Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063900305.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-20b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063900305
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 60K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 142K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748698068088

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-20b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 129 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Transformed 360 places.
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Transformed 311 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 360 places and 311 transitions and 987 arcs in 277 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 21 ms.
FORMULA DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 83 out of 360 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 360/360 places, 311/311 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 358 transition count 311
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 341 transition count 294
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 341 transition count 294
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 335 transition count 288
Iterating global reduction 1 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 335 transition count 288
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 335 transition count 284
Applied a total of 52 rules in 138 ms. Remains 335 /360 variables (removed 25) and now considering 284/311 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 284 rows 335 cols
[2025-05-31 13:27:50] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 61 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 623 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:27:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 785 ms returned [26]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1464 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 334/360 places, 284/311 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 334 /334 variables (removed 0) and now considering 284/284 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1637 ms. Remains : 334/360 places, 284/311 transitions.
Support contains 83 out of 334 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 13:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 59 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 284 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 334 places (down from 83) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (345 resets) in 3073 ms. (13 steps per ms) remains 10/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (53 resets) in 128 ms. (310 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (49 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (47 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (59 resets) in 200 ms. (199 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (61 resets) in 121 ms. (327 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (49 resets) in 179 ms. (222 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (51 resets) in 146 ms. (272 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (48 resets) in 98 ms. (404 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (51 resets) in 125 ms. (317 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (50 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 10/10 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 284 rows 334 cols
[2025-05-31 13:27:54] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 52/68 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 126/194 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 128/322 variables, 25/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 4/326 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 277/603 variables, 326/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/388 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 7/610 variables, 4/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 183 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 138 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 158 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 6/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 0/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 4/614 variables, 2/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 116 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/614 variables, 5/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/614 variables, 0/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/616 variables, 1/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/616 variables, 0/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 2/618 variables, 1/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/618 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/618 variables, 0/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 618/618 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved in 4559 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 334/334 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 52/68 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 126/194 variables, 28/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 6/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/194 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 128/322 variables, 25/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 4/326 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/326 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 277/603 variables, 326/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 10/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 10 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp21 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 2/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 1/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/603 variables, 0/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 7/610 variables, 4/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 3/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 89 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/610 variables, 6/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 610/618 variables, and 422 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved in 5008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 330/334 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 9625ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 9 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 14 out of 334 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 692 edges and 334 vertex of which 328 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 6 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 6 places :
Also discarding 3 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 3 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 328 transition count 266
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 314 transition count 265
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 313 transition count 265
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 313 transition count 257
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 305 transition count 257
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 295 transition count 247
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 295 transition count 247
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 295 transition count 241
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 294 transition count 241
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 5 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 79 place count 290 transition count 237
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 83 place count 290 transition count 237
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 290 transition count 234
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 290 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 288 transition count 232
Performed 79 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 79
Deduced a syphon composed of 79 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 79 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 158 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 209 transition count 153
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 209 transition count 152
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -5
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 207 transition count 157
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 207 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 206 transition count 156
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 206 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 205 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 8 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 204 transition count 155
Applied a total of 258 rules in 138 ms. Remains 204 /334 variables (removed 130) and now considering 155/284 (removed 129) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 139 ms. Remains : 204/334 places, 155/284 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1879 resets) in 646 ms. (61 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (323 resets) in 192 ms. (207 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (344 resets) in 175 ms. (227 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (324 resets) in 147 ms. (270 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (323 resets) in 178 ms. (223 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (333 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (333 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (341 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (357 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (325 resets) in 151 ms. (263 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 503026 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=167 ) properties seen :0 out of 9
Probabilistic random walk after 503026 steps, saw 72238 distinct states, run finished after 3014 ms. (steps per millisecond=166 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 204 cols
[2025-05-31 13:28:08] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/21 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/35 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/142 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 27/169 variables, 22/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 3/172 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 135/307 variables, 172/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 38/345 variables, 18/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 14/359 variables, 14/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/359 variables, 0/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 359/359 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 926 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/14 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 7/21 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 14/35 variables, 7/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 107/142 variables, 22/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 27/169 variables, 22/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 3/172 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 135/307 variables, 172/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 5/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/307 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 38/345 variables, 18/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 4/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/345 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 14/359 variables, 14/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/359 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 359/359 variables, and 272 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 2848 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3793ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Fused 9 Parikh solutions to 8 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 12807 ms.
