Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r058-smll-174854063800273.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is DES-PT-05b, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800273
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.4K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 65K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.9K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.0K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 67K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1748671621822

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=DES-PT-05b
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 146 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Transformed 300 places.
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Transformed 251 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 300 places and 251 transitions and 747 arcs in 329 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 22 ms.
Support contains 89 out of 300 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 300/300 places, 251/251 transitions.
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 298 transition count 251
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 286 transition count 239
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 286 transition count 239
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 282 transition count 235
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 282 transition count 235
Ensure Unique test removed 4 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 4 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 282 transition count 231
Applied a total of 38 rules in 155 ms. Remains 282 /300 variables (removed 18) and now considering 231/251 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 282 cols
[2025-05-31 06:07:04] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 41 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 779 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:07:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 725 ms returned [11]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1569 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 281/300 places, 231/251 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 16 ms. Remains 281 /281 variables (removed 0) and now considering 231/231 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1766 ms. Remains : 281/300 places, 231/251 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 281 places after structural reductions.
[2025-05-31 06:07:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 102 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:07] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-05-31 06:07:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 231 transitions.
Support contains 83 out of 281 places (down from 89) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (346 resets) in 1849 ms. (21 steps per ms) remains 5/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (51 resets) in 264 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (46 resets) in 225 ms. (177 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (53 resets) in 145 ms. (273 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (47 resets) in 182 ms. (218 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (49 resets) in 216 ms. (184 steps per ms) remains 5/5 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 231 rows 281 cols
[2025-05-31 06:07:08] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/52 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 125/177 variables, 29/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/268 variables, 26/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 5/273 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 224/497 variables, 273/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 7/504 variables, 4/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/504 variables, 0/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 4/508 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/508 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/510 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 2/512 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 512/512 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 1043 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 281/281 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/9 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 43/52 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 125/177 variables, 29/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 95 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 120 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 110 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 7/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/177 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/268 variables, 26/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 133 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 146 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 2/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 5/273 variables, 3/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 224/497 variables, 273/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 5/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 273 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 227 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 125 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 92 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 4/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 141 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 4/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/497 variables, 0/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 7/504 variables, 4/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/504 variables, 4/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/504 variables, 1/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/504 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 504/512 variables, and 368 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved in 5011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 29/29 constraints, State Equation: 277/281 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6104ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 5 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 9 out of 281 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 522 edges and 281 vertex of which 276 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Drop transitions (Empty/Sink Transition effects.) removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 276 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 257 transition count 206
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 257 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 248 transition count 197
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 70 place count 237 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 81 place count 237 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 237 transition count 183
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 237 transition count 182
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 236 transition count 182
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 230 transition count 176
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 230 transition count 176
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 230 transition count 170
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 229 transition count 170
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 105 place count 229 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 109 place count 227 transition count 168
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 152 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 152 transition count 92
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: -15
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 149 transition count 107
Free-agglomeration rule (complex) applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 267 place count 149 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 6 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 268 place count 148 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 7 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 269 place count 147 transition count 105
Applied a total of 269 rules in 151 ms. Remains 147 /281 variables (removed 134) and now considering 105/231 (removed 126) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 147/281 places, 105/231 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1659 resets) in 1260 ms. (31 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (305 resets) in 165 ms. (240 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (330 resets) in 170 ms. (233 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (291 resets) in 209 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (313 resets) in 156 ms. (254 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 147 cols
[2025-05-31 06:07:15] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:15] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 17/24 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/26 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 83/109 variables, 25/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 28/137 variables, 25/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 2/139 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 105/244 variables, 139/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 12/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 8/252 variables, 8/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 4/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/252 variables, 0/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 252/252 variables, and 222 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 311 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 17/24 variables, 6/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/26 variables, 1/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 1/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/26 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 83/109 variables, 25/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 28/137 variables, 25/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 2/139 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 105/244 variables, 139/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 12/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 8/252 variables, 8/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 4/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/252 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 252/252 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1612 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1940ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 1696 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 147 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 147/147 places, 105/105 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 145 transition count 103
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 144 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 144 transition count 102
Ensure Unique test removed 8 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 8 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 144 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 143 transition count 93
Applied a total of 15 rules in 23 ms. Remains 143 /147 variables (removed 4) and now considering 93/105 (removed 12) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 23 ms. Remains : 143/147 places, 93/105 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1863 resets) in 196 ms. (203 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (355 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (370 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (388 resets) in 109 ms. (363 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 847638 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=282 ) properties seen :0 out of 3
