About the Execution of ITS-Tools for DES-PT-30b
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | T?????F?F??????? | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063900321.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-30b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063900321
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 560K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.4K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 124K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 103K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1748710595060
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-30b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 16:56:37] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 16:56:37] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 16:56:37] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 175 ms
[2025-05-31 16:56:37] [INFO ] Transformed 399 places.
[2025-05-31 16:56:37] [INFO ] Transformed 350 transitions.
[2025-05-31 16:56:37] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 16:56:37] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 399 places and 350 transitions and 1143 arcs in 381 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 40 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 106 out of 399 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 399/399 places, 350/350 transitions.
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 396 transition count 350
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 380 transition count 334
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 380 transition count 334
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 373 transition count 327
Iterating global reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 373 transition count 327
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 373 transition count 322
Applied a total of 54 rules in 203 ms. Remains 373 /399 variables (removed 26) and now considering 322/350 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 322 rows 373 cols
[2025-05-31 16:56:38] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 73 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:56:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 1161 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 16:56:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:56:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1633 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 2883 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 321 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 16:56:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 322/695 variables, 373/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 214 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 295 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 450 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 194 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 270 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 197 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 275 ms of which 50 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 290 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 229 ms of which 42 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/695 variables, 14/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 695/695 variables, and 449 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved in 30040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 373/373 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 321/321 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/372 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/373 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 14/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 90 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 119 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 5/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 8/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 373/695 variables, and 112 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved in 30034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 0/373 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/321 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60350ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 321 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60379ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 373/399 places, 322/350 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 63511 ms. Remains : 373/399 places, 322/350 transitions.
Support contains 106 out of 373 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 16:57:42] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-05-31 16:57:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 120 ms
FORMULA DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-31 16:57:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 64 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 322 transitions.
Support contains 97 out of 373 places (down from 106) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (329 resets) in 3271 ms. (12 steps per ms) remains 22/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 47 ms. (83 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 31 ms. (125 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 37 ms. (105 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 41 ms. (95 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 34 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 17 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 20 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (8 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 19 ms. (200 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (8 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (8 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 22/22 properties
[2025-05-31 16:57:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 82/119 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 94/213 variables, 26/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/213 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 140/353 variables, 27/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 3/356 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 22 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp60 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 307/663 variables, 356/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/663 variables, 0/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 18/681 variables, 10/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/681 variables, 0/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 6/687 variables, 3/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 687/695 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 369/373 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 83/117 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 94/211 variables, 26/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 166 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 3/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 142/353 variables, 27/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 129 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 127 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 5/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 3/356 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 307/663 variables, 356/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/663 variables, 20/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 663/695 variables, and 446 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved in 5013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 356/373 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/22 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 10037ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 21 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 34 out of 373 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 808 edges and 373 vertex of which 369 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 4 places using SCC suffix rule.3 ms
Discarding 4 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 369 transition count 301
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 354 transition count 300
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 353 transition count 300
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 353 transition count 291
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 344 transition count 291
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 337 transition count 284
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 337 transition count 284
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 337 transition count 279
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 336 transition count 279
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 336 transition count 278
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 335 transition count 278
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 78 place count 332 transition count 275
Iterating global reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 332 transition count 275
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 332 transition count 273
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 256 transition count 197
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 256 transition count 196
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -5
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 254 transition count 201
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 3 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 254 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 251 transition count 198
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 251 transition count 197
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 251 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 250 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 249 transition count 196
Applied a total of 251 rules in 271 ms. Remains 249 /373 variables (removed 124) and now considering 196/322 (removed 126) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 271 ms. Remains : 249/373 places, 196/322 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1580 resets) in 840 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 20/21 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (25 resets) in 28 ms. (138 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (24 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 25 ms. (154 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (25 resets) in 42 ms. (93 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (30 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (19 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (23 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (28 resets) in 21 ms. (181 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 60 ms. (65 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (30 resets) in 21 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 23 ms. (166 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 18 ms. (210 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (26 resets) in 25 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (24 resets) in 29 ms. (133 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (33 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (28 resets) in 24 ms. (160 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (29 resets) in 22 ms. (174 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 460970 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 ) properties seen :0 out of 20
Probabilistic random walk after 460970 steps, saw 61829 distinct states, run finished after 3009 ms. (steps per millisecond=153 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 249 cols
[2025-05-31 16:57:57] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/59 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/73 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 148/221 variables, 27/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 20/241 variables, 17/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/243 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 196/439 variables, 243/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 6/445 variables, 6/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/445 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 445/445 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 2646 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 249/249 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/59 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/73 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 148/221 variables, 27/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 20/241 variables, 17/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 2/243 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 196/439 variables, 243/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 16/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 0/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 6/445 variables, 6/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 3/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 4/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/445 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 1/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/445 variables, 0/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 445/445 variables, and 336 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 29549 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 249/249 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 32212ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5770 ms.
