:39:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 452/452 variables, and 511 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved in 35119 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 225/225 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/18 constraints, Known Traps: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 38298ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 16 unsolved
Fused 16 Parikh solutions to 9 different solutions.
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3260685460871875206.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3260685460871875206.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3260685460871875206.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3260685460871875206.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3260685460871875206.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:40:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:40:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:40:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 105 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:40:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 102 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:40:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality87993358195447147.gal : 16 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15014191451439860474.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality87993358195447147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15014191451439860474.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...306
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15014191451439860474.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,16 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,16 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :8 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,16 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :40 after 59
SDD proceeding with computation,16 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :59 after 529
SDD proceeding with computation,16 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :529 after 1448
SDD proceeding with computation,16 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1448 after 752101
SDD proceeding with computation,16 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :752101 after 1.14401e+07
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 32058 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 225 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 225/225 places, 227/227 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 225 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 222 transition count 224
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 222 /225 variables (removed 3) and now considering 224/227 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 12 ms. Remains : 222/225 places, 224/227 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5759 resets) in 221 ms. (180 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (350 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (351 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (372 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (358 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (365 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (364 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (352 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (358 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (350 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (359 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (378 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (366 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (369 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4000 steps (363 resets) in 22 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (366 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4001 steps (364 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 16/16 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 258666 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=86 ) properties seen :0 out of 16
Probabilistic random walk after 258666 steps, saw 129342 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=86 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 224 rows 222 cols
[2025-06-01 00:40:35] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 9 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 125/134 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 81/215 variables, 26/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 138 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 102 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/217 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 224/441 variables, 217/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 33/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/446 variables, 5/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 446/446 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 3502 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 222/222 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 125/134 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 81/215 variables, 26/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 95 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 114 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 101 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 130 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 140 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 152 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 134 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 137 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 155 ms of which 71 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 189 ms of which 109 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 133 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 119 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 168 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 211 ms of which 124 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 170 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 131 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 135 ms of which 52 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 149 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 154 ms of which 69 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 141 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 164 ms of which 78 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 161 ms of which 77 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 149 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 119 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 163 ms of which 76 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 144 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 143 ms of which 64 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 137 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 171 ms of which 84 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 227 ms of which 142 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 135 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 162 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 131 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 174 ms of which 88 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 134 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 117 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 131 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 118 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 117 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 158 ms of which 73 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 135 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 106 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 133 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 149 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 151 ms of which 66 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 139 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 123 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 115 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 120 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 124 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 121 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 120 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 109 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 110 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 105 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 121 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 109 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 133 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 18/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 114 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 121 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 2/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/217 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 224/441 variables, 217/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 33/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 16/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 127 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 103 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 103 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 7/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/441 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 5/446 variables, 5/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 108 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 119 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 114 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 118 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 2/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 116 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 3/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 112 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 121 ms of which 44 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 116 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 99 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/446 variables, 0/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 0/446 variables, 0/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 446/446 variables, and 430 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved in 26659 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 222/222 constraints, ReadFeed: 33/33 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 30187ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 16 unsolved
Fused 16 Parikh solutions to 9 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 16178 ms.
Support contains 9 out of 222 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 222/222 places, 224/224 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 222 /222 variables (removed 0) and now considering 224/224 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 222/222 places, 224/224 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 222/222 places, 224/224 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 222 /222 variables (removed 0) and now considering 224/224 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:41:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 418 ms returned [42, 47, 219]
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [219]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 420 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 221/222 places, 224/224 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 221 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 220 transition count 223
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 220 /221 variables (removed 1) and now considering 223/224 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 223 rows 220 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 384 ms returned [42, 47]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 385 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 218/222 places, 223/224 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 218 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 217 transition count 222
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 217 /218 variables (removed 1) and now considering 222/223 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 222 rows 217 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 328 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 33 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1425 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1754 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 217/222 places, 222/224 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 2589 ms. Remains : 217/222 places, 222/224 transitions.
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-14 1 TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_MAX
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-10 1 TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_MAX
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-07 1 TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_MAX
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-06 1 TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_MAX
FORMULA DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-00 1 TECHNIQUES REACHABILITY_MAX
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 5 queries.) : Max Seen:[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] Max Struct:[1, 1, 1, +inf, 1, 1, 1, 1, 5]
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-01
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 15 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1462 resets) in 11 ms. (833 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (897 resets) in 8 ms. (1111 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 105 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 108 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 103 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 94 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:24] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:41:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 118 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:26] [INFO ] Added : 135 causal constraints over 27 iterations in 1617 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 415 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p399) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 232/232 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 3 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 228 transition count 227
Reduce places removed 1 places and 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 227 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 4 places and 12 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 802 edges and 223 vertex of which 221 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 221 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 7 places and 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 765 edges and 214 vertex of which 209 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 209 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 208 transition count 201
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 31 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 41 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 173 transition count 164
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 169 transition count 164
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 168 transition count 164
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 168 transition count 163
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 167 transition count 163
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 8 times.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 167 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 159 transition count 156
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 159 transition count 156
Applied a total of 87 rules in 22 ms. Remains 159 /232 variables (removed 73) and now considering 156/232 (removed 76) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23 ms. Remains : 159/232 places, 156/232 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:27] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 8 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144067 resets) in 635 ms. (1572 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91345 resets) in 448 ms. (2227 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:41:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 106 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:28] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 47 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 103 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 55 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 126/766/126 causal constraints (skipped 29 transitions) in 8 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 93 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:29] [INFO ] Added : 100 causal constraints over 20 iterations in 751 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 225 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 159/159 places, 156/156 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 156/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 156/156 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:41:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned [42, 47, 122, 125, 156]
[2025-06-01 00:41:30] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [156, 125]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 227 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 157/159 places, 156/156 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 157 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 156 transition count 155
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 156 /157 variables (removed 1) and now considering 155/156 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 156 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:30] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 189 ms returned [42, 47, 122]
[2025-06-01 00:41:30] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 191 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 154/159 places, 155/156 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 154 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 153 transition count 154
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 153 /154 variables (removed 1) and now considering 154/155 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 153 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:30] [INFO ] Computed 24 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [119]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 152/159 places, 154/156 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 154/154 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 4 iterations and 606 ms. Remains : 152/159 places, 154/156 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 152 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:31] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 7 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144366 resets) in 631 ms. (1582 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (91125 resets) in 451 ms. (2212 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 10 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 53 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Real]Added 29 Read/Feed constraints in 34 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 10 positive and 13 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 48 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 29 Read/Feed constraints in 54 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 126/773/126 causal constraints (skipped 27 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:41:33] [INFO ] Added : 114 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 786 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 198 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 152 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 152/152 places, 154/154 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 154/154 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 152/152 places, 154/154 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 152/152 places, 154/154 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 152 /152 variables (removed 0) and now considering 154/154 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:41:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 162 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:41:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 29 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 860 ms returned [120]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1024 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 151/152 places, 154/154 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 150 transition count 153
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 150 transition count 152
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 149 transition count 152
Applied a total of 4 rules in 12 ms. Remains 149 /151 variables (removed 2) and now considering 152/154 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 152 rows 149 cols
[2025-06-01 00:41:35] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:41:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 799 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 956 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 149/152 places, 152/154 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 1995 ms. Remains : 149/152 places, 152/154 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:41:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144262 resets) in 633 ms. (1577 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (91442 resets) in 453 ms. (2202 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 51 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 26 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 44 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 41 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:41:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 124/761/124 causal constraints (skipped 27 transitions) in 7 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:41:38] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 75 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:38] [INFO ] Added : 92 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 574 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 178 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 149 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 152/152 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 152/152 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:41:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 159 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:41:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 780 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 941 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:41:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:41:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 13/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 152/301 variables, 149/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 32/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 301/301 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 13101 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 21/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 152/301 variables, 149/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 32/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 151/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 13/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 65 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 19/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 301/301 variables, and 434 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 43149ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43151ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 44111 ms. Remains : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:42:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7312715584450281405.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17103359705263248509.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7312715584450281405.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17103359705263248509.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5776 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17103359705263248509.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :8 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :27 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 168
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :168 after 261
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :261 after 743
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3684 resets) in 132 ms. (300 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3625 resets) in 65 ms. (606 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :743 after 6443
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :6443 after 24094
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :24094 after 43864
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :43864 after 122858
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :122858 after 264910
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 483548 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=161 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 483548 steps, saw 242018 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=161 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:42:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:42:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 101/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
SDD size :264910 after 577058
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/144 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 151/295 variables, 144/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 31/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/301 variables, 5/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 301/301 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 561 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 101/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/144 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 151/295 variables, 144/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 31/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 6/301 variables, 5/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 301/301 variables, and 211 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 245 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 811ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1644 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 149 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 152/152 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:42:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:42:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :577058 after 9.99434e+06
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 64 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 13/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 111 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 152/301 variables, 149/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :9.99434e+06 after 4.84081e+07
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 32/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 301/301 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 13308 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 21/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 60 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 152/301 variables, 149/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 32/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :4.84081e+07 after 1.36601e+08
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 151/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 64 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 68 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 13/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 301/301 variables, and 410 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 20012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 33355ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33356ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 33359 ms. Remains : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5773 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3658 resets) in 48 ms. (816 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3642 resets) in 58 ms. (677 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 569730 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=189 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 569730 steps, saw 285125 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=189 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:43:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:43:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 101/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/144 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 151/295 variables, 144/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 31/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/301 variables, 5/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 301/301 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 529 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 101/102 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/144 variables, 15/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 151/295 variables, 144/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 31/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/295 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 6/301 variables, 5/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 2/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 301/301 variables, and 211 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 231 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 792ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 1900 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 149 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 152/152 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 149 /149 variables (removed 0) and now considering 152/152 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:43:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 131 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:43:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 758 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 891 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:43:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 13/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15221243689811783713.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15221243689811783713.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15221243689811783713.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15221243689811783713.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15221243689811783713.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 82 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16317108522231450109.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5639654991244891179.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16317108522231450109.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5639654991244891179.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5639654991244891179.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :10 after 15
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :15 after 23
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :23 after 1146
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1146 after 1175
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1175 after 1221
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :1221 after 1910
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1910 after 45025
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :45025 after 88969
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 152/301 variables, 149/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :88969 after 177453
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 32/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/301 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 301/301 variables, and 225 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 13090 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, ReadFeed: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/149 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 21/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :177453 after 357642
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 152/301 variables, 149/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 32/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 151/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 13/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 19/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :357642 after 760046
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 43181ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43182ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 44089 ms. Remains : 149/149 places, 152/152 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 149 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 136 transition count 139
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 129 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 129 transition count 132
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 128 transition count 131
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 128 transition count 130
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 127 transition count 130
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 127 transition count 129
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 126 transition count 129
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 126 transition count 129
Applied a total of 47 rules in 38 ms. Remains 126 /149 variables (removed 23) and now considering 129/152 (removed 23) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 129 rows 126 cols
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 20 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] After 52ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] After 11ms SMT Verify possible using 3 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
[2025-06-01 00:43:51] [INFO ] After 114ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 0 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 20 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] After 53ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] After 10ms SMT Verify possible using 3 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 63 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] After 105ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] After 213ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17676399923894683729.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 00:43:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16816643515367078948.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17676399923894683729.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16816643515367078948.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16816643515367078948.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 13
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :13 after 36
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :36 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 63
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :63 after 172
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :172 after 370
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :370 after 1262
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1262 after 3495
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3495 after 10150
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :10150 after 21830
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :21830 after 49483
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :49483 after 106028
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :106028 after 224315
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :224315 after 465055
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :465055 after 953959
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :953959 after 1.94662e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7605899844490775241.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7605899844490775241.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7605899844490775241.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7605899844490775241.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7605899844490775241.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 78 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10680480242313849484.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14101917502360882919.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10680480242313849484.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14101917502360882919.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...309
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14101917502360882919.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 9581
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30555 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-01 in 178191 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-04
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 16 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1463 resets) in 15 ms. (625 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (940 resets) in 6 ms. (1428 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 72 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 115 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 74 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 158 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 102 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 111 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:44:26] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 8/7 trap constraints in 1036 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:26] [INFO ] Added : 152 causal constraints over 32 iterations in 3051 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 432 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p304) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 232/232 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 230 transition count 229