Probabilistic random walk after 847638 steps, saw 120064 distinct states, run finished after 3009 ms. (steps per millisecond=281 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 143 cols
[2025-05-31 06:07:21] [INFO ] Computed 63 invariants in 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 79/85 variables, 23/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/119 variables, 29/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 10/129 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 89/218 variables, 129/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 16/234 variables, 12/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/236 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 275 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/6 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 79/85 variables, 23/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/119 variables, 29/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 10/129 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 89/218 variables, 129/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 16/234 variables, 12/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/236 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 769 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 784 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 143 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 6 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 93/93 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1974 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (361 resets) in 71 ms. (555 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (372 resets) in 79 ms. (500 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 983791 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=327 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 983791 steps, saw 138034 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=327 ) properties seen :0
[2025-05-31 06:07:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 06:07:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 80/85 variables, 23/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/119 variables, 29/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 10/129 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 89/218 variables, 129/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 16/234 variables, 12/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/236 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 193 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 2/5 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 80/85 variables, 23/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 34/119 variables, 29/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/119 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 10/129 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 89/218 variables, 129/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 8/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 16/234 variables, 12/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 5/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/234 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 2/236 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 341 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 439 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 143 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 93/93 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:07:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 221 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:07:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
[2025-05-31 06:07:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 445 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 667 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 90 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:07:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-05-31 06:07:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 8 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 17/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/143 variables, 10/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 93/236 variables, 143/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 219 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 11193 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 36/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 17/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 4/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/143 variables, 10/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 93/236 variables, 143/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 8/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 90/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 310 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved in 18209 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 36/36 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, ReadFeed: 8/8 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 29473ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 90 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 29476ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30163 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 93/93 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Graph (complete) has 388 edges and 143 vertex of which 142 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 1 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 1 places :
Also discarding 0 output transitions
Applied a total of 1 rules in 10 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 142 cols
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] After 65ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive place invariants in 13 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 35 positive and 27 generalized place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] After 97ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] After 131ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] After 266ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 371 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 231 transitions.
Computed a total of 81 stabilizing places and 74 stable transitions
Graph (complete) has 522 edges and 281 vertex of which 273 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.10 ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 263 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 263 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 263 transition count 211
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 254 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 254 transition count 202
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 254 transition count 196
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 253 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 253 transition count 195
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 253 transition count 194
Applied a total of 65 rules in 49 ms. Remains 253 /281 variables (removed 28) and now considering 194/231 (removed 37) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 253 cols
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:07:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 436 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 621 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 193 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/253 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 194/447 variables, 253/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 113 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 167 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 210 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 161 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 112 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 111 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 156 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 101 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 25 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 123 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 125 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 20/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 152 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 138 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 79 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 1/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 447/447 variables, and 358 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 253/253 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/253 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 42/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 154 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 5/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 151 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 1/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 194/447 variables, 253/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 193/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 133 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/447 variables, 7/564 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60063ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60066ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 253/281 places, 194/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60740 ms. Remains : 253/281 places, 194/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:08:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:08:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13408747251072298634.gal : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:08:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11686467883067217705.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13408747251072298634.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11686467883067217705.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1738979139977661620.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1738979139977661620.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1738979139977661620.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1738979139977661620.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1738979139977661620.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 95 ms
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7550729253183396868.gal : 20 ms
[2025-05-31 06:09:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7793296902587746906.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7550729253183396868.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7793296902587746906.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.47069e+18,2.22167,55848,3813,296,124984,1850,698,141744,140,5847,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(((i1.i1.u3.p88==0)&&(i2.i0.u5.p35==1))) * A((u75.p15==1) U (u75.p296==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(((i1.i1.u3.p88==0)&&(i2.i0.u5.p35==1))) * !((E(!((u75.p296==0)) U (!((u75.p15==1)) * !((u75.p29...200
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t58, t87, t143, t155, t156, t188, u75.t17, u75.t134, i1.i0.u29.t79, i2.i0.t119, i2.i...762
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 265 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 265 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 265 transition count 213
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 257 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 257 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 257 transition count 200
Applied a total of 55 rules in 33 ms. Remains 257 /281 variables (removed 24) and now considering 200/231 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 257 cols