Support contains 33 out of 249 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 249/249 places, 196/196 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 249 /249 variables (removed 0) and now considering 196/196 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 249/249 places, 196/196 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1558 resets) in 348 ms. (114 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (23 resets) in 40 ms. (97 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (25 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (25 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (22 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (27 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (23 resets) in 15 ms. (250 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (26 resets) in 14 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (23 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (26 resets) in 12 ms. (308 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (22 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (27 resets) in 13 ms. (286 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (25 resets) in 16 ms. (235 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (25 resets) in 13 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4002 steps (26 resets) in 11 ms. (333 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4003 steps (25 resets) in 12 ms. (307 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (25 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (31 resets) in 10 ms. (364 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 4004 steps (19 resets) in 9 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 20/20 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 503331 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=167 ) properties seen :0 out of 20
Probabilistic random walk after 503331 steps, saw 67225 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=167 ) properties seen :0
[2025-05-31 16:58:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/59 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/73 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 148/221 variables, 27/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 20/241 variables, 17/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/243 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 196/439 variables, 243/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 6/445 variables, 6/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 162 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/445 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/445 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 445/445 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 6384 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 249/249 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/33 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 26/59 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/73 variables, 7/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 148/221 variables, 27/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 20/241 variables, 17/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 134 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/243 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/243 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 196/439 variables, 243/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 16/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/439 variables, 0/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 6/445 variables, 6/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 3/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 4/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 2/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/445 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 445/445 variables, and 337 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 26262 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 249/249 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 32676ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 6182 ms.
Support contains 33 out of 249 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 249/249 places, 196/196 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 249 /249 variables (removed 0) and now considering 196/196 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 11 ms. Remains : 249/249 places, 196/196 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 249/249 places, 196/196 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 249 /249 variables (removed 0) and now considering 196/196 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 16:59:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 239 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 16:59:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 666 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 907 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 16:59:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 13/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 4/249 variables, 15/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 196/445 variables, 249/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 166 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 112 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 4/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 134 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/445 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 16:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 445/445 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 249/249 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 13/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 6/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/245 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/245 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 4/249 variables, 15/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 196/445 variables, 249/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 191/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 445/445 variables, and 510 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 249/249 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60140ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60143ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 61083 ms. Remains : 249/249 places, 196/196 transitions.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-05-31 17:00:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 322 transitions.