Support contains 14 out of 204 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 155/155 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 155/155 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 10 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 155/155 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 204/204 places, 155/155 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 155/155 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:28:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 222 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:28:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 336 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 561 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:28:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 155/358 variables, 203/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/359 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 4/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/359 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 359/359 variables, and 269 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 16554 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 35/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 24/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 6/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 155/358 variables, 203/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 154/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/358 variables, 0/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/359 variables, 1/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 359/359 variables, and 423 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 35/35 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 24/24 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 46669ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46673ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 47257 ms. Remains : 204/204 places, 155/155 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 204 transition count 155
Applied a total of 1 rules in 16 ms. Remains 204 /204 variables (removed 0) and now considering 155/155 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 9 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 204 cols
[2025-05-31 13:29:11] [INFO ] Computed 59 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 10 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 35 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 15 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] After 150ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:9
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 9 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive and 24 generalized place invariants in 14 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] After 291ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :9
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-31 13:29:12] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 176 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 101 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 2
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] After 1265ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :9
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] After 1650ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :9
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 1844 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 41 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 284 transitions.
Computed a total of 137 stabilizing places and 130 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 692 edges and 334 vertex of which 326 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.18 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 322 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 322 transition count 273
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 322 transition count 270
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 316 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 316 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 316 transition count 260
Applied a total of 42 rules in 31 ms. Remains 316 /334 variables (removed 18) and now considering 260/284 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 260 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-31 13:29:13] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 305 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:29:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 747 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1058 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 259 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:29:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 105 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 9/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 138 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 126 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 106 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 10/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 260/576 variables, 316/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 236 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 325 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 97 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 169 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 168 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/576 variables, 7/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 576/576 variables, and 409 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 259/259 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 32/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 136 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 212 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 243 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 249 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 180 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 98 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 8/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 6/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 5/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 7/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 94 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 100 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 15/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 260/576 variables, 316/450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 576/576 variables, and 709 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved in 30045 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 259/259 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60146ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 259 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60150ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 316/334 places, 260/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61242 ms. Remains : 316/334 places, 260/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:30:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 260 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:30:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6673040466981026946.gal : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17769871736080466520.ctl : 19 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6673040466981026946.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17769871736080466520.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6937599303611161676.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6937599303611161676.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6937599303611161676.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6937599303611161676.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6937599303611161676.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 88 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18372689638814832629.gal : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 13:30:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8577223341088848055.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18372689638814832629.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8577223341088848055.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.52845e+20,2.91079,74324,7542,1474,165980,9015,673,153144,246,40581,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((!(((i4.u29.p192==0)||(i5.i1.u25.p169==1))) + EF((i2.u8.p116==1))) U A(AX(EX((i4.u28.p186==1))) U AX(!(((i5.i1.u17.p152==0)||(i10.i4...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),(!(((i4.u29.p192==0)||(i5.i1.u25.p169==1))) + E(TRUE U (i2.u8.p116==1)))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(((i...382
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t58, t192, t220, t221, t253, u34.t76, u32.t79, u76.t17, u76.t153, i2.t116, i2.u7.t177, i2...953
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 320 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 320 transition count 271
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 320 transition count 266
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 314 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 314 transition count 260
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 314 transition count 256
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 313 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 313 transition count 255
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 313 transition count 254
Applied a total of 51 rules in 62 ms. Remains 313 /334 variables (removed 21) and now considering 254/284 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 254 rows 313 cols
[2025-05-31 13:31:16] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 539 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:31:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 812 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1355 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:31:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 171 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 110 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 254/567 variables, 313/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 152 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 153 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 143 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 146 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 163 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 164 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 175 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30069ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30073ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31492 ms. Remains : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3115241202661012215.gal : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 13:31:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17459110466883077709.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3115241202661012215.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17459110466883077709.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13818066870458712974.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13818066870458712974.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13818066870458712974.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13818066870458712974.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13818066870458712974.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15935176322577658421.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7507582685729375495.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15935176322577658421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7507582685729375495.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07989e+20,3.71034,88980,8134,1360,215124,8278,637,211782,247,39608,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(AX(((EF((i3.u9.p79==1)) + E((i7.i1.i0.u44.p246==1) U (i0.u1.p3==0))) + ((i6.u58.p308==0)&&(u34.p7==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(EX(!(((E(TRUE U (i3.u9.p79==1)) + E((i7.i1.i0.u44.p246==1) U (i0.u1.p3==0))) + ((i6.u58.p308...189
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t56, t188, t215, t216, t248, u34.t76, i0.u32.t79, i2.t119, i2.u7.t124, i2.u7.t125, i2.u8....893