[2025-05-31 06:09:59] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 381 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:10:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 504 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 887 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 199 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:10:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/257 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 200/457 variables, 257/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 110 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 212 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 224 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 117 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 134 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 103 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 11/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 160 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 154 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 103 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 107 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 18/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 183 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 6/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 1/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 457/457 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 257/257 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 199/199 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/257 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 38/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 110 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 10/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/457 variables, 257/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 199/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 141 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 164 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 143 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 166 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 114 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 135 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 130 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 14/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60059ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 257/281 places, 200/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60982 ms. Remains : 257/281 places, 200/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:11:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:11:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2595559415739267497.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2309531616706684777.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2595559415739267497.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2309531616706684777.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8631043117723107758.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8631043117723107758.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8631043117723107758.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8631043117723107758.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8631043117723107758.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2365133282144836605.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:11:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2403096363100978216.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2365133282144836605.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2403096363100978216.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.12769e+18,2.84578,72068,9546,270,172565,1434,698,165156,133,5036,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(((i11.i2.u76.p282!=0) + !(EG((((i7.i0.u46.p181==1)||(i7.i3.u66.p237==0))||(i3.i1.u26.p108==1))))) U !(((u37.p8==0) + (((i0.i0.u35.p1...212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(((u37.p8==0) + (((i0.i0.u35.p18==0)||(i2.i1.u12.p51==1)) * E(TRUE U (i6.i2.u56.p210==1)))...722
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t54, t58, t148, t161, t162, t194, u37.t76, i0.i0.u35.t79, i0.i1.u19.t104, i1.t124, i1.u6....761
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 522 edges and 281 vertex of which 276 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 5 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 5 places :
Also discarding 4 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 4 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 275 transition count 211
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 260 transition count 211
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 260 transition count 202
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 251 transition count 202
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 62 place count 238 transition count 189
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 238 transition count 189
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 238 transition count 186
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 238 transition count 184
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 236 transition count 184
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 89 place count 229 transition count 177
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 229 transition count 177
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 229 transition count 169
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 227 transition count 168
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 227 transition count 166
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 225 transition count 166
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 155 transition count 96
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 155 transition count 96
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 153 transition count 94
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 152 transition count 94
Applied a total of 255 rules in 73 ms. Remains 152 /281 variables (removed 129) and now considering 94/231 (removed 137) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 152 cols
[2025-05-31 06:12:01] [INFO ] Computed 60 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 156 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:12:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 274 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 455 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:01] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:12:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/152 variables, 8/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 94/246 variables, 152/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 89 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 7080 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 152/152 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 32/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/152 variables, 8/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 94/246 variables, 152/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 91/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 306 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 26930 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 32/32 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 152/152 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 34024ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34024ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 152/281 places, 94/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34561 ms. Remains : 152/281 places, 94/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 94 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9775355079007485923.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 06:12:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8471576890296205396.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9775355079007485923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8471576890296205396.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11111952454904365805.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11111952454904365805.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11111952454904365805.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11111952454904365805.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11111952454904365805.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7654196607578943467.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14718881753900621416.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7654196607578943467.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14718881753900621416.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.05036e+12,0.330187,14020,2717,232,28966,567,350,20699,120,1871,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((((u1.p44==0)&&(i11.i1.u17.p170==1)) * A(((i2.u2.p26!=1) + EG((i12.i0.u45.p268==1))) U AG(((u14.p6==0)||(i11.i1.u17.p170==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((((u1.p44==0)&&(i11.i1.u17.p170==1)) * !((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((u14.p6==0)||(i11.i1.u17.p170==1))))...342
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t63, t70, t79, t82, t83, t86, u1.t15, u49.t2, u49.t88, i0.u0.t53, i0.u6.t10, i1.t61, ...305
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 268 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 268 transition count 219
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 268 transition count 217
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 264 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 264 transition count 213
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 264 transition count 210
Applied a total of 38 rules in 15 ms. Remains 264 /281 variables (removed 17) and now considering 210/231 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 264 cols
[2025-05-31 06:13:36] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 223 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:13:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 589 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 815 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 209 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:13:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/264 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 210/474 variables, 264/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 234 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 236 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 149 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 115 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 104 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 141 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 121 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 92 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 169 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 20/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 86 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 119 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 9/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 78 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 2/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 474/474 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 264/264 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 209/209 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/264 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 29/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 107 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 95 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 11/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 7/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 174 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 166 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 7/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 210/474 variables, 264/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/474 variables, 209/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 125 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 474/474 variables, and 599 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 264/264 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 209/209 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60060ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 264/281 places, 210/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60903 ms. Remains : 264/281 places, 210/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4249778214010181132.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1267125126972109203.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4249778214010181132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1267125126972109203.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16768917431030184970.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16768917431030184970.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16768917431030184970.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16768917431030184970.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16768917431030184970.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9849527272063738748.gal : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15656993854086757386.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9849527272063738748.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15656993854086757386.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00595e+19,3.87014,81560,6564,237,170369,1407,725,259695,128,4582,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((E(AF((i4.i2.u24.p104==0)) U ((i7.u69.p276!=1) + AG(((i7.u76.p285==0)||(i5.u30.p127==1))))) * (i10.i0.u55.p211==1)) * (EG((i11.i1.u7...573