Computed a total of 180 stabilizing places and 172 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 808 edges and 373 vertex of which 365 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.13 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 360 transition count 309
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 360 transition count 309
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 360 transition count 305
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 354 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 354 transition count 299
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 354 transition count 295
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 353 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 353 transition count 294
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 353 transition count 293
Applied a total of 49 rules in 49 ms. Remains 353 /373 variables (removed 20) and now considering 293/322 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 293 rows 353 cols
[2025-05-31 17:00:18] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 509 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:00:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1724 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:00:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/353 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 293/646 variables, 353/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 203 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 165 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 245 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 247 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 153 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 141 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 148 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 146 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 176 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 155 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 184 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/646 variables, 20/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/646 variables, 14/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 646/646 variables, and 450 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 353/353 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/353 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 35/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 129 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 122 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 168 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 168 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 166 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 161 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 13/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 8/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 145 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 170 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 160 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 8/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 7/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
(s145 0timeout
^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 1)
(s2 1)
(s3 1)
(s4 1)
(s5 10)
(s6 1)
(s7 1)
(s8 1)
(s9 1)
(s10 1)
(s11 1)
(s12 1)
(s13 1)
(s14 7)
(s15 1)
(s16 1)
(s17 6)
(s18 1)
(s19 1)
(s20 1)
(s21 1)
(s22 1)
(s23 1)
(s24 1)
(s25 11)
(s26 1)
(s27 1)
(s28 1)
(s29 1)
(s30 1)
(s31 1)
(s32 1)
(s33 1)
(s34 1)
(s35 9)
(s36 8)
(s37 1)
(s38 1)
(s39 1)
(s40 1)
(s41 1)
(s42 1)
(s43 1)
(s44 1)
(s45 1)
(s46 1)
(s47 1)
(s48 1)
(s49 1)
(s50 1)
(s51 1)
(s52 1)
(s53 1)
(s54 13)
(s55 1)
(s56 1)
(s57 1)
(s58 3)
(s59 1)
(s60 1)
(s61 1)
(s62 1)
(s63 1)
(s64 1)
(s65 1)
(s66 1)
(s67 1)
(s68 1)
(s69 31)
(s70 1)
(s71 1)
(s72 1)
(s73 1)
(s74 1)
(s75 1)
(s76 1)
(s77 1)
(s78 1)
(s79 1)
(s80 1)
(s81 1)
(s82 1)
(s83 1)
(s84 1)
(s85 1)
(s86 1)
(s87 1)
(s88 1)
(s89 1)
(s90 1)
(s91 1)
(s92 1)
(s93 1)
(s94 1)
(s95 1)
(s96 1)
(s97 32)
(s98 1)
(s99 1)
(s100 1)
(s101 1)
(s102 1)
(s103 1)
(s104 1)
(s105 1)
(s106 1)
(s107 1)
(s108 1)
(s109 1)
(s110 1)
(s111 1)
(s112 1)
(s113 1)
(s114 1)
(s115 1)
(s116 1)
(s117 1)
(s118 1)
(s119 1)
(s120 1)
(s121 1)
(s122 1)
(s123 1)
(s124 1)
(s125 1)
(s126 1)
(s127 0)
(s128 0)
(s129 0)
(s130 0)
(s131 0)
(s132 0)
(s133 0)
(s134 0)
(s135 1)
(s136 0)
(s137 0)
(s138 0)
(s139 1)
(s140 0)
(s141 0)
(s142 1)
(s143 0)
(s144 0)
(s145 0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 353/646 variables, and 133 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/353 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/292 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60076ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60077ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 353/373 places, 293/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61851 ms. Remains : 353/373 places, 293/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:01:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 293 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:01:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12346967808427177283.gal : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17834545443444766198.ctl : 8 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12346967808427177283.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17834545443444766198.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6215098861306949025.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6215098861306949025.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6215098861306949025.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6215098861306949025.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6215098861306949025.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6651683973678841522.gal : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 17:01:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality186650586175585844.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6651683973678841522.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality186650586175585844.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 360 transition count 309
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 360 transition count 309
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 360 transition count 305
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 354 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 354 transition count 299
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 354 transition count 295
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 353 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 353 transition count 294
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 353 transition count 293
Applied a total of 49 rules in 68 ms. Remains 353 /373 variables (removed 20) and now considering 293/322 (removed 29) transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:02:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 416 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:02:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1208 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1628 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:02:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/353 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 293/646 variables, 353/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 117 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 156 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 161 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 95 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 182 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 171 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 150 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 112 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 151 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 156 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/646 variables, 20/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/646 variables, 14/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 209 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 646/646 variables, and 451 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 353/353 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/353 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 36/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 17/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 163 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 124 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 4/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 293/646 variables, 353/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/646 variables, 292/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 646/646 variables, and 764 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 353/353 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60120ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60123ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 353/373 places, 293/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61821 ms. Remains : 353/373 places, 293/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 293 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9155772620000030664.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9200653449015728116.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9155772620000030664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9200653449015728116.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13755324110165338085.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13755324110165338085.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13755324110165338085.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13755324110165338085.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13755324110165338085.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 56 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8690166690934784789.gal : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 17:03:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7691270764115821415.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8690166690934784789.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7691270764115821415.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 808 edges and 373 vertex of which 365 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 364 transition count 302
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 350 transition count 302
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 350 transition count 290
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 338 transition count 290
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 328 transition count 280
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 328 transition count 280
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 328 transition count 275
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 327 transition count 275