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 692 edges and 334 vertex of which 326 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 325 transition count 264
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 311 transition count 264
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 311 transition count 253
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 300 transition count 253
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 290 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 290 transition count 243
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 290 transition count 239
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 80 place count 285 transition count 234
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 285 transition count 234
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 285 transition count 229
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 284 transition count 229
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 284 transition count 227
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 282 transition count 227
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 212 transition count 157
Drop transitions (Redundant composition of simpler transitions.) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transition composition rules discarded 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 212 transition count 156
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 237 place count 212 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 239 place count 210 transition count 154
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 240 place count 209 transition count 154
Applied a total of 240 rules in 119 ms. Remains 209 /334 variables (removed 125) and now considering 154/284 (removed 130) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 209 cols
[2025-05-31 13:32:48] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 217 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:32:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 361 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 583 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 6 ms returned []
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:32:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 18/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/208 variables, 8/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 154/362 variables, 208/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 4/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/363 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 113 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 3/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/363 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 363/363 variables, and 274 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 20085 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 26/26 constraints, State Equation: 209/209 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 18/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/208 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 154/362 variables, 208/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 151/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 50125ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50127ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 209/334 places, 154/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50841 ms. Remains : 209/334 places, 154/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:33:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 154 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:33:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:33:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12573451072825514813.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:33:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5518617969569841730.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12573451072825514813.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5518617969569841730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11847592769651719705.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11847592769651719705.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11847592769651719705.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11847592769651719705.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11847592769651719705.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14060147266012963829.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11430830256220223273.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14060147266012963829.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11430830256220223273.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.00442e+14,1.27233,35220,3295,1920,77774,4997,322,73704,232,24475,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((i2.u7.p151==0)||(i0.u4.p114==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((i2.u7.p151==0)||(i0.u4.p114==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t92, t123, t128, t131, u15.t53, u16.t99, u51.t0, u51.t133, i0.t8, i0.u2.t14, i0.u2.t18, i0.u2...526
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 320 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 320 transition count 271
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 320 transition count 266
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 314 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 314 transition count 260
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 314 transition count 256
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 313 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 313 transition count 255
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 313 transition count 254
Applied a total of 51 rules in 33 ms. Remains 313 /334 variables (removed 21) and now considering 254/284 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 254 rows 313 cols
[2025-05-31 13:34:39] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:34:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 754 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1023 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:34:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 144 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 254/567 variables, 313/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 219 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 204 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 141 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 129 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 168 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 140 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 216 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 153 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 7/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 33/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 95 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 100 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 12/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 254/567 variables, 313/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 253/673 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 567/567 variables, and 682 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61115 ms. Remains : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6613274428461387880.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 13:35:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5677748337108300347.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6613274428461387880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5677748337108300347.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8271291415271914950.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8271291415271914950.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8271291415271914950.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8271291415271914950.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8271291415271914950.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15223186909771613098.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13602767704607828277.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15223186909771613098.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13602767704607828277.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07989e+20,22.096,404372,42223,1507,1.04364e+06,10624,695,825958,253,44264,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 322 transition count 273
Iterating global reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 322 transition count 273
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 322 transition count 269
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 317 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 317 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 317 transition count 261
Applied a total of 40 rules in 34 ms. Remains 317 /334 variables (removed 17) and now considering 261/284 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-31 13:36:40] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 422 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:36:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 760 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 260 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:36:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 16/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 261/578 variables, 317/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 283 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 128 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 188 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 283 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 253 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 229 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 221 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 207 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 150 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 148 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 20/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 578/578 variables, and 417 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 317/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 39/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 103 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 175 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 171 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 20/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 261/578 variables, 317/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/578 variables, 260/702 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 578/578 variables, and 702 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 317/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60078ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60080ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/334 places, 261/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61301 ms. Remains : 317/334 places, 261/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15644647149839721057.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:37:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2512564940266696816.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15644647149839721057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2512564940266696816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4035038534886607111.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4035038534886607111.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4035038534886607111.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4035038534886607111.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4035038534886607111.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7486617769449123535.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5453326963269024720.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7486617769449123535.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5453326963269024720.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.69044e+20,7.58817,166276,13900,1205,367505,10387,679,342748,245,50172,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 320 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 320 transition count 271