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (E(!(EG(!((i4.i2.u24.p104==0)))) U ((i7.u69.p276!=1) + !(E(TRUE U !(((i7.u76.p285==0)|...1623
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t58, t154, t170, t171, i0.t109, i0.u18.t111, i1.i1.u34.t79, i2.t130, i2.u7.t135, i2....818
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 522 edges and 281 vertex of which 273 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 272 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 255 transition count 208
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 255 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 246 transition count 199
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 233 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 233 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 233 transition count 183
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 233 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 231 transition count 181
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 224 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 224 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 222 transition count 165
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 222 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 220 transition count 163
Performed 68 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 68 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 152 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 150 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 149 transition count 93
Applied a total of 254 rules in 77 ms. Remains 149 /281 variables (removed 132) and now considering 93/231 (removed 138) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 149 cols
[2025-05-31 06:15:37] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 269 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:15:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 389 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 660 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 89 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:15:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 11/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 9/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 2/148 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 93/241 variables, 148/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 210 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 12442 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 24/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 11/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/146 variables, 9/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 7/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 2/148 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 93/241 variables, 148/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 89/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 3/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/241 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/242 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 149/149 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 42469ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 89 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42470ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 149/281 places, 93/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43220 ms. Remains : 149/281 places, 93/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:16:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:16:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4177903748459056108.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8253805069688441713.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4177903748459056108.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8253805069688441713.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2374018435864716041.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2374018435864716041.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2374018435864716041.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2374018435864716041.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2374018435864716041.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 6 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1274853320539573759.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11102038160992471055.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1274853320539573759.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11102038160992471055.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.79322e+12,0.489689,13672,1963,180,26986,494,383,20952,111,1466,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((i9.i0.u20.p169!=0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((i9.i0.u20.p169!=0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t62, t70, t79, t82, t83, t86, u15.t23, u1.t12, u53.t1, u53.t88, i0.t9, i0.u2.t14, i0.u2.t...345
(forward)formula 0,0,1.67288,49512,1,0,126067,1837,1820,109004,709,6579,184612
FORMULA DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 264 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 264 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 264 transition count 212
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 256 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 256 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 256 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 255 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 255 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 255 transition count 197
Applied a total of 60 rules in 20 ms. Remains 255 /281 variables (removed 26) and now considering 197/231 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 255 cols
[2025-05-31 06:16:52] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:16:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:16:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 488 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 687 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:16:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 10/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 105 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 120 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 10/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 197/452 variables, 255/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 231 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 224 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 153 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 138 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 174 ms of which 24 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 14/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 83 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 3/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 452/452 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 38/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 124 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 13/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 142 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 197/452 variables, 255/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 196/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 151 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 150 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 121 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 146 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 9/574 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60046ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 255/281 places, 197/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60755 ms. Remains : 255/281 places, 197/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12877874899803429129.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 06:17:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2830161516186829746.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12877874899803429129.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2830161516186829746.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17098639619718095671.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17098639619718095671.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17098639619718095671.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17098639619718095671.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17098639619718095671.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15199406128340922836.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:18:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9587066225259819596.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15199406128340922836.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9587066225259819596.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.19796e+18,2.21696,50332,3708,218,104720,1700,703,134324,128,4672,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EX(((i7.u75.p285==0)||(i10.i0.u41.p170==1))) * EF(((AG(((i10.i2.u62.p243==0)&&(i6.u29.p127==0))) * (i10.i0.u41.p171==0)) * (i12.i1.u3...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EX(((i7.u75.p285==0)||(i10.i0.u41.p170==1)))),TRUE) * (i12.i1.u35.p153==1)) * (i10.i...240
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t58, t89, t145, t157, t158, t190, i0.t17, i0.u77.t136, i1.u13.t111, i2.t121, i2.u6.t...746
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 264 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 264 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 264 transition count 212
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 255 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 255 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 255 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 254 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 254 transition count 196
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 254 transition count 195
Applied a total of 63 rules in 17 ms. Remains 254 /281 variables (removed 27) and now considering 195/231 (removed 36) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 254 cols