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 327 transition count 274
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 326 transition count 274
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 86 place count 321 transition count 269
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 321 transition count 269
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 321 transition count 264
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 320 transition count 263
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 320 transition count 262
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 319 transition count 262
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 248 transition count 191
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 246 transition count 189
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 245 transition count 189
Applied a total of 245 rules in 137 ms. Remains 245 /373 variables (removed 128) and now considering 189/322 (removed 133) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 189 rows 245 cols
[2025-05-31 17:04:24] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:04:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 391 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:04:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:04:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 665 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1068 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:04:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 186 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:04:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 18/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/244 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 189/433 variables, 244/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/433 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/433 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/434 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:04:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 165 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/434 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 434/434 variables, and 305 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 245/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 186/186 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 18/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/244 variables, 8/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 189/433 variables, 244/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/433 variables, 186/490 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 433/434 variables, and 493 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 244/245 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 186/186 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 186 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60091ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 245/373 places, 189/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61346 ms. Remains : 245/373 places, 189/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 189 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1199952847486503580.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality759695685684268688.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1199952847486503580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality759695685684268688.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11614726709579607279.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11614726709579607279.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11614726709579607279.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11614726709579607279.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11614726709579607279.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1774295847821035469.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 17:05:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2169813284515749422.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1774295847821035469.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2169813284515749422.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.12162e+14,1.81847,49792,4344,3832,112859,9733,305,93091,311,55043,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((u50.p61==0)||(i0.u2.p100==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((u50.p61==0)||(i0.u2.p100==1))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,5.94567,126208,1,0,233636,52507,1160,479470,2209,296302,238593
FORMULA DES-PT-30b-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 362 transition count 311
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 362 transition count 311
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 362 transition count 307
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 357 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 357 transition count 302
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 357 transition count 299
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 356 transition count 298
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 356 transition count 298
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 356 transition count 297
Applied a total of 42 rules in 36 ms. Remains 356 /373 variables (removed 17) and now considering 297/322 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 297 rows 356 cols
[2025-05-31 17:06:01] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 298 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:06:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 969 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1271 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 296 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:06:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/356 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 297/653 variables, 356/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 153 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 170 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 214 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 182 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 147 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 141 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 152 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 112 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/653 variables, 16/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 179 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 121 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 315 ms of which 43 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 223 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 235 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30233ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 296 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30237ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 356/373 places, 297/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31545 ms. Remains : 356/373 places, 297/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 297 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6532684011252005495.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 17:06:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality433808062002894121.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6532684011252005495.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality433808062002894121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph327910504277702046.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph327910504277702046.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph327910504277702046.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph327910504277702046.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph327910504277702046.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10868149958982334706.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14120447077617261862.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10868149958982334706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14120447077617261862.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 361 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 361 transition count 310
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 361 transition count 306
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 356 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 356 transition count 301
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 356 transition count 298
Applied a total of 41 rules in 34 ms. Remains 356 /373 variables (removed 17) and now considering 298/322 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 298 rows 356 cols
[2025-05-31 17:07:33] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 381 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:07:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1488 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1871 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 297 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:07:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/356 variables, 33/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 298/654 variables, 356/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 230 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 162 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 235 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 228 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 224 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 222 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 164 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 115 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/654 variables, 10/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 654/654 variables, and 428 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 356/356 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 297/297 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/356 variables, 33/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 10/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 144 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 122 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 19/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 20/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 298/654 variables, 356/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/654 variables, 297/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 654/654 variables, and 764 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 356/356 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 297/297 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60092ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 297 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60095ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 356/373 places, 298/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 62002 ms. Remains : 356/373 places, 298/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 298 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14505788852652493631.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 17:08:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7810510815769492512.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14505788852652493631.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7810510815769492512.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph744680257891108239.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph744680257891108239.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph744680257891108239.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph744680257891108239.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph744680257891108239.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15260011589636702146.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4548800153018157897.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15260011589636702146.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4548800153018157897.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 808 edges and 373 vertex of which 365 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 364 transition count 306