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 320 transition count 266
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 314 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 314 transition count 260
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 314 transition count 256
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 313 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 313 transition count 255
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 313 transition count 254
Applied a total of 51 rules in 35 ms. Remains 313 /334 variables (removed 21) and now considering 254/284 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 254 rows 313 cols
[2025-05-31 13:38:42] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 371 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:38:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 814 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:38:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 141 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 254/567 variables, 313/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 205 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 190 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 144 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 140 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 153 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 153 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 133 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 7/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 33/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 171 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 91 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 115 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 127 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 12/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 254/567 variables, 313/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 253/673 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 567/567 variables, and 682 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61310 ms. Remains : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4012456295967912340.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:39:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16835737220727790848.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4012456295967912340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16835737220727790848.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9220442105093823989.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9220442105093823989.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9220442105093823989.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9220442105093823989.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9220442105093823989.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13947796454576435078.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1642702940960846512.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13947796454576435078.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1642702940960846512.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 321 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 321 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 321 transition count 268
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 315 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 315 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 315 transition count 258
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 314 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 314 transition count 257
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 314 transition count 256
Applied a total of 48 rules in 24 ms. Remains 314 /334 variables (removed 20) and now considering 256/284 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 256 rows 314 cols
[2025-05-31 13:40:43] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 315 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:40:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 806 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:40:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 12/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 109 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 111 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 10/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 168 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 256/570 variables, 314/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 177 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 217 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 162 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 171 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 164 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 130 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 236 ms of which 33 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 230 ms of which 37 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 1.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 1.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 1.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 1.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 1.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 1.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 1.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 1.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 1.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 1.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 1.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 0.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 1.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 1.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 1.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 1.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 1.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 1.0)
(s234 0.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 1.0)
(s240 0.0)timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 9/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 570/570 variables, and 407 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved in 30040 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 314/314 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/314 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 32/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 97 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 113 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 9/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 256/570 variables, 314/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/570 variables, 255/675 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 570/570 variables, and 675 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 314/314 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60091ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60093ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 314/334 places, 256/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61252 ms. Remains : 314/334 places, 256/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 256 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12937837333551321694.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:41:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11407791254547064366.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12937837333551321694.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11407791254547064366.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7944735136277309953.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7944735136277309953.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7944735136277309953.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7944735136277309953.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7944735136277309953.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10919246268065677172.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality99697893681601025.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10919246268065677172.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality99697893681601025.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.34976e+20,29.0282,659004,118976,1337,1.80535e+06,7673,638,1.06058e+06,250,36372,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 321 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 321 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 321 transition count 267
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 316 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 316 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 316 transition count 259
Applied a total of 43 rules in 18 ms. Remains 316 /334 variables (removed 18) and now considering 259/284 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-31 13:42:45] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 352 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:42:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 687 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1055 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 258 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:42:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 259/575 variables, 316/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 180 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 222 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 107 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 20/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 115 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 108 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 200 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 208 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 115 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 176 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 18/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 217 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 223 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 229 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 237 ms of which 28 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 224 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 225 ms of which 31 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 575/575 variables, and 422 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/316 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 45/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 137 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 139 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 183 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 10/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 6/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 157 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 187 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 259/575 variables, 316/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/575 variables, 258/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 575/575 variables, and 699 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 316/316 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60071ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60072ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 316/334 places, 259/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61148 ms. Remains : 316/334 places, 259/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15757917914359815273.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 13:43:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality573944624024236317.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15757917914359815273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality573944624024236317.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11503603519194915778.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11503603519194915778.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11503603519194915778.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11503603519194915778.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11503603519194915778.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8055085379443758844.gal : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12040334346908415981.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8055085379443758844.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12040334346908415981.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.53489e+20,9.77867,189324,14842,1207,457438,8339,681,421905,247,30985,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 321 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 321 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 321 transition count 267