[2025-05-31 06:18:53] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:18:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:18:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:18:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 490 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 691 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:18:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/254 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 195/449 variables, 254/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 124 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 232 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 221 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 122 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 96 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 106 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 123 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 135 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 123 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 129 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 121 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 117 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 20/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 96 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 92 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 83 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 18/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 10/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 6/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 2/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 449/449 variables, and 371 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 254/254 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/253 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/254 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 54/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 111 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 106 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 10/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 2/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 2/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 195/449 variables, 254/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 194/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 98 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 98 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 100 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 120 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/449 variables, 11/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60053ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 254/281 places, 195/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60765 ms. Remains : 254/281 places, 195/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17217021244704052082.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 06:19:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2088223928153916007.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17217021244704052082.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2088223928153916007.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12537104459936636486.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12537104459936636486.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12537104459936636486.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12537104459936636486.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12537104459936636486.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2071775168489969401.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:20:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5583095472256936677.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2071775168489969401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5583095472256936677.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.60969e+18,2.77591,64948,3923,250,141969,1706,683,178406,127,5117,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((i8.i2.u60.p241==0)||(i9.i1.u49.p205==1)) + (EG((AG((i9.i1.u40.p180==0)) + (i8.i2.u60.p239==1))) + (AF(EX(((i8.i2.u51.p212==0)&&(i11...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i8.i2.u60.p241==0)||(i9.i1.u49.p205==1)))) * !(EG((!(E(TRUE U !((i9.i1.u40.p180==...458
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t57, t59, t88, t144, t156, t157, t189, i0.u29.t80, i1.t120, i1.u7.t125, i1.u7.t126, i1.u8...757
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 265 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 265 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 265 transition count 213
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 258 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 258 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 258 transition count 201
Applied a total of 53 rules in 17 ms. Remains 258 /281 variables (removed 23) and now considering 201/231 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 258 cols
[2025-05-31 06:20:54] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:20:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:20:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:20:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 542 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 751 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:20:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/258 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 104 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 146 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 201/459 variables, 258/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 230 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 237 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 165 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 188 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 164 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 161 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 146 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 151 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 140 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 180 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 172 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 148 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 99 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 110 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 82 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 20/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 131 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 88 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 117 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 19/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 459/459 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 258/258 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/258 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 51/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 152 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 93 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 4/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 152 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 7/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 201/459 variables, 258/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 200/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 165 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 199 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 156 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 84 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/459 variables, 15/596 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 459/459 variables, and 596 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 258/258 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 258/281 places, 201/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60828 ms. Remains : 258/281 places, 201/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality598456165489633550.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 06:21:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9012414510860193787.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality598456165489633550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9012414510860193787.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4865587057317275608.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4865587057317275608.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4865587057317275608.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4865587057317275608.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4865587057317275608.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 11 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality527308256983808229.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7338918728312188217.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality527308256983808229.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7338918728312188217.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.94021e+18,4.05208,74424,4256,281,153274,1837,690,219984,136,4864,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AX(!(A(((i2.i0.u12.p58==0)||(i11.i0.u56.p207==1)) U AG(((i3.i1.u18.p87==0)||(i8.u46.p186==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(EY(Init)) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.i1.u18.p87==0)||(i8.u46.p186==1))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.i1...312
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t50, t56, t87, t91, t149, t162, t163, i0.u81.t17, i0.u81.t140, i1.t125, i1.u7.t130, i1.u7...798
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 522 edges and 281 vertex of which 273 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.2 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 272 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 255 transition count 208
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 255 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 246 transition count 199
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 233 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 233 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 233 transition count 183
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 233 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 231 transition count 181
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 224 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 224 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 222 transition count 165
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 222 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 220 transition count 163
Performed 70 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 70
Deduced a syphon composed of 70 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 70 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 140 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 150 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 148 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 147 transition count 91
Applied a total of 258 rules in 46 ms. Remains 147 /281 variables (removed 134) and now considering 91/231 (removed 140) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 91 rows 147 cols
[2025-05-31 06:22:55] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 167 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:22:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 274 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 443 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 88 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:22:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/146 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 91/237 variables, 146/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 3/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 208 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 7475 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/146 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/146 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 91/237 variables, 146/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 88/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/237 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/238 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved in 29817 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 147/147 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 37305ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 88 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37306ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 147/281 places, 91/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37805 ms. Remains : 147/281 places, 91/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 91 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