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 354 transition count 305
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 353 transition count 305
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 353 transition count 295
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 343 transition count 295
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 334 transition count 286
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 334 transition count 286
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 334 transition count 282
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 333 transition count 282
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 333 transition count 281
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 332 transition count 281
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 73 place count 327 transition count 276
Iterating global reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 327 transition count 276
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 5 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 327 transition count 271
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 326 transition count 270
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 7 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 326 transition count 269
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 87 place count 325 transition count 269
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 227 place count 255 transition count 199
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 2 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 2 transitions
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 229 place count 255 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 231 place count 253 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 252 transition count 197
Applied a total of 232 rules in 80 ms. Remains 252 /373 variables (removed 121) and now considering 197/322 (removed 125) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 252 cols
[2025-05-31 17:09:36] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 304 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:09:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 763 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1079 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:37] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 4 ms returned []
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:09:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/251 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 197/448 variables, 251/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/449 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 3/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:09:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 449/449 variables, and 316 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 252/252 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 6/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/251 variables, 7/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 197/448 variables, 251/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/448 variables, 194/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 448/449 variables, and 509 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 251/252 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60105ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60106ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 252/373 places, 197/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61283 ms. Remains : 252/373 places, 197/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 17:10:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 17:10:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 17:10:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10406045881568986786.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 17:10:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16082014684792930596.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10406045881568986786.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16082014684792930596.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13307638997079955830.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13307638997079955830.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13307638997079955830.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13307638997079955830.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13307638997079955830.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1614179990002079235.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7725679314175803972.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1614179990002079235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7725679314175803972.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.68442e+14,2.88196,62936,4715,3846,140306,8473,360,126309,321,46654,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(E((i2.u10.p224==1) U ((i2.u6.p190==0)||(u13.p94==1))) U ((i6.i3.u23.p290==0)||(i10.i0.u33.p327==1))) + EF(((i2.u1.p147!=0)||((i10.i...196
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((i2.u1.p147!=0)||((i10.i1.u47.p388!=0)&&(i10.i0.u43.p367!=1)))))) * !(E(E((i2.u...259
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t117, t157, t160, t163, t195, u13.t82, u14.t140, u48.t3, u48.t165, i0.t19, i0.u2.t23, i0.u2.t...629
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 361 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 361 transition count 310
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 361 transition count 307
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 355 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 355 transition count 301
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 355 transition count 297
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 354 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 354 transition count 296
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 354 transition count 295
Applied a total of 46 rules in 29 ms. Remains 354 /373 variables (removed 19) and now considering 295/322 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 354 cols
[2025-05-31 17:11:37] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 319 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:11:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1313 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1633 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:11:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 33/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 295/649 variables, 354/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 270 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 267 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 134 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 138 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 136 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/649 variables, 20/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 189 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 186 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 185 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 142 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/649 variables, 9/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 649/649 variables, and 445 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 33/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 29/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 7/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 6/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 295/649 variables, 354/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/649 variables, 294/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 649/649 variables, and 752 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60069ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60070ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 354/373 places, 295/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61734 ms. Remains : 354/373 places, 295/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11829997297087904565.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:12:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6430221365702732526.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11829997297087904565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6430221365702732526.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph457311698884429565.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph457311698884429565.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph457311698884429565.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph457311698884429565.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph457311698884429565.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2602629907042451534.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4153149935339643373.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2602629907042451534.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4153149935339643373.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 360 transition count 309
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 360 transition count 309
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 360 transition count 305
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 354 transition count 299
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 354 transition count 299
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 354 transition count 295
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 353 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 353 transition count 294
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 353 transition count 293