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 223 transition count 222
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 222 transition count 222
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 222 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 221 transition count 221
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 221 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 211 transition count 211
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 211 transition count 211
Applied a total of 43 rules in 51 ms. Remains 211 /232 variables (removed 21) and now considering 211/232 (removed 21) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 51 ms. Remains : 211/232 places, 211/232 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 211 cols
[2025-06-01 00:44:26] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 17 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144670 resets) in 785 ms. (1272 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91411 resets) in 575 ms. (1736 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 31 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 77 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 34 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 167/1038/167 causal constraints (skipped 43 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 31 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 92 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 133 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 167/1038/167 causal constraints (skipped 43 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:44:29] [INFO ] Added : 69 causal constraints over 14 iterations in 612 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 261 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 211 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:44:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 432 ms returned [42, 47, 136, 208]
[2025-06-01 00:44:30] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [208]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 433 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 210/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 210 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 209 transition count 210
Applied a total of 2 rules in 14 ms. Remains 209 /210 variables (removed 1) and now considering 210/211 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 209 cols
[2025-06-01 00:44:30] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 337 ms returned [42, 47, 136]
[2025-06-01 00:44:30] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 339 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 207/211 places, 210/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 207 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 209
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 209/210 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 209 rows 206 cols
[2025-06-01 00:44:30] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 300 ms returned [133]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 303 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 205/211 places, 209/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 205 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 204 transition count 208
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 204 /205 variables (removed 1) and now considering 208/209 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-01 00:44:31] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 286 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:44:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:44:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2808 ms returned [76, 81]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3096 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 202/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 202 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 200 transition count 208
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 200 /202 variables (removed 2) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 200 cols
[2025-06-01 00:44:34] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 276 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:44:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:44:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 200/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 5 iterations and 6608 ms. Remains : 200/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:44:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (143904 resets) in 719 ms. (1388 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91516 resets) in 504 ms. (1980 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:44:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 2 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 72 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 83 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/911/147 causal constraints (skipped 60 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 2 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 68 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 147/911/147 causal constraints (skipped 60 transitions) in 13 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:44:38] [INFO ] Added : 89 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 608 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 233 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 200 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:44:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 263 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:44:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:44:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2122 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2386 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 207 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:44:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:44:41] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/200 variables, 7/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 89 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 13/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 7/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 91 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD19 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD45 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD47 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD77 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD82 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD87 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD96 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD106 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 208/408 variables, 200/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 39/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/408 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 408/408 variables, and 292 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved in 19081 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 2/2 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 200/200 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 23/142 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 51/193 variables, 9/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 24/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 6/199 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 208/407 variables, 199/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 39/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 123/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 1/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 7/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 49136ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 84 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 84 dead transitions in 49138ms
Found 84 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 84 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 84 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 200/200 places, 124/208 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 580 edges and 200 vertex of which 121 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 79 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 79 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 121 /200 variables (removed 79) and now considering 124/124 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] Computed 19 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 127 ms returned [79]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 128 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 120/200 places, 124/208 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 120 transition count 122
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 118 transition count 122
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 118 /120 variables (removed 2) and now considering 122/124 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 118 cols
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 434 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 538 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 118/200 places, 122/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 52209 ms. Remains : 118/200 places, 122/208 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144110 resets) in 612 ms. (1631 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91541 resets) in 435 ms. (2293 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 35 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Real]Added 23 Read/Feed constraints in 11 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 33 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 23 Read/Feed constraints in 30 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:45:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 101/626/101 causal constraints (skipped 20 transitions) in 6 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:45:33] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 72 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:33] [INFO ] Added : 99 causal constraints over 21 iterations in 651 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 239 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 118 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 122/122 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 122/122 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 433 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 555 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:45:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 10/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 122/240 variables, 118/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 23/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 6088 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 16/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/240 variables, 118/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 23/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 121/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 9/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 27699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 33805ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33806ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 34370 ms. Remains : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9182280612358623875.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17834366652938900257.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9182280612358623875.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17834366652938900257.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17834366652938900257.prop.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5848 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :8 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :27 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 137
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :137 after 261
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :261 after 743
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :743 after 2521
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3660 resets) in 103 ms. (384 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3636 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :2521 after 13677
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :13677 after 42861
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :42861 after 117084
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :117084 after 272109
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :272109 after 594810
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 648621 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=216 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 648621 steps, saw 324569 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=216 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:46:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:46:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 84/85 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/113 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 13/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/235 variables, 113/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 23/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/240 variables, 5/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 969 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 84/85 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/113 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 13/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/235 variables, 113/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 23/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/240 variables, 5/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 208 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1204ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 259 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 118 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 122/122 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5833 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3650 resets) in 44 ms. (888 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3661 resets) in 42 ms. (930 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :594810 after 5.71235e+07
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 642641 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=214 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 642641 steps, saw 321581 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=214 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 84/85 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/113 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 13/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/235 variables, 113/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 23/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/240 variables, 5/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 964 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 84/85 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 28/113 variables, 9/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 13/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 122/235 variables, 113/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 23/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/240 variables, 5/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 188 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1156ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 664 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 118 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 122/122 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 118 /118 variables (removed 0) and now considering 122/122 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:46:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:46:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:46:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 438 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 541 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:46:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:46:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
SDD size :5.71235e+07 after 3.69692e+08
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 10/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 122/240 variables, 118/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 23/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 175 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 5940 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 9/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/118 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 16/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 122/240 variables, 118/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 23/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 121/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :3.69692e+08 after 1.27566e+09
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 9/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 27337 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 118/118 constraints, ReadFeed: 23/23 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 33300ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33300ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 33855 ms. Remains : 118/118 places, 122/122 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 118 transition count 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 108 transition count 112
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 103 transition count 107
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 103 transition count 107
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 103 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 102 transition count 106
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 102 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 100 transition count 104
Applied a total of 36 rules in 22 ms. Remains 100 /118 variables (removed 18) and now considering 104/122 (removed 18) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-01 00:46:51] [INFO ] Computed 18 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:46:51] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:46:51] [INFO ] After 54ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:46:51] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] After 97ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] After 209ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 9 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] After 133ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] After 7ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] After 20ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] After 196ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3791233933049624103.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5388105857511635907.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3791233933049624103.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5388105857511635907.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5388105857511635907.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 17
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :17 after 36
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :36 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 63
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :63 after 162
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :162 after 296
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :296 after 1828
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1828 after 3860
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3860 after 16881
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :16881 after 54516
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :54516 after 138783
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :138783 after 403221
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :403221 after 1.04165e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :1.04165e+06 after 2.4089e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17066275139022202809.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17066275139022202809.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17066275139022202809.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17066275139022202809.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17066275139022202809.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 58 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2359154239246553685.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:46:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11440804276263000150.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2359154239246553685.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11440804276263000150.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11440804276263000150.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :14 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :40 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 1161
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :2.4089e+06 after 5.58821e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1161 after 45008
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14813805981044733852.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14813805981044733852.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14813805981044733852.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14813805981044733852.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14813805981044733852.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 67 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16213768132763432857.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5264473778381249295.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16213768132763432857.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5264473778381249295.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5264473778381249295.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 6286
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30615 ms.
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-04 in 180053 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-05
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 10 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1420 resets) in 13 ms. (714 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (906 resets) in 7 ms. (1250 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 162 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 63 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 167 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:23] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 208 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:47:23] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 17 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:47:25] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 124 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:25] [INFO ] Added : 152 causal constraints over 32 iterations in 2178 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 450 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p502) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 232/232 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 925 edges and 232 vertex of which 231 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 230 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 3 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 227 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 2 places and 3 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 867 edges and 225 vertex of which 223 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 223 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 1 places and 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 849 edges and 222 vertex of which 221 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 221 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 220 transition count 218
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 219 transition count 217
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 218 transition count 216
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 210 transition count 208
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 209 transition count 208
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 209 transition count 207
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 208 transition count 207
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 208 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 198 transition count 197
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 9 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 198 transition count 197
Applied a total of 55 rules in 21 ms. Remains 198 /232 variables (removed 34) and now considering 197/232 (removed 35) transitions.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 198 cols
[2025-06-01 00:47:30] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 7 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:30] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 29/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/198 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 14/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 3/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 197/395 variables, 198/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 37/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/395 variables, 0/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 395/395 variables, and 285 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 17841 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 29/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/198 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 17/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 107 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 98 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 74 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 76 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 86 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 85 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 86 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 92 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 84 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 20/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 5/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 197/395 variables, 198/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 37/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/395 variables, 196/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 395/395 variables, and 568 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 20015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/3 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 30/30 constraints, State Equation: 198/198 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 37909ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37909ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 37931 ms. Remains : 198/232 places, 197/232 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:48:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144480 resets) in 689 ms. (1449 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (91501 resets) in 492 ms. (2028 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:48:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:09] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 101 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] [Real]Added 37 Read/Feed constraints in 75 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 156/967/156 causal constraints (skipped 40 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 30 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 95 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 37 Read/Feed constraints in 125 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:10] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 156/967/156 causal constraints (skipped 40 transitions) in 8 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:48:11] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 95 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:11] [INFO ] Added : 135 causal constraints over 28 iterations in 1417 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 270 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 198 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 198/198 places, 197/197 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 198 /198 variables (removed 0) and now considering 197/197 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 198/198 places, 197/197 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 198/198 places, 197/197 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 198 /198 variables (removed 0) and now considering 197/197 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:48:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 350 ms returned [42, 47, 136, 195]
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [195]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 352 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 197/198 places, 197/197 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 197 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 196 transition count 196
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 196 /197 variables (removed 1) and now considering 196/197 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 196 cols
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 301 ms returned [42, 47, 136]
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 302 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 194/198 places, 196/197 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 194 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 193 transition count 195
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 193 /194 variables (removed 1) and now considering 195/196 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 193 cols
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 265 ms returned [133]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 266 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 192/198 places, 195/197 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 192 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 191 transition count 194
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 191 /192 variables (removed 1) and now considering 194/195 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 191 cols
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 268 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:48:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:48:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1952 ms returned [165]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2222 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 190/198 places, 194/197 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 190 /190 variables (removed 0) and now considering 194/194 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 5 iterations and 3177 ms. Remains : 190/198 places, 194/197 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 190 cols
[2025-06-01 00:48:19] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 7 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144300 resets) in 685 ms. (1457 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91507 resets) in 490 ms. (2036 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 11 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 91 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Real]Added 37 Read/Feed constraints in 53 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 11 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 37 Read/Feed constraints in 133 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:48:21] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 155/977/155 causal constraints (skipped 38 transitions) in 8 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:48:23] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 171 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:23] [INFO ] Added : 116 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 1556 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 289 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 190 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 190 /190 variables (removed 0) and now considering 194/194 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 190 /190 variables (removed 0) and now considering 194/194 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:48:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 252 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:48:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:48:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2013 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 193 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:48:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:48:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 72 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 69 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 17/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 73 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 7/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 194/384 variables, 190/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 37/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/384 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/384 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 25072 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 47/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 75 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 78 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 106 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 102 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 93 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 75 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 14/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 113 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 84 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 85 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 87 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 92 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 97 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 121 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 113 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 118 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 98 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 10/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 6/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 194/384 variables, 190/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 37/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 193/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/384 variables, and 594 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55135ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55136ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 57412 ms. Remains : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2812586455629231285.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8724124847170865260.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2812586455629231285.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8724124847170865260.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5808 resets) in 84 ms. (470 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality8724124847170865260.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3626 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :10 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 30
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :30 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 124
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :124 after 242
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3682 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :242 after 536
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :536 after 1223
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :1223 after 23429
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :23429 after 43142
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :43142 after 120992
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :120992 after 263204
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 527963 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 527963 steps, saw 264240 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:49:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:49:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 132/133 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
SDD size :263204 after 566686
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/185 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 95 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 193/378 variables, 185/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 36/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/384 variables, 5/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 2/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/384 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/384 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 644 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 132/133 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/185 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 193/378 variables, 185/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 36/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 6/384 variables, 5/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 2/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/384 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/384 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 751 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1404ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :566686 after 1.15222e+07
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5220 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 190 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 190 /190 variables (removed 0) and now considering 194/194 (removed 0) transitions.