RANDOM walk for 1829 steps (58 resets) in 20 ms. (87 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA DES-PT-05b-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16151974575458394666.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2117942309239922380.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16151974575458394666.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2117942309239922380.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 264 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 33 place count 264 transition count 215
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 264 transition count 212
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 256 transition count 204
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 256 transition count 204
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 57 place count 256 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 255 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 255 transition count 198
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 255 transition count 197
Applied a total of 60 rules in 19 ms. Remains 255 /281 variables (removed 26) and now considering 197/231 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 255 cols
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 268 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:23:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 651 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 921 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:23:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 197/452 variables, 255/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 110 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 180 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 147 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 105 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 152 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 170 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 102 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 13/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 101 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 15/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 112 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 130 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 9/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 132 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 12/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 108 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 4/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 452/452 variables, and 369 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 53/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 144 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 4/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 102 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 3/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 197/452 variables, 255/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 196/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 90 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 92 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 452/452 variables, and 576 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 255/281 places, 197/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60987 ms. Remains : 255/281 places, 197/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4010461182113917919.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 06:24:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8061279526003556393.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4010461182113917919.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8061279526003556393.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6103342588169135483.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6103342588169135483.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6103342588169135483.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6103342588169135483.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6103342588169135483.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14093321802575776859.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8520747270436851597.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14093321802575776859.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8520747270436851597.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.20603e+18,1.98304,50036,5491,225,117140,1450,780,124888,133,4275,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(EX(((i2.i0.u13.p76==0)&&(i3.i2.u16.p88==1)))) + EF(AX((i7.i1.u40.p193==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i2.i0.u13.p76==0)&&(i3.i2.u16.p88==1)))))) + E(TRUE U !(EX(!((i7.i1.u40.p193==1)))...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t56, t87, t145, t158, t159, t191, i0.t121, i0.u7.t126, i0.u7.t127, i0.u8.t123, i0.u8...787
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 265 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 265 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 265 transition count 215
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 256 transition count 206
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 256 transition count 206
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 256 transition count 200
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 255 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 255 transition count 199
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 255 transition count 198
Applied a total of 59 rules in 15 ms. Remains 255 /281 variables (removed 26) and now considering 198/231 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 255 cols
[2025-05-31 06:25:34] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 204 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:25:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 618 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 823 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 197 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:25:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 126 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 105 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 114 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 108 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 89 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 7/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 2/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 198/453 variables, 255/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 160 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 199 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 3/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 159 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 140 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 126 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 114 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 106 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 111 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 109 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 14/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 1.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 1.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 1.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 1.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 1.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 1.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 1/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 453/453 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 47/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 109 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 114 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 8/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 129 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 121 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 139 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 198/453 variables, 255/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 197/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 112 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 206 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 188 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 453/453 variables, and 579 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 27/27 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 255/281 places, 198/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60885 ms. Remains : 255/281 places, 198/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13970309531411896016.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 06:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3307105836561343617.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13970309531411896016.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3307105836561343617.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1942647427425358040.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1942647427425358040.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1942647427425358040.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1942647427425358040.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1942647427425358040.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 10 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1394454264886279367.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14616372119792043165.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1394454264886279367.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14616372119792043165.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.99646e+18,2.74416,63780,4170,291,148096,1711,688,161343,134,5199,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(((AF(((i4.u26.p116==0)||(i4.u22.p101==1))) + (i3.u31.p21==0)) + (i8.i1.u55.p221==1)) U AX(((i13.i1.u71.p266!=0)||((i5.u29.p132==1)&...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(((!(EG(!(((i4.u26.p116==0)||(i4.u22.p101==1))))) + (i3.u31.p21==0)) + (i8.i1.u55.p221==1)) U !(EX(...313
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t58, t88, t145, t158, t159, t191, i0.u76.t17, i0.u76.t136, i1.t117, i2.u13.t110, i3....769
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 263 transition count 214
Iterating global reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 263 transition count 214
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 263 transition count 211
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 46 place count 255 transition count 203
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 255 transition count 203
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 255 transition count 198
Applied a total of 59 rules in 11 ms. Remains 255 /281 variables (removed 26) and now considering 198/231 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 255 cols