Applied a total of 49 rules in 27 ms. Remains 353 /373 variables (removed 20) and now considering 293/322 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 293 rows 353 cols
[2025-05-31 17:13:39] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 311 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:13:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1423 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 292 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:13:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/353 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 293/646 variables, 353/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 226 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 195 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 150 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 244 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 234 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 201 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 153 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 210 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 169 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 182 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 167 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 173 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 154 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 262 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 211 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 151 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/646 variables, 20/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/646 variables, 14/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 646/646 variables, and 449 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 353/353 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 292/292 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/352 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/353 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 34/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 170 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 143 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 161 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 133 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 154 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 131 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 140 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 12/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 164 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 5/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 5/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 353/646 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/353 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/292 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60085ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 292 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60087ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 353/373 places, 293/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61539 ms. Remains : 353/373 places, 293/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:14:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 293 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:14:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16830026534435305523.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 17:14:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12158004016064278605.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16830026534435305523.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12158004016064278605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10828968352078558621.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10828968352078558621.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10828968352078558621.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10828968352078558621.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10828968352078558621.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16694865546577063760.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6980907682527204993.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16694865546577063760.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6980907682527204993.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.58066e+20,6.35641,121828,10257,2701,231521,15426,644,396607,324,88699,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EX(EX(EF(((i9.u74.p53==0)||(i7.u49.p305==1))))) * AG(AF((i3.u8.p148==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(EX(E(TRUE U ((i9.u74.p53==0)||(i7.u49.p305==1)))))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),!((...181
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 363 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 363 transition count 312
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 363 transition count 309
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 358 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 358 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 358 transition count 300
Applied a total of 37 rules in 36 ms. Remains 358 /373 variables (removed 15) and now considering 300/322 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 300 rows 358 cols
[2025-05-31 17:15:41] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 492 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:15:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 890 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1390 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 299 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:15:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/358 variables, 33/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 12/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 300/658 variables, 358/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 163 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 146 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 169 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 127 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 248 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 234 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 241 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 224 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 200 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/658 variables, 19/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 658/658 variables, and 439 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 358/358 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 299/299 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/358 variables, 33/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 12/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 19/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 157 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 131 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 114 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 12/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 113 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 6/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 161 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 3/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 358/658 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 0/358 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/299 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60098ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 299 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60101ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 358/373 places, 300/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61529 ms. Remains : 358/373 places, 300/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 300 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11793485218505638892.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 17:16:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality582389982635314205.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11793485218505638892.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality582389982635314205.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16580189572484078729.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16580189572484078729.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16580189572484078729.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16580189572484078729.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16580189572484078729.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8527370679116400449.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16011651912874256471.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8527370679116400449.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16011651912874256471.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 361 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 361 transition count 310
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 361 transition count 307
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 355 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 355 transition count 301
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 355 transition count 297
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 354 transition count 296
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 354 transition count 296
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 354 transition count 295
Applied a total of 46 rules in 28 ms. Remains 354 /373 variables (removed 19) and now considering 295/322 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 295 rows 354 cols