Running 193 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:49:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:49:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD size :1.15222e+07 after 7.69466e+07
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 17/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 7/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 194/384 variables, 190/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 37/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 2.0)
(s5 (/ 9.0 8.0))
(s6 1.0)
(s7 (/ 9.0 8.0))
(s8 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s9 1.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 1.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 (/ 15.0 8.0))
(s30 (/ 9.0 8.0))
(s31 2.0)
(s32 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s33 (/ 7.0 8.0))
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 (/ 9.0 8.0))
(s51 (/ 9.0 8.0))
(s52 (/ 1.0 4.0))
(s53 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s54 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 (/ 9.0 8.0))
(s74 0.0)
(s75 (/ 1.0 4.0))
(s76 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s77 (/ 5.0 4.0))
(s78 1.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 3.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 (/ 11.0 8.0))
(s100 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s101 (/ 17.0 8.0))
(s102 (/ 7.0 4.0))
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 (/ 25.0 8.0))
(s120 (/ 25.0 8.0))
(s121 (/ 9.0 4.0))
(s122 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s123 (/ 1.0 8.0))
(s124 1.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 timeout
0.0)
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/384 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 20021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 20.0 s and query timeout 2000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 47/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 83 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 66 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 112 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 97 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 98 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 107 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 14/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :7.69466e+07 after 2.37926e+08
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 119 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 114 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 97 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 91 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 100 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 126 ms of which 54 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 104 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 102 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 10/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 6/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 190/384 variables, and 174 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 20012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 0/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/193 constraints, Known Traps: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 40069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40070ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 40073 ms. Remains : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5750 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3607 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3679 resets) in 41 ms. (952 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8963155572354979835.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8963155572354979835.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8963155572354979835.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8963155572354979835.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8963155572354979835.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 110 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14381809890620870751.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12388572548501608481.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14381809890620870751.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12388572548501608481.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...309
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12388572548501608481.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :10 after 21
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :21 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :27 after 95
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :95 after 1182
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1182 after 132825
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 525272 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 525272 steps, saw 262896 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:50:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:50:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 132/133 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/185 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
[2025-06-01 00:50:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
SDD size :132825 after 355714
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 193/378 variables, 185/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 36/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 6/384 variables, 5/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 2/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/384 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/384 variables, and 259 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 619 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 132/133 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/185 variables, 18/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 4/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/185 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 193/378 variables, 185/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 36/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 6/384 variables, 5/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 2/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/384 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/384 variables, and 265 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 776 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1422ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 6272 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 190 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 190 /190 variables (removed 0) and now considering 194/194 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 190 /190 variables (removed 0) and now considering 194/194 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:50:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 246 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:50:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :355714 after 747395
[2025-06-01 00:50:23] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :747395 after 764116
[2025-06-01 00:50:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2004 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2259 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 193 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:50:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:50:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 37 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 109 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :764116 after 870943
[2025-06-01 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 17/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 7/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 194/384 variables, 190/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 37/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/384 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 384/384 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 25623 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/190 variables, 9/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 47/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 83 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 74 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 112 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 105 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 88 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 95 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 92 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 69 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 76 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 14/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 115 ms of which 49 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 112 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 95 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 100 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 126 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 128 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 107 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 102 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 10/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 6/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 194/384 variables, 190/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 37/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/384 variables, 193/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 384/384 variables, and 594 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 11/11 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, ReadFeed: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55677ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55678ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 57944 ms. Remains : 190/190 places, 194/194 transitions.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-05 in 238777 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-08
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 17 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1439 resets) in 10 ms. (909 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10001 steps (900 resets) in 6 ms. (1428 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 93 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 84 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:51:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 460 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:22] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:51:25] [INFO ] Added : 170 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 3349 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 501 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 233/233 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 232 transition count 232
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 232
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 225 transition count 226
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 224 transition count 226
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 224 transition count 225
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 223 transition count 225
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 223 transition count 215
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 213 transition count 215
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 213 transition count 215
Applied a total of 40 rules in 21 ms. Remains 213 /232 variables (removed 19) and now considering 215/233 (removed 18) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 213/232 places, 215/233 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Found an invariant !
This invariant on transitions {21=1, 34=1, 51=1, 73=1, 102=1, 127=1, 140=1, 151=1}
Produces a positive solution :{}
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization OK=successtook 1 ms.
This minimized invariant on transitions {21=1, 34=1, 51=1, 73=1, 102=1, 127=1, 140=1, 151=1}
Produces a positive solution
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1442 resets, run finished after 23 ms. (steps per millisecond=434 ) properties (out of 1) seen :[0]
Current structural bounds on expressions (after cover walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 213 cols
[2025-06-01 00:51:26] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 17 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144392 resets) in 708 ms. (1410 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91785 resets) in 496 ms. (2012 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 91 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 93 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:51:28] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 38 Read/Feed constraints in 370 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:28] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 169/1049/169 causal constraints (skipped 45 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 115 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 97 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 97 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:51:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 14/13 trap constraints in 1727 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:31] [INFO ] Added : 141 causal constraints over 29 iterations in 3211 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 402 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Support contains 1 out of 213 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 215/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 213 /213 variables (removed 0) and now considering 215/215 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 213/213 places, 215/215 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 213/213 places, 215/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 213 /213 variables (removed 0) and now considering 215/215 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:51:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 414 ms returned [42, 47, 136, 210]
[2025-06-01 00:51:34] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [210]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 416 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 212/213 places, 215/215 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 212 transition count 214
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 211 transition count 214
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 211 /212 variables (removed 1) and now considering 214/215 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 211 cols
[2025-06-01 00:51:34] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 344 ms returned [42, 47, 136]
[2025-06-01 00:51:34] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 347 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 209/213 places, 214/215 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 209 transition count 213
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 208 transition count 213
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 208 /209 variables (removed 1) and now considering 213/214 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 213 rows 208 cols
[2025-06-01 00:51:34] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 331 ms returned [133]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 332 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 207/213 places, 213/215 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 207 transition count 212
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 212
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 212/213 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 206 cols
[2025-06-01 00:51:35] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 322 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:51:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:51:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1375 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1698 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 206/213 places, 212/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 4 iterations and 2822 ms. Remains : 206/213 places, 212/215 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Found an invariant !
This invariant on transitions {20=1, 32=1, 46=1, 67=1, 96=1, 121=1, 134=1, 145=1}
Produces a positive solution :{}
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization OK=successtook 0 ms.
This minimized invariant on transitions {20=1, 32=1, 46=1, 67=1, 96=1, 121=1, 134=1, 145=1}
Produces a positive solution
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1428 resets, run finished after 18 ms. (steps per millisecond=555 ) properties (out of 1) seen :[0]
Current structural bounds on expressions (after cover walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
[2025-06-01 00:51:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144147 resets) in 685 ms. (1457 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91748 resets) in 485 ms. (2057 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 99 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 99 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:51:40] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:51:41] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 38 Read/Feed constraints in 227 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:51:41] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 100 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:41] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 168/1059/168 causal constraints (skipped 43 transitions) in 8 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:51:43] [INFO ] Added : 131 causal constraints over 27 iterations in 2124 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 455 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Support contains 1 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 9 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:51:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 305 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:51:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:51:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1394 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1700 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 211 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:51:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:51:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 82 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 80 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 84 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 80 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 74 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 9/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 9/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 4/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 86 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 78 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 10/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 80 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 80 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 75 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 10/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 75 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 206/418 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 0/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 100/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 82 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 84 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 82 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 85 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 84 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 14/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 212/418 variables, 206/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 38/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 211/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 105 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 418/418 variables, and 616 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60077ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60078ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61791 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 6000.0 s and query timeout 600000.0 ms
Found an invariant !
This invariant on transitions {20=1, 32=1, 46=1, 67=1, 96=1, 121=1, 134=1, 145=1}
Produces a positive solution :{}
Attempting to minimize the solution found.
Minimization OK=successtook 0 ms.
This minimized invariant on transitions {20=1, 32=1, 46=1, 67=1, 96=1, 121=1, 134=1, 145=1}
Produces a positive solution
Incomplete random walk after 10000 steps, including 1467 resets, run finished after 14 ms. (steps per millisecond=714 ) properties (out of 1) seen :[0]
Current structural bounds on expressions (after cover walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
[2025-06-01 00:52:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15167008044269124923.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2201678471296292215.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15167008044269124923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2201678471296292215.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5823 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3669 resets) in 35 ms. (1111 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2201678471296292215.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 11
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :11 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 32
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :32 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 117
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :117 after 230
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :230 after 487
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :487 after 1092
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :1092 after 23429
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :23429 after 42516
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :42516 after 107767
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :107767 after 222552
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :222552 after 481973
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 762198 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=253 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 762198 steps, saw 381356 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=253 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/149 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/153 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/201 variables, 16/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 418/418 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 160 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/149 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/153 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 48/201 variables, 16/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:52:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 418/418 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 3123 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3300ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :481973 after 2.10253e+07
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 604 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5712 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3671 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 768491 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=256 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 768491 steps, saw 384504 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=256 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/149 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/153 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/201 variables, 16/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 418/418 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 165 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/8 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 141/149 variables, 10/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 4/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 4/153 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 48/201 variables, 16/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 100 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 98 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 212/413 variables, 201/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 38/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 1/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/413 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 5/418 variables, 5/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 2/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/418 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 418/418 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 3162 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3357ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 602 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 206 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 206 /206 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:53:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 313 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:53:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:05] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:53:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1384 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1721 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 211 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:53:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:53:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 38 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 262144
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
SDD size :2.10253e+07 after 2.35797e+08
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 88 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 72 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 9/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 9/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 4/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 87 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 10/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 5/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 85 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 82 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 79 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 10/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 524288
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 206/418 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 0/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
SDD size :2.35797e+08 after 7.29731e+08
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/206 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 100/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 2/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13898794765967608456.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13898794765967608456.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13898794765967608456.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13898794765967608456.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13898794765967608456.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 108 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 98 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1656673838049466821.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13255443905158867039.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1656673838049466821.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13255443905158867039.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13255443905158867039.prop.