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 316 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 316 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 316 transition count 259
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 315 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 315 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 315 transition count 257
Applied a total of 46 rules in 24 ms. Remains 315 /334 variables (removed 19) and now considering 257/284 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 257 rows 315 cols
[2025-05-31 13:44:46] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 367 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:44:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 599 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 990 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 256 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:44:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 154 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 107 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 113 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:44:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 168 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 124 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 17/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 161 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 3/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 122 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 86 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 101 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 4/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 257/572 variables, 315/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 157 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 233 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 136 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 115 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 156 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 140 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 190 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 178 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s24 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 (/ 19.0 20.0))
(s67 (/ 1.0 20.0))
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 1.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 1.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s115 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 1.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 1.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 1.0)
(s150 1.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 1.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 0.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 0.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 1.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 0.0)
(s175 1.0)
(s176 0.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 1.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 0.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 1.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 0.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 0.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 0.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 1.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 1.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 0.0)
(s228 1.0)
(s229 0.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 1.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 1.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 0.0)
(s237 1.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 1.0)
(s241 0.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 1.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 0.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 0.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 0.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 1.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 1.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s276 0.0)
(s277 (/ 1.0 2.0))
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 0.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 1.0)
(s291 1.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 0.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 0.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 1.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 0.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 0.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 0.0)
(s310 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 572/572 variables, and 410 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 34/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 3/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 257/572 variables, 315/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 256/670 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 132 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 106 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 572/572 variables, and 675 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60062ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 315/334 places, 257/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61078 ms. Remains : 315/334 places, 257/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 257 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13436858159244381677.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:45:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18391208455523510565.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13436858159244381677.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18391208455523510565.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11898622232479650635.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11898622232479650635.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11898622232479650635.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11898622232479650635.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11898622232479650635.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 19 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1247562769418970273.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18440355140995638045.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1247562769418970273.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18440355140995638045.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.29587e+20,4.4781,111968,11190,1225,270970,13460,688,224500,233,52853,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(EX(((i0.u32.p55==0)||(i9.u3.p68==1)))) * (EX(!(A((i4.u29.p186==0) U (i6.i0.u38.p223==1)))) + AG(((i4.u29.p193==0)&&(i7.i1.u62.p295...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(EX(((i0.u32.p55==0)||(i9.u3.p68==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!((...326
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t58, t190, t217, t218, t250, i0.u32.t79, i1.t121, i1.u6.t126, i1.u6.t127, i1.u7.t123, i1....948
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 321 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 321 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 321 transition count 267
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 316 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 316 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 316 transition count 258
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 315 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 315 transition count 257
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 315 transition count 256
Applied a total of 47 rules in 21 ms. Remains 315 /334 variables (removed 19) and now considering 256/284 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 256 rows 315 cols
[2025-05-31 13:46:48] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 295 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:46:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 752 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1048 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:46:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 9/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:46:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 256/571 variables, 315/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 183 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 263 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 130 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 131 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 174 ms of which 36 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 10/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 571/571 variables, and 405 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 29/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 5/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 181 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 8/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 2/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 11/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 256/571 variables, 315/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/571 variables, 255/687 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 571/571 variables, and 687 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 255/255 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 315/334 places, 256/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61129 ms. Remains : 315/334 places, 256/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 256 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10683322046512597323.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:47:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16317400238229991602.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10683322046512597323.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16317400238229991602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10517296723655266513.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10517296723655266513.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10517296723655266513.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10517296723655266513.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10517296723655266513.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6306846922172968663.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2275359509402992280.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6306846922172968663.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2275359509402992280.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 692 edges and 334 vertex of which 326 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 325 transition count 264
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 311 transition count 264
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 311 transition count 255
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 302 transition count 255
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 291 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 291 transition count 244
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 291 transition count 238
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 290 transition count 238
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 81 place count 285 transition count 233
Iterating global reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 285 transition count 233
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 4 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 91 place count 285 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 284 transition count 227
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 6 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 284 transition count 225
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 282 transition count 225
