Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r063-smll-174854070400119.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is Dekker-PT-020, examination is Liveness
Time confinement is 1800 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r063-smll-174854070400119
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 784K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 76K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.7K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 151K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 118K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 247K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

FORMULA_NAME Liveness

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748586598115

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=Liveness
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=1800
BK_INPUT=Dekker-PT-020
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
Liveness PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-30 06:30:00] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, Liveness, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 1800]
[2025-05-30 06:30:00] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-30 06:30:01] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 275 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:01] [INFO ] Transformed 100 places.
[2025-05-30 06:30:01] [INFO ] Transformed 440 transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:30:01] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-30 06:30:01] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 100 places and 440 transitions and 3240 arcs in 515 ms.
Built sparse matrix representations for Structural reductions in 22 ms.12542KB memory used
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 140 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 168 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Computed a total of 0 stabilizing places and 0 stable transitions
Applied a total of 0 rules in 41 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:30:01] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 100 cols
[2025-05-30 06:30:01] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 357 ms returned []
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 291 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 719 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 51 ms returned []
Running 420 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-30 06:30:02] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 20 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 10/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 20/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 80/180 variables, 100/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 180/180 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved in 30057 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 100/100 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 40/40 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 20/20 constraints, State Equation: 100/100 constraints, ReadFeed: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 420/420 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 80/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 70/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 20/100 variables, 20/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 20/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 80/180 variables, 100/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 420/770 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/790 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/810 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/830 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/180 variables, 20/850 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60601ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 420 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60634ms
Finished structural reductions in DEADLOCK mode , in 1 iterations and 61477 ms. Remains : 100/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Random walk for 1250000 steps, including 0 resets, run took 7632 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=163 )
Random directed walk for 1250002 steps, including 0 resets, run took 7129 ms (no deadlock found). (steps per millisecond=175 )
[2025-05-30 06:31:17] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
[2025-05-30 06:31:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 300.0 s and query timeout 30000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 40 positive place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-05-30 06:31:18] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 40 positive and 20 generalized place invariants in 2 ms returned unsat
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:31:18] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
[2025-05-30 06:31:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 328 ms returned [40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55, 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91, 94, 97]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 347 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 80/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 2 iterations and 357 ms. Remains : 80/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Discarding 20 transitions out of 440. Remains 420
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 4552 ms. (8 steps per ms) remains 29/420 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 28/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 27/28 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 26/27 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 25/26 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 23/25 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 65 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 21/23 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 20/21 properties
[2025-05-30 06:31:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 217 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 19/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 17/19 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 35 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 16/17 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 14/16 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 13/14 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 11/13 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 10/11 properties
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 96 ms
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 32 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 8/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 7/8 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 4/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 26 ms. (148 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 2969 steps (5 resets) in 10 ms. (269 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9252804222286767652.gal : 55 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4479554386296638771.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9252804222286767652.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4479554386296638771.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Able to resolve query QuasiLiveness after proving 420 properties.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 0 : 100/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 100 /100 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Flow matrix only has 80 transitions (discarded 360 similar events)
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 481 ms returned [40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 55, 58, 61, 64, 67, 70, 73, 76, 79, 82, 85, 88, 91, 94, 97]
Discarding 20 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 484 ms to find 20 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LIVENESS mode, iteration 1 : 80/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 80 /80 variables (removed 0) and now considering 440/440 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LIVENESS mode , in 2 iterations and 497 ms. Remains : 80/100 places, 440/440 transitions.
Discarding 20 transitions out of 440. Remains 420
Net is quasi-live, checking if it is reversible to establish liveness.
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 71 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12430080162285473965.gal : 16 ms
[2025-05-30 06:31:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18074686990687597841.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12430080162285473965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18074686990687597841.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15343e+07,0.237088,8924,2,252,5,7566,6,0,763,3181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((((((((flag_0_0==1)&&(flag_1_0==0))&&((flag_0_1==1)&&(flag_1_1==0)))&&(((flag_0_2==1)&&(flag_1_2==0))&&((flag_0_3==1)&&(flag_1_3==...1262
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((((((((flag_0_0==1)&&(flag_1_0==0))&&((flag_0_1==1)&&(flag_1_1==0)))&&(((flag_0_...1322
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions exit_0, exit_1, exit_2, exit_3, exit_4, exit_5, exit_6, exit_7, exit_8, exit_9, exit_10, exit...332
(forward)formula 0,1,0.708587,14940,1,0,910,71835,901,444,7068,42360,894
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Able to resolve query Liveness after proving 1 properties.
FORMULA Liveness TRUE TECHNIQUES RANDOM_WALK DECISION_DIAGRAMS BESTFIRST_WALK TOPOLOGICAL QUASI_LIVE_REVERSIBLE
Total runtime 81063 ms.

BK_STOP 1748586681730

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ Liveness = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination Liveness -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 1800

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="Dekker-PT-020"
export BK_EXAMINATION="Liveness"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="1800"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is Dekker-PT-020, examination is Liveness"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r063-smll-174854070400119"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/Dekker-PT-020.tgz
mv Dekker-PT-020 execution
cd execution
if [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "Liveness" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "Liveness" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "Liveness.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' Liveness.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "Liveness" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "Liveness" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "Liveness" = "Liveness" ] || [ "Liveness" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME Liveness"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;