[2025-05-31 06:27:35] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 203 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:27:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 575 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 780 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 197 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:27:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 198/453 variables, 255/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 134 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 212 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 223 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 124 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 118 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 142 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 184 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 171 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 126 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 155 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 205 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 184 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 165 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 159 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 147 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 17/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 99 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 8/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 122 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 17 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 83 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 125 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 135 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 145 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 149 ms of which 29 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 17/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 1/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 453/453 variables, and 359 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 255/255 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 197/197 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/255 variables, 33/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 14/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 42/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 82 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 7/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 102 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 7/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/255 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 198/453 variables, 255/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 197/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 82 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 132 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 169 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 189 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 192 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/453 variables, 10/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60055ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 255/281 places, 198/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60848 ms. Remains : 255/281 places, 198/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14474412821984446500.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 06:28:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1911354792658379668.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14474412821984446500.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1911354792658379668.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10436137640820178942.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10436137640820178942.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10436137640820178942.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10436137640820178942.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10436137640820178942.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4027203481839874347.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17569048713494021088.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4027203481839874347.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17569048713494021088.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.46395e+18,5.7611,119720,12202,314,296401,2791,680,235049,139,8046,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(((!(((u75.p16==1)||(i13.u65.p258==0))) * EF((i3.u8.p50==1))) * !((((i10.u54.p220==0)||(i5.u32.p144==1))&&(i10.u55.p249==1))))) U AG(...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(!(!(EX(!(((i11.i3.u63.p242==0)||(i3.u10.p59==1)))))) U (i12.i0.u37.p163==1))))))...524
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t58, t87, t99, t146, t159, t160, u75.t17, u75.t137, i2.i0.u12.t112, i2.i0.u14.t109, ...742
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 280 transition count 231
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 265 transition count 216
Iterating global reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 31 place count 265 transition count 216
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 265 transition count 213
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 42 place count 257 transition count 205
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 257 transition count 205
Ensure Unique test removed 5 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 5 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 55 place count 257 transition count 200
Applied a total of 55 rules in 12 ms. Remains 257 /281 variables (removed 24) and now considering 200/231 (removed 31) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 200 rows 257 cols
[2025-05-31 06:29:36] [INFO ] Computed 61 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 208 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:29:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 389 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 599 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 199 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:29:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/257 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 200/457 variables, 257/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 85 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 213 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 228 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 116 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 97 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 135 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 127 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 130 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 105 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 115 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 200 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 178 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 158 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 119 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 20/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 139 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 5/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 93 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 107 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 105 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 6/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 123 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 16/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 457/457 variables, and 366 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 257/257 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 199/199 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 15/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/257 variables, 33/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 48/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 103 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 8/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 200/457 variables, 257/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 199/573 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 134 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 107 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 131 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 143 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/457 variables, 7/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 457/457 variables, and 580 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 257/257 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 199/199 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 199 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 257/281 places, 200/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60646 ms. Remains : 257/281 places, 200/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 200 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6516697935893546704.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 06:30:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4356562551147108998.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6516697935893546704.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4356562551147108998.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13331419696305533239.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13331419696305533239.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13331419696305533239.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13331419696305533239.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13331419696305533239.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 14 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 4 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8129036551383362562.gal : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17540777133287073250.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8129036551383362562.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17540777133287073250.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.78095e+18,2.48928,71968,4681,272,172820,2108,697,167012,135,4726,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((i5.i0.u21.p94==0)&&(i10.i0.u60.p250==1)) + (EG((AG((i4.i0.u26.p105==0)) + (i11.i1.u78.p284==1))) * AX(((i3.i0.u11.p53==0)||(i3.i1.u...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((i5.i0.u21.p94==0)&&(i10.i0.u60.p250==1)) + (EG((!(E(TRUE U !((i4.i0.u26.p105==0)))) + (i11.i1.u78....231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t56, t87, t147, t160, t161, t172, t194, u36.t76, i1.i1.u34.t79, i2.t123, i2.u7.t128, i2.u...790
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Graph (complete) has 522 edges and 281 vertex of which 273 are kept as prefixes of interest. Removing 8 places using SCC suffix rule.1 ms
Discarding 8 places :
Also discarding 5 output transitions
Drop transitions (Output transitions of discarded places.) removed 5 transitions
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 272 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 255 transition count 208
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 255 transition count 199
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 246 transition count 199
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 66 place count 233 transition count 186
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 79 place count 233 transition count 186
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 233 transition count 183
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 233 transition count 181
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 231 transition count 181
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 224 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 224 transition count 174
Ensure Unique test removed 6 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 6 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 224 transition count 166
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 222 transition count 165
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 111 place count 222 transition count 163
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 220 transition count 163
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 149 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 147 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 146 transition count 90