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 137 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :14 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :27 after 83
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :83 after 1155
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1155 after 45036
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 3/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 84 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :45036 after 133011
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 85 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 84 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 83 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 14/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 212/418 variables, 206/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 38/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :133011 after 402369
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/418 variables, 211/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 98 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 116 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 418/418 variables, and 616 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 206/206 constraints, ReadFeed: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps: 130/130 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60104ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 211 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60106ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61835 ms. Remains : 206/206 places, 212/212 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 206 transition count 195
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 189 transition count 195
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 181 transition count 187
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 181 transition count 187
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 181 transition count 186
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 180 transition count 186
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 180 transition count 184
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 178 transition count 184
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 178 transition count 184
Applied a total of 57 rules in 26 ms. Remains 178 /206 variables (removed 28) and now considering 184/212 (removed 28) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 178 cols
[2025-06-01 00:54:06] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:06] [INFO ] After 33ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:06] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] After 137ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] After 10ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 59 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 121 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 2
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] After 238ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] After 427ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15685818719467834528.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17527483244418092644.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15685818719467834528.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17527483244418092644.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17527483244418092644.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 13
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :13 after 36
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :36 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 63
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :63 after 172
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :172 after 370
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :370 after 1321
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1321 after 3495
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3495 after 10385
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :10385 after 22358
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :22358 after 49913
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :49913 after 105979
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :105979 after 222990
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :222990 after 458153
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :458153 after 937334
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :937334 after 1.90261e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12119025394802393749.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12119025394802393749.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12119025394802393749.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12119025394802393749.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12119025394802393749.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 106 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16484906047476706508.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4704555569476679260.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16484906047476706508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4704555569476679260.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4704555569476679260.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :402369 after 753620
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :753620 after 3.01123e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30682 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-08 in 196345 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-09
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 18 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1417 resets) in 12 ms. (769 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (929 resets) in 8 ms. (1111 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 82 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 102 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:37] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 85 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:38] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 144 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:38] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:54:40] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 127 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:40] [INFO ] Added : 176 causal constraints over 37 iterations in 2693 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 449 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p253) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 230 transition count 229
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 223 transition count 222
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 222 transition count 222
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 222 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 221 transition count 221
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 9 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 221 transition count 212
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 212 transition count 212
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 212 transition count 212
Applied a total of 40 rules in 18 ms. Remains 212 /232 variables (removed 20) and now considering 212/231 (removed 19) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 18 ms. Remains : 212/232 places, 212/231 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 212 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-01 00:54:41] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 14 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144345 resets) in 708 ms. (1410 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91778 resets) in 505 ms. (1976 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 75 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 64 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:42] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 74 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:43] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 65 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:43] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 168/1045/168 causal constraints (skipped 43 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:54:43] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 133 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:43] [INFO ] Added : 74 causal constraints over 15 iterations in 754 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 220 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 212 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 212 /212 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 212/212 places, 212/212 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 212/212 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 212 /212 variables (removed 0) and now considering 212/212 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:54:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 446 ms returned [42, 47, 137, 209]
[2025-06-01 00:54:44] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [209]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 448 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 211/212 places, 212/212 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 211 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 210 transition count 211
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 210 /211 variables (removed 1) and now considering 211/212 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 210 cols
[2025-06-01 00:54:44] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 371 ms returned [42, 47, 137]
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 373 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 208/212 places, 211/212 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 208 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 207 transition count 210
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 207 /208 variables (removed 1) and now considering 210/211 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 207 cols
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 278 ms returned [134]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 279 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 206/212 places, 210/212 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 206 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 205 transition count 209
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 205 /206 variables (removed 1) and now considering 209/210 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 209 rows 205 cols
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 285 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3729 ms returned [53, 58]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 4014 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 203/212 places, 209/212 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 202 transition count 208
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 202 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 200 transition count 208
Applied a total of 6 rules in 12 ms. Remains 200 /203 variables (removed 3) and now considering 208/209 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 200 cols
[2025-06-01 00:54:49] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 254 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:54:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:49] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:54:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 3009 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3264 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 200/212 places, 208/212 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 5 iterations and 8424 ms. Remains : 200/212 places, 208/212 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:54:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144217 resets) in 700 ms. (1426 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91295 resets) in 487 ms. (2049 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:54:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 21 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 80 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:54:53] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 39 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 21 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 78 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 70 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 149/936/149 causal constraints (skipped 58 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 112 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 98 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 100 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 108 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:54:55] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 7/6 trap constraints in 875 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:55] [INFO ] Added : 69 causal constraints over 15 iterations in 1350 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 277 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 200 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 246 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:54:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:54:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2990 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 3237 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:54:59] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 207 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:54:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:54:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 21/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/200 variables, 6/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 88 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 90 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 6/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 92 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 93 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 94 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Problem TDEAD12 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD13 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD14 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD15 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD16 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD17 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD18 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD20 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD21 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD22 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD23 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD24 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD25 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD26 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD27 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD29 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD30 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD40 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD42 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD43 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD44 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD55 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD56 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD61 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD62 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD63 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD64 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD65 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD66 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD67 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD68 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD69 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD70 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD71 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD72 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD73 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD74 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD85 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD86 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD91 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD92 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD93 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD102 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD103 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD104 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD105 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD108 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD109 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD115 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD116 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD118 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD119 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD120 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD121 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD126 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD139 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD140 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD141 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD142 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD143 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD144 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD145 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD146 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD147 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD148 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD149 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD150 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD158 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD168 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD169 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD170 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD171 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD172 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD173 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD174 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD175 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD176 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD177 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD178 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD179 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD180 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD181 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD182 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD183 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD189 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD190 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD191 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD192 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD196 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD198 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 208/408 variables, 200/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 39/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/408 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 408/408 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved in 16229 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 200/200 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 53/151 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/199 variables, 14/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 19/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 102 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 102 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 20/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 13/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 101 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 5/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 8/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 20/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 7/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 7/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 208/407 variables, 199/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 39/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 101/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 9/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 46292ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 106 solved, 101 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 106 dead transitions in 46293ms
Found 106 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 106 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 106 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 200/200 places, 102/208 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 475 edges and 200 vertex of which 100 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 100 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 100 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 4 ms. Remains 100 /200 variables (removed 100) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 100 cols
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] Computed 16 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [56]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 76 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 99/200 places, 102/208 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 99 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 98 transition count 101
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 98 /99 variables (removed 1) and now considering 101/102 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 98 cols
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 270 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 345 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 98/200 places, 101/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 49966 ms. Remains : 98/200 places, 101/208 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:55:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144243 resets) in 595 ms. (1677 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91679 resets) in 432 ms. (2309 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:55:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 8 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:46] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 27 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:46] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:55:46] [INFO ] [Real]Added 19 Read/Feed constraints in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 87/532/87 causal constraints (skipped 13 transitions) in 5 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 8 positive and 7 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 27 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 19 Read/Feed constraints in 14 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 87/532/87 causal constraints (skipped 13 transitions) in 5 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 4/3 trap constraints in 179 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Added : 81 causal constraints over 17 iterations in 481 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 101 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:55:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 279 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 359 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:55:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:55:48] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/98 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 101/199 variables, 98/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 19/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 199/199 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 3451 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/98 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 101/199 variables, 98/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 19/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 100/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 7/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 199/199 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 9107 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12571ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12571ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 12937 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5314015646999832855.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2667128968917116329.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5314015646999832855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2667128968917116329.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2667128968917116329.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 8
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :8 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :27 after 42
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :42 after 131
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :131 after 267
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :267 after 743
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5750 resets) in 77 ms. (512 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3629 resets) in 45 ms. (869 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :743 after 2681
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3637 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :2681 after 14572
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :14572 after 43991
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :43991 after 124954
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :124954 after 292797
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :292797 after 644320
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 680368 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=226 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 680368 steps, saw 340439 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=226 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:56:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:56:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 70/71 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 22/93 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 8/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 101/194 variables, 93/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 19/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/199 variables, 5/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 199/199 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 687 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 70/71 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 22/93 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 8/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 101/194 variables, 93/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 19/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/199 variables, 5/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 199/199 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 257 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 963ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 125 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 1 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5783 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3631 resets) in 56 ms. (701 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3687 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :644320 after 3.82848e+08
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 654751 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=218 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 654751 steps, saw 327630 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=218 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 70/71 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 22/93 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 8/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 101/194 variables, 93/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 19/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 5/199 variables, 5/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 199/199 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 715 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 70/71 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 22/93 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 8/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/93 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 101/194 variables, 93/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 19/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 5/199 variables, 5/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 199/199 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 275 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1016ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 130 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 98 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 98 /98 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 272 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 367 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 100 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:56:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 19 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/98 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 6/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 1/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 101/199 variables, 98/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 19/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 199/199 variables, and 139 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 3546 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/96 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/98 variables, 6/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 101/199 variables, 98/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 19/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 100/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 7/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :3.82848e+08 after 2.55683e+09
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/199 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 199/199 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved in 9386 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/8 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 7/7 constraints, State Equation: 98/98 constraints, ReadFeed: 19/19 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 100/100 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 12944ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 100 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12945ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 13318 ms. Remains : 98/98 places, 101/101 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 98 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 90 transition count 93
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 86 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 86 transition count 89
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 86 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 85 transition count 88
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 85 transition count 86
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 83 transition count 86
Applied a total of 30 rules in 11 ms. Remains 83 /98 variables (removed 15) and now considering 86/101 (removed 15) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] Computed 15 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 5 positive and 10 generalized place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] After 35ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] After 7ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] After 19ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] After 98ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6933811975895394416.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13646665501964264783.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6933811975895394416.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13646665501964264783.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13646665501964264783.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 13
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :13 after 31
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :31 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 86
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :86 after 165
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :165 after 314
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :314 after 653
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :653 after 1661
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :1661 after 3685
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :3685 after 7742
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :7742 after 15864
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :15864 after 32077
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :32077 after 64493
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :64493 after 129251
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10661390522372476640.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10661390522372476640.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10661390522372476640.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10661390522372476640.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10661390522372476640.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13579388549887418300.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3215096389800526856.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13579388549887418300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3215096389800526856.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3215096389800526856.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :3544 after 3559
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :2.55683e+09 after 8.39698e+09
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5890294319713649778.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5890294319713649778.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5890294319713649778.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5890294319713649778.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5890294319713649778.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 64 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 65 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4382326340812947007.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality73173008909446832.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4382326340812947007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality73173008909446832.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...305
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality73173008909446832.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :4 after 7
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :29 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :47 after 53
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :1100 after 1146
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :1333 after 1543
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30269 ms.