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 233 place count 214 transition count 157
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 212 transition count 155
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 211 transition count 155
Applied a total of 236 rules in 54 ms. Remains 211 /334 variables (removed 123) and now considering 155/284 (removed 129) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 211 cols
[2025-05-31 13:48:49] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 281 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:48:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 329 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 642 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 5 ms returned []
Running 151 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:48:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 2/210 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 155/365 variables, 210/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 130 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 121 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 140 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 123 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 6/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 4/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/366 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 151 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 1/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 366/366 variables, and 284 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 211/211 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 151/151 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/207 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/208 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/208 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/210 variables, 7/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 155/365 variables, 210/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 151/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 2/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60037ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 151 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 211/334 places, 155/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60747 ms. Remains : 211/334 places, 155/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6923401405471794626.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:49:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1842184420676417354.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6923401405471794626.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1842184420676417354.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2833071343314354913.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2833071343314354913.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2833071343314354913.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2833071343314354913.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2833071343314354913.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8089052593229214700.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:50:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3864882533907773616.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8089052593229214700.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3864882533907773616.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.14631e+14,1.48954,35620,3543,1916,79419,4131,359,70554,234,19306,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((u15.p52==0) U !(AF(((!(((u16.p10==0)||(i1.i1.u9.p163==1))) + !(A(((i5.i0.u27.p260==0)||(i8.u25.p251==1)) U (i1.i1.u7.p162==0)))) * EF(...175
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(EG(!(((!(((u16.p10==0)||(i1.i1.u9.p163==1))) + !(!((E(!((i1.i1.u7.p162==0)) U (!(((i5.i0.u2...761
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t94, t125, t130, t133, u15.t56, u16.t102, u52.t1, u52.t135, i0.t12, i0.u2.t17, i0.u2.t21, i0....545
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 322 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 322 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 322 transition count 267
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 317 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 317 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 317 transition count 258
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 316 transition count 257
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 316 transition count 257
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 316 transition count 256
Applied a total of 46 rules in 20 ms. Remains 316 /334 variables (removed 18) and now considering 256/284 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 256 rows 316 cols
[2025-05-31 13:50:50] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:50:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 404 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:50:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:50:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 933 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1338 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 255 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:50:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/316 variables, 34/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 14/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 174 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 256/572 variables, 316/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 218 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 270 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 104 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 173 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 189 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 177 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 170 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 149 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 13/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 104 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 156 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30117ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 255 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30119ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 316/334 places, 256/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31478 ms. Remains : 316/334 places, 256/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 256 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:51:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8974654917693531634.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9204882784209461534.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8974654917693531634.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9204882784209461534.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8397104780495022338.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8397104780495022338.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8397104780495022338.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8397104780495022338.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8397104780495022338.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4499528313266031401.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:51:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality315876569550885500.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4499528313266031401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality315876569550885500.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 320 transition count 271
Iterating global reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 320 transition count 271
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 320 transition count 266
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 38 place count 314 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 314 transition count 260
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 314 transition count 256
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 313 transition count 255
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 313 transition count 255
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 313 transition count 254
Applied a total of 51 rules in 35 ms. Remains 313 /334 variables (removed 21) and now considering 254/284 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 254 rows 313 cols
[2025-05-31 13:52:22] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 428 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:52:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 703 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 253 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:52:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 254/567 variables, 313/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 290 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 290 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 123 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 137 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 140 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 185 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 157 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 17/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 115 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 234 ms of which 35 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 567/567 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/312 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/313 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 32/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 116 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:52:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 203 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 185 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 7/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/313 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 254/567 variables, 313/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/567 variables, 253/668 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 567/567 variables, and 668 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 313/313 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 253/253 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 253 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61249 ms. Remains : 313/334 places, 254/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:53:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 254 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:53:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5949382736506412977.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14860794980020299997.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5949382736506412977.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14860794980020299997.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17349841334535016704.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17349841334535016704.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17349841334535016704.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17349841334535016704.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17349841334535016704.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2025213417552204111.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:53:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13383417654585222702.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2025213417552204111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13383417654585222702.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.07989e+20,21.5908,334748,9025,1439,732671,7945,623,685842,250,34747,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(TRUE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * TRUE)] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,21.702,334748,1,0,732671,7945,829,685842,374,34747,873
FORMULA DES-PT-20b-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 321 transition count 272
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 321 transition count 272
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 321 transition count 267
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 316 transition count 262