[2025-05-31 17:17:43] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 477 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:17:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 1181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1663 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 294 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:17:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 33/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 295/649 variables, 354/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 233 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 331 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 137 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/649 variables, 20/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 99 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 193 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 148 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/649 variables, 9/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/649 variables, 1/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 649/649 variables, and 446 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 33/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 13/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 30/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 75 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 144 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 13/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 114 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 141 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 4/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 166 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 295/649 variables, 354/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/649 variables, 294/760 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 649/649 variables, and 760 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 294/294 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60098ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 294 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60100ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 354/373 places, 295/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61796 ms. Remains : 354/373 places, 295/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 295 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15158460922219315741.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:18:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11509828855190907727.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15158460922219315741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11509828855190907727.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9300054927197367445.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9300054927197367445.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9300054927197367445.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9300054927197367445.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9300054927197367445.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15250635835136287100.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:19:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18072860420678222120.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15250635835136287100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18072860420678222120.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 361 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 361 transition count 310
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 361 transition count 306
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 356 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 356 transition count 301
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 356 transition count 298
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 355 transition count 297
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 355 transition count 297
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 355 transition count 296
Applied a total of 44 rules in 31 ms. Remains 355 /373 variables (removed 18) and now considering 296/322 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 296 rows 355 cols
[2025-05-31 17:19:45] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:19:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 367 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:19:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:19:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 809 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1178 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 295 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:19:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/355 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 296/651 variables, 355/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 157 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 227 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 211 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 191 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 165 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 171 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 177 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 131 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 184 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/651 variables, 20/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 266 ms of which 39 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 651/651 variables, and 438 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 355/355 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/355 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 21/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 13/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 20/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/355 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 296/651 variables, 355/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/651 variables, 295/766 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 651/651 variables, and 766 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 355/355 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 295/295 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60090ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 295 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60093ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 355/373 places, 296/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61304 ms. Remains : 355/373 places, 296/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 296 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality737786212956423015.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 17:20:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15929274072521163557.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality737786212956423015.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15929274072521163557.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:21:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:21:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13324451121293134602.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13324451121293134602.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13324451121293134602.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13324451121293134602.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13324451121293134602.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:21:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:21:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:21:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:21:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:21:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3523134612227054945.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14832924355689257030.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3523134612227054945.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14832924355689257030.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 808 edges and 373 vertex of which 366 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 7 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 7 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 365 transition count 304
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 352 transition count 303
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 351 transition count 303
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 351 transition count 292
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 340 transition count 292
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 60 place count 331 transition count 283
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 331 transition count 283
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 331 transition count 278
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 330 transition count 278
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 330 transition count 277
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 329 transition count 277
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 325 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 325 transition count 273
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 325 transition count 270
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 325 transition count 269
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 324 transition count 269
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 253 transition count 198
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 253 transition count 197
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 253 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 251 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 250 transition count 195
Applied a total of 237 rules in 97 ms. Remains 250 /373 variables (removed 123) and now considering 195/322 (removed 127) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 250 cols
[2025-05-31 17:21:47] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 324 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:21:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 499 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 825 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:21:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 16/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/249 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 195/444 variables, 249/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 3/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 1/445 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 445/445 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 250/250 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 16/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 6/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/249 variables, 10/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 195/444 variables, 249/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/444 variables, 191/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 444/445 variables, and 504 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 249/250 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60063ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 250/373 places, 195/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60994 ms. Remains : 250/373 places, 195/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:22:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:22:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13994413044003994911.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 17:22:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6374819722156395001.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13994413044003994911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6374819722156395001.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15644917342652269060.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15644917342652269060.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15644917342652269060.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15644917342652269060.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15644917342652269060.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14040294007197496953.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 17:23:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7957968757011455306.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14040294007197496953.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7957968757011455306.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.61801e+14,2.82456,67560,5389,3644,151508,10844,346,130330,313,50403,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(EG(AF(((u16.p7==1)&&((i0.u3.p104==0)||(i0.u3.p154==1))))) U (((i11.i0.u19.p277==0) * E(A(((i2.u42.p351==0)||(i12.i0.u43.p353==1)) U ...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(EG(!(EG(!(((u16.p7==1)&&((i0.u3.p104==0)||(i0.u3.p154==1))))))) U (((i11.i0.u19.p277==0)...389