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-09 in 135192 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-11
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 00:56:52] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 13 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1428 resets) in 18 ms. (526 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (929 resets) in 6 ms. (1428 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:56:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 221 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 83 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 222 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 116 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:56:58] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 609 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:58] [INFO ] Added : 211 causal constraints over 43 iterations in 4504 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 103 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p448) removed 2 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 231/231 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 232 transition count 230
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 230
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 223 transition count 222
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 222 transition count 222
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 222 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 221 transition count 221
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 221 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 211 transition count 211
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 211 transition count 211
Applied a total of 43 rules in 21 ms. Remains 211 /232 variables (removed 21) and now considering 211/231 (removed 20) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 211/232 places, 211/231 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 211 cols
[2025-06-01 00:56:58] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 12 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144465 resets) in 694 ms. (1438 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (91373 resets) in 494 ms. (2020 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 3 positive and 32 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 120 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Real]Added 40 Read/Feed constraints in 81 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 3 positive and 32 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 117 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 40 Read/Feed constraints in 122 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:56:59] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 165/1033/165 causal constraints (skipped 45 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:57:01] [INFO ] Added : 97 causal constraints over 20 iterations in 1526 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 287 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 211 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:57:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 436 ms returned [42, 47, 136, 208]
[2025-06-01 00:57:02] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [208]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 444 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 210/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 210 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 209 transition count 210
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 209 /210 variables (removed 1) and now considering 210/211 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 209 cols
[2025-06-01 00:57:02] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 378 ms returned [42, 47, 136]
[2025-06-01 00:57:03] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 381 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 207/211 places, 210/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 207 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 209
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 209/210 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 209 rows 206 cols
[2025-06-01 00:57:03] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 309 ms returned [133]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 310 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 205/211 places, 209/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 205 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 204 transition count 208
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 204 /205 variables (removed 1) and now considering 208/209 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-01 00:57:03] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 310 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:57:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:57:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1989 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2301 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 204/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 4 iterations and 3461 ms. Remains : 204/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:57:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144146 resets) in 703 ms. (1420 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91149 resets) in 487 ms. (2049 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 116 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Real]Added 40 Read/Feed constraints in 103 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 115 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 40 Read/Feed constraints in 113 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:57:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 164/1043/164 causal constraints (skipped 43 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 00:57:08] [INFO ] Added : 102 causal constraints over 21 iterations in 957 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 395 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 204 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:57:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 306 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:57:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:11] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:57:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1962 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 207 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:57:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:57:13] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/204 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 80 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 16/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 7/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 12/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Problem TDEAD155 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 208/412 variables, 204/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 40/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/412 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 412/412 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved in 27689 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 18/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/204 variables, 11/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 58/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 12/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 101 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 101 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 101 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 102 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 100 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 134 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 135 ms of which 59 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 109 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 107 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 101 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 101 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 96 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 91 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 89 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 92 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 91 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 208/412 variables, 204/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 40/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 206/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 412/412 variables, and 615 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 206/207 constraints, Known Traps: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 57756ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 206 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 1 dead transitions in 57757ms
Found 1 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 1 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 204/204 places, 207/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 207/207 (removed 0) transitions.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:11] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 60053 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 207/208 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 207 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-01 00:58:11] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 11 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144005 resets) in 691 ms. (1445 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91543 resets) in 484 ms. (2061 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:58:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 19 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 123 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:12] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:58:13] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 78 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:13] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 19 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:13] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 178 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:13] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 163/1029/163 causal constraints (skipped 43 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:58:16] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 12/11 trap constraints in 1514 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:16] [INFO ] Added : 115 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 2983 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 403 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 204 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 207/207 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 207/207 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 207/207 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 207/207 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 207/207 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:58:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 306 ms returned [147]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 307 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 203/204 places, 207/207 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 202 transition count 206
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 202 transition count 205
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 201 transition count 205
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 201 /203 variables (removed 2) and now considering 205/207 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 205 rows 201 cols
[2025-06-01 00:58:28] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 327 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:58:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:58:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2480 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 201/204 places, 205/207 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 2803 ms. Remains : 201/204 places, 205/207 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:58:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144647 resets) in 709 ms. (1408 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91183 resets) in 490 ms. (2036 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 00:58:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 98 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] [Real]Added 41 Read/Feed constraints in 104 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 94 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 41 Read/Feed constraints in 121 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 00:58:32] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 160/1016/160 causal constraints (skipped 44 transitions) in 12 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 00:58:34] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 277 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:34] [INFO ] Added : 120 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 1837 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 468 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 201 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 205/205 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 205/205 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:58:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 316 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 00:58:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:37] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 00:58:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2454 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 204 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:58:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:58:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/201 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 19/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 85 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 74 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 4/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 8/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 90 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 82 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 12/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:58:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 205/406 variables, 201/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 41/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/201 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 52/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 10/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 102 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 112 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 116 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 100 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 115 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 129 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 150 ms of which 58 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 115 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 117 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 115 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 116 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 120 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 99 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 121 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 94 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 105 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 116 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 123 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 139 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 113 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 162 ms of which 81 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 111 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 98 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 89 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 98 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 97 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 114 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 120 ms of which 45 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 129 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 119 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 104 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 110 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 103 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 106 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 129 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 102 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 111 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 105 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 108 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 95 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 99 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 106 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 183 ms of which 110 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 124 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 113 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 105 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 135 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 120 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 115 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 118 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 105 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 105 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 109 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 103 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 104 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 113 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 108 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 104 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 92 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 117 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 102 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 109 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 104 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 101 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 102 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 99 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 113 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 119 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 137 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60082ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60084ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62553 ms. Remains : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15504938924623910113.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality541814022324251321.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15504938924623910113.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality541814022324251321.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5725 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3617 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality541814022324251321.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3652 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 11
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :11 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 32
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :32 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 117
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :117 after 230
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :230 after 487
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :487 after 1092
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :1092 after 23429
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :23429 after 42516
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :42516 after 107767
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :107767 after 222552
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :222552 after 481973
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 454661 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=151 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 454661 steps, saw 227566 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=151 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:59:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:59:42] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 138/139 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/143 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 51/194 variables, 17/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 101 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 137 ms of which 62 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/196 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 100 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 205/401 variables, 196/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 41/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 5/406 variables, 5/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 3210 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 138/139 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/143 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 51/194 variables, 17/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 21/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 2/196 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 127 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 205/401 variables, 196/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 41/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD size :481973 after 2.10253e+07
[2025-06-01 00:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 2193 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 5/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 5/406 variables, 5/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/406 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 3324 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6554ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4947 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 201 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 205/205 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5792 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3601 resets) in 60 ms. (655 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3619 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 525175 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 525175 steps, saw 262846 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=175 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 00:59:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 00:59:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 138/139 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/143 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD size :2.10253e+07 after 2.35797e+08
[2025-06-01 00:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 51/194 variables, 17/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 95 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 00:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 102 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 20/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 145 ms of which 63 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/196 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 110 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 205/401 variables, 196/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 41/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 5/406 variables, 5/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 2982 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 138/139 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 4/143 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 51/194 variables, 17/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 21/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 2/196 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/196 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 205/401 variables, 196/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 41/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 2/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 5/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 5/406 variables, 5/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 406/406 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 983 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3969ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4327 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 201 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 205/205 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 201 /201 variables (removed 0) and now considering 205/205 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:00:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 289 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:00:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:00:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2098 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2390 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 204 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:00:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:00:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 41 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/201 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 76 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 19/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 84 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 4/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 78 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 79 places in 75 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 85 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 8/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 84 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 89 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 60 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 12/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 205/406 variables, 201/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :2.35797e+08 after 7.29731e+08
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 41/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:00:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:00:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15921295487921059532.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15921295487921059532.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15921295487921059532.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15921295487921059532.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15921295487921059532.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:00:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:00:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:00:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 107 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:00:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 100 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:00:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7575169958565695874.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3033973359426353110.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7575169958565695874.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3033973359426353110.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...307
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3033973359426353110.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :10 after 21
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :21 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :27 after 270
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :270 after 1182
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/406 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1182 after 132867
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 1.0)
(s7 2.0)
(s8 2.0)
(s9 1.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 1.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 (/ 5.0 3.0))
(s30 (/ 5.0 2.0))
(s31 (/ 13.0 6.0))
(s32 1.0)
(s33 (/ 1.0 6.0))
(s34 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 (/ 7.0 6.0))
(s51 (/ 1.0 3.0))
(s52 (/ 1.0 3.0))
(s53 (/ 1.0 6.0))
(s54 1.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 (/ 11.0 6.0))
(s74 (/ 11.0 6.0))
(s75 2.0)
(s76 1.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 (/ 5.0 6.0))
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 (/ 11.0 6.0))
(s98 (/ 11.0 6.0))
(s99 2.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 (/ 5.0 6.0))
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 1.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 (/ 7.0 6.0))
(s122 (/ 1.0 6.0))
(s123 (/ 1.0 6.0))
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 (/ 7.0 6.0))
(s144 (/ 7.0 6.0))
(s145 (/ 7.0 6.0))
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 1.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 2.0)
(s166 1.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 (/ 7733.0 6.0))
(s182 1288.0)
(s183 (/ 7729.0 6.0))
(s184 (/ 1.0 6.0))
(s185 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/406 variables, 0/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 406/406 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 201/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 204/204 constraints, Known Traps: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/201 variables, 11/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 1/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 52/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 10/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 87 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 121 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 102 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 121 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 116 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 115 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 116 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 106 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 111 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 140 ms of which 53 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 106 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 136 ms of which 57 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 118 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 111 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 102 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 112 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 101 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 117 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 108 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 130 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 94 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 123 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 109 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 113 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 131 ms of which 56 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 107 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 111 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 89 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 102 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 154 ms of which 79 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 106 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 105 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 116 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 104 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 92 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 101 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 75 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 103 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 106 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 96 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 113 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 105 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 107 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 115 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 132 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 125 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 114 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 113 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 124 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 111 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 108 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 94 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 97 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 111 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 125 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 108 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 113 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 118 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 116 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 117 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 104 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 114 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 115 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 192 ms of which 112 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 125 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 115 ms of which 34 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 115 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 127 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 106 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 120 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 110 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 98 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 112 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 105 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 101 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 97 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 108 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 102 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 106 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 103 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 100 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 104 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 102 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 104 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 109 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 111 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 110 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 120 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 106 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 109 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 20/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 114 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 95 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 97 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 109 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 98 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 112 ms of which 32 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 107 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 119 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 113 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 118 ms of which 41 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 136 ms of which 55 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 96 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 201/406 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 18/18 constraints, State Equation: 0/201 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/204 constraints, Known Traps: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60068ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 204 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60069ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62471 ms. Remains : 201/201 places, 205/205 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 201 transition count 189