Applied a total of 260 rules in 35 ms. Remains 146 /281 variables (removed 135) and now considering 90/231 (removed 141) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 90 rows 146 cols
[2025-05-31 06:31:37] [INFO ] Computed 58 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:31:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 260 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 418 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 87 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:31:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/145 variables, 7/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 90/235 variables, 145/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 2/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 236/236 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 10619 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 146/146 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 33/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/145 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 90/235 variables, 145/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 87/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 1/236 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/236 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/236 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 236/236 variables, and 294 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved in 20963 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 33/33 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 25/25 constraints, State Equation: 146/146 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 87/87 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 31590ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 87 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31590ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 146/281 places, 90/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 32053 ms. Remains : 146/281 places, 90/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 90 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11420975881348819953.gal : 0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9916227626787297390.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11420975881348819953.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9916227626787297390.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2245716951466170297.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2245716951466170297.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2245716951466170297.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2245716951466170297.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2245716951466170297.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4668702705514256272.gal : 2 ms
[2025-05-31 06:32:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8859886273156371359.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4668702705514256272.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8859886273156371359.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.60125e+12,0.270766,11216,1367,212,19261,545,310,17366,108,1915,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((u16.p7==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((u16.p7==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t60, t76, t79, t80, t83, u15.t22, u16.t61, u51.t1, u51.t85, i0.t8, i0.u2.t13, i0.u2.t17, ...324
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 231/231 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 269 transition count 219
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 269 transition count 219
Ensure Unique test removed 3 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 3 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 269 transition count 216
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 1 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 265 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 265 transition count 212
Ensure Unique test removed 2 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 2 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 265 transition count 210
Applied a total of 37 rules in 12 ms. Remains 265 /281 variables (removed 16) and now considering 210/231 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 210 rows 265 cols
[2025-05-31 06:33:10] [INFO ] Computed 62 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 279 ms returned []
[2025-05-31 06:33:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 612 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 893 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 209 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:33:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/265 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 15/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 210/475 variables, 265/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 227 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 208 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 156 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 122 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 96 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 119 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 123 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 133 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 102 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 114 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 91 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 148 ms of which 26 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 151 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 145 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 94 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 91 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 98 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 112 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 89 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 103 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 95 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 93 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 90 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 96 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 89 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 93 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 20/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 1/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 475/475 variables, and 369 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, Generalized P Invariants (flows): 28/28 constraints, State Equation: 265/265 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 209/209 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/263 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/265 variables, 34/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 15/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 41/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 120 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 14/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 150 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 94 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 10/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/265 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 210/475 variables, 265/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 209/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 95 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 118 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 141 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 111 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 100 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 7/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60047ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 209 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 265/281 places, 210/231 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60961 ms. Remains : 265/281 places, 210/231 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 210 transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9664139589112954373.gal : 1 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4513695839414252375.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9664139589112954373.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4513695839414252375.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15089671957884353607.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15089671957884353607.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15089671957884353607.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15089671957884353607.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15089671957884353607.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 20 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 8 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9173560330350249633.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:34:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14065485119729226578.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9173560330350249633.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14065485119729226578.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.27023e+19,3.29439,87180,6657,192,215378,874,728,184249,128,2559,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AG(AX(((i13.u75.p278==0)&&(i10.u44.p170==1)))) + (((i1.i1.u7.p45==1)&&(i9.i2.u49.p182==1))&&((i3.i1.u17.p77==0)&&((i2.u10.p51==0)||(...354
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((i13.u75.p278==0)&&(i10.u44.p170==1)))))))) + (((i1.i1.u7.p45==1)&&(i9.i2.u49....421
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t52, t58, t87, t154, t170, t171, t203, i0.i0.u36.t79, i1.t127, i1.i0.u6.t135, i1.i0.u6.t1...800
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6321454294710545982.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6321454294710545982.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6321454294710545982.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6321454294710545982.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6321454294710545982.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 14 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2428896186861675745.gal : 3 ms
[2025-05-31 06:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10687890014135715533.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2428896186861675745.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10687890014135715533.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.43256e+19,16.9875,379224,22191,242,810348,1743,752,1.53628e+06,125,4739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(((i5.i0.u21.p88==0)&&(i3.i0.u6.p35==1))) * A((i1.u86.p15==1) U (i1.u86.p296==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(((i5.i0.u21.p88==0)&&(i3.i0.u6.p35==1))) * !((E(!((i1.u86.p296==0)) U (!((i1.u86.p15==1)) * !((...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t53, t59, t141, t168, t188, t189, i0.u40.t80, i1.t17, i1.u86.t159, i2.t128, i2.u10.t164, ...939
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 34 redundant transitions.
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 150 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8090125794099929823.gal : 5 ms
[2025-05-31 06:38:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10432160919894568704.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8090125794099929823.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10432160919894568704.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.43256e+19,665.431,8355772,67176,329,1.13922e+07,1531,654,7.33529e+07,167,9696,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="DES-PT-05b"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is DES-PT-05b, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r058-smll-174854063800273"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/DES-PT-05b.tgz
mv DES-PT-05b execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;