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t116, t156, t159, t162, u15.t44, u16.t136, u50.t0, u50.t164, i0.t8, i0.u3.t11, i0.u3.t78, i0....636
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 363 transition count 312
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 363 transition count 312
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 363 transition count 308
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 359 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 359 transition count 304
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 359 transition count 301
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 36 place count 358 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 358 transition count 300
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 358 transition count 299
Applied a total of 38 rules in 31 ms. Remains 358 /373 variables (removed 15) and now considering 299/322 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 299 rows 358 cols
[2025-05-31 17:23:48] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:23:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 342 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:23:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:23:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 953 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1297 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 298 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:23:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/358 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 299/657 variables, 358/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 20/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 123 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 3/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 194 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 126 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 3/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 657/657 variables, and 446 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 358/358 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 298/298 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/357 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/358 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 26/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 11/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 200 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 299/657 variables, 358/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/657 variables, 298/759 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 657/657 variables, and 759 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 358/358 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 298/298 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 298 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60073ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 358/373 places, 299/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61403 ms. Remains : 358/373 places, 299/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 299 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7595785357808790370.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 17:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9622373157975642508.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7595785357808790370.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9622373157975642508.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11193131273824595749.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11193131273824595749.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11193131273824595749.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11193131273824595749.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11193131273824595749.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13087139426202796172.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:25:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16781666195756114270.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13087139426202796172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16781666195756114270.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 373/373 places, 322/322 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 361 transition count 310
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 361 transition count 310
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 361 transition count 306
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 355 transition count 300
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 355 transition count 300
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 355 transition count 296
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 354 transition count 295
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 354 transition count 295
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 354 transition count 294
Applied a total of 47 rules in 26 ms. Remains 354 /373 variables (removed 19) and now considering 294/322 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 294 rows 354 cols
[2025-05-31 17:25:49] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:25:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 315 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 17:25:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:25:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 899 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1236 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 293 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:25:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 294/648 variables, 354/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 158 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 106 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 113 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/648 variables, 20/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/648 variables, 3/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/648 variables, 1/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 648/648 variables, and 440 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 293/293 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 121 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 97 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 118 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 20/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 120 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 157 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 161 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 146 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 98 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 20/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 294/648 variables, 354/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/648 variables, 293/779 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60089ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 293 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60090ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 354/373 places, 294/322 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61355 ms. Remains : 354/373 places, 294/322 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 294 transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2248396406245079031.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 17:26:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5042801706871369524.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2248396406245079031.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5042801706871369524.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16662424806718474563.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16662424806718474563.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16662424806718474563.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16662424806718474563.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16662424806718474563.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3099452514494480045.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 17:27:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9875138484079157226.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3099452514494480045.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9875138484079157226.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.6697e+20,29.4312,615560,37988,2221,1.5851e+06,10431,665,1.38287e+06,302,43688,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9501323370877905759.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9501323370877905759.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9501323370877905759.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9501323370877905759.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9501323370877905759.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 25 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14095129478989021587.gal : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 17:27:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9632384653170237649.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14095129478989021587.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9632384653170237649.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.82565e+21,79.6406,709056,13151,2438,1.25288e+06,17073,746,1.61886e+06,318,79710,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(AX(((i1.i1.u38.p246==0)||(i9.i0.u51.p274==1)))) * AF(((AF((i11.u84.p394==1)) + (i10.i0.u49.p276==1)) + (i11.u84.p393==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(!(EX(!(((i1.i1.u38.p246==0)||(i9.i0.u51.p274==1)))))))) * !(EG(!(((!(EG(!((i11.u84.p394==1)))...216
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t60, t95, t136, t236, t278, u37.t81, i2.i0.u15.t120, i2.i1.u13.t124, i3.t127, i3.i0.u8.t2...1200
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-30b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-30b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063900321"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-30b.tgz
mv DES-PT-30b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;