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 185 transition count 189
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 176 transition count 180
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 176 transition count 180
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 176 transition count 179
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 175 transition count 179
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 175 transition count 177
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 173 transition count 177
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 173 transition count 177
Applied a total of 57 rules in 15 ms. Remains 173 /201 variables (removed 28) and now considering 177/205 (removed 28) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 177 rows 173 cols
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 111ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 15ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 83ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 248ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 104ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 12ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 59 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 115ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] After 285ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13535276477179209556.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13697790805152308379.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13535276477179209556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13697790805152308379.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13697790805152308379.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 13
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :13 after 36
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :36 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 63
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :63 after 172
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :172 after 370
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :370 after 1321
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1321 after 3495
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3495 after 10385
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :10385 after 22358
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :22358 after 49913
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :49913 after 105979
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :105979 after 222990
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :222990 after 458153
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :458153 after 937334
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :937334 after 1.90261e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1084093363531582087.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1084093363531582087.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1084093363531582087.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1084093363531582087.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1084093363531582087.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:01:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:01:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:01:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 108 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:01:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:01:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7878445666573705828.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13712647811310375426.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7878445666573705828.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13712647811310375426.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality13712647811310375426.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 255
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :255 after 54475
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30740 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-11 in 286310 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-12
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 17 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1487 resets) in 13 ms. (714 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (920 resets) in 8 ms. (1111 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 89 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 54 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 85 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 179 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:39] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 12 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:01:42] [INFO ] Added : 182 causal constraints over 38 iterations in 2932 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 501 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p247) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 232/232 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 231 transition count 230
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 223 transition count 222
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 222 transition count 222
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 222 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 221 transition count 221
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 221 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 211 transition count 211
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 211 transition count 211
Applied a total of 43 rules in 20 ms. Remains 211 /232 variables (removed 21) and now considering 211/232 (removed 21) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 20 ms. Remains : 211/232 places, 211/232 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 211 cols
[2025-06-01 01:01:43] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 14 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144638 resets) in 700 ms. (1426 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91936 resets) in 542 ms. (1841 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 31 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 78 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 61 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 31 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 76 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 107 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 98 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:44] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 166/1038/166 causal constraints (skipped 44 transitions) in 11 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:01:45] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 120 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:45] [INFO ] Added : 57 causal constraints over 12 iterations in 678 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 289 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 211 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:01:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 427 ms returned [42, 47, 136, 208]
[2025-06-01 01:01:46] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [208]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 429 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 210/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 210 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 209 transition count 210
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 209 /210 variables (removed 1) and now considering 210/211 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 209 cols
[2025-06-01 01:01:46] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 18 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 349 ms returned [42, 47, 136]
[2025-06-01 01:01:46] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 351 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 207/211 places, 210/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 207 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 209
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 209/210 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 209 rows 206 cols
[2025-06-01 01:01:46] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 315 ms returned [133]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 316 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 205/211 places, 209/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 205 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 204 transition count 208
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 204 /205 variables (removed 1) and now considering 208/209 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-01 01:01:47] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 341 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:01:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:01:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1815 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2158 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 204/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 4 iterations and 3282 ms. Remains : 204/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:01:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144317 resets) in 794 ms. (1257 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91285 resets) in 549 ms. (1818 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 75 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 44 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:50] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 80 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:01:51] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 82 ms returned sat
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:01:51] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 82 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:51] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 165/1048/165 causal constraints (skipped 42 transitions) in 11 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:01:51] [INFO ] Added : 67 causal constraints over 14 iterations in 487 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 255 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 204 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 319 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:01:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1767 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2089 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 207 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:01:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:01:54] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 7/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 88 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 96 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 88 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 97 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 92 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 208/412 variables, 204/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 39/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 412/412 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 48/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 11/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 100 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 207 ms of which 124 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 137 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 129 ms of which 47 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 98 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 98 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 88 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 100 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 101 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 96 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 99 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 16/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 98 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 88 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 83 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 94 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 80 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 95 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 83 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 99 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 208/412 variables, 204/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 39/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 412/412 variables, and 640 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved in 30050 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60112ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60113ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62216 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11392331958349508180.gal : 2 ms
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5724 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-01 01:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1660734307555034763.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11392331958349508180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1660734307555034763.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3623 resets) in 68 ms. (579 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1660734307555034763.prop.
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3692 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 11
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :11 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 32
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :32 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 117
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :117 after 230
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :230 after 487
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :487 after 1080
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :1080 after 23429
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :23429 after 42516
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :42516 after 107767
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :107767 after 221976
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 530163 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=176 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 530163 steps, saw 265341 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=176 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 01:02:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:02:57] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 110/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/143 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/197 variables, 19/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/199 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 208/407 variables, 199/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :221976 after 480713
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 39/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 5/412 variables, 5/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/412 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 412/412 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 679 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 110/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/143 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/197 variables, 19/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 95 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 114 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 98 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 14/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/199 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 208/407 variables, 199/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 39/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 2/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 5/412 variables, 5/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/412 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 412/412 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1938 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2622ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 263 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 204 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5728 resets) in 80 ms. (493 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3598 resets) in 60 ms. (655 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (3642 resets) in 55 ms. (714 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :480713 after 2.08562e+07
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 528329 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=176 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 528329 steps, saw 264425 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=176 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 01:03:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:03:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 110/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/143 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/197 variables, 19/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 2/199 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 208/407 variables, 199/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 39/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 5/412 variables, 5/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/412 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 412/412 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 663 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 110/111 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 32/143 variables, 2/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/197 variables, 19/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 93 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 110 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 120 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 105 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 14/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/199 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 208/407 variables, 199/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 39/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 2/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 2/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/407 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 5/412 variables, 5/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/412 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 412/412 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 2037 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2704ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 292 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 204 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:03:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 303 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:03:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:06] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:03:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1751 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2055 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 207 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:03:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:03:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 7/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 99 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 98 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 90 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 95 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
[2025-06-01 01:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 86 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
SDD size :2.08562e+07 after 2.35213e+08
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 103 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 71 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 75 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 4/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 208/412 variables, 204/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 39/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 2.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 (/ 19.0 10.0))
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 (/ 1.0 10.0))
(s9 1.0)
(s10 2.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 2.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 1.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 (/ 16.0 5.0))
(s30 (/ 16.0 5.0))
(s31 (/ 33.0 10.0))
(s32 (/ 1.0 10.0))
(s33 (/ 1.0 10.0))
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 (/ 11.0 10.0))
(s51 (/ 11.0 10.0))
(s52 (/ 6.0 5.0))
(s53 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 412/412 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 20/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/203 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 48/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 7/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 11/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 95 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 97 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1228963219788339679.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1228963219788339679.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1228963219788339679.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1228963219788339679.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1228963219788339679.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 105 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 102 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14188840285107799705.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7533047036854086112.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14188840285107799705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7533047036854086112.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7533047036854086112.prop.
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 134 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 15
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :15 after 17
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :17 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :27 after 95
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :95 after 1164
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1164 after 1302
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :1302 after 1898
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 100 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1898 after 45011
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 103 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 100 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :45011 after 89055
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 73 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :89055 after 177439
[2025-06-01 01:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 205 ms of which 125 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 107 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 136 ms of which 51 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 131 ms of which 48 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 108 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 109 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 108 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 92 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 111 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 91 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 96 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :177439 after 357535
[2025-06-01 01:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 83 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 104 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 81 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 16/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 85 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 93 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 92 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 91 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 108 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 95 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 101 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 88 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 98 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 93 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 4/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 208/412 variables, 204/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :357535 after 760034
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 39/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 412/412 variables, and 640 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved in 30042 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/4 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60109ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60109ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 62173 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 208/208 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 204 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 188 transition count 192
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 179 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 179 transition count 183
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 179 transition count 182
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 178 transition count 182
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 178 transition count 180
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 176 transition count 180
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 176 transition count 180
Applied a total of 57 rules in 16 ms. Remains 176 /204 variables (removed 28) and now considering 180/208 (removed 28) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 180 rows 176 cols
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 13 positive and 18 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] After 93ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] After 14ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] After 39ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] After 202ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9118626868401421463.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1863702816843836337.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9118626868401421463.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1863702816843836337.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1863702816843836337.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 13
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :13 after 36
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :36 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 63
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :63 after 172
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :172 after 370
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :370 after 1310
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1310 after 3495
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3495 after 10364
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :10364 after 22544
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :22544 after 50007
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :50007 after 107060
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :107060 after 226915
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :226915 after 471715
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :471715 after 971384
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :971384 after 1.98763e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16211951530107032658.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16211951530107032658.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16211951530107032658.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16211951530107032658.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16211951530107032658.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 106 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14458052237497338589.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6706489124978367763.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14458052237497338589.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6706489124978367763.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6706489124978367763.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 28
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :28 after 60
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :60 after 373
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :373 after 17356
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30463 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-12 in 179924 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-13
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 01:04:38] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 13 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1471 resets) in 14 ms. (666 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (930 resets) in 7 ms. (1250 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 136 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 105 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 133 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 135 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:39] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:04:42] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 484 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:42] [INFO ] Added : 169 causal constraints over 34 iterations in 2774 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 502 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p462) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 232/232 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 230
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 229 transition count 228
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 223 transition count 222
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 222 transition count 222
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 222 transition count 221
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 221 transition count 221
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 10 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 221 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 211 transition count 211
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 211 transition count 211
Applied a total of 42 rules in 22 ms. Remains 211 /232 variables (removed 21) and now considering 211/232 (removed 21) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23 ms. Remains : 211/232 places, 211/232 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 211 rows 211 cols
[2025-06-01 01:04:43] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 12 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (143994 resets) in 695 ms. (1436 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (91107 resets) in 492 ms. (2028 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 7 positive and 28 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 84 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 67 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 7 positive and 28 generalized place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 92 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 151 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:44] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 167/1033/167 causal constraints (skipped 43 transitions) in 10 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:04:46] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 380 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:46] [INFO ] Added : 108 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 1578 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 292 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 211 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 211/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 211 /211 variables (removed 0) and now considering 211/211 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:04:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 398 ms returned [42, 47, 136, 208]