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 316 transition count 262
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 43 place count 316 transition count 259
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 315 transition count 258
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 45 place count 315 transition count 258
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 315 transition count 257
Applied a total of 46 rules in 21 ms. Remains 315 /334 variables (removed 19) and now considering 257/284 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 257 rows 315 cols
[2025-05-31 13:54:15] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 267 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:54:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 883 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1152 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 256 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:54:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 257/572 variables, 315/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 145 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 179 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 293 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 190 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 144 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 154 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 159 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 104 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 144 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 121 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 158 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 20/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 128 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 6/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 126 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 110 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 112 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 96 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 20/422 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 193 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 1.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 (/ 19.0 20.0))
(s46 (/ 1.0 20.0))
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 572/572 variables, and 424 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/314 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/315 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 48/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 10/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 152 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 5/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:54:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 3/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 110 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/315 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 257/572 variables, 315/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/572 variables, 256/699 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 572/572 variables, and 699 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 315/315 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 256/256 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 256 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 315/334 places, 257/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61232 ms. Remains : 315/334 places, 257/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 257 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2931036571748148832.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13549702033828003620.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2931036571748148832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13549702033828003620.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12315618363187073026.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12315618363187073026.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12315618363187073026.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12315618363187073026.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12315618363187073026.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8870238610937865708.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:55:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4041177891767466013.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8870238610937865708.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4041177891767466013.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61983e+20,3.616,79580,7850,1438,182220,9798,730,174714,262,36128,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX(AF(((EG((i2.i1.u13.p138==0)) * (i11.u71.p342==0)) * ((i1.u8.p110==1)||(u30.p54==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG(!(((EG((i2.i1.u13.p138==0)) * (i11.u71.p342==0)) * ((i1.u8.p110==1)||(u30.p54==0)))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t56, t58, t87, t190, t218, t219, t251, u30.t79, u32.t76, i0.t121, i0.u6.t126, i0.u6.t127,...963
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 334/334 places, 284/284 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 333 transition count 284
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 323 transition count 274
Iterating global reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 323 transition count 274
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 323 transition count 269
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 318 transition count 264
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 318 transition count 264
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 318 transition count 261
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 40 place count 317 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 317 transition count 260
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 317 transition count 259
Applied a total of 42 rules in 19 ms. Remains 317 /334 variables (removed 17) and now considering 259/284 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 317 cols
[2025-05-31 13:56:16] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 277 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 13:56:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 844 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 258 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:56:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 259/576 variables, 317/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 81 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 172 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 134 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 126 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 137 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 126 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/576 variables, 20/398 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 132 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 99 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/576 variables, 13/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 121 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 179 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 153 ms of which 27 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/576 variables, 3/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 68 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 576/576 variables, and 416 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 317/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/316 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/317 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 36/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 96 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:56:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 9/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/317 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 259/576 variables, 317/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/576 variables, 258/681 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 247 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 226 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 236 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 191 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 136 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 204 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 576/576 variables, and 695 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 30033 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 317/317 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60077ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60078ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 317/334 places, 259/284 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61226 ms. Remains : 317/334 places, 259/284 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8426037844680808447.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1061940028451269556.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8426037844680808447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1061940028451269556.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12573478719493548939.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12573478719493548939.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12573478719493548939.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12573478719493548939.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12573478719493548939.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11485982044222354361.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:57:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1842847350720537009.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11485982044222354361.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1842847350720537009.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5655437968136021066.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5655437968136021066.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5655437968136021066.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5655437968136021066.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5655437968136021066.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 28 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4926033831125538884.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 13:58:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3161146770136814486.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4926033831125538884.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3161146770136814486.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.32188e+20,15.6049,330756,26217,1102,800499,7055,707,643161,261,38184,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((!(((i5.u34.p192==0)||(i2.u28.p169==1))) + EF((i3.u10.p116==1))) U A(AX(EX((i5.u33.p186==1))) U AX(!(((i2.u20.p152==0)||(i8.u60.p309...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),(!(((i5.u34.p192==0)||(i2.u28.p169==1))) + E(TRUE U (i3.u10.p116==1)))) * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(((i2....359
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t56, t58, t93, t123, t125, t136, t240, t241, t273, u37.t79, u38.t76, i1.u7.t143, i1.u7.t1...770
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-31 14:03:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 94 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 333 labels/synchronizations in 41 ms.
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5733213104358297626.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 14:04:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3932905187867197994.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5733213104358297626.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3932905187867197994.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.32188e+20,1155.4,10392680,67593,446,1.41726e+07,4360,648,8.51446e+07,192,19766,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-20b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-20b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063900305"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-20b.tgz
mv DES-PT-20b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;