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [208]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 399 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 210/211 places, 211/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 210 transition count 210
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 209 transition count 210
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 209 /210 variables (removed 1) and now considering 210/211 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 209 cols
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 327 ms returned [42, 47, 136]
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 328 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 207/211 places, 210/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 207 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 206 transition count 209
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 206 /207 variables (removed 1) and now considering 209/210 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 209 rows 206 cols
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 289 ms returned [133]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 290 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 205/211 places, 209/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 205 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 204 transition count 208
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 204 /205 variables (removed 1) and now considering 208/209 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-01 01:04:49] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 303 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:04:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:50] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:04:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 2606 ms returned [145, 150]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2924 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 4 : 202/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 202 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 200 transition count 208
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 200 /202 variables (removed 2) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 208 rows 200 cols
[2025-06-01 01:04:52] [INFO ] Computed 29 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:04:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:53] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:04:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1839 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 5 : 200/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 5 iterations and 6088 ms. Remains : 200/211 places, 208/211 transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:04:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (143761 resets) in 691 ms. (1445 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (90928 resets) in 500 ms. (1996 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 17 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Real]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 79 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 17 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 73 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 39 Read/Feed constraints in 260 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:04:56] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 159/1021/159 causal constraints (skipped 48 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:04:57] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 104 ms
[2025-06-01 01:04:57] [INFO ] Added : 92 causal constraints over 19 iterations in 1089 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 305 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 200 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 200/200 places, 208/208 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 200 /200 variables (removed 0) and now considering 208/208 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 270 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:05:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:05:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1879 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2150 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 207 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:05:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:05:04] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 39 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 17/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/198 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/200 variables, 10/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 88 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 90 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 82 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 16/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 74 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 12/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 94 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 5/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 72 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/200 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 207 unsolved
Problem TDEAD28 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD46 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD75 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD76 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD81 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD94 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD95 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD156 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD157 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD184 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD185 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD186 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD187 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD188 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD194 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD205 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD206 is UNSAT
Problem TDEAD207 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 208/408 variables, 200/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 39/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/408 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/408 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 408/408 variables, and 309 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved in 24162 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 200/200 constraints, ReadFeed: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/182 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/191 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 41/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 58 places in 87 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 84 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 86 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 82 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 10/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 85 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 83 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 4/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 2/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/191 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 6/197 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 9/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 20/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 86 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 87 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 74 places in 83 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 95 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 79 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 86 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 93 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 20/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 93 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 98 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 88 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 98 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 90 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 79 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 20/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 83 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 82 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 84 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 12/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 103 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 92 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 101 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 99 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 109 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 121 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 105 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 127 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 101 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 116 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 115 ms of which 38 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 107 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 102 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 105 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 106 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 125 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 119 ms of which 46 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 105 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 20/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 69 places in 83 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 70 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 94 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 85 places in 86 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 86 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 13/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/197 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 1)
(s1 0)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 1)
(s5 1)
(s6 1)
(s7 1)
(s8 1)
(s9 1)
(s10 1)
(s11 0)
(s12 1)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 0)
(s16 1)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 0)
(s21 0)
(s22 0)
(s23 0)
(s24 0)
(s25 0)
(s26 0)
(s27 0)
(s28 0)
(s29 1)
(s30 1)
(s31 1)
(s32 1)
(s33 1)
(s34 1)
(s35 0)
(s36 0)
(s37 0)
(s38 0)
(s39 0)
(s40 0)
(s41 0)
(s42 0)
(s43 0)
(s44 0)
(s45 0)
(s46 0)
(s47 0)
(s48 0)
(s49 0)
(s50 1)
(s51 1)
(s52 1)
(s53 1)
(s54 1)
(s55 1)
(s56 0)
(s57 0)
(s58 0)
(s59 0)
(s60 0)
(s61 0)
(s62 0)
(s63 0)
(s64 0)
(s65 0)
(s66 0)
(s67 0)
(s68 0)
(s69 0)
(s70 0)
(s71 0)
(s72 0)
(s73 1)
(s74 1)
(s75 1)
(s76 1)
(s77 1)
(s78 1)
(s79 0)
(s80 0)
(s81 0)
(s82 0)
(s83 0)
(s84 0)
(s85 0)
(s86 0)
(s87 0)
(s88 0)
(s89 0)
(s90 0)
(s91 0)
(s92 0)
(s93 0)
(s94 0)
(s95 0)
(s96 0)
(timeout
s97 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 197/408 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/200 constraints, ReadFeed: 0/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/207 constraints, Known Traps: 174/174 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 54227ms problems are : Problem set: 18 solved, 189 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 18 dead transitions in 54228ms
Found 18 dead transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Dead Transitions using SMT only with invariants) removed 18 transitions
Dead transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 18 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 200/200 places, 190/208 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 960 edges and 200 vertex of which 184 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 16 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 16 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 3 ms. Remains 184 /200 variables (removed 16) and now considering 190/190 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 184 cols
[2025-06-01 01:05:59] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned [148]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 270 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 183/200 places, 190/208 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 183 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 181 transition count 188
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 181 /183 variables (removed 2) and now considering 188/190 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 188 rows 181 cols
[2025-06-01 01:05:59] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 226 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:05:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:05:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:06:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1531 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1758 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 181/200 places, 188/208 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 58426 ms. Remains : 181/200 places, 188/208 transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:06:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144285 resets) in 668 ms. (1494 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (91077 resets) in 477 ms. (2092 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 87 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Real]Added 35 Read/Feed constraints in 75 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 149/951/149 causal constraints (skipped 38 transitions) in 9 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 15 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 85 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 35 Read/Feed constraints in 102 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:06:02] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 149/951/149 causal constraints (skipped 38 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:06:03] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 120 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:03] [INFO ] Added : 113 causal constraints over 23 iterations in 1054 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 307 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 181 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 181 /181 variables (removed 0) and now considering 188/188 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 181 /181 variables (removed 0) and now considering 188/188 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:06:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:06:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:06:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1514 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1741 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:09] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 187 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:06:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:06:09] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/181 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 92 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 16/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 82 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 5/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 84 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 81 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 6/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 70 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 87 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 5/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 188/369 variables, 181/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 35/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 369/369 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved in 25189 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 187/187 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/181 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 41/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 80 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 7/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 4/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 188/369 variables, 181/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 35/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 187/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 84 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 20/512 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 369/369 variables, and 512 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 187/187 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55237ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55238ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 56992 ms. Remains : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5551868004436972996.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3650226573045019408.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5551868004436972996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3650226573045019408.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality3650226573045019408.prop.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5737 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 10
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :10 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 30
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :30 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 124
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3700 resets) in 58 ms. (678 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :124 after 242
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :242 after 536
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3713 resets) in 53 ms. (740 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :536 after 1223
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :1223 after 23429
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :23429 after 43142
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :43142 after 120992
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :120992 after 263204
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 442574 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 442574 steps, saw 221508 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=147 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 01:07:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:07:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
SDD size :263204 after 566686
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 46/176 variables, 15/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 7/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 188/364 variables, 176/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 35/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 5/369 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 369/369 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 805 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 46/176 variables, 15/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 7/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 74 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 188/364 variables, 176/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 35/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 2/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/369 variables, 5/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 369/369 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 380 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1191ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :566686 after 1.15222e+07
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5915 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 181 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 181 /181 variables (removed 0) and now considering 188/188 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5802 resets) in 75 ms. (526 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3614 resets) in 40 ms. (975 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (3645 resets) in 55 ms. (714 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 472976 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=157 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 472976 steps, saw 236737 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=157 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 01:07:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:07:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 46/176 variables, 15/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 7/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 188/364 variables, 176/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 35/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 0/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 5/369 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 369/369 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 129/130 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 46/176 variables, 15/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 7/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 73 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 188/364 variables, 176/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 35/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 2/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/364 variables, 0/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 5/369 variables, 5/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 369/369 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 383 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1193ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :1.15222e+07 after 7.69466e+07
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5912 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 181 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 181 /181 variables (removed 0) and now considering 188/188 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 181 /181 variables (removed 0) and now considering 188/188 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:07:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 227 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:07:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:25] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:07:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1586 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1839 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:26] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 187 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:07:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:07:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 35 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/181 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 85 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 81 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 83 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 16/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 89 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 5/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 96 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 99 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 6/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 93 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 87 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 91 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 87 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 100 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 88 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 5/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :7.69466e+07 after 2.37926e+08
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 188/369 variables, 181/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 35/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/369 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 369/369 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved in 25195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 187/187 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 15/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/179 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/181 variables, 10/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 41/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 70 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 72 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14237230822299286960.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14237230822299286960.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14237230822299286960.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14237230822299286960.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14237230822299286960.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 92 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 102 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6857449470063188145.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12812988366487177025.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6857449470063188145.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12812988366487177025.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...308
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12812988366487177025.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :14 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :40 after 1038
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :1038 after 1252
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 7/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 91 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 4/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 85 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 3/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/181 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 188/369 variables, 181/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 35/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 187/492 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 83 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 92 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 80 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 81 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 78 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 76 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 20/512 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 369/369 variables, and 512 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 15/15 constraints, State Equation: 181/181 constraints, ReadFeed: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 187/187 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 55250ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 187 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55251ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 57096 ms. Remains : 181/181 places, 188/188 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 181 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 165 transition count 172
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 157 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 157 transition count 164
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 157 transition count 163
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 156 transition count 163
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 2 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 156 transition count 161
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 154 transition count 161
Applied a total of 54 rules in 10 ms. Remains 154 /181 variables (removed 27) and now considering 161/188 (removed 27) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 161 rows 154 cols
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] Computed 27 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] After 89ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] After 13ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] After 145ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] After 74ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] After 11ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] After 36ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] After 182ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality48788879382303769.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17588629167297127826.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality48788879382303769.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17588629167297127826.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...327
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17588629167297127826.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 13
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :13 after 31
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :31 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 63
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :63 after 171
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :171 after 295
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :295 after 1131
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1131 after 3495
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3495 after 12611
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :12611 after 29584
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :29584 after 65317
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :65317 after 150079
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :150079 after 328681
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :328681 after 713342
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1252 after 638585
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :713342 after 1.49564e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :1.49564e+06 after 3.12129e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4034188212807919881.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4034188212807919881.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4034188212807919881.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4034188212807919881.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4034188212807919881.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 58 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15663215892642489123.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality756545581624813952.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15663215892642489123.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality756545581624813952.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...307
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality756545581624813952.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 17
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :17 after 76
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :76 after 185
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :185 after 7381
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30538 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-13 in 253565 ms.
Starting property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-15
Current structural bounds on expressions (Initially) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[+inf]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Adding known information on max bounds.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[5]
Current structural bounds on expressions (Before main loop) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[5]
// Phase 1: matrix 233 rows 232 cols
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 10 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[5]
RANDOM walk for 10000 steps (1460 resets) in 15 ms. (625 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 10000 steps (933 resets) in 6 ms. (1428 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[5]
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 8 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 163 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 31 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] [Real]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 136 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:52] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 12 positive and 23 generalized place invariants in 7 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 100 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:53] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 31 Read/Feed constraints in 182 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:53] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 216/1174/216 causal constraints (skipped 16 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 103 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 51 places in 96 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 100 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 102 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 94 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 102 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 56 places in 111 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:08:58] [WARNING] SMT solver failed with error :java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close... while checking expression at index 0
java.lang.RuntimeException: SMT solver raised an error when submitting script. Raised (error "Failed to assert expression: java.io.IOException: Stream close...
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTUtils.execAndCheckResult(SMTUtils.java:301)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.SMTTrapUtils.refineWithTraps(SMTTrapUtils.java:177)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.refineWithCausalOrder(DeadlockTester.java:1131)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.verifyPossible(DeadlockTester.java:878)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.structural.smt.DeadlockTester.findStructuralMaxWithSMT(DeadlockTester.java:2254)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.solver.UpperBoundsSolver.applyReductions(UpperBoundsSolver.java:219)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.startNoEx(Application.java:946)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.Application.start(Application.java:193)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.itscl.application.Application.start(Application.java:44)
at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:208)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:149)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:115)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:467)
at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:298)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:670)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:607)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1492)
at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1465)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[5]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[5]
Support contains 1 out of 232 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 232/232 places, 233/233 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 232 transition count 232
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 231 transition count 232
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 8
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 223 transition count 224
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 222 transition count 224
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 222 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 221 transition count 223
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 9 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 221 transition count 214
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 212 transition count 214
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 212 transition count 214
Applied a total of 42 rules in 21 ms. Remains 212 /232 variables (removed 20) and now considering 214/233 (removed 19) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 212/232 places, 214/233 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 214 rows 212 cols
[2025-06-01 01:08:58] [INFO ] Computed 35 invariants in 16 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144367 resets) in 712 ms. (1402 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91384 resets) in 508 ms. (1964 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 102 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 40 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Real]Added 40 Read/Feed constraints in 177 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 5 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 84 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 40 Read/Feed constraints in 159 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:08:59] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 171/1061/171 causal constraints (skipped 42 transitions) in 9 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:09:01] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 120 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:01] [INFO ] Added : 110 causal constraints over 22 iterations in 1490 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 477 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 212 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Drop transitions (Removing consumers from one bounded place p401) removed 1 transitions
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 212/212 places, 213/213 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 211 transition count 209
Reduce places removed 4 places and 12 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 950 edges and 207 vertex of which 205 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 2 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 2 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 205 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 7 places and 9 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 912 edges and 198 vertex of which 194 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 194 transition count 188
Reduce places removed 1 places and 2 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 890 edges and 193 vertex of which 192 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.0 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 192 transition count 186
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 192 transition count 185
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 20 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 170 transition count 165
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 167 transition count 165
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 167 transition count 165
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 166 transition count 165
Applied a total of 44 rules in 11 ms. Remains 166 /212 variables (removed 46) and now considering 165/213 (removed 48) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 166/212 places, 165/213 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 165 rows 166 cols
[2025-06-01 01:09:02] [INFO ] Computed 30 invariants in 9 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144276 resets) in 665 ms. (1501 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000001 steps (91275 resets) in 475 ms. (2100 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:09:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:03] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 57 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:03] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 32 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] [Real]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 64 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 26 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 55 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 32 Read/Feed constraints in 103 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 133/827/133 causal constraints (skipped 31 transitions) in 10 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:09:04] [INFO ] Added : 78 causal constraints over 16 iterations in 576 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 246 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 166 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 166/166 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 166 /166 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 166/166 places, 165/165 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 166/166 places, 165/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 166 /166 variables (removed 0) and now considering 165/165 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 249 ms returned [42, 47, 122, 127, 163]
[2025-06-01 01:09:05] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [163, 127]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 250 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 164/166 places, 165/165 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 164 transition count 164
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 163 transition count 164
Applied a total of 2 rules in 6 ms. Remains 163 /164 variables (removed 1) and now considering 164/165 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 164 rows 163 cols
[2025-06-01 01:09:05] [INFO ] Computed 28 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned [42, 47, 122]
[2025-06-01 01:09:06] [INFO ] Actually due to overlaps returned [47, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 208 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 161/166 places, 164/165 transitions.
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 161 transition count 163
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 160 transition count 163
Applied a total of 2 rules in 7 ms. Remains 160 /161 variables (removed 1) and now considering 163/164 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 160 cols
[2025-06-01 01:09:06] [INFO ] Computed 26 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 169 ms returned [119]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 170 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 159/166 places, 163/165 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 4 iterations and 648 ms. Remains : 159/166 places, 163/165 transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 163 rows 159 cols
[2025-06-01 01:09:06] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 7 ms
Current structural bounds on expressions (after invariants) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
RANDOM walk for 1000000 steps (144107 resets) in 660 ms. (1512 steps per ms)
BEST_FIRST walk for 1000000 steps (91222 resets) in 475 ms. (2100 steps per ms)
Current structural bounds on expressions (after WALK) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 9 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using state equation in 52 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Real]Added 30 Read/Feed constraints in 73 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] Solution in real domain found non-integer solution.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 9 positive and 16 generalized place invariants in 3 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using state equation in 50 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] [Nat]Added 30 Read/Feed constraints in 80 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:09:07] [INFO ] Computed and/alt/rep : 133/834/133 causal constraints (skipped 29 transitions) in 8 ms.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 69 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 77 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 79 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 84 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 82 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 75 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 77 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 87 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 76 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 72 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 81 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 76 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 85 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 73 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 81 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 72 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 72 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 77 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 75 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 78 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 74 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 80 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:09:15] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 68/67 trap constraints in 7014 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:15] [INFO ] Added : 114 causal constraints over 24 iterations in 7933 ms. Result :sat
Minimization took 388 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (after SMT) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Current structural bounds on expressions (After Parikh guided walk) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Support contains 1 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:09:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:16] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:09:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 989 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1157 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:09:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:09:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/159 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 65 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 65 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 20/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 61 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 6/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 69 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 74 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 72 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 66 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 6/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 76 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 76 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 68 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 9/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 163/322 variables, 159/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 30/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 287 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 27968 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/159 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 73/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 163/322 variables, 159/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 30/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 162/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 65 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 69 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 69 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 11/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 468 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 58010ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58011ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 59180 ms. Remains : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:10:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16443492400784567679.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17950105412509672817.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16443492400784567679.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17950105412509672817.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5702 resets) in 83 ms. (476 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3746 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17950105412509672817.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 2
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :2 after 6
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :6 after 13
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :13 after 14
BEST_FIRST walk for 40000 steps (3655 resets) in 55 ms. (714 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :14 after 32
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :32 after 40
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :40 after 124
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :124 after 248
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :248 after 521
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :521 after 1134
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :1134 after 23429
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :23429 after 41826
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :41826 after 102138
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :102138 after 219293
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :219293 after 471512
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 479463 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=159 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 479463 steps, saw 239984 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=159 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 01:10:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:10:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/27 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 82/109 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 46/155 variables, 16/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 163/318 variables, 155/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 30/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/322 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 611 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/27 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 82/109 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 46/155 variables, 16/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 4/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 163/318 variables, 155/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 30/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 4/322 variables, 4/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 2219 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2833ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :471512 after 3.61093e+06
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2456 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (5728 resets) in 76 ms. (519 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3676 resets) in 78 ms. (506 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (3647 resets) in 52 ms. (754 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 481538 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=160 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 481538 steps, saw 241016 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=160 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/27 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 82/109 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 77 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 46/155 variables, 16/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 163/318 variables, 155/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 30/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 4/322 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 560 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/27 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 82/109 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 3/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 46/155 variables, 16/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
SDD size :3.61093e+06 after 2.72655e+07
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 80 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 20/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 4/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 163/318 variables, 155/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 30/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/318 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 4/322 variables, 4/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 2642 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 3218ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2749 ms.
Support contains 1 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 159 /159 variables (removed 0) and now considering 163/163 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 309 ms returned []
[2025-06-01 01:10:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:10:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1604 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1917 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 162 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:10:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-01 01:10:35] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 30 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/159 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 146 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 83 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 143 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 132 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 139 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 132 ms of which 30 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 128 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 117 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 93 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 129 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 123 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 52 places in 70 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 69 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 20/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 77 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 524288
SDD size :2.72655e+07 after 8.37326e+07
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 4/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 59 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 6/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 59 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 82 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 84 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 79 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 80 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 64 places in 71 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 6/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 50 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 78 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 63 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 61 places in 71 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 62 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 5/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 74 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 73 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 49 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 79 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 67 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 9/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 163/322 variables, 159/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 30/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/322 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 322/322 variables, and 287 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 28695 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 13/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/159 variables, 7/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 73/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 53 places in 79 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 76 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 2/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16227539570096286497.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16227539570096286497.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16227539570096286497.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16227539570096286497.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16227539570096286497.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 82 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11513101983111197988.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15820201642815814862.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality11513101983111197988.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15820201642815814862.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...309
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality15820201642815814862.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 5
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :5 after 14
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :14 after 27
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :27 after 84
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :84 after 1162
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :1162 after 45027
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :45027 after 142569
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 163/322 variables, 159/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 30/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :142569 after 404631
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 162/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 57 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 68 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 71 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 66 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 67 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 68 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 11/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :404631 after 813037
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :813037 after 8.62667e+06
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 2/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 65 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 54 places in 72 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 66 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 66 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 322/322 variables, and 469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 16/16 constraints, State Equation: 159/159 constraints, ReadFeed: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 58757ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 162 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58757ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 60686 ms. Remains : 159/159 places, 163/163 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 159 transition count 149
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 145 transition count 149
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 138 transition count 142
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 138 transition count 142
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 138 transition count 141
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 137 transition count 141
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 137 transition count 140
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 136 transition count 140
Applied a total of 46 rules in 8 ms. Remains 136 /159 variables (removed 23) and now considering 140/163 (removed 23) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 140 rows 136 cols
[2025-06-01 01:11:33] [INFO ] Computed 25 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:11:33] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 4 positive and 21 generalized place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] After 64ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] After 11ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] After 127ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive place invariants in 1 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 4 positive and 21 generalized place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] After 59ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] After 11ms SMT Verify possible using 2 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 46 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] After 90ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] After 203ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4519071078187623294.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5672193215119239602.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4519071078187623294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5672193215119239602.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality5672193215119239602.prop.
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 17
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :17 after 36
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :36 after 52
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :52 after 63
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :63 after 170
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :170 after 307
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :307 after 1280
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :1280 after 3545
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :3545 after 13224
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 4096
SDD size :13224 after 31432
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 8192
SDD size :31432 after 69686
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 16384
SDD size :69686 after 160417
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 32768
SDD size :160417 after 346035
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 65536
SDD size :346035 after 739215
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 131072
SDD size :739215 after 1.55206e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,2 properties remain. new max is 262144
SDD size :1.55206e+06 after 3.21343e+06
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14545638263471682734.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14545638263471682734.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14545638263471682734.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14545638263471682734.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14545638263471682734.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 80 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 38 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12556515149088487794.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 01:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17467599829562619565.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12556515149088487794.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17467599829562619565.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...309
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17467599829562619565.prop.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 30497 ms.
Current structural bounds on expressions (After reachability solving 0 queries.) : Max Seen:[0] Max Struct:[1]
Ending property specific reduction for DoubleExponent-PT-010-UpperBounds-15 in 191879 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14798038972318663670.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14798038972318663670.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14798038972318663670.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14798038972318663670.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14798038972318663670.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 113 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 100 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/UpperBounds18176674557610206975.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-01 01:12:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/UpperBounds1492431191140363037.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/UpperBounds18176674557610206975.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/UpperBounds1492431191140363037.prop' '--nowitness'
its-reach command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...284
Loading property file /tmp/UpperBounds1492431191140363037.prop.
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ UpperBounds = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution UpperBounds -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination UpperBounds -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DoubleExponent-PT-010"
export BK_EXAMINATION="UpperBounds"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DoubleExponent-PT-010, examination is UpperBounds"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r072-tall-174860067600493"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DoubleExponent-PT-010.tgz
mv DoubleExponent-PT-010 execution
cd execution
if [ "UpperBounds" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "Liveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "UpperBounds" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "UpperBounds" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "UpperBounds.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "UpperBounds" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "Liveness" ] || [ "UpperBounds" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME UpperBounds"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;